A Comparison of Telehealth and In-Person Therapy for Youth Anxiety Disorders.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth service use increased. However, little research has compared the efficacy of individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth with anxiety administered via (a) telehealth and (b) in-person. The present study used non-inferiority analyses to examine outcomes for youth with anxiety disorders (diagnosed by an Independent Evaluator; IE) treated via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and youth treated via in-person therapy prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Participants (n = 92; Mage = 11.5 years; 60.1% female; 75.0% White) were 46 youth who completed telehealth treatment and 46 youth who completed services in-person, matched on age and principal anxiety diagnosis. One-sided t-tests for non-inferiority were first estimated. Next, ANOVAs and regression models were performed, examining treatment differences and candidate moderators (e.g. social anxiety disorder, comorbid attention problems). RESULTS: Results support non-inferiority across multiple indices of outcomes (i.e. self- and caregiver-reported anxiety symptoms, IE-rated functional impairment, and IE-rated treatment response). Analyses indicate that both treatments were effective in reducing anxiety symptoms and functional impairment. Caregivers reported higher post-treatment levels of anxiety for youth treated via telehealth than youth treated in person. No variables moderated the differences in outcomes between treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support that CBT administered via telehealth is similarly efficacious as CBT administered in-person for youth with anxiety. Implications regarding the availability and accessibility of evidence-based treatment for youth with anxiety are discussed.