RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak in China exposed health care workers (HCWs) to an increased risk of infection. The acquired immunity rapidly diminishes after the previous COVID-19 vaccination and the second booster vaccination has been recommended in several countries. HCWs are a priority group for vaccination because they are at increased risk of being infected, however, a certain amount of HCWs were hesitant. METHODS: The survey was conducted among 5805 HCWs in China from January 5 to February 9, 2023. Questionnaire included sociodemographic information, COVID-19-related variables, psychological factors, and the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influencing factors of the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy. RESULTS: 42.2% of HCWs self-reported having the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy. Occupations, years of working, COVID-19 infection status were associated with less vaccine hesitancy. HCWs who had received 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to be hesitant compared to those had not received. HCWs with PTSD symptoms and anxiety symptoms were more likely to be hesitant. No relation was observed between COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy and age, marriage, salary, and perceived an increased risk of COVID-19 infection due to work (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of HCWs were hesitant to accept the second dose of the COVID-19 booster vaccine. Incorporating vaccine knowledge and new evidence into routine health educations and procedures to raise confidence and reduce complacency may be effective and feasible in promoting the vaccination and implementing future vaccination programs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Chinese government has pay attention about tuberculosis infection among medical staff in infectious disease hospitals, but the effects have not yet been reported. This study will explore latent infection and immune function in the medical staff and systematically analyze the associated influencing factors. METHODS: Ninety-four medical staffs were enrolled and 20 medical staffs were defined as low risk group and others were high risk group. We used IFN-γ release assay and flow cytometry to analyze the latent TB infection status and immune function. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors of latent TB infection. RESULTS: This study explored and compared the infection status of medical workers and found that the rate of positive TB-IGRA results was higher among high risk group than in low risk group. Working environment, occupational history and work type were risk factors for TB infection in hospital. This study also found that high risk group had higher IFN-γ expression and a lower ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T cells and further analysis found that this immune disorder is associated with wards and occupations. CONCLUSIONS: This study through rigorous sample collection and analysis found the risk factors of latent tuberculosis infection in health care workers. This finding may provide a theoretical basis to be used by the countries with a high TB burden to further improve their strategies for the prevention of TB infections in hospitals and may give an indication for improving the personal health of medical staff in infectious disease hospitals.