Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy with prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer.
Abe, Tetsuya; Fujieda, Hironori; Higaki, Eiji; Komori, Koji; Ito, Seiji; Shimizu, Yasuhiro.
Afiliação
  • Abe T; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan. tabe@aichi-cc.jp.
  • Fujieda H; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Higaki E; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Komori K; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Ito S; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Shimizu Y; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
Surg Endosc ; 38(8): 4695-4703, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886226
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Salvage esophagectomy for residual tumor and localized relapses after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for patients with esophageal cancer is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. In addition, there are many controversial issues associated with salvage esophagectomy, such as the acceptability of minimally invasive surgery and the need for prophylactic dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and usefulness of thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy with prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection.

METHODS:

The study included 31 patients who underwent thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy with prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection after dCRT between 2013 and 2022 (salvage patients) and 610 nonsalvage patients who underwent conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy during the same time period.

RESULTS:

Differences between the median ages and sexes of the 2 patient groups were not significant. The dominant location of tumors in the salvage patients was the upper thoracic esophagus. More salvage patients had clinical T4 disease. The salvage patients had a lower median number of retrieved mediastinal lymph nodes than the nonsalvage patients. The differences between the rates of R0, postoperative complications, and in-hospital deaths in the 2 patient groups were not significant. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for the salvage patients were 73%, with 3-year OS rates for R0 vs non-R0 of 81% vs 0%, p < 0.01 and pN0 vs pN1-3 of 89% vs 49%, p < 0.01.

CONCLUSION:

Regarding short-term outcomes, prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection for patients undergoing thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy was as safe as prophylactic dissection for patients undergoing conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy. R0 surgery and pN0 are important factors for long-term survival in patients undergoing thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Toracoscopia / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Terapia de Salvação / Esofagectomia / Quimiorradioterapia / Excisão de Linfonodo / Mediastino Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Toracoscopia / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Terapia de Salvação / Esofagectomia / Quimiorradioterapia / Excisão de Linfonodo / Mediastino Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article