Public health nursing education in Ireland and Norway: A comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Public health, primary health care, and nursing are founding principles of public health nursing. Thus, the underpinning curriculum needs to reflect these core principles. Public health nursing educators sought to delve deeper into curricula and training of public health nurse (PHNs) in Ireland and Norway OBJECTIVE: To compare PHNs' educational training in Ireland and Norway through a collaborative process DESIGN: This study used a descriptive comparative design SAMPLE: A panel of expert educators (the authors) compared national Public health nursing education strategies, guidelines, and curricula used to train PHN students RESULTS: Four core categories emerged from the analysis: general characteristics, theoretical and empirical knowledge base for PHNs practice, applying theory to clinical practice, and professional/ethical dimensions for practice. Results revealed more similarities than differences in both countries' educational models. The central difference related to the specialist role in Norway versus the generalist role in Ireland CONCLUSIONS: Workforce requirements drive the delivery of Public Health Nursing programs and educational curricula. However, it is imperative that educators evaluate their curricula in terms of fitness and practice, not just purpose.

A falls case summary: Application of the public health nursing intervention wheel.

BACKGROUND: The Public Health Intervention Wheel (PHIW) is a population-based practice model that encompasses three levels of practice (community, systems, and individual/family) and 17 public health interventions. Each intervention and practice level contributes to improving population health. Public health nurses (PHNs) provide care at the three levels of practice. Prevention of falls is a public health issue and the majority of falls happen at home. Therefore, prevention and management of falls in the community could benefit from a public health systems approach by PHNs underpinned by the PHIW. CASE PRESENTATION: A hypothetical case is presented of a 78-year-old gentleman who had a fall which resulted in a fractured right acetabulum and surgery before being discharged home. METHODS: The aim of this paper was to use a case summary to illustrate PHN practice in the context of the PHIW as applied to falls management and prevention. This paper focuses on fall incidence and PHN response in Ireland and Norway. The PHIW is described and relevant interventions from the PHIW are applied to PHN practice in managing the case. CONCLUSIONS: The PHIW model provides insight into the potential scope of public health nursing in falls, articulating PHN practice in the community.

Breastfeeding skills training for health care professionals: A systematic review.

Background: Breastfeeding is a public health issue and the response to the low rates in the Global North needs to be multi-faceted. Within this context healthcare professionals have an important role to play in the overall multi-dimensional promotion and support of breastfeeding. As a learned skill, there is a fundamental need to improve breastfeeding skills amongst healthcare professionals. Aim: To identify, analyse and evaluate studies on breastfeeding skills education for health care professionals. Methods: The review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies from June 2006 to July 2021 that examined the provision of breastfeeding skills-based education for qualified or student healthcare professionals were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and risk of bias independently assessed by two reviewers. Findings: Of 5,497 papers originally identified, 11 were included in the review. Nine studies were interventional, whilst two were observational. Participants included paediatric residents, midwives, nurses, care co-ordinators and other health care staff. Training took place in classrooms, practical workshops, or clinical settings. Observational or experiential teaching components in combination with theoretical knowledge were found to produce better outcomes than classroom-based interventions. However, the findings need to be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias regarding study design-specific criteria. Discussion: There is both a paucity of studies, and from those available, a lack of quality in terms of educational interventions specifically offering skills-based training to healthcare professionals. Breastfeeding education needs to incorporate practical breastfeeding skills not just theoretical training. Lack of standardisation currently exists across guiding frameworks, course content, educator qualification and assessment strategies which impedes the optimisation of breastfeeding education and subsequent support for mothers. Serious or high risk of bias was identified in all but one of the studies included in the review. Conclusion: There is a need for high quality research evidence to optimise the design and delivery of skills-based breastfeeding education for healthcare professionals. This would have the potential to contribute to the broad suite of interventions necessary to improve support for breastfeeding.

Building capacity: getting evidence-based practice into healthcare professional curricula.

Fostering a culture of clinical effectiveness in healthcare is crucial to achieving optimum outcomes for patients. Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a cornerstone of clinical effectiveness. An EBP capacity-building project commenced in Ireland in 2016, in collaboration with the Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine in Oxford. A key part of this project, reported here, was the development of a competency framework for education in EBP and clinical effectiveness to ensure responsiveness of education standards and curricula of healthcare professionals in this area. METHODS: Following a review of national and international reports, professional guidance documents and empirical literature pertaining to clinical effectiveness education (CEE), a preliminary competency framework was developed. Stakeholder consultations were conducted over a 6-month period, which consisted of 13 focus groups (n=45) and included representatives from clinical practice, higher education and professional training sectors, regulator/accrediting bodies, the Department of Health (Ireland) and patient/service user groups. RESULTS: An overarching interprofessional competency framework for CEE was proposed and included the following domains: EBP, quality improvement processes, implementation strategies and collaborative practice: a total of 16 competencies and 60 indicators. CONCLUSION: A competency framework for CEE for health and social care professionals is presented. It is intended that this framework will provide guidance to healthcare educators and regulators in the construction and revision of curricula, learning outcomes, teaching and assessment strategies, and graduate/clinician attributes.