الملخص
Resumen Introducción: Aún es controversial si la deficiencia de vitamina B12 se asocia a alteraciones cognitivas. Objetivo: Conocer la asociación entre los niveles séricos de vitamina B12 y el desempeño cognitivo. Métodos: Se incluyeron 241 personas ≥ 60 años con medición de niveles séricos de vitamina B12. Se realizó evaluación física y cognitiva y se formaron tres grupos: cognición normal (CN), deterioro cognitivo leve (DCL) y demencia. Los niveles de vitamina B12 se clasificaron en suficiencia (> 400 pg/mL), deficiencia subclínica (201-400 pg/mL) y deficiencia absoluta (≤ 200 pg/mL). Se realizó análisis de regresión lineal multivariado para evaluar la asociación entre función cognitiva y niveles de vitamina B12 después de controlar las variables confusoras. Resultados: La media de edad fue 81.4 ± 8.0 años; 68 % fue del sexo femenino; 17.8 y 39.8 % presentaron deficiencia absoluta y subclínica de vitamina B12; 80 individuos (33 %) cumplieron los criterios de DCL y 70 (29 %), de demencia. Después de ajustar por edad, sexo y escolaridad, los sujetos con DCL y demencia tuvieron niveles más bajos de vitamina B12 comparados con aquellos con CN (p = 0.019). Conclusiones: Se observó asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el desempeño cognitivo global y los niveles bajos de vitamina B12.
Abstract Introduction: Whether vitamin B12 deficiency is associated with cognitive impairment remains controversial. Objective: To determine the association between vitamin B12 serum levels and cognitive performance. Methods: Two-hundred and forty-one adults aged ≥ 60 years who had serum vitamin B12 serum levels measurement were included. Physical and cognitive evaluation was carried out, and three groups were formed: normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Vitamin B12 levels were classified as sufficiency (> 400 pg/mL), subclinical deficiency (201-400 pg/mL), and absolute deficiency (≤ 200 pg/mL). Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between cognitive function and vitamin B12 levels after controlling for confounding variables. Results: Mean age was 81.4 ± 8.0 years; 68% were females; 17.8 % and 39.8% had absolute and subclinical vitamin B12 deficiency, respectively; 80 individuals (33%) met the criteria for MCI, and 70 (29%), for dementia. Those with MCI and dementia had lower vitamin B12 levels in comparison with those with NC after adjusting for age, gender and educational level (p = 0.019). Conclusions: A statistically significant association was observed between global cognitive performance and levels of vitamin B12.
الملخص
ABSTRACT Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a global pandemic. Older adults have been found as a vulnerable group for developing severe forms of disease and increased mortality. Objective: The objective of the study was to propose a pathway to assist the decision-making process for hospital resource allocation for older adults with COVID-19 using simple geriatric assessment-based tools. Methods: We reviewed the available literature at this point of the COVID-19 outbreak, focusing in older adult care to extract key recommendations for those health-care professionals who will be treating older adults in the hospital emergency ward (HEW) in developing countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: We listed a series of easy recommendations for non-geriatrician doctors in the HEW and suggested simple tools for hospital resource allocation during critical care evaluation of older adults with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries. Conclusions: Age must not be used as the sole criterion for resource allocation among older adults with COVID-19. Simple and efficient tools are available to identify components of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, which could be useful to predict outcomes and provide high-quality care that would fit the particular needs of older adults in resource-limited settings amidst this global pandemic.
