Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Different Procedures for Titanium Dental Implant Surface Decontamination-In Vitro Study.
Jordan, Ante; Smojver, Igor; Budimir, Ana; Gabric, Dragana; Vuletic, Marko.
Afiliação
  • Jordan A; Department of Oral Surgery, Dental Polyclinic Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Smojver I; St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Budimir A; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Infection Prevention and Control, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Gabric D; Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Vuletic M; Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 11(4)2024 Mar 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671748
ABSTRACT
Polymicrobial biofilm removal and decontamination of the implant surface is the most important goal in the treatment of periimplantitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of four different decontamination methods for removing Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro. Seventy-five dental implants were contaminated with a bacterial suspension and randomly divided into five groups (n = 15) the negative control group, which received no treatment; the positive control group, treated with 0.2% chlorhexidine; group 1, treated with a chitosan brush (Labrida BioCleanTM, Labrida AS, Oslo, Norway); group 2, treated with a chitosan brush and 0.2% chlorhexidine; and group 3, treated with a device based on the electrolytic cleaning method (GalvoSurge, GalvoSurge Dental AG, Widnau, Switzerland). The colony-forming unit (CFU) count was used to assess the number of viable bacteria in each sample, and statistical analyses were performed. When compared to the negative control group, all the decontamination methods reduced the CFU count. The electrolytic cleaning method decontaminated the implant surface more effectively than the other three procedures, while the chitosan brush was the least effective. Further research in more realistic settings is required to assess the efficacy of the decontamination procedures described in this study.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article