Root replacement for all allograft aortic valves: preferred technique or too radical?

ABSTRACT

From November 1985 to January 1994, 146 patients have received a viable cryopreserved allograft for aortic root replacement. The follow-up was complete, with all events included to March 1st, 1994. The median age of patients was 49 years; 83.6% were male. Valve dysfunction (91 patients), primary aortic wall disease (45 patients), and a combination of both (10 patients) were the indications for aortic root replacement. The current operative mortality is 1.7% (three deaths in 172 patients to July 1st, 1994). Four late deaths have occurred, with an 8-year actuarial survival of 85% +/- 8% (95% confidence limits). Endocarditis (two events) and thromboembolism (four events) had a low incidence. Structural deterioration (three events) and reoperation for all causes (nine events) have constituted low morbidity and are compared with the results after non-root allograft implantation techniques. The clinical and echocardiographic evidence indicates that the immediate results of valve function with root replacement are superior. But no statistical difference between aortic root replacement and non-root procedures is apparent at 8 years, indicating that a longer follow-up is required before the answer to the question "preferred technique or too radical" can be answered.