Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 114
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hum Resour Health ; 18(1): 34, 2020 05 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32410633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of appropriate and relevant nurse-sensitive indicators provides an opportunity to demonstrate the unique contributions of nurses to patient outcomes. The aim of this work was to develop relevant metrics to assess the quality of nursing care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where they are scarce. MAIN BODY: We conducted a scoping review using EMBASE, CINAHL and MEDLINE databases of studies published in English focused on quality nursing care and with identified measurement methods. Indicators identified were reviewed by a diverse panel of nursing stakeholders in Kenya to develop a contextually appropriate set of nurse-sensitive indicators for Kenyan hospitals specific to the five major inpatient disciplines. We extracted data on study characteristics, nursing indicators reported, location and the tools used. A total of 23 articles quantifying the quality of nursing care services met the inclusion criteria. All studies identified were from high-income countries. Pooled together, 159 indicators were reported in the reviewed studies with 25 identified as the most commonly reported. Through the stakeholder consultative process, 52 nurse-sensitive indicators were recommended for Kenyan hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Although nurse-sensitive indicators are increasingly used in high-income countries to improve quality of care, there is a wide heterogeneity in the way indicators are defined and interpreted. Whilst some indicators were regarded as useful by a Kenyan expert panel, contextual differences prompted them to recommend additional new indicators to improve the evaluations of nursing care provision in Kenyan hospitals and potentially similar LMIC settings. Taken forward through implementation, refinement and adaptation, the proposed indicators could be more standardised and may provide a common base to establish national or regional professional learning networks with the common goal of achieving high-quality care through quality improvement and learning.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Atención de Enfermería/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Participación de los Interesados , Benchmarking/métodos , Manejo de Datos , Humanos , Kenia , Atención de Enfermería/normas , Seguridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas
2.
Hum Resour Health ; 16(1): 55, 2018 10 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340497

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Performance-based financing (PBF) reforms aim to directly influence health worker behavior through changes to institutional arrangements, accountability structures, and financial incentives based on performance. While there is still some debate about whether PBF influences extrinsic or intrinsic motivators, recent research finds that PBF affects both. Against this backdrop, our study presents findings from a process evaluation of a PBF program in Mozambique, exploring the perceived changes to both internal and external drivers of health worker motivation associated with PBF. METHODS: We used a qualitative research design with in-depth, semi-structured interviews with health workers, which included a rank order exercise and focus group discussions. Interviews were analyzed by two researchers using thematic analysis techniques. Rank order frequency was calculated using weighted average methodology. RESULTS: Health workers reported that PBF, overall, positively influenced their motivation by introducing or reinforcing both internal and external motivational drivers. Internal drivers included enhanced self-efficacy driven by goal orientation, healthy competition among colleagues, and job satisfaction. External drivers included an organized work environment, enhanced access to equipment and supplies, financial incentives, teamwork, and regular consultations with verifiers (a type of supervision). PBF stimulates an interactive relationship between internal and external motivational drivers, creating a feedback loop involving responsibility, achievement, and recognition, which increased perceived motivation. CONCLUSIONS: The PBF program helped workers feel that they had well-defined and achievable goals and that they received recognition from verification teams, management committees, and colleagues due to enhanced accountability and governance. Our paper shows that financial incentives could serve as the "driver" to kick-start the feedback loop, of responsibility, achievement, and recognition, in environments that lack other drivers. Understanding how PBF programs can be designed and refined to reinforce this feedback loop could be a powerful tool to further enhance and track positive motivational changes. For countries thinking about PBF, we recommend that policymakers assess the loop in their contexts, identify drivers, determine whether these drivers are sufficient, and consider PBF if they are not. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We obtained ethical approval for the study protocol, data collection instruments, and informed consent forms from the Ethics Review Committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [IRB 2015-190] and the Ethics Review Committee of the Mozambique Ministry of Health.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/psicología , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Motivación , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Reembolso de Incentivo/organización & administración , Lugar de Trabajo/economía , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mozambique , Investigación Cualitativa
3.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 32(3): 1027-1037, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29171678

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Problems experienced by older people with complex needs to live at home have been reported in the literature. This qualitative study builds on previous research and investigates enduring issues older people face when interacting with healthcare services. AIM: To gain an in-depth understanding of what is involved in providing good quality health care for older people who need support to live at home. METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN: We adopted an interpretive descriptive approach and conducted semi-structured interviews with older people (n = 7), carers (n = 8) and key informants (n = 11). Initial and secondary analysis of qualitative data was completed. FINDINGS: Major themes emerged about meanings of partnership in health care, and invisibility of the older person as a partner in health care. Partnership in health care was understood to mean being treated as an equal, being involved in decision-making, and making contributions which impact on health care and health systems. The metaphorical concept of 'invisibility' related to the older person not being seen and heard as a partner in health care, as well as being a recipient of care. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that older people who need support to live at home are not highly visible to health providers, policymakers and researchers as a central partner and consumer to be meaningfully engaged in shaping their health care. Opportunities to address persistent issues with quality of health care may in future be achieved through stronger partnerships between older people and health providers, to find new ways to improve the quality of care for older people.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Anciano Frágil/psicología , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Australia del Sur
4.
Ann Fam Med ; 15(6): 529-534, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29133491

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medicare's merit-based incentive payment system and narrowing of physician networks by health insurers will stoke clinicians' and policy makers' interest in care delivery attributes associated with value as defined by payers. METHODS: To help define these attributes, we analyzed 2009 to 2011 commercial health insurance claims data for more than 40 million preferred provider organization patients attributed to over 53,000 primary care practice sites. We identified sites ranking favorably on both quality and low total annual per capita health care spending ("high-value") and sites ranking near the median ("average-value"). Sites were selected for qualitative assessment from 64 high-value sites and 102 average-value sites with more than 1 primary care physician who delivered adult primary care and provided services to enough enrollees to permit meaningful spending and quality ranking. Purposeful sampling ensured regional diversity. Physicians experienced in primary care assessment and blinded to site rankings visited 12 high-value sites and 4 average-value sites to identify tangible attributes of care delivery that could plausibly explain a high ranking on value. RESULTS: Thirteen attributes of care delivery distinguished sites in the high-value cohort. Six attributes attained statistical significance: decision support for evidence-based medicine, risk-stratified care management, careful selection of specialists, coordination of care, standing orders and protocols, and balanced physician compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of care delivery attributes that distinguish their high-value peers may help physicians respond successfully to incentives from Medicare and private payers to lower annual health care spending and improve quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29756755

RESUMEN

Incentive-based pay is rational, intuitive, and popular. Agency theory tells us that a principal seeking to align its incentives with an agent's should be able to simply pay the agent to achieve the principal's desired results. Indeed, this strategy has long been used across diverse industries-from executive compensation to education, professional sports to public service-but with mixed results. Now a new convert to incentive compensation has appeared on the scene: the United States' behemoth health-care industry. In many ways, the incentive mismatch story is the same. Insurance companies and employers are concerned about constraining the cost of care, and patients are concerned about quality of care. Physicians lack an adequate financial incentive to pay attention to either. Health care's recent move away from the traditional fee-for-service compensation model to incentive pay is perhaps unsurprising. But there is a problem: mixed preliminary evidence and potential mal-effects on vulnerable third-party patients. This Article employs a new lens-the legal and behavioral literature on optimal contract specificity-to suggest why incentive pay is problematic and why the health-care experience will be no different than other industries. The use of incentive pay is a change in contractdrafting strategy, a decision to write a more detailed, control-based contract rather than one that relies on discretion. The contracts literature suggests that this strategy will only work well where simple compliance is the goal rather than creativity or innovation. The health industry will not succeed in implementing incentive pay better than other industries have. What it needs is to recognize the limits of incentive pay and implement it sparingly. The new Trump Administration may be particularly primed to heed this call.


Asunto(s)
Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos/organización & administración , Reembolso de Incentivo/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Humanos , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Médicos de Atención Primaria/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
6.
J Nurs Adm ; 47(2): 116-122, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28106682

RESUMEN

An organizational culture that reflects distrust, fear of reprisal, reluctance to challenge the status quo, acceptance of poor practice, denial, and lack of accountability creates significant issues in healthcare in relation to employee retention, burnout, organizational commitment, and patient safety. Changing culture is one of the most challenging endeavors an organization will encounter. We highlight that the Magnet Recognition Program® can be implemented as an organizational intervention to positively impact on nursing workplace culture in an international healthcare facility.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Competencia Profesional/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración , Australia , Benchmarking , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Cultura Organizacional
7.
Hum Resour Health ; 13: 67, 2015 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26268602

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization lists Kenya among African countries experiencing health workforce crisis catalysed through immigration, underproduction, inconsistent quality of production and unequal distribution. Strengthening health training institutions to increase production of high-quality health workers is acknowledged as a measure to mitigate the crisis.IntraHealth International's USAID-funded FUNZOKenya Project (2012-2017) undertook an assessment to identify the bottlenecks to increasing the number and quality of pre-service graduates in Kenya. The assessment, a cross-sectional descriptive study, collected data through structured respondent interviews among faculty, students in health training institutions, key informants and desk review. The assessment purposively selected 14 institutions from 18 institutions identified for initial collaboration with the project towards strengthening health workforce training. The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) application helped analyse quantitative data and quotes used to illustrate perceptions on the quality of curricula.The findings revealed major gaps in quality and adequacy of curricula in the training institutions. A national standard framework to guide curricula review process is lacking. Further, curricula did not adequately prepare students for clinical placement, as most failed to directly respond to national health needs. The study recommended reviews of curricula to ensure their responsiveness to emerging issues in the health sector, the formation of curriculum committees to review curricula, development of official curricula review standards and an integrated mechanism to disseminate policies and guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum/normas , Personal de Salud/educación , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Personal de Salud/normas , Prioridades en Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/normas , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Kenia , Masculino , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración
8.
Hum Resour Health ; 13: 9, 2015 Apr 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26264184

RESUMEN

This paper proposes approaches to break down the boundaries that reduce the ability of the health workforce to respond to population needs, or workforce flexibility. Accessible health services require sufficient numbers and types of skilled workers to meet population needs. However, there are several reasons that the health workforce cannot or does not meet population needs. These primarily stem from workforce shortages. However, the health workforce can also be prevented from responding appropriately and efficiently because of restrictions imposed by professional boundaries, funding models or therapeutic partitions. These boundaries limit the ability of practitioners to effectively diagnose and treat patients by restricting access to specific skills, technologies and services. In some cases, these boundaries not only reduce workforce flexibility, but they introduce inefficiencies in the form of additional clinical transactions and costs, further detracting from workforce responsiveness. Several new models of care are being developed to enhance workforce flexibility by enabling existing staff to work to their full scope of practice, extend their roles or by introducing new workers. Expanding on these concepts, this theoretical paper proposes six principles that have the potential to enhance health workforce flexibility, specifically: 1. Measure health system performance from the perspective of the patient. 2. Minimise training times. 3. Regulate tasks (competencies), not professions. 4. Match rewards and indemnity to the levels of skill and risk required to perform a particular task, not professional title. 5. Ensure that practitioners have all the skills they need to perform the tasks required to work in the environment in which they work 6. Enable practitioners to work to their full scope of practice delegate tasks where required These proposed principles will challenge some of the existing social norms around health-care delivery; however, many of these principles are already being applied, albeit on a small scale. This paper discusses the implications of these reforms. PROPOSED DISCUSSION POINTS: 1. Is person-centred care at odds with professional monopolies? 2. Should the state regulate professions and, by doing so, protect professional monopolies or, instead, regulate tasks or competencies? 3. Can health-care efficiency be enhanced by reducing the number of clinical transactions required to meet patient needs?


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/normas , Personal de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Salarios y Beneficios
9.
Bull World Health Organ ; 91(11): 853-63, 2013 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24347710

RESUMEN

Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) involves distributing resources, especially human resources for health (HRH), to match population needs. This paper explores the policy lessons on HRH from four countries that have achieved sustained improvements in UHC: Brazil, Ghana, Mexico and Thailand. Its purpose is to inform global policy and financial commitments on HRH in support of UHC. The paper reports on country experiences using an analytical framework that examines effective coverage in relation to the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality (AAAQ) of HRH. The AAAQ dimensions make it possible to perform tracing analysis on HRH policy actions since 1990 in the four countries of interest in relation to national trends in workforce numbers and population mortality rates. The findings inform key principles for evidence-based decision-making on HRH in support of UHC. First, HRH are critical to the expansion of health service coverage and the package of benefits; second, HRH strategies in each of the AAAQ dimensions collectively support achievements in effective coverage; and third, success is achieved through partnerships involving health and non-health actors. Facing the unprecedented health and development challenges that affect all countries and transforming HRH evidence into policy and practice must be at the heart of UHC and the post-2015 development agenda. It is a political imperative requiring national commitment and leadership to maximize the impact of available financial and human resources, and improve healthy life expectancy, with the recognition that improvements in health care are enabled by a health workforce that is fit for purpose.


Parvenir à la couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) implique la répartition des ressources, et en particulier des ressources humaines pour la santé (RHS), afin de répondre aux besoins de la population. Cet article étudie les leçons politiques sur les RHS de quatre pays ayant accompli des progrès durables en matière de CSU: le Brésil, le Ghana, le Mexique et la Thaïlande. Son but est d'informer sur les politiques globales et les engagements financiers dans les RHS visant à promouvoir la CSU.L'article décrit les expériences des pays à l'aide d'un cadre analytique examinant la couverture efficace par rapport à la disponibilité, l'accessibilité, l'acceptabilité et la qualité (DAAQ) des RHS. Les dimensions DAAQ permettent de réaliser une analyse de traçage des actions politiques en RHS depuis 1990 dans les quatre pays étudiés, par rapport aux tendances nationales des statistiques de main-d'oeuvre et des taux de mortalité de la population. Les résultats indiquent quels sont les principes clés pour la prise de décisions basées sur les faits sur les RHS visant à promouvoir la CSU. Premièrement, les RHS sont essentielles à l'expansion de la couverture des services de santé et de l'ensemble des avantages; deuxièmement, des stratégies RHS pour chacune des dimensions DAAQ favorisent collectivement les progrès vers une couverture efficace; et troisièmement, le succès est atteint à travers des partenariats impliquant des acteurs tant médicaux que non médicaux.Répondre aux défis sans précédent dans les domaines de la santé et du développement, qui concernent tous les pays, et transformer les faits RHS en politiques et en pratiques doivent être à la base du programme de CSU et de l'agenda de développement post-2015. C'est un impératif politique qui exige un engagement et un leadership nationaux pour optimiser l'impact des ressources financières et humaines disponibles et accroître l'espérance de vie en bonne santé, avec la reconnaissance que les progrès dans le domaine des soins de santé ne sont possibles qu'avec une main-d'oeuvre de santé adéquate.


Lograr una cobertura sanitaria universal implica una distribución de los recursos, en particular, de los recursos humanos para la salud (RHS), a fin de satisfacer las necesidades de la población. Este documento examina las lecciones sobre políticas relacionadas con los RHS de cuatro países que han conseguido avances ininterrumpidos en materia de cobertura sanitaria universal: Brasil, Ghana, México y Tailandia. Su objetivo consiste en exponer la política mundial y los compromisos financieros sobre RHS como ayuda para una cobertura sanitaria universal.El documento explica las experiencias de los países mencionados por medio de un marco de trabajo analítico que examina la eficacia de una cobertura en función de la disponibilidad, accesibilidad, aceptabilidad y calidad (DAAC) de los RHS. Los aspectos DAAC permiten llevar a cabo análisis de seguimiento sobre las acciones políticas relativas a los RHS desde 1990 en los cuatro países de interés en relación con las tendencias nacionales en el número de trabajadores y las tasas de mortalidad de la población.Los resultados muestran los principios fundamentales para la toma de decisiones basadas en pruebas científicas sobre los RHS como apoyo a una cobertura sanitaria universal. En primer lugar, los RHS son esenciales para expandir la cobertura de los servicios sanitarios y el conjunto de prestaciones. En segundo lugar, las estrategias RHS en cada uno de los aspectos DAAC respaldan de forma colectiva los logros en la eficacia de la cobertura y, en tercer lugar, los buenos resultados solo pueden conseguirse a través de la asociación de actores sanitarios y no sanitarios.Hacer frente a los desafíos sanitarios y de desarrollo sin precedentes que afectan a todos los países y traducir las pruebas científicas sobre RHS en políticas y prácticas deben convertirse en los puntos centrales de la cobertura sanitaria universal y de la agenda de desarrollo a partir del año 2015. Se trata de un imperativo político que requiere un compromiso y liderazgo nacionales para potenciar el impacto de los recursos financieros y humanos disponibles, y así mejorar la esperanza de vida saludable, sin olvidar que las mejoras en materia de asistencia sanitaria son posibles gracias a un personal sanitario apto para tal propósito.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Salud Global , Producto Interno Bruto , Gastos en Salud , Personal de Salud/educación , Personal de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/economía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/normas , Humanos , Políticas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración
10.
Bull World Health Organ ; 91(11): 881-5, 2013 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24347714

