Gender Representation by Specialty Track at Surgical Meetings: The American and Australasian Experiences.

BACKGROUND: We compared the representation of women panelists at two large, general interest surgical meetings: the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Scientific Congress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed comprehensive analyses of panels and panelists at ACS and RACS meetings (2013-2018). Manual review was conducted to determine counts and proportions of invited panelists by gender. We made within- and between-meeting comparisons regarding gender representation by specialty track. Tracks were characterized after our review of meeting programs. RESULTS: There were 4542 panelists and 1390 panels at RACS from 2013 to 2018. At ACS, there were 3363 panelists over 693 panels. The specialty tracks with the highest proportion of men-only panels were transplant (75%) and cardiothoracic (63%) at ACS and cardiothoracic (83%) and multidisciplinary (81%) at RACS. The lowest proportions of men-only panels were in breast and pediatric surgery at ACS (5% and 11%, respectively) and breast and rural surgery at RACS (24% and 36%, respectively). At ACS, the highest proportions of women panelists were on panels in breast (63%) and endocrine surgery (48%) and in breast (44%) and rural surgery (33%) at RACS, while the lowest proportion of women panelists were in transplant (10%) and cardiothoracic (14%) at ACS and multidisciplinary (8%) and cardiothoracic (7%) at RACS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a persistent difference in gender representation at surgical meetings, particularly within certain subspecialties. Program chairs and committees could increase the proportion of women by focusing on who serves as panelists overall and within specialty tracks.

Women in German Neurosurgery: Status and Representation at Annual National Meetings.

BACKGROUND: Few women have ascended the professional-academic ladder to become chairs of German neurosurgical departments. Indeed, only 2 out of 36 current departmental heads are female. This study aims to assess the current representation and role of women in German neurosurgery and to identify indicators of how these aspects will progress. METHODS: National statistics concerning the gender distribution of neurosurgery specialists over the past 20 y and the gender distribution across DGNC (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie - German Society of Neurosurgery) membership grades from 2016 to 2018 were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office and the DGNC, respectively. Additionally, the programmes of DGNC annual meetings from 2015 to 2018 were evaluated to determine the number of presentations and speaking time awarded to male and female presenters. RESULTS: In 2017, 19% of neurosurgical specialists were female. In the same year, overall 13% of the members of the DGNC were female. There were a higher proportion of females among extraordinary members. In the last 4 y, females were overall responsible for less than a third of presentations at the annual DGNC meetings. There was also a decrease of female participation from 2015 to 2018, with regard to both overall amount of presentations and speaking time. Female participation was overall higher for presentation types typically associated with lower academic and clinical positions and which cover shorter speaking times. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, which has one of Europe's largest neurosurgical communities, female neurosurgeons remain a minority. Structured programmes to support gender equality and diversity could facilitate the rise of women to senior positions and close the gender gap.

Extending a Hand: Increasing Diversity at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess diversity among American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) members, ASSH annual meeting attendees, and ASSH annual meeting presenters from 2010 to 2016. We hypothesized that over the past 7 years, the ASSH has seen an increase in diversity in its membership, annual meeting attendance, and presenters. METHODS: Detailed demographic data for membership, annual meeting attendance, and annual meeting presenters were obtained from the ASSH for a 7-year period (2010-2016). The proportion of women, underrepresented minorities (URM), and nationality of members, attendees, and presenters was compared over the 7 years to assess trends and differences. RESULTS: Membership in ASSH has increased 30.0% over the past 7 years. Whereas United States membership increased by 113 members annually, international membership increased by 53 members annually, reflecting a 136% total increase. The percentage of women and URM attending the annual meeting is higher than the that of women and URM members. There have been increases in the number of women, URM, and international members over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Over the study period, the ASSH membership has seen increases in women and URM representation. International membership has seen substantial growth. In addition, meeting attendance by international members has increased, particularly since implementation of the guest nation program. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Women and URM make up an increasing percentage of ASSH members. International members and presenters have also increased. Although diversity has improved over the past several years, the ASSH should continue to efforts toward greater inclusion and representation.

Assessing Contemporary Trends in Female Speakership within Urologic Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multidisciplinary female representation at urologic oncology conferences, we reviewed speakership trends at contemporary Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Symposium (GU-ASCO) annual meetings. METHODS: Meeting programs from SUO and GU-ASCO from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. Biographical information was determined by querying institutional websites and social/professional media platforms. Statistical analyses were performed to assess for differences and relationships between male and female authorship based on gender, specialty, professional, and educational factors. RESULTS: We identified 1102 speakers at genitourinary oncology conferences. Overall, 222 (20%) were female. There was no significant difference between female speakership rates at SUO and GU-ASCO. The overall proportion of female speakers increased over time, but not when analyzing each individual subspecialty conference separately. Several professional and educational differences were noted between genders. Female speakers were more likely to be medical oncologists (P <.001), have more recent years of graduation (2001 vs 1996, P <.001), hold an additional advanced degree (OR 2.09, P = .005), and speak in sessions where other women served as chair (OR 1.42, P = .044). Conversely, female speakers had lower odds of delivering a plenary or keynote address (OR 0.28, P = .015). CONCLUSION: We identified a significantly positive trend towards increased female representation within contemporary genitourinary conferences over time; these trends did not remain significant when analyzing each meeting separately. Several important disparities between men and women speakers were identified. Our data suggests that inclusion of women in planning committees may help reduce gender bias and promote diversity within urologic oncology.

