The Perspectives of Advanced Practice Provider Directors on Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Alignment and Hiring.

Demand for acute care is forecasted to grow in the United States. To meet this demand, nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly employed in acute care settings. Yet, there is concern about an adequate supply of acute care NPs given demand. Further, professional nursing organizations recommend aligning an NP's role with their education, certification, licensure, and practice. Given workforce constraints and the policy environment, little is known about how hospitals approach hiring NPs for acute care roles. The purpose of this study was to explore advanced practice provider (APP) directors' approaches to hiring NPs within the context of alignment and describe factors that influence hiring decisions. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 APP directors in hospitals and health systems. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using an iterative, hybrid inductive and deductive method. Two themes emerged: (1) local factors that inform aligned hiring and (2) adaptive hiring responses to changing environments. Practices around hiring NPs varied across institutions influenced by organization and state policies and regulations, workforce availability, and institutional culture. Most APP directors recognized trends towards hiring aligned NPs for acute care roles. However, they also identified barriers to fully aligning their NP workforce and described adaptive strategies including hiring physician assistants, building relationships with APP schools, and leveraging hospital resources to develop the APP workforce to meet care delivery demands given the current NP workforce supply. Future research is needed to assess widespread practices around acute care NP alignment and the implications of alignment for patient and organizational outcomes.

Describing the male registered nursing workforce toward increasing male representation in professional nursing.

BACKGROUND: Men are significantly underrepresented in nursing and increasing their numbers should be a priority. PURPOSE: To describe the male nursing workforce in terms of size, demographics, education, and work settings. METHODS: Using data from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, we performed a secondary descriptive analysis. FINDINGS: We find that 9.6% of registered nurses are men. Men are more likely than women to hold an associate degree and clinical doctorates, be nurse anesthetists and supervisors, and work in emergency settings but less likely than females to participate in teaching. DISCUSSION: To increase male representation in nursing we must simultaneously rearticulate what it means for a job to be "female" while also showing that nursing incorporates many skills and interests traditionally coded as "male." We can also show men that nursing offers appealing employment that can lead to a deeply fulfilling personal and professional life.

Advancement of research on nurse practitioners: Setting a research agenda.

BACKGROUND: Primary care delivered by nurse practitioners (NPs) helps to meet the United States' growing demand for care and improves patient outcomes. Yet, barriers impede NP practice. Knowledge of these barriers is limited, hindering opportunities to eliminate them. PURPOSE: We convened a 1.5-day conference to develop a research agenda to advance evidence on the primary care NP workforce. METHODS: Thirty experts gathered in New York City for a conference in 2022. The conference included plenary sessions, small group discussions, and a prioritization process to identify areas for future research and research questions. DISCUSSION: The research agenda includes top-ranked research questions within five categories: (a) policy regulations and implications for care, quality, and access; (b) systems affecting NP practice; (c) health equity and the NP workforce; (d) NP education and workforce dynamics, and (e) international perspectives. CONCLUSION: The agenda can advance evidence on the NP workforce to guide policy and practice.

Association between physician practice Medicaid acceptance and employing nurse practitioners and physician assistants: A longitudinal analysis.

BACKGROUND: Access to care is often a challenge for Medicaid beneficiaries due to low practice participation. As demand increases, practices will likely look for ways to see Medicaid patients while keeping costs low. Employing nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) is one low-cost and effective means to achieve this. However, there are no longitudinal studies examining the relationship between practice Medicaid acceptance and NP/PA employment. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association of practice Medicaid acceptance with NP/PA employment over time. METHODS: Using SK&A data (2009-2015), we constructed a panel of 102,453 unique physician practices to assess for changes in Medicaid acceptance after newly employing NPs and PAs. We employed practice-level fixed effects linear regressions. RESULTS: Our results showed that, among practices employing both NPs and PAs, there was a roughly 2% increase in the likelihood of Medicaid participation over time. When stratifying our sample by practice size and specialty, the positive correlation localized to small primary care and medical practices. When both NPs and PAs were present, small primary care practices had a 3.3% increase and small medical practices had a 6.9% increase in the likelihood of accepting Medicaid. CONCLUSION: NP and PA employment was positively associated with increases in Medicaid participation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: As more individuals gain coverage under Medicaid, organizations will need to decide how to adapt to greater patient demand. Our results suggest that hiring NPs and PAs may be a potential lower cost strategy to accommodate new Medicaid patients.