RESUMEN

Human resources for health (HRH) will have to be strengthened if universal health coverage (UHC) is to be achieved. Existing health workforce benchmarks focus exclusively on the density of physicians, nurses and midwives and were developed with the objective of attaining relatively high coverage of skilled birth attendance and other essential health services of relevance to the health Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, the attainment of UHC will depend not only on the availability of adequate numbers of health workers, but also on the distribution, quality and performance of the available health workforce. In addition, as noncommunicable diseases grow in relative importance, the inputs required from health workers are changing. New, broader health-workforce benchmarks - and a corresponding monitoring framework - therefore need to be developed and included in the agenda for UHC to catalyse attention and investment in this critical area of health systems. The new benchmarks need to reflect the more diverse composition of the health workforce and the participation of community health workers and mid-level health workers, and they must capture the multifaceted nature and complexities of HRH development, including equity in accessibility, sex composition and quality.


Les ressources humaines de la santé devront être renforcées pour pouvoir réaliser la couverture sanitaire universelle. Les points de référence existants des effectifs de santé se concentrent exclusivement sur la densité des médecins, infirmiers et sages-femmes, et ils ont été développés avec l'objectif d'atteindre une couverture relativement élevée des accouchements médicalisés et des autres services de santé essentiels qui sont importants pour la réalisation des objectifs du Millénaire pour le développement (OMD) de la santé. Cependant, la réalisation de la couverture sanitaire universelle ne dépendra pas seulement de la disponibilité d'un nombre approprié de professionnels de la santé, mais également de la distribution, de la qualité et de la performance des effectifs de santé disponibles. En outre, comme le nombre des maladies non transmissibles ne cesse de croître, les contributions requises de la part des professionnels de la santé sont en train de changer. Des points de référence nouveaux et plus larges des effectifs de santé ­ et un cadre de suivi correspondant ­ doivent donc être développés et inclus dans l'agenda pour la couverture sanitaire universelle afin de catalyser l'attention et les investissements dans ce domaine critique des systèmes de santé. Les nouveaux points de référence doivent refléter la composition plus diverse des effectifs de santé et la participation des agents sanitaires des collectivités et des agents sanitaires de niveau intermédiaire, et ils doivent saisir la nature polymorphe et la complexité du développement des ressources humaines de la santé, y compris en ce qui concerne l'équité dans l'accessibilité, la composition sexospécifique et la qualité.