الموضوعات
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronavirus Infections/economics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Developing Countries/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Clinical Decision-Making , Betacoronavirus , Pneumonia, Viral/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Activities of Daily Living , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Triage , Frail Elderly , Resource Allocation/standards , Resource Allocation/ethics , Vulnerable Populations , Patient Preference , Pandemics/economics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19الملخص
ABSTRACT Background It has been proposed that Vitamin D helps reduce the accumulation of cerebral β-amyloid-42 by innate immune stimulation and phagocytosis activation. An association between low Vitamin D levels and Alzheimers dementia (AD) has been established. We determined the association between Vitamin D, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD in older Mexican adults (> 65 years) Methods Cross-sectional study conducted at the memory clinic in a tertiary-level hospital in Mexico City. We evaluated subjects with MCI, AD, and normal cognition (NC) with available serum Vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels (past 6 months). Three categories were assigned according to 25(OH)D levels: sufficiency (> 30 ng/mL), insufficiency (21-29 ng/mL), and deficiency (≤ 20 ng/mL). Descriptive statistics, means and standard deviations were used. Logistic regression analyses adjusted by age, sex, and educational level were performed Results We evaluated 208 patients. Mean age was 79 ± 1 year, 65% (n = 136) were female; and mean educational level was 6.7 ± 2.3 years. Thirty-one subjects (14%) had NC; 42% (n = 88) had MCI; and 43% (n = 89) had AD. Prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency was 54%, more frequent in the AD group (64%) followed by the MCI (59%) and NC (13%) (p < 0.001) groups. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, Vitamin D deficiency was associated with MCI (HR 25.02 [confidence interval 95% 4.48-139]; p < 0.001) and AD (HR 41.7 [5.76-301]; p < 0.001) after adjusting for confounders Conclusions Serum Vitamin D deficiency was associated with MCI and dementia; low levels produced a greater effect over executive functions.
الموضوعات
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cognition , Dementia/etiology , Dementia/blood , Executive Function/physiology , Alzheimer Disease/blood , Cognitive Dysfunction/blood , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Mexicoالملخص
resumen Objetivo: Establecer la validez y confiabilidad del Montreal Evaluación Cognitiva en Español (MoCA-E) para identificar deterioro cognitivo leve (DCL) y demencia en adultos mayores mexicanos. Material y métodos: Se incluyó a 168 participantes en una clínica de memoria de la ciudad de México, en 3 grupos: 59 cognitivamente sanos (GCS), 52 con DCL (criterios del DSM-V) y 57 con demencia (criterios NINCDS-ADRDA). Se aplicó el MoCA-E y el Mini-Mental State Evaluation al inicio y en los últimos meses, para establecer la confiabilidad intraobservador. Se construyeron curvas ROC y un modelo de regresión multinomial para evaluar el efecto de la edad y la escolaridad en el desempeño del MOCA-E. Resultados: El promedio de edad de los participantes era 76 ± 8,1 años; la tasa de escolaridad, 10,7 ± 5,2. Las puntuaciones de MoCA-E por grupo fueron: GCS, 27,3 ± 1,9; DCL, 22,9 ± 2,9, y demencia, 13,7 ± 4,9 (p< 0,001). La confiabilidad del MoCA-E fue 0,89 con un coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,955. La sensibilidad fue del 80% y la especificidad, del 75% con el punto de corte de 26 puntos para DCL (área bajo la curva = 0,886; p< 0,001). Para demencia, la sensibilidad fue del 98% y la especificidad, del 93% con el punto de corte de 24 puntos (área bajo la curva = 0,998; p< 0,001). La regresión multinomial no mostró asociación con la escolaridad y la edad tanto para DCL como para demencia. Conclusiones: El MoCA-E es un instrumento con validez y confiabilidad para el cribado de DCL y demencia en la población mexicana, aun después de ajustar por edad y escolaridad.
abstract Objective: To establish the validity and reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Spanish (MoCA-S) to identify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in the Mexican elderly population. Material and methods: 168 participants from a memory clinic in Mexico City were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: 59 cognitively healthy (CHG), 52 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (DSM-5 criteria) and 57 with dementia (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria). The MoCA-S and Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) were applied at baseline and during the last months to establish intra-observer reliability. ROC curves and a multinomial regression model were constructed to evaluate the effect of age and education on MoCA-S performance. Results: The mean age of the participants was 76 ± 8.1 years and the education rate was 10.7 ± 5.2. The MoCA-S scores by group were: CHG, 27.3 ± 1.9; MCI, 22.9 ± 2.9; and dementia, 13.7 ± 4.9(p< 0.001). The reliability of the MoCA-S was 0.89 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.955. Sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 75%, with a cut-off point of 26 points for MCI (area under the curve, 0.886; p< 0.001). For the dementia group, the sensitivity was 98% and specificity was 93%, with a cut-off point of 24 points (area under the curve, 0.998; p< 0.001). The multinomial regression showed no association with education and age for both the MCI and dementia groups. Conclusions: The MoCA-S is a valid and reliable instrument for MCI and dementia screening in the Mexican population, even after adjusting for age and education.