Is there a glass ceiling at national trauma meetings?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the roles of women at national trauma meetings. METHODS: Available scientific programs for the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2013-19), Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2010-19), and Western Trauma Association (2010-19) as well as the Scudder Oration at the American College of Surgeons (1963-2019), were reviewed for names of participants and categorized by gender. RESULTS: Women made up 963 of 2746 (35.1%) of presenters, 252 of 1020 (24.7%) of discussants, 116 of 622 (18.6%) of moderators of scientific sessions, 189 of 707 (26.7%) of panelists, and 69 of 254 (27.2%) of panel moderators. Only 12 of 126 (9.5%) of named lectures or presidential addresses were given by women. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of female named speakers suggests that there remains a "glass ceiling" when it comes to upper-level participation in national trauma meetings.

Who is at the Podium? Women Urologist Speakers at Recent AUA Meetings.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the representation of women urologists as invited speakers at the AUA Annual Meeting. METHODS: Programs for the AUA Annual Meeting were reviewed from 2017 to 2019. Topics of sessions and genders of moderators and panelists were collected. Percentages of women urologists as well as topics of sessions were compared between years. RESULTS: Women urologists comprised 60 of 467 moderators (12.8%) and 63 of 614 panelists (10.3%). Sessions about infection had the most women urologist moderators while oncology had the least. Sessions about FPMRS has the most women urologists as panelists. Male urologists were more likely to be full professors compared to women urologists. While the percentage of female panelists fluctuated, the percentage of female moderators decreased each year. CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of women to men in urology is increasing, the number and proportion of woman urologist panelists and moderators at the annual AUA meeting does not reflect this trend. It is important to recognize and correct this discrepancy, as well as to increase visibility of women and others underrepresented in the field.

Representation of women plenary speakers at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women have been equitably represented among plenary speakers at the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Annual Meeting by counting and categorizing speakers and comparing outcomes to AAN membership and US neurology workforce data. METHODS: Lists of plenary speakers between 1958 and 2019 (62 years) were obtained from the AAN. The primary outcome measures were numbers and proportions of men and women in aggregate and among physicians. RESULTS: We identified 635 plenary speakers, including 148 (23.3%) women. Specifically, women made up 14.6% (19 of 130) of presidential and 25.5% (129 of 505) of nonpresidential plenary session speakers. The inclusion of women plenary speakers was meaningfully higher (h = 0.33; difference 14.9%; 95% confidence interval 4.2%-26.7%) for nonphysicians (27 of 74 [36.5%]) than physicians (121 of 561 [21.6%]). Although at zero levels for Annual Meetings held between 1958 and 1990 and at mostly low but varying levels thereafter, the representation of women and women physicians has been at or above their proportions in the AAN membership and US neurology workforce since 2017. Comparison of representation by plenary session name revealed an unequal distribution of women, with women physicians concentrated in the Sidney Carter Award in Child Neurology presidential session. CONCLUSION: Historically and recently, women and women physicians were underrepresented among AAN plenary speakers. As the AAN has taken active steps to address equity, women have been included in more representative proportions overall. However, notable gaps remain, especially in specific prestigious plenary sessions, and further research is needed to determine causality.

Gender Representation at Neurological Surgery Conferences.

BACKGROUND: Women constitute a minority (9.2%) of academic neurosurgeons. We previously found that women in academic medicine are disadvantaged in funding and career advancement opportunities. We hypothesized that women are also underrepresented at neurosurgical society conferences. METHODS: Programs from the 2014-2018 meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), American Association of Neurological Surgery (AANS), and North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) were analyzed. Demographic data, including name, gender, and geographic region of practice, were collected for speaker, moderator, or leadership positions. χ2 statistical analysis was performed for difference in gender representation across all opportunity spots. RESULTS: In the period 2014-2018, there was no female presidents or honored guest at any academic meetings analyzed; 53.8% of executive committees comprised all men. Women often constituted a minority (<15%) of speakers and moderators at CNS, AANS, and NASBS meetings: speakers (% female, range), 8.6 (5.5-11.7), 13.6 (10.1-19.7), and 10.5 (5.6-16.6); moderators (% female, range), 7.8 (0-14.3), 23.0 (81.3-91.3), and 13.0 (8.6-18.7). Conference panels frequently comprised all men (58% CNS, 20.7% AANS, 61% NASBS). χ2 analysis found a disparity in male and female participation across all opportunity spots (P = 0.002). Additionally, female participants are often repeated, decreasing total number of unique women participating. There was no significant increase in female participation across the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In 2014-2018, underrepresentation of women in national neurosurgical conferences either matched or exceeded the baseline gender disparity seen in academic neurosurgery. We discussed potential causes of and strategies to address these findings.