Health care professionals' experiences of pain management in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study.

Despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines for the assessment and management of pain in the critical care setting, the prevalence of acute pain remains high. Inadequate pain management is associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced capacity for rehabilitation and long-term psychological sequelae. This study aimed to describe the experiences of pain management from healthcare professionals working in intensive care units. Healthcare professionals were recruited from intensive care units in London, UK using a purposive sampling technique. Semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis technique. Thirty participants were recruited from eight diverse intensive care units. Five themes were identified. First, there was a lack of consensus in pain assessment in the ICU where nursing staff described more knowledge and confidence of validated pain measures than physicians, and concerns over validity and usability were raised. Second, there was a universal perception of resource availability impacting the quality of pain management including high clinical workload, staff turnover and availability of certain pain management techniques. Third, acknowledgement of the importance of pain management was highest in those with experience of interacting with critical care survivors. Fourth, participants described their own emotional reaction to managing those in pain which influenced their learning. Finally, there was a perception that, due to the complexity of the intensive care unit population, pain was de-prioritised and there were conflicting views as to whether standardised analgosedation algorithms were useful. This study provides evidence to suggest interdisciplinary training, collaboratively designed decision-making tools, prioritisation initiatives and research priorities are areas that could be targeted to improve pain management in critical care.

The Use and Perceptions of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale by Nursing Personnel.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Office of the US Army Surgeon General recommended the Veterans Administration (VA) assess pain using the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). One item in the DVPRS is for measuring pain intensity. This item contains a combination of five response metrics: categories, faces, colors, numbers, and functional descriptors. A few studies have supported patients' and health care providers' preferences for the DVPRS and its psychometric properties. However, they also left uncertainties about its usability and validity. AIMS: To advance our understanding of the DVPRS, this study examined the use and perceptions of the DVPRS' pain intensity item by nursing personnel during multi-modal care. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey design was used. SETTING: VA Community Living Center. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing personnel. METHODS: Nursing personnel answered closed- and open-ended survey questions during a single session. RESULTS: Nursing personnel reported sufficient training before implementing the measure and that patients primarily used the numeric metric. When patients used a non-numeric metric, the nursing personnel responded in variable ways. In addition, the nursing personnel interpreted the functional descriptors differently. The nursing personnel also noted the need to supplement the pain intensity item with patients' pain duration and pain location. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study inform the nursing community about the DVPRS' pain intensity item, which combines multiple response metrics. The results support the need for nursing units to generate and standardize procedures for using the item to measure multi-site pain and for interpreting and documenting patients' non-numeric responses. The effects of such procedures on the measure's usability and psychometric properties warrants additional investigation.

Determination of Pain-Related Knowledge and Behaviors of Adult Intensive Care Nurses.

AIM: To determine the knowledge and attitudes of adult intensive care nurses regarding pain. METHOD: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 196 nurses working in the intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital between June 2022 and September 2022. Data were collected by face-to-face interview method, and the "Personal Information Form" and "Nurses' Knowledge and Attitude Scale Regarding Pain" were used as data collection tools. RESULTS: About 71.8% of the nurses were between the ages of 18 and 30, 58.5% were women, 54.9% had a bachelor's degree, and 55.1% had been working in intensive care for 0-5 years. The nurses' total knowledge and attitude score levels were 11.8% inadequate, 64.1% moderate, and 24.1% good. A statistically significant relationship was found between age, gender, receiving training on pain in the institution, satisfaction level with the unit in which one works, frequency of pain assessment and indicators taken into consideration when evaluating pain severity, and the total scale score average (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The average pain knowledge and attitude scores of intensive care nurses are at a good level. Results can be further improved with planned training on pain.

Factors related to nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia.

AIM: To evaluate registered nurses' beliefs and related factors regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia. DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between July 2022 and April 2023. METHODS: An online survey comprised of demographics, knowledge scale, and beliefs scale relating to pain assessment in dementia was distributed to registered nurses (RNs) caring for people living with dementia in Australia. RESULTS: RNs (N = 131) completed the survey. Most respondents were females (87.0%) and self-identified as Caucasian (60.3%). The mean beliefs score was 72.60 (±6.39) out of a maximum possible score of 95. RNs' beliefs about pain assessment varied based on their education, dementia pain assessment knowledge, nursing experience, and ethnicity. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed factors significantly related to the beliefs score (i.e. education and dementia pain assessment knowledge). CONCLUSION: The relationship between education and knowledge, and the beliefs score indicates the potential to improve RNs' knowledge and overcome their erroneous beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Education and training in assessing pain in people living with dementia should be tailored to overcome RNs' misconceived beliefs. These programmes should be integrated into continuous learning programmes. IMPACT: Some RNs' beliefs about pain assessment in dementia were not evidence-based, and knowledge and educational status were the strongest factors related to RNs' beliefs. RNs' erroneous beliefs about pain assessment in dementia need to be addressed to improve pain assessment and management. Researchers should explore the potential of educational interventions to overcome RNs' misconceived beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. REPORTING METHOD: This study was reported adhering to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: RNs caring for people living with dementia participated as survey respondents. Additionally, RNs were involved in the pre-testing of the study's survey instrument.

A Cross-Sectional Survey on Pain Management in Dermal Filler Injections from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers injection is a common procedure in patients with cosmetic needs. Concomitant pain is a major complaint among patients undergoing HA filler injections. Relevant research is limited and there is no consensus on pain management of dermal filler injection. OBJECTIVES: To assist physicians in determining a more appropriate treatment approach, and to better provide treatment suggestions. METHODS: A nationwide (China) cross-sectional survey was conducted using questionnaires designed for physicians and patients, respectively. A total of 62 semi-structured questionnaires were administered to aesthetic physicians via face-to-face interview, whereas 123 online-based questionnaires were collected from patients who have ever undergone HA treatment. The collected questionnaire information was analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. RESULTS: 42 (67.74%) physicians observed that over 50% of their patients were concerned about pain during injection. 101 (82.11%) of patients were concerned about impending pain ≥5 points (a total score is 10) before injection. For preferred pain relief modalities, 48 (77.42%) physicians would choose a hyaluronic acid dermal filler with lidocaine, and 82 (66.67%) patients would choose anesthetic-containing products. 59 (95.16%) physicians who injected lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid found patients had a comfortable treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: Pain management during hyaluronic acid dermal fillers injection is important from both perspectives of physicians and patients. This survey showed that compared with other analgesic methods, lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid has offered a more satisfying experience. It also provides insights to physicians and patients in pain management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Similarities and Differences of Nurse-Postoperative Patient Dyads' Attitudes, Social Norms, and Behaviors Regarding Pain and Pain Management.

PURPOSE: Pain is an expected symptom in surgical patients, despite advances in pharmacology, surgical procedures, and perioperative care. The aim of this study was to examine the similarities and differences between nurse-postoperative patient dyads of the same or differing cultures/ethnicities with regard to perceptions, social norms, and behaviors related to pain and pain management. DESIGN: This was a descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: The sample consisted of six nurses (2 Hispanic, 2 Black, 2 Caucasian) and 12 patients of the same and different culture/ethnicity than their nurse) on a postoperative unit within 48 hours of surgery. A structured interview guide was developed to explore the attitudes, social norms, and behaviors of nurses related to pain and pain management, and a separate interview guide was developed for postoperative patients. All transcripts were analyzed and coded using Carini's principles. FINDINGS: Nurses used the pain scale to quantify pain intensity but did not conduct a comprehensive pain assessment. Nurses were concerned about opioid side effects and addiction and hesitated to provide opioids after the first postoperative day. Patients expected complete and immediate pain relief, with no worry about short-term opioid use. Patients did not believe that culture played a role in their care, but nurses were more comfortable caring for patients from the same cultural background. The use of complementary and nonpharmacologic pain management techniques was not well known by nurses and patients, but should be used in conjunction with medications. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing education stresses cultural competence, but nurses emphasize "treating all patients the same," which creates a cognitive dissonance, with implications for education. Nurses should conduct a comprehensive pain assessment to inform pain management and nonpharmacologic and complementary therapies should be available on the postoperative unit.

Assessment of the concordance between DN4 scores performed by the patient (self-assessment) or by the physician (hetero-assessment) to detect subacute neuropathic postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Centres dedicated to chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) have been developed, but delays for accessing to it are generally long. Teleconsultation might be a means to facilitate access to care by allowing an initial triage. CPSPs are neuropathic pain in around half of the cases and their diagnosis is mainly based on the score obtained from validated questionnaires. Among them, those requiring a neurological examination (i.e. the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions [DN4]) have a better sensitivity and specificity, and should be preferred. However, effectiveness of a remote neurological examination remains to be established. The aim of this observational study is to check during a face-to-face consultation if, after a short training, a naïve patient is capable to self-assess the clinical signs of neuropathic sensations. METHODS: Thirty patients with suspected neuropathic pain were seen in a face-to-face postoperative pain consultation. Before examination, the patient was instructed to fill the DN4 questionnaire, including the neurological examination. Once explanations were given and checked, the patient was left and completed it alone. Then, the pain physician performed the DN4 questionnaire. Inter-rater reliability between patient and pain physician was assessed for each item and for DN4 score with the Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: For each item of the DN4 questionnaire, Kappa coefficients were between 0.74 and 1, and could be considered as excellent. For DN4 ≥ 4, the Kappa coefficient was 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that after a short training, a naïve patient is capable of recognizing and diagnosing symptoms of neuropathic pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that self-assessment, carried out after brief training and using a simple tool, provides results comparable to those obtained by a specialist physician to diagnose symptoms of neuropathic pain. If the results of the current study are confirmed on a larger scale, self-assessment will help improve access to specialized chronic pain care by better orienting patients and opening up access to teleconsultations.

A dor como 5º sinal vital: atuação da equipe de enfermagem no hospital privado com gestão do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) / Pain as 5th vital sign: role of the nursing staff in a private hospital with management of Basic Health Unit

Objetivo - Classificar a dor como 5º sinal vital sugere que sua avaliação seja automática, como outros sinais vitais. Sendo necessário que a equipe de enfermagem seja conhecedora de sua responsabilidade frente ao paciente com dor, avaliando, fazendo intervenções adequadas. O objetivo do estudo foi verificar se a dor é abordada sistematicamente como 5º sinal vital. Métodos - Trata-se de pesquisa do tipo descritiva, exploratória, correlacional com abordagem quantitativa na unidade de clinica médica de um hospital privado com gestão do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), de uma cidade do interior de São Paulo. Os sujeitos foram 50 pacientes e 50 membros da equipe de enfermagem que concordaram em participar da pesquisa. Foram utilizados quatro instrumentos para coleta de dados, dois para os pacientes e dois para a equipe de enfermagem. Resultados - Os resultados apontaram uma população predominante do sexo masculino com internação em clinica cirúrgica, evidenciou-se que eles consideram que são prontamente atendidos quando estão com dor, porém nunca foram avaliados sistematicamente.A equipe de enfermagem teve predominância pelo sexo feminino, auxiliares e técnicos de enfermagem, com média de tempo de formado de 5 anos, relatam que atendem prontamente o paciente com dor, o método mais utilizado para a avaliação da dor é o relato verbal, somente 52% a avalia juntamente com os SSVV. Conclusões - As instituições devem treinar e/ou criar comissões para o controle da dor, mostrando a importância de sua verificação junto com os SSVV diversas vezes ao dia, evitando o sofrimento do paciente.

Objective - Rating pain as the 5th vital sign suggests that pain assessment is automatic, as well as other vital signs. There is need for the nursing staff is cognizant of its responsibility towards the patient with pain, evaluating, making appropriate interventions to alleviate it and providing humane treatment. The aim of this study was to determine if the pain is addressed systematically as the 5th vital sign. Methods - This is a type of descriptive research, exploratory, correlational and quantitative approach to an emergency medical clinic of a private hospital with management of Basic Health Unit, a city in the interior of São Paulo. The subjects were 50 patients and 50 members of the nursing staff who agreed to participate. We used four instruments to collect data for two patients and two to the nursing staff. Results - Results show that the population is predominantly male, with internment in clinical, surgical instrument used in patients showed that they consider that they are readily seen when they are in pain, but have never been systematically evaluated in relation to the size of this pain. The nursing staff was predominantly adult female assistants and nursing technicians, with an average length of education for 5 years, report that readily meets the patient in pain, however, the predominant method of pain assessment is the verbal report, only 52% rate the pain along with the SSVV. Conclusions - The institutions should train and / or set up committees for pain control, thus showing the importance of verifying the pain along with the SSVV several times a day, this way the medical staff can determine the correct medication and dosage for the treatment adequate pain, avoiding the suffering of the patient.