Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Retrospective Assessment of the Effectiveness and Risk Factors of Fluoroquinolones, Cephalosporines, and Selective Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.
Haack, Maximilian; Ruckes, Christian; Dotzauer, Robert; Thomas, Anita; Sparwasser, Maximilian P; Fischer, Nikita D; Frey, Lisa J; Duwe, Gregor; Haferkamp, Axel; Tsaur, Igor; Brandt, Maximilian P.
Afiliação
  • Haack M; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Ruckes C; Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Dotzauer R; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Thomas A; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Sparwasser MP; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Faculty of Medicine at Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Fischer ND; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Frey LJ; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Duwe G; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Haferkamp A; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
  • Tsaur I; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Faculty of Medicine at Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Brandt MP; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Urol Int ; : 1-8, 2024 May 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744263
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Despite increasing resistance of enterobacteria against fluoroquinolones (FLU), they are still widely used during transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB). This study was designed to analyse infectious complications and risk factors between FLU, cephalosporines (CEPH) and selective other antibiotics (O-AB) used during TRPB.

METHODS:

664 patients were included retrospectively (152 FLU, 452 CEPH and 60 O-AB). Infectious complications were defined as fever >38.0°C, the in-house definition of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) (if all applied fever >38.0°C, leucocytosis >11.000/µL and positive urine dipstick) or postinterventional bacteriuria. Hospitalisation rate, duration and comorbidities were also assessed. χ2 and Fisher's exact test were used for group comparison. Multivariate regression analysis assessed the association of comorbidities with infectious complications.

RESULTS:

FLU and CEPH were indifferent regarding infectious complications, however in the O-AB group significantly more common compared to FLU and CEPH (11.6, 13.3, 25%, p < 0.05). Duration of hospital stay in CEPH was significantly shorter compared to FLU and O-AB (4.1 vs. 6.3 vs. 8.2 days, p < 0.05). Arterial hypertension showed increased association with fever (OR 6.002 (1.178; 30.597) p = 0.031) and cUTI (OR 6.006 (1.207; 29.891) p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION:

Infectious complications were low and indifferent between FLU and CEPH but significantly more frequent in O-AB. Arterial hypertension was significantly associated with postinterventional fever and cUTI.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article