Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage.

Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) involves distributing resources, especially human resources for health (HRH), to match population needs. This paper explores the policy lessons on HRH from four countries that have achieved sustained improvements in UHC: Brazil, Ghana, Mexico and Thailand. Its purpose is to inform global policy and financial commitments on HRH in support of UHC. The paper reports on country experiences using an analytical framework that examines effective coverage in relation to the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality (AAAQ) of HRH. The AAAQ dimensions make it possible to perform tracing analysis on HRH policy actions since 1990 in the four countries of interest in relation to national trends in workforce numbers and population mortality rates. The findings inform key principles for evidence-based decision-making on HRH in support of UHC. First, HRH are critical to the expansion of health service coverage and the package of benefits; second, HRH strategies in each of the AAAQ dimensions collectively support achievements in effective coverage; and third, success is achieved through partnerships involving health and non-health actors. Facing the unprecedented health and development challenges that affect all countries and transforming HRH evidence into policy and practice must be at the heart of UHC and the post-2015 development agenda. It is a political imperative requiring national commitment and leadership to maximize the impact of available financial and human resources, and improve healthy life expectancy, with the recognition that improvements in health care are enabled by a health workforce that is fit for purpose.

Parvenir à la couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) implique la répartition des ressources, et en particulier des ressources humaines pour la santé (RHS), afin de répondre aux besoins de la population. Cet article étudie les leçons politiques sur les RHS de quatre pays ayant accompli des progrès durables en matière de CSU: le Brésil, le Ghana, le Mexique et la Thaïlande. Son but est d'informer sur les politiques globales et les engagements financiers dans les RHS visant à promouvoir la CSU.L'article décrit les expériences des pays à l'aide d'un cadre analytique examinant la couverture efficace par rapport à la disponibilité, l'accessibilité, l'acceptabilité et la qualité (DAAQ) des RHS. Les dimensions DAAQ permettent de réaliser une analyse de traçage des actions politiques en RHS depuis 1990 dans les quatre pays étudiés, par rapport aux tendances nationales des statistiques de main-d'oeuvre et des taux de mortalité de la population. Les résultats indiquent quels sont les principes clés pour la prise de décisions basées sur les faits sur les RHS visant à promouvoir la CSU. Premièrement, les RHS sont essentielles à l'expansion de la couverture des services de santé et de l'ensemble des avantages; deuxièmement, des stratégies RHS pour chacune des dimensions DAAQ favorisent collectivement les progrès vers une couverture efficace; et troisièmement, le succès est atteint à travers des partenariats impliquant des acteurs tant médicaux que non médicaux.Répondre aux défis sans précédent dans les domaines de la santé et du développement, qui concernent tous les pays, et transformer les faits RHS en politiques et en pratiques doivent être à la base du programme de CSU et de l'agenda de développement post-2015. C'est un impératif politique qui exige un engagement et un leadership nationaux pour optimiser l'impact des ressources financières et humaines disponibles et accroître l'espérance de vie en bonne santé, avec la reconnaissance que les progrès dans le domaine des soins de santé ne sont possibles qu'avec une main-d'oeuvre de santé adéquate.

Lograr una cobertura sanitaria universal implica una distribución de los recursos, en particular, de los recursos humanos para la salud (RHS), a fin de satisfacer las necesidades de la población. Este documento examina las lecciones sobre políticas relacionadas con los RHS de cuatro países que han conseguido avances ininterrumpidos en materia de cobertura sanitaria universal: Brasil, Ghana, México y Tailandia. Su objetivo consiste en exponer la política mundial y los compromisos financieros sobre RHS como ayuda para una cobertura sanitaria universal.El documento explica las experiencias de los países mencionados por medio de un marco de trabajo analítico que examina la eficacia de una cobertura en función de la disponibilidad, accesibilidad, aceptabilidad y calidad (DAAC) de los RHS. Los aspectos DAAC permiten llevar a cabo análisis de seguimiento sobre las acciones políticas relativas a los RHS desde 1990 en los cuatro países de interés en relación con las tendencias nacionales en el número de trabajadores y las tasas de mortalidad de la población.Los resultados muestran los principios fundamentales para la toma de decisiones basadas en pruebas científicas sobre los RHS como apoyo a una cobertura sanitaria universal. En primer lugar, los RHS son esenciales para expandir la cobertura de los servicios sanitarios y el conjunto de prestaciones. En segundo lugar, las estrategias RHS en cada uno de los aspectos DAAC respaldan de forma colectiva los logros en la eficacia de la cobertura y, en tercer lugar, los buenos resultados solo pueden conseguirse a través de la asociación de actores sanitarios y no sanitarios.Hacer frente a los desafíos sanitarios y de desarrollo sin precedentes que afectan a todos los países y traducir las pruebas científicas sobre RHS en políticas y prácticas deben convertirse en los puntos centrales de la cobertura sanitaria universal y de la agenda de desarrollo a partir del año 2015. Se trata de un imperativo político que requiere un compromiso y liderazgo nacionales para potenciar el impacto de los recursos financieros y humanos disponibles, y así mejorar la esperanza de vida saludable, sin olvidar que las mejoras en materia de asistencia sanitaria son posibles gracias a un personal sanitario apto para tal propósito.

Performance of physician-certified verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards.

BACKGROUND: Physician review of a verbal autopsy (VA) and completion of a death certificate remains the most widely used approach for VA analysis. This study provides new evidence about the performance of physician-certified verbal autopsy (PCVA) using defined clinical diagnostic criteria as a gold standard for a multisite sample of 12,542 VAs. The study was also designed to analyze issues related to PCVA, such as the impact of a second physician reader on the cause of death assigned, the variation in performance with and without household recall of health care experience (HCE), and the importance of local information for physicians reading VAs. METHODS: The certification was performed by 24 physicians. The assignment of VA was random and blinded. Each VA was certified by one physician. Half of the VAs were reviewed by a different physician with household recall of health care experience included. The completed death certificate was processed for automated ICD-10 coding of the underlying cause of death. PCVA was compared to gold standard cause of death assignment based on strictly defined clinical diagnostic criteria that are part of the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC) gold standard verbal autopsy study. RESULTS: For individual cause assignment, the overall chance-corrected concordance for PCVA against the gold standard cause of death is less than 50%, with substantial variability by cause and physician. Physicians assign the correct cause around 30% of the time without HCE, and addition of HCE improves performance in adults to 45% and slightly higher in children to 48%. Physicians estimate cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) with considerable error for adults, children, and neonates. Only for neonates for a cause list of six causes with HCE is accuracy above 0.7. In all three age groups, CSMF accuracy improves when household recall of health care experience is available. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that physician coding for cause of death assignment may not be as robust as previously thought. The time and cost required to initially collect the verbal autopsies must be considered in addition to the analysis, as well as the impact of diverting physicians from servicing immediate health needs in a population to review VAs. All of these considerations highlight the importance and urgency of developing better methods to more reliably analyze past and future verbal autopsies to obtain the highest quality mortality data from populations without reliable death certification.