Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inclusion of person-centred care in UK postgraduate medical education curricula: Interviews and documentary analysis.
Moore, Heather L; Watson, Rose; Farnworth, Allison; Giles, Karen; Tomson, David; Thomson, Richard G.
Afiliación
  • Moore HL; School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK. heather.moore@newcastle.ac.uk.
  • Watson R; School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Farnworth A; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Giles K; Faculty of Health Sciences & Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
  • Tomson D; Collingwood Surgery, Collingwood Health Group, North Shields, UK.
  • Thomson RG; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 757, 2023 Oct 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821866
BACKGROUND: Person-centred care (PCC) involves placing people at the centre of their healthcare decision making to ensure it meets their needs, values, and personal circumstances. Increasingly, PCC is promoted in healthcare policy and guidance, but little is known about how this is embedded in postgraduate medical training. The aim of this research was to understand how PCC is embedded in UK postgraduate medical training and explore factors influencing inclusion of PCC in curricula content. METHODS: To explore this, we interviewed senior professionals with key roles in the curricula from four UK Royal Colleges (Psychiatrists; Physicians; Surgeons; and GPs) and used framework analysis on interviews and relevant curricula documents to identify themes. RESULTS: Legislation and professional/educational guidance influenced inclusion. PCC definitions and terminology differed and placement within curricula was variable. Royal Colleges defined the curriculum and provided training to ensure competence, but local deaneries independently implemented the curriculum. Trainer engagement was greater than trainee buy in. Quality assurance focused on feedback from trainers and trainees rather than patients, and patient and public involvement in curriculum development, teaching, and assessment was limited. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for cross-organisation collaboration to develop a PCC competence framework that defines the skills and level of competence required at different points in training, with clarity around the differences between undergraduate and postgraduate requirements. Greater auditing and quality assurance of programme delivery would help identify successful practices to share within and across Royal Colleges, while still maintaining the flexibility of local provision. Engagement with patients and the public in this work can only strengthen provision.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Temas RHS: Educacion Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación Médica / Cirujanos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Temas RHS: Educacion Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación Médica / Cirujanos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article