Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of dynamic compression system versus multiple cancellous screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults.
Aljasim, Omar; Yener, Can; Özkayin, Nadir.
Afiliação
  • Aljasim O; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ege University Medical Faculty Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. omar.aljasim.md@gmail.com.
  • Yener C; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hand, Microsurgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EMOT) Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Özkayin N; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ege University Medical Faculty Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 422, 2024 Jul 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039508
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Femoral neck fractures have posed a significant global healthcare challenge and had notable impacts on the quality of life. Current treatment strategies for femoral neck fractures in young individuals have varied, emphasizing the need for optimal fixation methods. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of the dynamic compression system (DCS) and multiple cancellous screws (MCS) methods.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included a total of 275 young adults with fresh femoral neck fractures treated with DCS and MCS. A matching analysis with a 11 ratio based on age, gender, fracture classification, and reduction quality was conducted. Demographic data were recorded, and comparisons were made according to follow-up time (FUT), hospitalization period, operation duration, femoral neck shortening, caput-collum-diaphysis (CCD) angle, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and post-operative complications.

RESULTS:

A total of 42 fractures were matched with a median age of 42 years (range, 22-48). In the DCS group, vertical neck shortening (median 1.92) was significantly lower than that in the MCS group (median 4.53) (P < 0.05). In the DCS group, horizontal femoral neck shortening, resultant femoral neck shortening, the amount of change in CCD angle, and HHS were 0.57 mm (0.43, 4.74 mm), 1.82 mm (0.40, 3.53 mm), 0.13° (-0.78°, 1.80°), and 91 (85-93), respectively. They were all non-significant than 1.00 mm (0.56, 6.23 mm), 2.74 mm (1.59, 6.71 mm), -0.18° (-1.11°,1.85°), and 91 (75, 93) in the MCS group, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in FUT, hospitalization period, operation time, and post-operative complications at the latest follow-up (P > 0.05). There were no complications such as pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and incision infection reported.

CONCLUSION:

DCS and MCS demonstrated effectiveness in treating femoral neck fractures in young adults. The DCS implant provides additional stability in the vertical axis. A prospective randomized controlled study with a large sample size was needed to validate these findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parafusos Ósseos / Fraturas do Colo Femoral / Fixação Interna de Fraturas Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parafusos Ósseos / Fraturas do Colo Femoral / Fixação Interna de Fraturas Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article