Apoptosis and NETotic cell death affect diabetic nephropathy independently: An study integrative study encompassing bioinformatics, machine learning, and experimental validation.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although programmed cell death (PCD) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) are intrinsically conneted, the interplay among various PCD forms remains elusive. In this study, We aimed at identifying independently DN-associated PCD pathways and biomarkers relevant to the related pathogenesis. METHODS: We acquired DN-related datasets from the GEO database and identified PCDs independently correlated with DN (DN-PCDs) through single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) as well as, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, applying differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and Mfuzz cluster analysis, we filtered the DN-PCDs pertinent to DN onset and progression. The convergence of various machine learning techniques ultimately spotlighted hub genes, substantiated through dataset meta-analyses and experimental validations, thereby confirming hub genes and related pathways expression consistencies. RESULTS: We harmonized four DN-related datasets (GSE1009, GSE142025, GSE30528, and GSE30529) post-batch-effect removal for subsequent analyses. Our differential expression analysis yielded 709 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), comprising 446 upregulated and 263 downregulated DEGs. Based on our ssGSEA as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, apoptosis and NETotic cell death were appraised as independent risk factors for DN (Odds Ratio > 1, p < 0.05). Next, we further refined 588 apoptosis- and NETotic cell death-associated genes through WGCNA and Mfuzz analysis, resulting in the identification of 17 DN-PCDs. Integrating protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses, network topology, and machine learning, we pinpointed hub genes (e.g., IL33, RPL11, and CX3CR1) as significant DN risk factors with expression corroborating in subsequent meta-analyses and experimental validations. Our GSEA enrichment analysis discerned differential enrichments between DN and control samples within pathways such as IL2/STAT5, IL6/JAK/STAT3, TNF-α via NF-κB, apoptosis, and oxidative phosphorylation, with related proteins such as IL2, IL6, and TNFα, which we subsequently submitted to experimental verification. CONCLUSION: Innovatively stemming from from PCD interactions, in this study, we discerned PCDs with an independent impact on DN apoptosis and NETotic cell death. We further screened DN evolution- and progression-related biomarkers, i.e. IL33, RPL11, and CX3CR1, all of which we empirically validated. This study not only poroposes a PCD-centric perspective for DN studies but also provides evidence for PCD-mediated immune cell infiltration exploration in DN regulation. Our results could motivate further exploration of DN pathogenesis, such as how the inflammatory microenvironment mediates NETotic cell death in DN regulation, representing a promising direction for future research.