Valproic acid and ivermectin increase GABA levels to improve the viability of skin flaps in rats

Background: Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a nonproteinogenic amino acid known as the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. Ivermectin (IVM) and valproic acid (VA), both increase GABA levels. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of VA and IVM on the viability of extended random-pattern skin flaps in Wistar rats and their GABA-dependent mechanisms. Methods: This experimental study used 32 Wistar rats that underwent surgery to have caudally based extended random-pattern skin flaps divided into four distinct groups. In the first group, 0.05 mg/kg IVM was administered via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection 30 minutes (min) prior to elevating the flap. The second group was administered 100 mg/kg VA by i.p. injection 60 min prior to elevating the flap. The third group was administered VA 100 mg/kg followed by IVM 0.05 mg/kg injected (i.p.) 60 min and 30 min prior to flap elevation, respectively. The fourth group was used as a control. After 7 days, the percentage of flap viability was measured, and tissue sampling was performed to examine GABA levels. Results: It was found that the highest viability rate was in the group administered VA combined with IVM (93.98%) compared to all other groups (p<0.001). The highest GABA levels in the tissue were observed in the group administered VA combined with IVM (284.91 nmol/l) compared to all other groups (p<0.001). Conclusions: IVM in combination with VA improves the viability of extended random-pattern skin flaps by increasing GABA levels.

Efficacy of intense pulsed light in treatment of rosacea: a Meta analysis / 中华医学美学美容杂志

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of intense pulsed light on rosacea.Methods:From December 2022 to April 2023, the Dermatology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM and other Chinese and English databases to collect clinical randomized controlled studies on intense pulsed light treatment of rosacea for ameta-analysis.Results:A total of 559 patients were included in 6 randomized controlled trials. The efficacy of the combination of strong pulsed light and medication in the treatment of rosacea was significantly better than that of medication alone ( Z=6.15, P<0.001). After subgroup analysis, the combination of strong pulsed light and tetracycline drugs was more effective in treating rosacea than using tetracycline drugs alone ( Z=3.17, P<0.05). The efficacy of the combination of strong pulsed light and minocycline in the treatment of rosacea was better than that of minocycline alone ( Z=2.37, P<0.05), and clinical evaluation showed the improvements of erythema, papules, and pustules. The differences in scores for itching and capillary dilation were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy for rosacea is definite, and its combination with topical or oral medication is superior to that of medication alone. However, the stability of the effect needs to be confirmed by more high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Inefficacious drugs against covid-19: analysis of sales, tweets, and search engines / Medicamentos ineficazes contra covid-19: análise de vendas, tweets e mecanismos de busca

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Assess the correlation between the sales of two drugs with no proven efficacy against covid-19, ivermectin and chloroquine, and other relevant variables, such as Google® searches, number of tweets related to these drugs, number of cases and deaths resulting from covid-19. METHODS The methodology adopted in this study has four stages: data collection, data processing, exploratory data analysis, and correlation analysis. Spearman's method was used to obtain cross-correlations between each pair of variables. RESULTS The results show similar behaviors between variables. Peaks occurred in the same or near periods. The exploratory data analysis showed shortage of chloroquine in the period corresponding to the beginning of advertising for the application of these drugs against covid-19. Both drugs showed a high and statistically significant correlation with the other variables. Also, some of them showed a higher correlation with drug sales when we employed a one-month lag. In the case of chloroquine, this was observed for the number of deaths. In the case of ivermectin, this was observed for the number of tweets, cases, and deaths. CONCLUSIONS The results contribute to decision making in crisis management by governments, industries, and stores. In times of crisis, as observed during the covid-19 pandemic, some variables can help sales forecasting, especially Google® and tweets, which provide a real-time analysis of the situation. Monitoring social media platforms and search engines would allow the determination of drug use by the population and better prediction of potential peaks in the demand for these drugs.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Investigar a correlação entre as vendas de dois medicamentos sem eficácia comprovada no tratamento de covid-19, ivermectina e cloroquina, e outras variáveis relevantes: pesquisas no Google®, número de tweets relacionados aos medicamentos, casos e óbitos decorrentes da covid-19. MÉTODOS A metodologia adotada neste estudo se divide em quatro partes: coleta de dados; processamento dos dados; análise exploratória; e análise de correlação. Foi utilizado o método de Spearman para obter as correlações cruzadas entre cada par de variáveis. RESULTADOS Os resultados mostram similaridade entre os comportamentos das variáveis. Os picos ocorreram em períodos iguais ou próximos. A análise exploratória dos dados apontou que houve falta de cloroquina no período correspondente ao início das divulgações sobre a aplicação desses medicamentos para o tratamento da covid-19. Ambos os medicamentos apresentaram correlação alta e estatisticamente significativa com as demais variáveis analisadas. Também foi observado que algumas delas apresentaram maior correlação com as vendas de medicamentos quando assumiram defasagem temporal de um mês. No caso da cloroquina, isso ocorreu com a variável óbitos. No caso da ivermectina, ocorreu com as variáveis número de tweets, casos e óbitos. CONCLUSÕES Os resultados observados contribuem para a tomada de decisão durante a gestão de crises por parte de governo, indústrias e comércios. Em momentos de crises, como observado durante a pandemia, as variáveis mostraram que são capazes de auxiliar na previsão de vendas, em especial o Google® e os tweets, que proporcionam uma análise em tempo real da situação. Acompanhar as redes sociais e mecanismos de busca permitiria detecção de uso pela população e melhor previsão de potenciais picos de demanda desses medicamentos.

Eficácia da ivermectina e atazanavir no tempo de recuperação dos sintomas de covid-19: uma coorte prospectiva / Effectiveness of ivermectin and atazanavir on time to resolution from covid-19 symptoms: a prospective cohort / Eficacia de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tiempo hasta lá resolución de los síntomas de covid-19: una cohorte prospectiva

Objetivo: avaliar a eficácia da Ivermectina e do Atazanavir em comparação com placebo no tempo de resolução dos sintomas e no tempo de duração da doença por COVID-19. Método: estudo observacional, de coorte prospectivo, longitudinal, descritivo e analítico com pacientes sintomáticos ambulatoriais, acompanhados por 06 meses em duas Unidades Básicas de Saúde para atendimento de COVID-19 em Teresina- Piauí, Brasil, no período de novembro a abril de 2021 identificados por amostragem aleatória 1:1:1. Foram realizados exames Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) para confirmação laboratorial da suspeita de infecção pelo novo coronavírus e avaliação sociodemográfica e clínica. Resultados: dos 87 pacientes randomizados, 62,1% (n=54) eram do sexo masculino, com média de idade de 35,1 anos, possuíam companheira (53,9%), baixa renda (50,6%), eutróficos (40,7%) e sem comorbidades de saúde (78,2%). Não houve diferença entre o tempo médio para resolução dos sintomas, que foi de 21 dias (IQR, 8-30) no grupo atazanavir, 30 dias (IQR, 5-90) no grupo ivermectina em comparação com 14 dias (IQR, 9-21) no grupo controle. No dia 180, houve resolução dos sintomas em 100% no grupo placebo, 93,9% no grupo atazanavir e 95% no grupo ivermectina. A duração mediana da doença foi de 08 dias em todos os braços do estudo. Conclusão: o tratamento com atazanavir (6 dias) e ivermectina (3 dias) não reduziu o tempo de resolução dos sintomas e nem o tempo de duração da doença entre os pacientes ambulatoriais com COVID-19 leve em comparação com o grupo placebo. Os resultados não suportam o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir para tratamento de COVID-19 leve a moderado.

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of Ivermectin and Atazanavir compared to placebo in the time to resolution of symptoms and duration of illness due to COVID-19. Method: observational, prospective, longitudinal, descriptive and analytical cohort study with symptomatic outpatients, followed for 06 months in two Basic Health Units for COVID-19 care in Teresina-Piauí, Brazil, from November to April 2021 identified by 1:1:1 random sampling. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were performed for laboratory confirmation of suspected infection with the new coronavirus and sociodemographic and clinical evaluation. Results: of the 87 randomized patients, 62.1% (n=54) were male, with a mean age of 35.1 years, had a partner (53.9%), low income (50.6%), eutrophic (40.7%) and without health comorbidities (78.2%). There was no difference between the median time to resolution of symptoms, which was 21 days (IQR, 8-30) in the atazanavir group, 30 days (IQR, 5- 90) in the ivermectin group compared with 14 days (IQR, 9- 21) in the control group. At day 180, there was resolution of symptoms in 100% in the placebo group, 93.9% in the atazanavir group, and 95% in the ivermectin group. The median duration of illness was 8 days in all study arms. Conclusion: Treatment with atazanavir (6 days) and ivermectin (3 days) did not reduce the time to symptom resolution or the duration of illness among outpatients with mild COVID-19 compared to the placebo group. The results do not support the use of ivermectin and atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19.

Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad de Ivermectina y Atazanavir en comparación con placebo en el tiempo de resolución de los síntomas y duración de la enfermedad por COVID-19. Método: estudio de cohorte observacional, prospectivo, longitudinal, descriptivo y analítico con pacientes ambulatorios sintomáticos, seguidos durante 06 meses en dos Unidades Básicas de Salud para atención de COVID-19 en Teresina-Piauí, Brasil, de noviembre a abril de 2021 identificados por 1:1:1 muestreo aleatorio. Se realizaron pruebas de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcriptasa inversa (RT-PCR) para confirmación de laboratorio de sospecha de infección por el nuevo coronavirus y evaluación sociodemográfica y clínica. Resultados: de los 87 pacientes aleatorizados, 62,1% (n=54) eran del sexo masculino, con una edad media de 35,1 años, tenían pareja (53,9%), bajos ingresos (50,6%), eutróficos (40,7%) y sin comorbilidades de salud (78,2%). No hubo diferencia entre la mediana de tiempo hasta la resolución de los síntomas, que fue de 21 días (RIC, 8-30) en el grupo de atazanavir, 30 días (RIC, 5- 90) en el grupo de ivermectina en comparación con 14 días (RIC, 9 - 21) en el grupo control. En el día 180, hubo una resolución de los síntomas del 100 % en el grupo de placebo, del 93,9 % en el grupo de atazanavir y del 95 % en el grupo de ivermectina. La mediana de duración de la enfermedad fue de 8 días en todos los brazos del estudio. Conclusión: El tratamiento con atazanavir (6 días) e ivermectina (3 días) no redujo el tiempo de resolución de los síntomas ni la duración de la enfermedad entre los pacientes ambulatorios con COVID-19 leve en comparación con el grupo placebo. Los resultados no respaldan el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir para el tratamiento de la COVID-19 de leve a moderada.

Effects of ivermectin on cytokine and immunoglobulin levels in sheep / Efectos de la ivermectina en los niveles de citoquinas e inmunoglobulinas en ovejas / Efeitos da ivermectina nos níveis de citocinas e imunoglobulinas em ovinos

Abstract Background: Ivermectin may affect the levels of cytokines and immunoglobulins in sheep, considering that avermectins have an effect on the immune system. Objective: To determine whether ivermectin has an effect on cytokines and immunoglobulins in sheep. Methods: After administration of ivermectin to 10 healthy sheep, sheep-specific interferon-α, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M, and immunoglobulin E levels were measured with an ELISA reader. Results: Significant (p<0.05) fluctuations were detected in interleukin-2 and interleukin-10 levels. Transient increases (p<0.05) were measured in tumor necrosis factor-α and immunoglobulin E levels (p<0.05). Conclusion: Ivermectin may affect immune system parameters in healthy sheep; however, the effects of ivermectin administration on infected sheep should be investigated.

Resumen Antecedentes: La ivermectina puede alterar los niveles de citocinas e inmunoglobulinas en ovinos, dado que las avermectinas afectan el sistema inmunológico. Objetivo: Determinar si la ivermectina tiene algún efecto sobre las citocinas e inmunoglobulinas en ovinos. Métodos: Después de la administración de ivermectina a 10 ovejas sanas los niveles de interferón-α específico de oveja, factor de necrosis tumoral-α, interleucina-2, interleucina-6, interleucina-10, inmunoglobulina G, inmunoglobulina M, e inmunoglobulina E se midieron con un lector ELISA. Resultados: Se detectaron fluctuaciones significativas (p<0,05) en los niveles de interleucina-2 e interleucina-10. También se encontraron aumentos transitorios (p<0,05) en los niveles de factor de necrosis tumoral-α e inmunoglobulina E (p<0,05). Conclusión: la ivermectina puede afectar los parámetros del sistema inmunitario en ovejas sanas.

Resumo Antecedentes: A ivermectina pode alterar os níveis de citocinas e imunoglobulinas em ovinos, visto que as avermectinas afetam o sistema imunológico. Objetivo: Determinar o efeito da ivermectina nas citocinas e imunoglobulinas em ovinos. Métodos: Após a administração de ivermectina a 10 ovelhas saudáveis, interferon-α específico de ovelha, fator de necrose tumoral-α, interleucina-2, interleucina-6 e interleucina-10, os níveis de imunoglobulina G, imunoglobulina M e imunoglobulina E foram medidos com Leitor de ELISA. Resultados: Flutuações estatisticamente significativas (p<0,05) foram detectadas nos níveis de interkeukin-2 e interkeukin-10. Aumentos transitórios (p<0,05) foram medidos nos níveis de fator de necrose tumoral-α e imunoglobulina E (p<0,05). Conclusão: A ivermectina pode afetar parâmetros do sistema imunológico em ovinos saudáveis, entretanto, os efeitos da administração de ivermectina em ovinos infectados devem ser investigados.

Obstrucción intestinal por Strongyloides Stercolaris: A propósito de un caso / Intestinal obstruction due to strongyloides stercolaris: About a case

RESUMEN La estrongiloidiasis comúnmente produce problemas gastrointestinales. Presentamos el caso de un varón, cadete en la marina de guerra del Perú, de 30 años, procedente de lima; que desarrolló síndrome de hiperinfección por Strongyloides Stercoralis, teniendo como antecedente el diagnóstico presuntivo de polimiositis, por lo cual recibió un ciclo corto de corticoesteroides. No portador del virus htlv 1/2. Presentó al ingreso hiporexia, debilidad generalizada, caquexia, diarrea intermitente autolimitada, intolerancia oral y leve distensión abdominal. El paciente llegó a la etapa de diseminación, lo que resultó en un daño severo a nivel intestinal. La baja excreción de larvas en las heces dificultó el diagnóstico. Se brindó tratamiento con ivermectina parenteral a dosis de 1.2ml vía subcutánea cada 48 horas por tres dosis, con buena respuesta clínica y posteriormente con buena tolerancia oral. La importancia de presentar el caso es comentar sobre el abordaje diagnóstico y terapéutico de esta geohelmintiasis endémica del Perú.

Abstract Strongyloidiasis commonly causes gastrointestinal problems. We present the case of a male, a 30-year-old cadet in the peruvian navy from lima, who developed a hyperinfection syndrome due to strongyloides stercoralis, having a presumptive diagnosis of polymyositis for which he received a short cycle of corticosteroids. He was not a carrier of the htlv 1/2 virus. Upon admission, he presented with hyporexia, generalized weakness, cachexia, intermittent self-limited diarrhea, oral intolerance, and mild abdominal distension. The patient reached the dissemination stage, resulting in severe intestinal damage. The low excretion of larvae in the feces made the diagnosis difficult. Treatment was provided with parenteral ivermectin at a dose of 1.2ml subcutaneously every 48 hours for three doses, with a good clinical response and subsequently good oral tolerance. The importance of presenting the case is to comment on the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this endemic geohelminthiasis of peru.

Preferred practice patterns and review on rosacea

Rosacea is a chronic, inflammatory facial dermatosis commonly found in fair skin tone population. Recent studies have shown the increasing prevalence in the dark skin tone population as well. Ocular involvement is very common and can occur without cutaneous features. Common ocular features are chronic blepharoconjunctivitis with eyelid margin inflammation and meibomian gland dysfunction. Corneal complications include corneal vascularization, ulceration, scarring, and rarely, perforation. Diagnosis is largely based on clinical signs, although it is often delayed in the absence of cutaneous changes, particularly in children. The management ranges from local therapy to systemic treatment, depending on the severity of the disease. There is a positive association between demodicosis and rosacea; however, causality is always argued. In this review, we describe the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment of rosacea and ocular rosacea.

Prevention and treatment for COVID-19 associated severe pneumonia in the Gambia (PaTS-COVID-19), a single-blinded randomized clinical trial: study protocol

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in an unprecedent global response for the development of COVID-19 vaccines. However, as viral mutations continue to occur, potentially decreasing the efficacy of currently available vaccines, and inequity of vaccine access continues, identifying safe and effective drugs to minimise severity of COVID-19 disease remains a priority. Methods: We designed an adaptive individually randomized single blinded non identical placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repurposing licenced treatments for COVID-19 patients in an African setting. The trial has two cohorts: Cohort 1 recruits mild and moderate COVID-19 cases and their household contacts. Cases are actively followed up for 14 days, with a final visit at day 28. There are two co-primary endpoints: clinical progression to severe-pneumonia and persistence of the virus at day 14. The primary endpoint for household contacts is infection during a 14-day follow-up period. Cohort 2 recruits hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 associated pneumonia followed up actively until discharge or death, and passively until day 90, with a final visit. The primary endpoint is clinical progression or death. Conclusions: This randomized trial will contribute African-specific data to the global response to COVID-19. Besides the efficacy of drugs on clinical progression, the trial will provide information on the dynamics of intra-household transmission. Trial registration: This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov with registration number NCT04703608 and with Pan African clinical trials registry with registration number PACTR202101544570971.

Caracterización de eventos adversos a hidroxicloroquina, ivermectina, azitromicina y tocilizumab en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 en un hospital del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú / Characterization of adverse events to hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin and tocilizumab in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in a Peruvian Social Health Insurance hospital

Objetivos. Caracterizar los eventos adversos (EA) asociados a hidroxicloroquina (HQ), azitromicina (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) e ivermectina (IVM) prescritos como «fuera de etiqueta» en el tratamiento de pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario transversal de la base de datos del sistema de farmacovigilancia del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú (EsSalud) de las notificaciones de EA a HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM provenientes del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de abril a octubre del 2020. Se revisaron las historias clínicas digitales, se estimaron las tasas de reporte de EA y se evaluaron sus características por tipo de fármaco, tiempo de aparición, tipo por órgano-sistema afectado, gravedad y causalidad. Resultados. Se identificaron 154 notificaciones que describen un total de 183 EA posiblemente relacionados con HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM, siendo 8% la tasa de reporte de EA. La mediana de tiempo de aparición de EA fue de 3 días (RIC: 2-5). La mayoría fueron cardiovasculares, destacándose la prolongación del intervalo QT. Se observaron EA hepatobiliares principalmente asociados a TOB. La mayoría de los casos fueron moderados, no obstante, el 10,4% fue grave. Conclusiones. Se identificaron EA potencialmente asociados al uso de HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM contra la COVID-19, siendo los más frecuentes los de tipo cardiovasculares. A pesar de que la AZI, HQ e IVM poseen perfiles conocidos de seguridad, su empleo en la COVID-19 podría incrementar la aparición de EA por los factores de riesgo propios de esta infección. Se sugiere reforzar la vigilancia, especialmente, de TOB.

