Asunto(s)
Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Responsabilidad Legal , Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Errores Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mala Conducta Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Compensación y Reparación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conflicto de Intereses , Humanos , Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil/economía , Responsabilidad Legal/economía , Mala Praxis/economía , Errores Médicos/economía , Consejos de Especialidades/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The fundamental concern of this research study is to learn the quality and efficiency of U.S. healthcare services. It seeks to examine the impact of quality and efficiency on various stakeholders to achieve the best value for each dollar spent for healthcare. The study aims to offer insights on quality reformation efforts, contemporary healthcare policy and a forthcoming change shaped by the Federal healthcare fiscal policy and to recommend the improvement objective by comparing the U.S. healthcare system with those of other developed nations. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The US healthcare system is examined utilizing various data on recent trends in: spending, budgetary implications, economic indicators, i.e., GDP, inflation, wage and population growth. Process maps, cause and effect diagrams and descriptive data statistics are utilized to understand the various drivers that influence the rising healthcare cost. A proposed cause and effect diagram is presented to offer potential solutions, for significant improvement in U.S. healthcare. FINDINGS: At present, the US healthcare system is of vital interest to the nation's economy and government policy (spending). The U.S. healthcare system is characterized as the world's most expensive yet least effective compared with other nations. Growing healthcare costs have made millions of citizens vulnerable. Major drivers of the healthcare costs are institutionalized medical practices and reimbursement policies, technology-induced costs and consumer behavior. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Reviewing many articles, congressional reports, internet websites and related material, a simplified process map of the US healthcare system is presented. The financial process map is also created to further understand the overall process that connects the stakeholders in the healthcare system. Factors impacting healthcare are presented by a cause and effect diagram to further simplify the complexities of healthcare. This tool can also be used as a guide to improve efficiency by removing the "waste" from the system. Trend analyses are presented that display the crucial relationship between economic growth and healthcare spending. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: There are many articles and reports published on the US healthcare system. However, very few articles have explored, in a comprehensive manner, the links between the economic indicators and measures of the healthcare system and how to reform this system. As a result of the US healthcare system's complex structure, process map and cause-effect diagrams are utilized to simplify, address and understand. This study linked top-level factors, i.e., the societal, government policies, healthcare system comparison, potential reformation solutions and the enormity of the recent trends by presenting serious issues associated with U.S. healthcare.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Administración de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Administración de los Servicios de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Aseguradoras/economía , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Asistencia Médica/organización & administración , Errores Médicos/economía , Características de la Residencia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans AffairsAsunto(s)
Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil/normas , Mala Praxis/economía , Errores Médicos/economía , Médicos/economía , Humanos , Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil/economía , Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Errores Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Médicos/organización & administración , Gestión de Riesgos/economía , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/organización & administración , West VirginiaAsunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/economía , Errores Médicos/economía , Admisión y Programación de Personal/economía , Carga de Trabajo/normas , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Admisión y Programación de Personal/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Risk management strategies employed by capitated groups range from purchasing reinsurance to paying physicians to take risk management continuing medical education courses. While few groups have in-house risk management programs beyond reinsurance, a growing number of medical groups and IPAs are practicing passive forms of risk management.