Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External Validation of Predictors of Mortality in Polytrauma Patients.
Becker, Ellen R; Price, Adam D; Barth, Jackson; Hong, Sally; Chowdhry, Vikas; Starr, Adam J; Sagi, H Claude; Park, Caroline; Goodman, Michael D.
Afiliação
  • Becker ER; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Price AD; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Barth J; TraumaCare.AI, INC, Dallas, Texas; Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
  • Hong S; TraumaCare.AI, INC, Dallas, Texas.
  • Chowdhry V; TraumaCare.AI, INC, Dallas, Texas.
  • Starr AJ; TraumaCare.AI, INC, Dallas, Texas; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Sagi HC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Park C; TraumaCare.AI, INC, Dallas, Texas; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Goodman MD; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: goodmamd@ucmail.uc.edu.
J Surg Res ; 301: 618-622, 2024 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094520
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality (PTIM) is an integrated, machine learning 72-h mortality prediction model that automatically extracts and analyzes demographic, laboratory, and physiological data in polytrauma patients. We hypothesized that this validated model would perform equally as well at another level 1 trauma center.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed including ∼5000 adult level 1 trauma activation patients from January 2022 to September 2023. Demographics, physiologic and laboratory values were collected. First, a test set of models using PTIM clinical variables (CVs) was used as external validation, named PTIM+. Then, multiple novel mortality prediction models were developed considering all CVs designated as the Cincinnati Trauma Index of Mortality (CTIM). The statistical performance of the models was then compared.

RESULTS:

PTIM CVs were found to have similar predictive performance within the PTIM + external validation model. The highest correlating CVs used in CTIM overlapped considerably with those of the PTIM, and performance was comparable between models. Specifically, for prediction of mortality within 48 h (CTIM versus PTIM) positive prediction value was 35.6% versus 32.5%, negative prediction value was 99.6% versus 99.3%, sensitivity was 81.0% versus 82.5%, specificity was 97.3% versus 93.6%, and area under the curve was 0.98 versus 0.94.

CONCLUSIONS:

This external cohort study suggests that the variables initially identified via PTIM retain their predictive ability and are accessible in a different level 1 trauma center. This work shows that a trauma center may be able to operationalize an effective predictive model without undertaking a repeated time and resource intensive process of full variable selection.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article