Objective. To characterize the adverse events (AEs) related to the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine (HQ), azithromycin (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) and ivermectin (IVM) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. Materials and Methods. We conducted a secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Peruvian Social Health Insurance (EsSalud) pharmacovigilance system database of AE notifications to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM in the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital from April to October 2020. Information was collected from digital medical records. We estimated AE reporting rates and evaluated their characteristics by drug type, time of occurrence, type by the affected organ-system, severity and causality. Results. We identified 154 notifications describing a total of 183 AE possibly related to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM; the reporting rate was 8%. The median time of AE occurrence was 3 days (IQR: 2-5). Most were cardiovascular events; prolongation of the QT interval was the most frequent. Hepatobiliary AEs were mainly associated with TOB. Most cases were moderate, however, 10.4% were severe. Conclusions. We found AEs potentially associated with the use of HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM against COVID-19; cardiovascular events were the most frequent. Although AZI, HQ and IVM have known safety profiles, their use against COVID-19 could increase the occurrence of AE due to the risk factors inherent to this infection. Surveillance systems must be improved, especially those for TOB.

Treatment of oral myiasis in a patient with implant-supported fixed prosthesis

ABSTRACT Oral myiasis is a rare parasitic disease that requires immediate treatment once diagnosed. However, no standard treatment protocol can be found in the literature. Through a clinical-surgical report, we present the case of an 82-year-old man with lesions extending through the vestibule and alveolar ridge of the maxilla on both sides, in addition to occupying a large part of the palate, with a considerable number of larvae. The patient was initially treated with a single dose of systemic ivermectin (6 mg orally) and topical application of a tampon soaked in ether. The larvae were then surgically removed and debridement of the wound was performed. A crushed tablet of ivermectin 6 mg was applied topically for 2 days, the remaining larvae were again mechanically removed, and the patient received intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Treatment with systemic and topical ivermectin combined with antibiotic therapy and debridement proved to be effective in treating oral myiasis.

Prevalence of Ivermectin use to prevent COVID-19 during the pandemic in Mato Grosso: cross-sectional home-based study / Prevalência do uso de ivermectina para prevenir COVID-19 durante a pandemia em Mato Grosso: estudo transversal de base domiciliar

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the use of ivermectin as COVID-19 prevention method by the population of Mato Grosso in 2020. Methods: This is a home-based survey, carried out between September and October 2020, in 10 pole cities of the socioeconomic regions of State. The use of ivermectin was evaluated through the question: "Did you take ivermectin to prevent COVID-19?". Sociodemographic variables (sex, age group, education, family income), current work situation, being benefitted by government financial programs, as well as symptoms, seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and previous diagnosis of COVID-19 were evaluated. Prevalence and their associations were estimated using the chi-square test. Results: 4.206 individuals were evaluated for prevalence of ivermectin use; 58.3% of the individuals responded positively, this rate being higher in the municipalities of the western region of the state (66.6%). There was no significant difference between sexes, but the prevalence was higher among people aged 50-59 years (69.7%), who were white (66.5%), with complete higher education or more (68.8%) and higher family income (≥3 minimum wages-64.2%). The use of this drug was even higher among participants who considered their knowledge of the disease good or very good (65.0%), who reported having symptoms of COVID-19 (75.3%), and who had been previously diagnosed with the disease (91.2%). Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of use of ivermectin as a method to prevent covid-19 by the population of Mato Grosso, indicating the need for strategies to inform the population about the risks of off-label use of drugs and to combat the advertising of drugs that are ineffective against COVID-19.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a utilização de ivermectina como prevenção da COVID-19 pela população de Mato Grosso em 2020. Métodos: Trata-se de um inquérito de base domiciliar, realizado entre setembro e outubro de 2020, em dez municípios-polos das regiões socioeconômicas do estado. O uso da ivermectina foi avaliado por meio da pergunta: "Tomou ivermectina para prevenir a COVID-19?". Foram avaliadas as variáveis sociodemográficas (sexo, faixa etária, escolaridade, renda familiar), a situação de trabalho atual, o recebimento de benefícios financeiros governamentais, bem como sintomas, a soroprevalência de anticorpos contra SARS-CoV-2 e o diagnóstico prévio de COVID-19. As estimativas de prevalência e suas associações foram realizadas por meio do teste χ2. Resultados: Foram analisados 4.206 indivíduos, e a prevalência de uso de ivermectina foi de 58,3%, sendo maior nos municípios da região Oeste (66,6%). Não houve diferença significativa entre os sexos, a prevalência foi maior na da faixa etária de 50-59 anos (69,7%), em pessoas brancas (66,5%), com ensino superior completo ou mais (68,8%) e maior renda familiar (≥3 salários-mínimos — 64,2%). A utilização do medicamento ainda foi maior entre os que consideraram seu conhecimento sobre a doença como bom ou muito bom (65,0%), entre os que referiram ter apresentado sintomas de COVID-19 (75,3%) e que foram diagnosticados com a doença previamente (91,2%). Conclusão: Verifica-se a elevada a prevalência do uso de ivermectina para a prevenção da COVID-19 pela população de Mato Grosso, indicando a necessidade de estratégias para informar a população sobre os riscos do uso off-label de medicamentos e combater a publicidade de medicamentos sem eficácia contra COVID-19.

Uso de Ivermectina e Atazanavir no tratamento da Covid-19: uma revisão de escopo / Use of Ivermectin and Atazanavir in the treatment of Covid-19: a scoping review / Uso de Ivermectina y Atazanavir en el tratamiento de Covid-19: una revisión de alcance

