RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies on potential disruptions in rich club structure in nursing staff with occupational burnout are lacking. Moreover, existing studies on nurses with burnout are limited by their cross-sectional design. PURPOSE: To investigate rich club reorganization in nursing staff before and after the onset of burnout and the underlying impact of anatomical distance on such reconfiguration. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, longitudinal. POPULATION: Thirty-nine hospital nurses ( 23.67 ± 1.03 years old at baseline, 24.67 ± 1.03 years old at a follow-up within 1.5 years, 38 female). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo and gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequences at 3.0 T. ASSESSMENT: The Maslach Burnout Inventory and Symptom Check-List 90 testing were acquired at each MRI scan. Rich club structure was assessed at baseline and follow-up to determine whether longitudinal changes were related to burnout and to changes in connectivities with different anatomical distances (short-, mid-, and long range). STATISTICAL TESTS: Chi-square, paired-samples t, two-sample t, Mann-Whitney U tests, network-based statistic, Spearman correlation analysis, and partial least squares regression analysis. Significance level: Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.05 . RESULTS: In nurses who developed burnout: 1) Strengths of rich club, feeder, local, short-, mid-, and long-range connectivities were significantly decreased at follow-up compared with baseline. 2) At follow-up, strengths of above connectivities and that between A5m.R and dlPu.L were significantly correlated with emotional exhaustion (r ranges from -0.57 to -0.73) and anxiety scores (r = -0.56), respectively. 3) Longitudinal change (follow-up minus baseline) in connectivity strength between A5m.R and dlPu.L reflected change in emotional exhaustion score (r = 0.87). Longitudinal changes in strength of connectivities mainly involving parietal lobe were significantly decreased in nurses who developed burnout compared with those who did not. DATA CONCLUSION: In nurses after the onset of burnout, rich club reorganization corresponded to significant reductions in strength of connectivities with different anatomical distances. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Humanos , Esgotamento Profissional/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Estudos TransversaisRESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate whether implementing structured reporting based on Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses improves communication between radiologists, referrers, and patients/caregivers and enhances diagnostic performance for determining adnexal malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively issued MRI reports in 2019-2022 performed for characterizing adnexal masses before and after implementing O-RADS MRI; 56 patients/caregivers and nine gynecologic oncologists ("referrers") were surveyed about report interpretability/clarity/satisfaction; responses for pre- and post-implementation reports were compared using Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: A total of 123 reports from before and 119 reports from after O-RADS MRI implementation were included. Survey response rates were 35.7% (20/56) for patients/caregivers and 66.7% (6/9) for referrers. For patients/caregivers, O-RADS MRI reports were clearer (p < 0.001) and more satisfactory (p < 0.001) than unstructured reports, but interpretability did not differ significantly (p = 0.14), as 28.0% (28/100) of postimplementation and 38.0% (38/100) of preimplementation reports were considered difficult to interpret. For referrers, O-RADS MRI reports were clearer, more satisfactory, and easier to interpret (p < 0.001); only 1.3% (1/77) were considered difficult to interpret. For differentiating benign from malignant adnexal lesions, O-RADS MRI showed area under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.99), sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-0.95), and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96). Diagnostic performance of reports before implementation could not be calculated due to many different phrases used to describe the likelihood of malignancy. CONCLUSION: Implementing standardized structured reporting using O-RADS MRI for characterizing adnexal masses improved clarity and satisfaction for patients/caregivers and referrers. Interpretability improved for referrers but remained limited for patients/caregivers.
Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos , Neoplasias , Médicos , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças dos Anexos/patologia , Radiologistas , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) is highly transmissible and pathogenic. Patients with mild cases account for the majority of those infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although there is evidence that many patients with COVID-19 have varying degrees of attentional impairment, little is known about how SARS-COV-2 affects attentional function. This study included a high-risk healthcare population divided into groups of healthcare workers (HCWs) with mild COVID-19 (patient group, n = 45) and matched healthy HCWs controls (HC group, n = 42), who completed general neuropsychological background tests and Attention Network Test (ANT), and underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) using amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) to assess altered brain activity; Selective impairment occurred in orienting and executive control networks, but not in alert network, in the patient group, and widespread cognitive impairment encompassing general attention, memory, and executive dysfunction. Moreover, the patient group had significantly lower ALFF values in the left superior and left middle frontal gyri than the HC group. SARS-COV-2 infection may have led to reduced brain activity in the left superior and left middle frontal gyri, thus impairing attentional orienting and executive control networks, which may explain the development of attentional deficits after COVID-19.
Assuntos
Atenção , Encéfalo , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Humanos , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Feminino , Adulto , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Atenção/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disfunção Cognitiva/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Mapeamento Encefálico/métodosRESUMO
Studies have demonstrated that the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) extensively affects brain function. Although cognitive dysfunction is considered a common manifestation in COVID-19 patients during the recovery period, the potential changes in decision-making ability, are not yet clear. Decision-making functions are essential to the work of healthcare workers. However, there is a lack of a multidimensional assessment of its functioning in COVID-19 cases. Here, we used tests combined with the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) stabilization feature amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) to explore decision-making behavior and brain neural activity changes in healthcare workers after mild COVID-19. Participants were divided into the SARS-CoV-2 infected group (SI, n = 41) and healthy controls (HC, n = 42). All participants underwent a series of neuropsychological tests. They performed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Game of Dice Task (GDT), followed by fMRI (n = 20) to assess their decision-making ability under ambiguous and risky conditions and changes in brain neural activity. The SI group performed worse in verbal memory than the HC group. Furthermore, the SI group performed worse in the IGT, whereas no significant difference was observed in the GDT. In addition, rs-fMRI showed enhanced spontaneous neural activity in the postcentral gyrus and inferior parietal lobe in the SI group compared to the HC group.