RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether primary care specialists' demographics, specialty, and knowledge of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) influence their practice patterns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective PGT-M knowledge, subjective comfort with PGT-related topics, PGT care practices (discussions/referrals), and PGT-M implementation barriers. RESULTS: Our survey had 145 respondents: 65 obstetrician/gynecologists, 36 internists, and 44 pediatricians. Overall, 88% believed that patients at a risk of passing on genetic disorders should be provided PGT-M information. However, few discussed PGT-M with their patients (24%) or referred them for testing (23%). Over half (63%) believed that the lack of physician knowledge was a barrier to PGT use. In terms of subjective comfort with PGT, only 1 in 5 physicians felt familiar enough with the topic to answer patient questions. There were higher odds of discussing (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-5.87) or referring for PGT (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-4.51) for each additional 0.5 correct answers to PGT knowledge-related questions. The odds of referring patients for PGT-M were the highest among obstetrician/gynecologists compared with those among the internists and pediatricians. CONCLUSIONS: Physician specialty and PGT knowledge were associated with PGT-M care delivery practices. Although most specialists believed in equipping at-risk patients with PGT-M information, <1 in 4 discussed or referred patients for PGT. The low levels of PGT-related care among providers may be owed to inadequate knowledge of and comfort with the topic. An opportunity to promote greater understanding of PGT-M among primary care specialists exists and can in turn improve the use of referrals to PGT-M services.
Asunto(s)
Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Sistemas Multiinstitucionales/economía , Organizaciones Proveedor-Patrocinador/economía , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/organización & administración , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/tendencias , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Sistemas Multiinstitucionales/organización & administración , Sistemas Multiinstitucionales/tendencias , Organizaciones Proveedor-Patrocinador/organización & administración , Organizaciones Proveedor-Patrocinador/tendencias , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Médicos/economía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./tendencias , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Financiación Gubernamental/tendencias , Humanos , Renta/tendencias , Médicos/tendencias , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Pequeña Empresa/economía , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Pequeña Empresa/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
With the economy appearing to be in a recession, healthcare providers are expecting more bad debt coming their way. "We're not a financial institution and not in the business of financing the provision of care," says Neil Bertrand, chief financial officer for Longmont (Colo.) United Hospital.