Objetivo: Examinar e mapear as evidências científicas sobre a eficácia do uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de COVID-19. Metodologia: Scoping Review, baseado nos procedimentos recomendados pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs. Estabeleceu-se a pergunta norteadora: "Quais são as evidências científicas sobre o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de pacientes com sintomas leves de COVID-19?". Foram realizadas buscas em seis bases de dados nacionais e internacionais, sobre trabalhos publicados até dezembro de 2022. Dos 357 estudos encontrados, 22 foram selecionados para leitura na íntegra, resultando em uma amostra final de 11 estudos analisados. Resultados: As 11 publicações analisadas foram publicadas de 2020 a 2022 durante período pandêmico, de âmbito nacional e internacional com delineamento de estudos experimentais, do tipo ensaio clínico com randomização. Apenas 03 estudos (25%) testaram o atazanavir como intervenção conjugada a outras drogas, não evidenciando melhorias significativas em relação ao seu uso. Já no tratamento com Ivermectina, dos oito (75%) estudos que a testaram, apenas três (37,5%) recomendaram seu uso e cinco (62,5%) não suportam seu uso para tratamento de COVID-19 leve. O tempo de resolução dos sintomas variou de 8 a 10 dias nos braços tratados com ivermectina e em média 07 dias no tratamento com atazanavir. Não se detectou eventos adversos graves relacionados ao uso das duas drogas. Conclusão: As evidências que recomendavam o uso de ivermectina datam do início do período pandêmico, 2020, mas posteriormente, com a realização de ensaios clínicos robustos e controlados, novas evidências não suportam o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de COVID-19 leve mostrando que não houve diferença no tempo de resolução dos sintomas, na taxa de mortalidade, taxa de internação na UTI e tempo de hospitalização.

Objective: To examine and map the scientific evidence on the effectiveness of using ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of COVID-19. Methodology: Scoping Review, based on the procedures recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The guiding question was established, "What is the scientific evidence on the use of ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of patients with mild symptoms of COVID-19?" Searches were conducted in six national and international databases on papers published until December 2022. Of the 357 studies found, 22 were selected for reading in full, resulting in a final sample of 11 studies analyzed. Results: The 11 publications analyzed were published from 2020 to 2022 during pandemic period, of national and international scope with experimental study design, of clinical trial type with randomization. Only 03 studies (25%) tested atazanavir as a combined intervention with other drugs, showing no significant improvements in relation to its use. As for the treatment with Ivermectin, of the eight (75%) studies that tested it, only three (37.5%) recommended its use and five (62.5%) did not support its use for treating mild COVID-19. The time to symptom resolution ranged from 8 to 10 days in the ivermectin-treated arms and on average 07 days in the atazanavir treatment. No serious adverse events related to the use of the two drugs were detected. Conclusion: evidence recommending the use of ivermectin dates back to the beginning of the pandemic period, 2020, but subsequently, with robust controlled clinical trials, new evidence does not support the use of ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of mild COVID-19 showing that there was no difference in time to symptom resolution, mortality rate, ICU admission rate, and length of hospital stay.

Objetivo: Examinar y mapear la evidencia científica sobre la eficacia del uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de COVID-19. Metodología: Scoping Review, basada en los procedimientos recomendados por el Instituto Joanna Briggs. La pregunta guía era: "¿Cuál es la evidencia científica sobre el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de pacientes con síntomas leves de COVID-19? Se realizaron búsquedas en seis bases de datos nacionales e internacionales, en artículos publicados hasta diciembre de 2022. De los 357 estudios encontrados, se seleccionaron 22 para su lectura completa, lo que dio lugar a una muestra final de 11 estudios analizados. Resultados: Las 11 publicaciones analizadas fueron publicadas entre 2020 y 2022 durante el periodo pandémico, de ámbito nacional e internacional con diseño de estudio experimental, de tipo ensayo clínico con aleatorización. Apenas 03 estudios (25%) probaron el atazanavir como intervención combinada con otras drogas, sin evidenciar mejoras significativas en relación con su uso. En cuanto al tratamiento con Ivermectina, de los ocho (75%) estudios que la probaron, sólo tres (37,5%) recomendaron su uso y cinco (62,5%) no apoyaron su uso para tratar la COVID-19 leve. El tiempo transcurrido hasta la resolución de los síntomas osciló entre 8 y 10 días en los brazos tratados con ivermectina y una media de 07 días en el tratamiento con atazanavir. No se detectaron acontecimientos adversos graves relacionados con el uso de los dos fármacos. Conclusión: las pruebas que recomiendan el uso de ivermectina se remontan al inicio del periodo pandémico, 2020, pero posteriormente, con ensayos clínicos controlados sólidos, las nuevas pruebas no apoyan el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de la COVID-19 leve, lo que demuestra que no hubo diferencias en el tiempo hasta la resolución de los síntomas, la tasa de mortalidad, la tasa de ingreso en la UCI y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria.

Physiological gait test: an effective method for analyzing balance, locomotion, and neuromuscular disorders in rats and a comparison to the elevated beam test / Teste de marcha fisiológica: um método eficaz para analisar distúrbios de equilíbrio, locomoção e neuromusculares em roedores

The evaluation of animal locomotor activity is a behavioral tool widely used to measure the mechanisms underlying a particular disease, disorder, or injury, as well as the effects of exposure to a xenobiotic. The elevated beam test is one of the most used tests in rodents to assess balance and motor coordination. Despite being inexpensive and utilizing a simple apparatus, the high beam test requires a long period of animal training and habituation. The development and characterization of an alternative test, namely the gait test, has the potential to circumvent the time and effort required for animal training, deeming it an effective, inexpensive, and fast method for the analysis of behaviors that are comparably assessed by the high beam test. Therefore, the present study focused on determining the effectiveness and feasibility of the gait test for assessing rodent locomotion and balance as a replacement for the elevated beam test. For this purpose, male rats were divided into three groups: one control group exposed to a saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) and two experimental groups exposed to a single dose of either 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg of ivermectin intraperitoneally for induction of locomotor disturbance. The high beam and gait tests were performed 15 min and 24 h after drug administration. Results show that the experimental groups had difficulty performing the tasks of either test at both time points analyzed compared to the control groups. At the high beam, experimental animals had trouble maintaining balance and walking. At the gait test, experimental animals showed alterations in gait, which were quantitated by: (a) shortening of step length, (b) decrease of stride, (c) altered step symmetry, and (d) altered stride area. Such results are indicative of compensatory efforts and were comparable between both tests. Altogether, the data indicate that the gait test meets all requirements for assessing motor coordination in rodents. The gait test is therefore validated as a complement to the elevated beam test for the study and analysis of neurodegenerative impairment and other disorders involving neuromuscular disturbances.(AU)

A avaliação da atividade locomotora animal é uma ferramenta comportamental bastante utilizada para mensurar os mecanismos subjacentes a uma determinada doença, distúrbio ou lesão e efeitos da exposição a um xenobiótico. Um dos testes mais utilizados em roedores para avaliar o equilíbrio e coordenação motora é o teste da trave elevada que, apesar de ser um teste barato e que exige um aparato simples, é necessário um longo período de treino e habituação dos animais. O desenvolvimento e caracterização de um teste alternativo, chamado de teste da marcha, tem o potencial de contornar o tempo e o esforço necessários ao treino dos animais, considerando-o um método eficaz, barato e rápido para a análise de comportamentos avaliados comparativamente pelo alto teste de feixe. Portanto, o presente estudo concentrou-se em determinar a eficácia e viabilidade do teste de marcha para avaliação da locomoção e equilíbrio de roedores em substituição ao teste da trave elevada. Para isso, ratos machos foram divididos em 3 grupos, sendo 1 grupo controle exposto à solução salina (NaCl 0,9%) e 2 grupos experimentais expostos à dose única de 0,2 e 1,0 mg/kg de ivermectina por via intraperitoneal para indução da alteração locomotora. Os testes de trave elevada e marcha foram realizados 15 min e 24 h após a administração da droga. Os resultados mostram que os grupos experimentais tiveram dificuldade em realizar as tarefas de qualquer teste em ambos os momentos analisados em comparação com os grupos de controle. Na trave elevada, os animais experimentais tiveram dificuldade em manter o equilíbrio e andar. No teste de marcha, os animais experimentais apresentaram alterações na marcha, que foram quantificadas por: (a) encurtamento do comprimento da passada, (b) diminuição da passada, (c) alteração da simetria da passada e (d) alteração da área da passada. Tais resultados são indicativos de esforços compensatórios e foram comparáveis entre os dois testes. Em conjunto, os dados indicam que o teste de marcha atende a todos os requisitos para avaliação da coordenação motora em roedores. O teste de marcha é, portanto, validado como um complementar para o teste da trave elevada e para o estudo e análise de comprometimento neurodegenerativo e outros distúrbios envolvendo distúrbios neuromusculares.(AU)

Infección pulmonar por Strongyloides stercoralis en paciente inmunocomprometido. Reporte de caso / Pulmonary infection caused by Strongyloides stercoralis in an immunocompromised patient. Case report

El Strongyloides stercoralis es un nemátodo intestinal capaz de completar su ciclo de vida dentro del huésped humano. Se presenta el caso clínico de una mujer de 57 años con residencia en la zona amazónica por 10 años, la que presenta antecedentes patológicos personales de hiperten-sión arterial, osteoporosis y diabetes mellitus tipo 2, lo que la cataloga como inmunocomprome-tida. Esta asiste a servicios de emergencia con cuadro agudo característico de infección de vías urinarias, recibe tratamiento en la unidad de cuidados intensivos por shock séptico de origen urinario versus pulmonar. La prueba de laboratorio clínico mediante muestra tomada a través de broncoaspiración arroja la existencia de larvas activas de Strongyloides stercoralis. La paciente mejoró sus condiciones de salud luego de un mes de evolución, respondiendo satisfactoriamente a la antibioticoterapia con carbapenémicos y el antiparasitario ivermectina. Los pacientes con factores de riesgo subyacentes tienen alta probabilidad a este tipo de infección agravada. La estrongiloidásis grave tiene una alta tasa de mortalidad, por lo que un diagnóstico temprano es indispensable para mejorar el pronóstico.

Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal nematode capable of completing its life cycle within the human host. The clinical case of a 57-year-old woman who has lived in the Amazon region for 10 years is presented. She has a personal pathological history of arterial hypertension, osteopo-rosis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which classifies her as immunocompromised. She attends emergency services with acute symptoms characteristic of urinary tract infection, receives treat-ment in the intensive care unit for septic shock of urinary versus pulmonary origin. The clinical laboratory test using a sample taken through bronchial aspiration shows the existence of active larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis. The patient's health conditions improved after a month of evolution, responding satisfactorily to antibiotic therapy with carbapenems and the antiparasitic ivermectin. Patients with underlying risk factors are at high risk for this type of aggravated infection. Severe strongyloidiasis has a high mortality rate, so early diagnosis is essential to improve prognosis

Asociación del uso de ivermectina en la mortalidad de pacientes con la COVID-19 / Association of Ivermectin use on mortality in patients with COVID-19

RESUMEN Introducción: La ivermectina ha sido utilizada para prevenir y tratar pacientes con la COVID-19, sin embargo, investigaciones han demostrado que su eficacia no justifica el uso. Objetivo: Determinar la asociación del uso de ivermectina, mortalidad y otros 3 indicadores en pacientes con la COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio observacional de cohorte retrospectiva. Se revisaron las historias clínicas que estuvieron hospitalizados entre abril y octubre de 2020, quienes además del tratamiento estándar (oxigenoterapia, corticoide y enoxaparina), recibieron tratamiento con ivermectina por neumonía grave o crítica por la COVID-19. Se midieron 4 variables resultado: mortalidad, indicación de pase a la unidad de cuidados intensivos, días de hospitalización y tiempo de requerimiento de oxigenoterapia a alto flujo. Resultados: El 42 % (126) de los pacientes falleció y el 52 % (159) tuvo indicación de pase a la unidad de cuidados intensivos. En el análisis multivariado, quienes tomaron una mayor dosis tuvieron mayor indicación de pase a cuidados intensivos (RRa: 1,10; IC 95 %: 1,01-1,20; valor p= 0,035), días de hospitalización (coeficiente: 5,07; IC 95 %: 2,15-11,92; valor p< 0,001) y tiempo de requerimiento de oxigenoterapia con alto flujo (coeficiente: 3,33; IC 95 %: 1,56-7,09; valor p= 0,002). Conclusión: Los pacientes que recibieron ivermectina tuvieron mayor probabilidad de indicación de pase a la unidad de cuidados intensivos, mayor tiempo de hospitalización y mayor tiempo de requerimiento de oxígeno a alto flujo, sin hallar relación con la mortalidad de los pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19. La administración de ivermectina antes o durante la hospitalización no tuvo beneficios.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Ivermectin has been used to prevent and treat COVID-19 patients, however, research has shown that its efficacy does not justify its use. Objective: To determine the association between the use of Ivermectin, mortality and 3 other indicators in patients with COVID-19. Methods: Observational retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the medical records of patients who were hospitalized between April and October 2020, who in addition to standard treatment (oxygen therapy, corticosteroid and enoxaparin), received treatment with Ivermectin for severe or critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Four outcome variables were measured: mortality, indication for transfer to the Intensive Care Unit days of hospitalization and time required for high-flow oxygen therapy. Results: Of patients, 42 % (126) died and 52 % (159) had indication for transfer to the Intensive Care Unit. In the multivariate analysis those who took a higher dose had a greater indication for transfer to Intensive Care Unit (RRa: 1.10; IC 95 %: 1.01-1.20; p-value= 0.035), days of hospitalization (coefficient: 5,07; IC 95 %: 2.15-11.92; p-value< 0.001) and time requiring high-flow oxygen therapy (coefficient: 3.33; IC 95 %: 1.56-7.09; p-value= 0.002). Conclusion: Patients who received Ivermectin were more likely to be referred to the Intensive Care Unit, had a longer hospital stay, and required more time on high-flow oxygen, without finding a relationship with mortality in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2. The administration of Ivermectin before or during hospitalization had no benefit.

Efectos colaterales del uso de la ivermectina en ganadería: comunidad de las boñigas en Colombia / Side effects of ivermectin use in livestock: dung community in Colombia / Efeitos colaterais do uso de ivermectina na pecuária: comunidade boñigas na Colômbia

Resumen La ivermectina es el antiparasitario más usado en veterinaria a nivel mundial desde que entró al mercado en 1981. La U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) americana en su valoración de riesgos determinó que, si bien es muy tóxica para organismos acuáticos, es improbable que, con las aplicaciones registradas para uso animal y por sus propiedades fisicoquímicas, se lleguen a contaminar cursos de agua. Sin embargo, los efectos de la ivermectina (IVM) sobre la fauna de invertebrados no blanco si pueden tener gran repercusión en la ecología de los pastizales por los costes asociados a la presencia de las boñigas no degradadas. De hecho, las pérdidas económicas por disminuir la calidad de los pastizales y reducir la superficie de los pastos disponible y apetecibles al ganado se han calculado en hasta 380 millones de dólares para la economía americana. La ivermectina afecta a un grupo muy beneficioso y diverso taxonómicamente que habita las boñigas, incluyendo a moscas coprófagas, avispas parasíticas, y escarabajos coprófagos y depredadores. Algunos estudios muestran que las boñigas de animales tratados con IVM pueden permanecer en los pastizales sin muestras apreciables de degradación hasta 340 días, mientras que las de animales no tratados son degradadas casi totalmente después de 80 días. Además, estudios de campo y laboratorio han mostrado que la sensibilidad de muchos insectos ocurre a concentraciones muy por debajo de las que se excretan con las heces de bovinos tratados con IVM. Los efectos sobre la reproducción y desarrollo de larvas de coleópteros ocurren incluso a concentraciones que son de hasta 10 veces por debajo de las que producen mortalidad. En Colombia se han identificado al menos 68 especies de la subfamilia Scarabaeinae que integran la comunidad de las boñigas del bovino. La mayor diversidad de escarabajos estercoleros se ha asociado a bosques y sistemas silvopastoriles que incorporan arboles nativos y proveen hábitats favorables para su supervivencia.

Abstract Ivermectin (IVM) has been the world most widely used antiparasitic agent in veterinary medicine since it came to the market in 1981. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in its risk assessment determined that, although it is very toxic to aquatic organisms, it is unlikely to contaminate water courses from current applications registered for animal use. However, the effects of IVM on non-target invertebrate fauna can have great impact on grassland ecology due to the costs associated with the presence of undegraded dung. In fact, the economic losses from lowering the quality of pastures and reducing the area of pasture available and palatable to livestock have been estimated in $380 million for the American economy. Ivermectin affects a highly beneficial and taxonomically diverse group that inhabits dung, including dung flies, parasitic wasps, and coprophilus and predatory dung beetles. Some studies show that dung from IVM-treated animals can remain in pasture without appreciable signs of degradation for up to 340 days, while those from untreated animals are almost completely degraded after 80 days. In addition, field and laboratory studies have shown the susceptibility of many insects to occur at concentrations well below those excreted in the feces of cattle treated with IVM. Effects on reproduction and development of coleopteran larvae occur at concentrations that can be 10 times lower of those causing mortality. In Colombia, at least 68 species of the subfamily Scarabaeinae have been identified in dung communities. The greater diversity of dung beetles has been associated with forests and silvopastoral systems that incorporate native trees and provide favorable habitats for their survival.

Resumo A ivermectina (IVM) tem sido o agente antiparasitário mais utilizado no mundo na medicina veterinária desde que chegou ao mercado em 1981. A US. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) em sua avaliação de risco determinou que, embora seja muito tóxico para organismos aquáticos, é improvável que contamine cursos d'água a partir de aplicações atuais registradas para uso animal. No entanto, os efeitos do IVM na fauna de invertebrados não-alvo podem ter grande impacto na ecologia das pastagens devido aos custos associados à presença de esterco não degradado. De fato, as perdas econômicas decorrentes da redução da qualidade das pastagens e da redução da área de pastagem disponível e palatável para o gado foram estimadas em US$ 380 milhões para a economia americana. A ivermectina afeta um grupo altamente benéfico e taxonomicamente diverso que habita o esterco, incluindo moscas do esterco, vespas parasitas e coprófilos e escaravelhos predadores. Alguns estudos mostram que o esterco de animais tratados com MIV pode permanecer no pasto sem sinais apreciáveis de degradação por até 340 dias, enquanto os de animais não tratados são quase completamente degradados após 80 dias. Além disso, estudos de campo e de laboratório mostraram que a suscetibilidade de muitos insetos ocorre em concentrações bem abaixo daquelas excretadas nas fezes de bovinos tratados com MIV. Os efeitos sobre a reprodução e desenvolvimento de larvas de coleópteros ocorrem em concentrações que podem ser 10 vezes menores daquelas que causam mortalidade. Na Colômbia, pelo menos 68 espécies da subfamília Scarabaeinae foram identificadas em comunidades de esterco. A maior diversidade de escaravelhos tem sido associada a florestas e sistemas silvipastoris que incorporam árvores nativas e proporcionam habitats favoráveis à sua sobrevivência.

COVID Management Strategy for Third Wave / Omicron Variant in India

COVID-19, the worst Pandemic of this decade caused significant morbidity and mortality in the past 3 years and still continue to hit the human kind with it’s evil skills. After the first and second COVID-19 wave the third wave has emerged with new variants and with high transmission rate and reduced efficiency of treatments and vaccines. The main treatment strategy remain same as symptomatic and supportive treatments. Oxygen therapy, Steroid, Antivirals and some repurposed drugs like Ivermectin and newer drugs including monoclonal antibodies are used in this fight against COVID-19. Ivermectin is being the game changer in many states of India, they kept this medicine in their new treatment protocol also. Vaccination including additional Booster/Precautionary Dose along with the COVID appropriate behaviours, if we are able to maintain Physical distance, Wear mask properly, Wash our hands and Prevent crowd from gathering then we will not allow the virus to spread and prevent the emergence of another wave

Miasis en pacientes con cáncer en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología entre 2008 y 2018: Serie de Casos / Myiasis in cancer patients receiving medical care at a reference center in Bogotá, Colombia: 2008-2018. A case series

Resumen Introducción: La miasis puede ser considerada una enfermedad desatendida; corresponde a la infestación de larvas de dípteros en piel, heridas o cavidades naturales. La literatura para pacientes oncológicos con infestación es limitada para Colombia. Métodos: Se realizó una serie de casos de miasis en pacientes atendidos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de 2008 a 2018; se obtuvieron datos de las historias clínicas con el fin de caracterizar variables sociodemográficas, oncológicas y tratamiento recibido. Resultados: Se encontraron 32 registros: 27 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión, mediana de edad 69 años, 74% fueron hombres, 48% procedían de área rural, 33,3% de áreas con alturas superiores a 2000 msnm, 70% presentaban cáncer de cabeza y cuello, seguidos por cáncer de mama 14%; 40% ECOG 2-3; 77% visualizaron larvas antes de consultar; ningún paciente presentó sepsis al momento de consultar, 29% presentaban secreción en zona infestada, 85% recibieron ivermectina y curaciones por parte de enfermería; 70% recibió antibióticos sistémicos, y 60% otros tratamientos además de la remoción mecánica e ivermectina, la mediana de leucocitos al ingreso fue de 10280 y de eosinófilos 110. Conclusión: Ésta es la primera serie de casos informada de miasis en pacientes oncológicos para América. Es más frecuente en pacientes con neoplasias en áreas expuestas, aunque se puede presentar en zonas no expuestas; la infestación por larvas tiende a no ser purulenta. Se deben hacer estudios sobre el uso de ivermectina, otros antibióticos y las implicaciones pronósticas de esta patología en los pacientes con cáncer avanzado.

Abstract Introduction: Myiasis can be considered a neglected disease; it corresponds to the infestation of dipteran larvae in skin, wounds, or natural cavities. Literature for oncological patients with this infestation is limited for Colombia. Methods: A case series of myiasis was carried out in patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Colombia from 2008 to 2018. Data were obtained from medical records in order to characterize sociodemographic and oncological variables and the treatment received. Results: Thirty-two records were found, 27 of them met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 69 years, 74% were men, 48% came from rural areas, 33.3% from areas with altitudes greater than 2,000 meters above sea level, 70% had head and neck cancer, followed by breast cancer in 14%; 40% had ECOG 2-3, and 77% visualized larvae before consulting. No patient presented with sepsis at the time of consultation, 29% presented with discharge in the infested area, 85% received ivermectin and treatment by the nursing staff; 70% received systemic antibiotics, and 60% other treatments in addition to mechanical removal and ivermectin. Median of leukocytes at admission was 10,280, while median of eosinophils was 110. Conclusion: This is the first reported case series of myiasis in cancer patients for Latin America. It is more common in patients with neoplasms in exposed areas, although it can occur in unexposed areas too. Larval infestation tends not to be purulent. Further studies are needed on the use of ivermectin, other antibiotics, and the prognostic implications of this pathology in patients with advanced cancer.

Ivermectin treatment response in two rural villages with a high prevalence of onchocerciasis and epilepsy, Mahenge Tanzania

Background: Despite 20 years of ivermectin mass distribution in the Mahenge area, Tanzania, the prevalence of onchocerciasis and epilepsy has remained high in rural villages. Objectives: We investigated the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae and predictors for parasitic load following ivermectin treatment in persons with (PWE) and without epilepsy (PWOE). Methods: Between April and September 2019, 50 PWE and 160 randomly selected PWOE from Msogezi and Mdindo villages participated in a follow-up study. Skin snips were obtained pre (baseline) and three months post-ivermectin treatment. Results: The overall prevalence of O. volvulus positive skin snips at baseline was 49% (103/210), with no significant difference between PWE (58.0%) and PWOE (46.3%); p=0.197. The overall mean micro filarial density was significantly higher at baseline 1.45(95%CI:0.98-2.04)) than three-month post-ivermectin treatment (0.23(95%CI:0.11-0.37), p<0.001. Three months after ivermectin, the micro filarial density had decreased by ≥80% in 54 (81.8%, 95%CI: 72.3-91.4) of the 66 individuals with positive skin snips at baseline. High micro filarial density at baseline was the only significant predictor associated with higher micro filarial density in the post-ivermectin skin snips. Conclusion: Our study reports a decrease in micro filarial density following ivermectin treatment in most individuals. Optimizing ivermectin coverage will address the ongoing onchocerciasis transmission in Mahenge

COVID-19 incidence, severity, medication use, and vaccination among dentists: survey during the second wave in Brazil

Abstract Objective This cross-sectional study with dentists in Brazil assessed the COVID-19 incidence and severity, its vaccination status, and the level of confidence in vaccines in May 2021 (COVID-19 second wave). The medications used to prevent or treat COVID-19, including controversial substances (vitamin D, ivermectin, zinc, and chloroquine), were analyzed. Methodology Dentists were recruited by email and responded to a pretested questionnaire until May 31, 2021. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed (α=0.05). Prevalence ratios were calculated for the association between professional characteristics and two outcomes: SARS-CoV-2 infection and use of controversial substances. Results In total, 1,907 responses were received (return rate of 21.2%). One third of dentists reported intermediate levels of confidence in the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, but 96% had received at least one vaccine dose, mainly CoronaVac. The effect of the pandemic on dental practice was classified as lower/much lower, in comparison with the first wave, by 46% of participants. Moreover, 27% of dentists had already tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and about 50% had relatives or friends who had been hospitalized or died from COVID-19. At least one medication was used by 59% of participants and 43% used two or more substances. Vitamin D (41%), ivermectin (35%), and zinc (29%) were the most frequent substances. More experienced dentists (≥21 years of professional experience) were 42% more likely to use controversial substances than less experienced dentists. The prevalence of use of controversial substances was 30% higher among dentists with residency or advanced training, such as postgraduate degrees, in comparison with participants holding MSc or PhD degrees. Participants with low confidence in vaccines were 2.1 times more likely to use controversial substances than participants with a very high confidence. Conclusion The results of this study show the high severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and raised questions about the use of scientific evidence by dentists in their decision to use controversial substances.