الموضوعات
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Cognitive Dysfunction , Mass Screening , Dementia , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Memory , Mexicoالملخص
Abstract: Introduction: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a widely used instrument for identifying neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in older adults. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the best scoring method, since current quantitative methods involve the assignment of numerical values, while qualitative ones do not allow for objectivity in the diagnosis. Parsey & Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) proposed a scoring scheme which, in addition to providing a score of the patient's performance, permits error analysis, thereby making it possible to identify potential underlying cognitive difficulties. Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate the CDT scoring scheme proposed by Parsey & Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) for screening for NCDs in Mexican older adults. Method: There were 167 participants: 58 cognitively healthy subjects (CH), 52 with mild neurocognitive disorder (mild-NCD), and 57 with major neurocognitive disorder (major-NCD).The CDT scoring method was compared with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Spanish (MoCA-S). Inter- and intra-observer reliability and construct validity were determined and the sensitivity and specificity of this method were calculated. Results: The X - age was 75 years (SD ± 8 years) and the X - educational attainment was 10.7 years (SD ± 5.2 years). Internal reliability was .750, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .774. The cut-off point for the CDT in mild-NCD was 14 points (sensitivity: 40%, specificity: 70%) and 12 points for major-NCD (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 95%).The most frequent errors in the CDT were: graphic, conceptual, spatial, and/or planning difficulties. Discussion and conclusion: This method makes it possibly to quickly and easily explore the cognitive status of the patient. It contains ideal psychometric properties for the detection of patients with major-NCD, in addition to offering the possibility of analyzing performance errors and underlying cognitive difficulties.
Resumen: Introducción: El Test del Dibujo del Reloj (TDR) es un instrumento ampliamente utilizado para identificar trastornos neurocognitivos (TNC) en adultos mayores. Sin embargo, no existe suficiente evidencia para determinar el mejor método para calificarlo, ya que los métodos cuantitativos actuales se abocan a la asignación de valores numéricos, mientras que los cualitativos no permiten objetividad en el diagnóstico. Parsey y Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) propusieron un método de calificación que, además de proporcionar un puntaje de la ejecución del paciente, permite el análisis de los errores y, con ello, la identificación de las potenciales dificultades cognitivas subyacentes. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue validar el método de calificación del TDR propuesto por Parsey y Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) para el tamizaje del TNC en adultos mayores mexicanos. Método: Se contó con 167 participantes: 58 cognitivamente sanos (CS), 52 con trastorno neurocognitivo leve (TNC-leve) y 57 con trastorno neurocognitivo mayor (TNC-mayor). El método de calificación del TDR se comparó con el Examen Mínimo del Estado Mental (MMSE) y la Evaluación Cognitiva de Montreal en español (MoCA-E). Se determinó la confiabilidad inter e intra-observador y la validez de constructo, y se calcularon la sensibilidad y la especificidad de este método. Resultados: La X - de edad fue de 75 años (DE ± 8 años) y la X - de escolaridad fue de 10.7 años (DE ± 5.2 años). La confiabilidad interna fue de .750, con un coeficiente de correlación intraclase de .774. El punto de corte para el TDR en TNC-leve fue de 14 puntos (sensibilidad: 40%, especificidad: 70%) y 12 puntos para TNC-mayor (sensibilidad: 90%, especificidad: 95%). Los errores más frecuentes en el TDR fueron: dificultades gráficas, conceptuales y espaciales, y/o de planeación. Discusión y conclusión: Este método permite explorar breve y ágilmente el estado cognitivo del paciente y posee propiedades psicométricas ideales para la detección de pacientes con TNC-mayor, además de ofrecer la posibilidad de analizar los errores que presentan en el desempeño y las dificultades cognitivas subyacentes.