The Need for Advanced Clinical Education for Nurse Practitioners Continues Despite Expansion of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs.

We read with great interest Mundinger and Carter's exposition of how, in their view, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) education has lost its way and what consequences might result. Mundinger and Carter note that DNP programs are overwhelming focused on nonclinical practice. We share the concern of Mundinger and Carter about the future of nurse practitioner (NP) education within the context of expanding DNP programs. In this commentary, we raise concerns about NP transition to practice and the limited, but concerning, evidence that new NPs struggle in their transition to practice. We note that this concern is magnified as NPs continue to move into specialty roles. Health systems have responded to this concern by developing residency and fellowship programs. Fifteen years after the AACN position statement on the clinical doctorate was issued, the goal of DNP education remains an unfinished project. An important question remains: Can, will, and how should DNP programs deliver?

The Impact of the New York Nurse Practitioner Modernization Act on the Employment of Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care.

Expanding scope of practice (SOP) for nurse practitioners (NPs) may increase NP employment in primary care practices which can help meet the growing demand in primary care. We examined the impact of enacting less restrictive NP practice restrictions-NP Modernization Act-in New York State (NYS) on the overall employment of primary care NPs and specifically in underserved areas. We used longitudinal data from the SK&A outpatient database (2012-2018) to identify primary care practices in NYS and in the comparison states (Pennsylvania [PA] and New Jersey [NJ]). Using a difference-in-differences design with an event study specification, we compared changes in (1) the presence and (2) total counts of NPs in primary care practices in NYS and neighboring comparison states (ie, PA and NJ) before and after the policy change. The NP Modernization Act was associated with a 1.3 percentage point lower probability of a practice employing at least one NP on average across each of the 3 post-periods (95% CI: -.024, -.002). NP Modernization Act was associated with 0.065 fewer NPs on average across the post-period (95% CI: -.119, -.011). Results were similar in underserved areas. NP employment in primary care practices in NYS was lower after the NP Modernization Act than would have been expected based counterfactual of comparison states. The negative relationship may be explained by gains in provider efficiency which leads to reduced NP hiring in primary care. More research is needed to understand the relationship between SOP regulations, NP supply, and access to care.

Practice Patterns, Work Environments, and Job Outcomes of Rural and Urban Primary Care Nurse Practitioners.

As nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly relied on to deliver primary care in rural communities, it is critical to understand the contexts in which they work and whether they are characterized by work environments and infrastructures that facilitate the provision of high-quality patient care. This study compares urban and rural NPs using data from a survey of 1,244 primary care NPs in Arizona, California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington. While rural and urban NPs have a number of similarities in terms of demographic characteristics, practice patterns, and job outcomes, they also have noteworthy differences. Rural NPs report higher levels of independent practice, fewer structural capabilities that facilitate quality care, and poorer relationships with physicians. Health care organizations in rural communities may need to invest in work environments and infrastructures that facilitate high-quality care and autonomous practice for NPs.

Vertical Integration and Physician Practice Labor Composition.

With the growth of vertical integration among physician practices (i.e., hospital-physician integration), there have been many studies of its effects on health care treatments and spending. It is unknown if integration shapes provider configurations, especially against the backdrop of increasing employment of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) across specialties. Using a longitudinal panel of 144,289 practices (2008-2015), we examined the association of vertical integration with NP and PA employment. We find positive associations between vertical integration and newly employing NPs and PAs within physician practices; however, the relationships differ by practice specialty type as well as timing of vertical integration. Supplementary analyses offer supporting evidence for coinciding enhancements to practice productivity, diversification, and provider task allocation. Our results suggest that vertical integration may promote interdisciplinary provider configurations, which has the potential to improve care delivery efficiency.