Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Substitution of hospital care with Primary Care Plus: differences in referral patterns according to specialty, specialist and diagnosis group.
Smeele, Paul; Kroese, Mariëlle E A L; Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D; Ruwaard, Dirk.
Afiliación
  • Smeele P; Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. p.smeele@amc.nl.
  • Kroese MEAL; Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Spreeuwenberg MD; Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Ruwaard D; Research Centre for Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
BMC Fam Pract ; 20(1): 81, 2019 06 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31185921
BACKGROUND: Primary Care Plus (PC+) is an intervention where patients consult specialists in a primary care setting outside the hospital. Two facilities have been founded in the city of Maastricht, the Netherlands. Main aim is to achieve substitution of hospital care with primary care and hence reduce costs. The objective of this study is to evaluate referral patterns per specialty, specialist and diagnosis group, as input for deliberations to optimise substitution. METHODS: Prospectively collected referral data after PC+ consultations between November 2014 and March 2016 was analysed for eight participating specialties. Primary outcomes were differences in referral patterns per specialty, specialist and diagnosis group. Absolute counts and percentages were recorded for categorical variables, means and standard deviations for continuous variables. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: In total 4536 patients were seen in PC+; 3132 (69.0%) were referred back to the general practitioner (GP), whereas 1275 (28.1%) were referred to secondary care. Referral information of 130 (2.9%) patients was unknown. Large differences in referral numbers to secondary care after PC+ consultation were found between specialties (from 8.6% (gynaecology) to 43.8% (orthopaedic surgery)), specialists (14.5 to 65.2%) and diagnosis groups (11.1 to 93.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation in referral numbers to secondary care between specialties, specialists and diagnosis groups exists after PC+ consultations. This data indicates that deliberation and further research is needed in order to optimize substitution initiatives like PC+.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Derivación y Consulta / Especialización / Atención Secundaria de Salud / Atención a la Salud / Médicos Generales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Fam Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Derivación y Consulta / Especialización / Atención Secundaria de Salud / Atención a la Salud / Médicos Generales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Fam Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos