The work of palliative care from the perspectives of district nurses: A qualitative study.

AIM: To explore the work of palliative care from the perspectives of district nurses with a focus on the strategies they use to achieve positive outcomes for patients. DESIGN: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: A combination of group and individual interviews using semi-structured interviewing were used to explore district nurses' views of providing palliative care across two large urban community nursing services. RESULTS: Sixteen district nurse participants were interviewed. Three key themes were identified: "Getting what was needed" involved finding solutions, selling a story and establishing relationships. District nurses sought ways to "Stay involved" recognizing the benefit of delaying discharge for some patients. "Completing a nursing task" was a way of managing time constraints and a form of self-protection from having difficult conversations. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of understanding the contextual nature of the practice setting in relation to the provision of palliative care. In doing so, it has revealed the strategies district nurses use to overcome the challenges associated with providing palliative care within a generalist workload. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: District nurses experience a tension between managing high patient workloads and remaining patient centred in palliative care. Being task focused is a way of remaining safe while managing a high volume of work and is not always a negative factor in the care they provide. However, focusing on a task while at the same time addressing other unmet needs requires a set of skills that less experienced nurses may not have. IMPACT: Palliative care education alone will not improve the quality of palliative care provided by generalist community district nurses. The practice context is an important factor to take into consideration when supporting the integration of palliative care in district nursing. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was made to this study. REPORTING METHOD: We have adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines and used the COREQ reporting method.

The role of healthcare leaders in implementing equitable clinical academic pathways for nurses: An integrative review.

AIM: To identify and synthesize empirical evidence on the role of healthcare leaders in the development of equitable clinical academic pathways for nurses. DESIGN: Integrative literature review. DATA SOURCES: Literature was searched using CINAHL, PubMed, ProQuest and Google Scholar databases. REVIEW METHODS: A total of 114 eligible articles published between 2010 and2022 were screened, 16 papers were selected. RESULTS: Results highlighted the need for consistent national, regional, and organizational policy approaches to developing clinical academic careers for nurses. Government health departments and National Health boards must focus on increasing engagement in research and evidence-based nursing practice for high-quality patient care. Discriminatory practices and attitudes were identified as barriers. Discrimination due to gender was evident, while the impact of race, ethnicity, and other social categories of identity are under-researched. Educational leaders must unravel misconceptions about research, highlighting its relevance to patient care and bedside nurses' work. Academic leaders together with executive nurses, research funders and professional nursing bodies must create appropriately remunerated career structures. Transformative approaches are required to develop the clinical academic nurse role and understand its value in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Multiple elements exist within complex systems that healthcare leaders can navigate collaboratively to develop and implement clinical nurse academic roles. This requires vision, acknowledgement of the value of nursing research and the importance of evidence-based research infrastructures. IMPACT: Findings highlight the collaborative role of healthcare leaders as critical to the success of critical academic careers for nurses. This review can inform those still to formalize this innovative role for nurses. REPORTING METHOD: The review complies with the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. This paper contributes evidence about the healthcare leader's role in developing clinical academic pathways for nurses to the wider global clinical community. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was included in this review.

Conceptualising relational care from an Indigenous Maori perspective: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the attributes of relational care from an Indigenous Maori healthcare consumer perspective. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL Plus, Ovid MEDLINE, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health, Scopus, New Zealand Index, the Ministry of Health Library, New Zealand Research and Google Scholar were searched between 23 and 30 May 2022. METHODS: This scoping review used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, thematic analysis and the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework for the synthesis of the findings. RESULTS: A total of 1449 records were identified, and 10 sources were selected for final review. We identified five relational attributes that were most important to Maori: (1) the expressive behaviours and characteristics of healthcare professionals (HCPs), (2) communication to facilitate the healthcare partnership, (3) appreciating differing worldviews, (4) the context in which healthcare is delivered and (5) whanaungatanga (meaningful relationships). CONCLUSION: The relational attributes identified are inextricably linked. Connecting with HCPs and developing a therapeutic relationship is fundamental to improving consumer experience and engagement with mainstream healthcare services. Whanaungatanga is fundamental to meaningful engagements with HCPs. Future research should explore how relational care is practiced in acute care settings when clinician-consumer interactions are time-limited, examine how the health system influences the capacity for relational care and how Indigenous and Western paradigms can co-exist in healthcare. IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review can inform future projects addressing health equity for Indigenous communities by creating environments that prioritise culturally safe relational care and value Indigenous knowledge systems. REPORTING METHOD: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

The meaning of rapport for patients, families, and healthcare professionals: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Rapport is considered fundamental to clinical relationships but is a concept which is rarely defined. This review explores how rapport is defined, characterised, and operationalised in healthcare. METHODS: A scoping review methodology was used. Data were synthesised using thematic analysis. The review process adhered to the Preferred Reporting System for Meta-Analysis for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). RESULTS: Medline, CINAHL, and psychINFO were searched with thirty-four studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results were presented in two themes: The meanings of rapport and the implications for building rapport. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review found rapport has no commonly shared definition or conceptualisation in the reviewed research. At the same time rapport is operationalised and characterised. Factors that facilitate, and hinder rapport-building were identified. Having a consistently used definition and conceptualisation will benefit the research that is needed into patient and family experiences and outcomes of rapport. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is crucial for health professionals to incorporate simple kind gestures into practice to facilitate rapport. Equally it is necessary for health professionals to review their practice for dismissive, avoiding behaviours that impede rapport-building and consider how they spend their time with patients.