Es fundamental fortalecer la acción de los recursos humanos en sanidad (RHS) para alcanzar la cobertura universal de la salud (CUS). Los parámetros de referencia actuales sobre el personal sanitario se centran exclusivamente en la densidad de médicos, enfermeros y comadronas, y se desarrollaron con el fin de alcanzar una cobertura relativamente alta de asistencia especializada durante el parto y otros servicios de salud esenciales, que fueran para lograr los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio (ODM). Sin embargo, la consecución de la cobertura universal de la salud no solo depende de la disponibilidad de un número adecuado de personal sanitario, sino también de la distribución, la calidad y el desempeño del personal sanitario disponible. Además, la contribución necesaria por parte del personal sanitario cambia a medida que la importancia de las enfermedades no transmisibles crece relativamente. Por lo tanto, es necesario desarrollar e incluir en el programa otros parámetros de referencia más amplios y actuales, así como su marco de seguimiento correspondiente, de modo que los trabajadores comunitarios de salud puedan catalizar la atención y la inversión en esta área clave del sistema sanitario. Los nuevos puntos de referencia deben reflejar la composición más plural del personal sanitario y la participación de los trabajadores comunitarios de salud, así como de los trabajadores sanitarios de nivel medio. De esta manera, deben captar las múltiples facetas y complejidades del desarrollo de los recursos humanos para sanidad, incluyendo la equidad en la accesibilidad, la composición por sexo y la calidad.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Técnicos Medios en Salud/educación , Técnicos Medios en Salud/organización & administración , Benchmarking , Competencia Clínica , Salud Global , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/normas , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/normas , Humanos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas
11.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 15: 1-14, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22712103

RESUMEN

Practice coaching, also called practice facilitation, assists physician practices with the desire to improve in such areas as patient access, chronic and preventive care, electronic medical record use, patient-centeredness, cultural competence, and team-building. This issue brief clarifies the essential features of practice coaching and offers guidance for health system leaders, public and private insurers, and federal and state policymakers on how best to structure and design these programs in primary care settings. Good-quality evidence demonstrates that practice coaching is effective. The authors argue that primary care delivery in the United States would benefit from a more systematic approach to the training and deployment of primary care practice coaches.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/métodos , Administración de la Práctica Médica/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Canadá , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Humanos , Países Bajos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Médicos de Familia/educación , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
12.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur ; 24(4): 284-99, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21938974

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Modern lifestyle changes led to increased dental care needs in India. Consequently, there has been a sharp rise in dentist numbers. Karnataka state alone produces 2,500 dentists annually, who are engaged in the non-government sector owing to inadequate public sector opportunities. This article aims to assess Karnataka private dental clinic quality and efficiency. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Dentists were interviewed using a close-ended, structured interview schedule and their clinics were assessed using a checklist adopted from guidelines for providing machinery and equipment under the National Oral Health Care Programme (NOHCP). Dental "hotel" and clinical quality were scored based on this checklist. FINDINGS: Clinical quality was "excellent" in 12 per cent of clinics and poor in 49 per cent. Clinics with better infrastructure charged higher price (p < 0.05). Multi-chair clinics charging fixed rates were high (81 per cent). According to 59.5 per cent of dentists, competition did not improve quality while 27 per cent felt that competition increased price, not quality. About 30.9 per cent of the poor quality clinics, 41 per cent average quality clinics and 26 per cent good quality clinics were technically efficient. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The multi chair clinics offered better quality at higher prices and single chair clinics provided poorer quality at lower prices. In other words, they had a sub-optimal price-quality mix. Therefore, there is a need to regulate price and quality in all clinics to arrive at an optimal price-quality mix so that clients are not overburdened financially even while receiving good quality dental care. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The article advocates that resources are used optimally as a way to achieve value for money and to achieve break-even points thereby providing quality care in a competitive market. Factors that influence dental practitioner behaviour are evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Dental/organización & administración , Competencia Económica/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Personal de Odontología/organización & administración , Odontólogos/organización & administración , Equipos y Suministros , Humanos , India , Sector Privado/organización & administración
13.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur ; 24(5): 366-88, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21916090

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The fundamental concern of this research study is to learn the quality and efficiency of U.S. healthcare services. It seeks to examine the impact of quality and efficiency on various stakeholders to achieve the best value for each dollar spent for healthcare. The study aims to offer insights on quality reformation efforts, contemporary healthcare policy and a forthcoming change shaped by the Federal healthcare fiscal policy and to recommend the improvement objective by comparing the U.S. healthcare system with those of other developed nations. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The US healthcare system is examined utilizing various data on recent trends in: spending, budgetary implications, economic indicators, i.e., GDP, inflation, wage and population growth. Process maps, cause and effect diagrams and descriptive data statistics are utilized to understand the various drivers that influence the rising healthcare cost. A proposed cause and effect diagram is presented to offer potential solutions, for significant improvement in U.S. healthcare. FINDINGS: At present, the US healthcare system is of vital interest to the nation's economy and government policy (spending). The U.S. healthcare system is characterized as the world's most expensive yet least effective compared with other nations. Growing healthcare costs have made millions of citizens vulnerable. Major drivers of the healthcare costs are institutionalized medical practices and reimbursement policies, technology-induced costs and consumer behavior. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Reviewing many articles, congressional reports, internet websites and related material, a simplified process map of the US healthcare system is presented. The financial process map is also created to further understand the overall process that connects the stakeholders in the healthcare system. Factors impacting healthcare are presented by a cause and effect diagram to further simplify the complexities of healthcare. This tool can also be used as a guide to improve efficiency by removing the "waste" from the system. Trend analyses are presented that display the crucial relationship between economic growth and healthcare spending. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: There are many articles and reports published on the US healthcare system. However, very few articles have explored, in a comprehensive manner, the links between the economic indicators and measures of the healthcare system and how to reform this system. As a result of the US healthcare system's complex structure, process map and cause-effect diagrams are utilized to simplify, address and understand. This study linked top-level factors, i.e., the societal, government policies, healthcare system comparison, potential reformation solutions and the enormity of the recent trends by presenting serious issues associated with U.S. healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Administración de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Administración de los Servicios de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Aseguradoras/economía , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Asistencia Médica/organización & administración , Errores Médicos/economía , Características de la Residencia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
14.
J Med Pract Manage ; 26(6): 371-3, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21815554

RESUMEN

The ever-changing environment of healthcare leads many practices to consider how they will control the cost of overhead, give access to their patients, and maintain or increase practice income. The solution may be to add a midlevel provider (MLP)--a Physician Assistant (PA) or Nurse Practitioner (NP)--to the staff. Both of these specialties train to see patients independently. The difference between a PA and an NP is the type of training and level of supervision required. The addition of an MLP can address many of the impending changes in healthcare, while increasing the quality and profitability of the practice. This article outlines the initial steps to take when adding an MLP to your practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Practicantes/organización & administración , Asistentes Médicos/organización & administración , Administración de la Práctica Médica/organización & administración , Ahorro de Costo , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Renta , Enfermeras Practicantes/economía , Asistentes Médicos/economía , Administración de la Práctica Médica/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
16.
Soins ; 66(853): 10-14, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33775293

RESUMEN

In a healthcare facility, the way in which health professionals envisage quality can explain the different levels of investment observed. Documentary research into the representations of quality among caregivers identified the human and regulatory dimensions which influence their engagement. It opens up prospects for the involvement of lead nurses for quality, trained in encouraging a change of perspectives and the appropriation of a quality culture.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración
19.
Br J Nurs ; 19(18): 1190-1, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20948477

RESUMEN

The quest to provide individuals with good quality health care has been a long-term goal in which the contribution of health professionals, specifically nurses, has been vital. However, over the years ever-increasing demands from both the government and the general public for higher levels of performance, combined with problems associated with the long-standing issue of staff shortages, and the constant drive for cost-effectiveness, has meant achieving this objective has become more difficult.


Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermería/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Medicina Estatal/organización & administración , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Innovación Organizacional , Defensa del Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Privacidad , Reino Unido
20.
Rural Remote Health ; 10(2): 1494, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20504050

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: In February 2008, a new partnership between Maine Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine was formed to create a model medical school program. ISSUE: Major forces for change included: the increasing physician workforce needs of Maine, the need to increase access for medical education for Maine students, the opportunity for educational innovation, the societal imperative to increase the number of primary care physicians, and the desire for clinical and research collaborations. LESSONS LEARNED: The authors describe the process for exploring this partnership, and establishing a separate track and campus for 36 students per year. The key components of the 4 year curriculum, which includes clinical training based in Maine, are described, and 13 lessons learned to date are outlined. The authors hope these lessons provide guidance to other academic medical centers and medical schools wishing to address rural physician workforce challenges, through regional models of medical education, and similar partnerships.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Maine , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA