Prevalence of Chronic Mental and Physical Disorders, Impact on Work Productivity and Correlates of Alcohol Use Disorders and Nicotine Dependence across Occupations

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>This study assessed occupational differences in the prevalence of mental and physical disorders in an employed general population sample in Singapore and investigated the impact of these disorders on work productivity losses in terms of work-loss days and work-cutback days. The association of occupation with alcohol use disorders (AUD) and nicotine dependence (ND) was also investigated.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>Data from a population-based mental health survey of a representative sample of multi-ethnic residents aged 18 years and above were used. The World Health Organization's (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was administered to establish the lifetime diagnosis of key mental disorders. Self-report on sociodemographic characteristics, productivity loss, ND, and lifetime physical conditions were obtained. Nine occupational groups were included in this analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The sample comprised 4361 participants with a mean (SD) age of 42.2 (11.9) years, ranging between 19 to 80 years. 'Associate professionals and technicians' (26.2%), 'Services and sales workers' (17.7%) and 'Professionals' (15.4%) were the 3 predominant occupational categories. Sociodemographic characteristics differed significantly across occupations (P <0.001). The lifetime prevalences of having 'any mental disorder' and 'any physical disorder' were 13.0% and 37.9%, respectively; major depressive disorder was the most prevalent mental disorder (5.9%) and hypertension was the most common physical disorder (15.6%). There were no significant differences in work productivity loss across occupations. Sociodemographic and occupational correlates for AUD and ND were identified.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Sociodemographic and health disparities exist in the major occupational categories in Singapore. The strength of the associations between occupation and AUD and ND are significant, indicating the need for preventative measures in select occupations.</p>

"How much can I take?": predictors of perceived burden for relatives of people with chronic illness

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Chronic illnesses are common and have detrimental effects not only on the affected individuals but also on their families. These negative consequences on the physical and psychological health of caregivers constitute the burden of care. We investigate the predictors of perceived burden of care among relatives of people with any chronic physical or mental illness using secondary data from a nationwide survey in Singapore.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A cross-sectional household survey was conducted among adult residents of age 18 years and above and data were analysed to explore the predictors of high perceived burden of care. Two thousand four hundred and fifty-eight respondents having at least 1 close relative with any chronic physical and/or mental illness were included.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Majority of the respondents had at least 1 close family member with physical illness (88.3%)--the most common illnesses reported were memory problems (86.9%), physical disability (74.8%), heart problems (70.1%) and cancer (62.2%). About 30.9% (n = 723) perceived high burden resulting from their relatives' health condition. Logistic analysis showed that women were more likely (OR 1.58, P = 0.0026) and Malays were less likely (OR 0.68, P = 0.0044) to perceive burden. Those who were able to open up to their family or friends (OR 1.65, P = 0.0162) and those who had dysthymia had higher odds (OR 4.91, respectively, P =0.0364) of perceiving burden.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our results suggest that regardless of the nature of the chronic illnesses, gender or ethnicity, the capacity to open up to family or friends and the mental health status of caregivers can predict their perceived burden. The results provide valuable preliminary information for planning social policies and interventions for improving the well-being of caregivers.</p>