Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review.
Marasinghe, Keshini Madara; Chaurasia, Ashok; Adil, Maisha; Liu, Qian Yue; Nur, Teeyaa Ibrahim; Oremus, Mark.
Afiliación
  • Marasinghe KM; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Chaurasia A; Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Adil M; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Liu QY; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Nur TI; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Oremus M; UBC Hospital, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 897, 2022 11 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36424533
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the impact of assistive devices on the life satisfaction of (Research Question 1), and informal caregiving hours received by (Research Question 2), community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus from database inception to March 2022. For each question, two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted and narratively synthesized the data, and assessed article quality and strength of evidence. RESULTS: Of the 1391 citations screened, we found two articles pertaining to each question, for a total of four articles. In general, assistive device use was not associated with life satisfaction, while it was positively associated with informal caregiving hours. However, the risk of bias was serious across the two studies for Research Question 1, and the overall quality of evidence was "very low". The risk of bias was not serious across the two studies included in Research Question 2 and the overall quality of evidence was "low". CONCLUSION: Due to the scarcity of studies, the limitations of existing studies (i.e., risk of bias), and the evidence being low or very low quality, we could not draw firm conclusions about the associations of interest. Additional research will produce a better understanding of the two relationships and provide further evidence to inform policy decisions regarding the provision and funding of assistive devices for community-dwelling older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database of systematic reviews (identification number: CRD42021248929 ).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dispositivos de Autoayuda / Vida Independiente Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Geriatr Asunto de la revista: GERIATRIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dispositivos de Autoayuda / Vida Independiente Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Geriatr Asunto de la revista: GERIATRIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá