What can nurses learn from patient's needs and wishes when developing an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patient participation is fundamental in nursing care and has yielded benefits for patient outcomes. However, despite their compassionate care approach, nurses do not always incorporate patients' needs and wish into evidence-based practice, quality improvement or learning activities. Therefore, a shift to continuous quality improvement based on evidence-based practice is necessary to enhance the quality of care. The patient's opinion is an essential part of this process. To establish a more sustainable learning culture for evidence-based quality improvement, it is crucial that nurses learn alongside their patients. However, to promote this, nurses require a deeper understanding of patients' care preferences. OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' needs and wishes towards being involved in care processes that nurses can use in developing an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in two hospital departments and one community care team. In total, 18 patients were purposefully selected for individual semi-structured interviews with an average of 15 min. A framework analysis based on the fundamental of care framework was utilised to analyse the data deductively. In addition, inductive codes were added to patients' experiences beyond the framework. For reporting this study, the SRQR guideline was used. RESULTS: Participants needed a compassionate nurse who established and sustained a trusting relationship. They wanted nurses to be present and actively involved during the care delivery. Shared decision-making improved when nurses offered fair, clear and tailored information. Mistrust or a disrupted nurse-patient relationship was found to be time-consuming and challenging to restore. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirmed the importance of a durable nurse-patient relationship and showed the consequences of nurses' communication on shared decision-making. Insights into patients' care preferences are essential to stimulate the development of an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture within nursing teams and for successful implementation processes.

The influence of government policies on the nurse practitioner and physician assistant workforce in the Netherlands, 2000-2022: a multimethod approach study.

BACKGROUND: Many countries are looking for ways to increase nurse practitioner (NP) and physician assistant/associate (PA) deployment. Countries are seeking to tackle the pressing issues of increasing healthcare demand, healthcare costs, and medical doctor shortages. This article provides insights into the potential impact of various policy measures on NP/PA workforce development in the Netherlands. METHODS: We applied a multimethod approach study using three methods: 1) a review of government policies, 2) surveys on NP/PA workforce characteristics, and 3) surveys on intake in NP/PA training programs. RESULTS: Until 2012, the annual intake into NP and PA training programs was comparable to the number of subsidized training places. In 2012, a 131% increase in intake coincided with extending the legal scope of practice of NPs and PAs and substantially increasing subsidized NP/PA training places. However, in 2013, the intake of NP and PA trainees decreased by 23% and 24%, respectively. The intake decreased in hospitals, (nursing) home care, and mental healthcare, coinciding with fiscal austerity in these sectors. We found that other policies, such as legal acknowledgment, reimbursement, and funding platforms and research, do not consistently coincide with NP/PA training and employment trends. The ratios of NPs and PAs to medical doctors increased substantially in all healthcare sectors from 3.5 and 1.0 per 100 full-time equivalents in medical doctors in 2012 to 11.0 and 3.9 in 2022, respectively. For NPs, the ratios vary between 2.5 per 100 full-time equivalents in medical doctors in primary care and 41.9 in mental healthcare. PA-medical doctor ratios range from 1.6 per 100 full-time equivalents in medical doctors in primary care to 5.8 in hospital care. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that specific policies coincided with NP and PA workforce growth. Sudden and severe fiscal austerity coincided with declining NP/PA training intake. Furthermore, governmental training subsidies coincided and were likely associated with NP/PA workforce growth. Other policy measures did not consistently coincide with trends in intake in NP/PA training or employment. The role of extending the scope of practice remains to be determined. The skill mix is shifting toward an increasing share of medical care provided by NPs and PAs in all healthcare sectors.

How does government policy influence the employment and training of nurse practitioners and physician assistants? A realist analysis using qualitative interviews.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop insights into how and why Dutch government policies on deployment and training of nurse practitioners and physician assistants have effect and under what circumstances. DESIGN: A realist analysis using qualitative interviews. METHODS: Data analysis of 50 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2019 with healthcare providers, sectoral and professional associations, and training coordinators. Stratified purposive and snowball sampling were used. RESULTS: Policies stimulated employment and training of nurse practitioners and physician assistants by: (1) contributing to the familiarity of participants in the decision-making process in healthcare providers with and medical doctors' trust in these professions; (2) contributing to participants' motivation in employment and training; and (3) eliminating barriers perceived by medical doctors, managers and directors. The extent to which policies affected employment and training was largely determined by sectoral and organizational circumstances, such as healthcare demand and complexity, and decision-makers in healthcare providers (medical doctors or managers/directors). CONCLUSION: Effectuating familiarity and trust among participants in the decision-making process is a crucial first step. Next, policymakers can motivate participants and lower their perceived barriers by extending the scope of practice, creating reimbursement opportunities and contributing to training costs. Theoretical insights into nurse practitioner and physician assistant employment and training have been refined. IMPACT: The findings highlight how governments, health insurers, sectoral and professional associations, departments, councils, healthcare providers and professionals can facilitate and support nurse practitioner and physician assistant employment and training by contributing to familiarity, trust and motivation, and by clearing perceived barriers.