Effects of simvastatin/ezetimibe on microparticles, endothelial progenitor cells and platelet aggregation in subjects with coronary heart disease under antiplatelet therapy

It is not known whether the addition of ezetimibe to statins adds cardiovascular protection beyond the expected changes in lipid levels. Subjects with coronary heart disease were treated with four consecutive 1-week courses of therapy (T) and evaluations. The courses were: T1, 100 mg aspirin alone; T2, 100 mg aspirin and 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe; T3, 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe, and 75 mg clopidogrel (300 mg initial loading dose); T4, 75 mg clopidogrel alone. Platelet aggregation was examined in whole blood. Endothelial microparticles (CD51), platelet microparticles (CD42/CD31), and endothelial progenitor cells (CD34/CD133; CDKDR/CD133, or CD34/KDR) were quantified by flow cytometry. Endothelial function was examined by flow-mediated dilation. Comparisons between therapies revealed differences in lipids (T2 and T3<T1 and T4 for total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides; P<0.002 for all), as well as for endothelial function (T2>T1 and T4, P=0.001). Decreased platelet aggregation was observed after aspirin (arachidonic acid, T1<T3 and T4, P=0.034) and clopidogrel (adenosine, T3 and T4<T1 and T2, P<0.0001) therapy. Simvastatin/ezetimibe diphosphate did not change platelet aggregation, the amount of circulating endothelial and platelet microparticles, or endothelial progenitor cells. Cardiovascular protection following therapy with simvastatin/ezetimibe seems restricted to lipid changes and improvement of endothelial function not affecting the release of microparticles, mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells or decreased platelet aggregation.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of some novel furan derivatives

The present work involved cyclization of Schiff bases to azetidine-2-one and thiazolidine 4-one derivatives. The schiff bases [IIIa-j] were obtained upon reaction between electrophillic carbon atom of furfuraldehyde and nucleophillic nitrogen atom of amines. Azetidine-2-one derivatives [IVa-j] were obtained by reaction between imines and monochloro acetyl chloride in the presence of triethyl amine and 1, 4 dioxan. On the other hand, preparations of thiazolidine-4-ones [Va-j] were preceded by nucleophilic attack of sulphur of thioglycolic acid on imine carbon followed by intramolecular cyclization in the presence of SnCl[2]. The structures of the compounds were confirmed by spectral and elemental analysis. The biological evaluation of the compounds like anti-microbial, antioxidant, analgesic, CNS depressant and anti-diabetic activity were determined. From the pharmacological investigation it was found that out of all the compounds IVa, IVb, IVe, IVf, IVh,Va, Vb, Ve, Vf, Vh had shown more potent activity

comparison of ezetimibe and acarbose in decreasing liver transaminase in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized clinical trial

Ezetimibe inhibits the resorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol in the small intestine and decreases insulin resistance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD]. Acarbose has been used in type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. This study aims to compare the therapeutic effects of ezetimibe and acarbosein decreasing liver transaminase levels in patients with NAFLD. This was a single center, double-blind, parallel-group study conducted at Bu-Ali Sina Hospital, Qazvin, Iran. In this trial, we enrolled, by simple randomization, a total of 62 patients diagnosed with NASH. There were 29 patients treated with ezetimibe and 33 who were treated with acarbose over a ten-week period. Ezetimibe treatment significantly reduced ALT, AST, triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP], and serum insulin levels and the insulin resistance homeostasis model assessment [HOMA-IR] index compared to patients treated with acarbose [p<0.001]. Ezetimibe treatment decreased ALT [p=0.05], AST [p=0.01], total cholesterol [p=0.01], HDL cholesterol [p=0.03] and LDL cholesterol [p=0.03] levels to a significantly higher extent. Both ezetimibe and acarbose improved metabolic and biochemical abnormalities in patients with NASH, however these effects were more prominent with ezetimibe

Intestinal and Hepatic Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1

Polytopic transmembrane protein, Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) is localized at the apical membrane of enterocytes and the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes. It mediates intestinal cholesterol absorption and prevents extensive loss of cholesterol by transporting biliary cholesterol into hepatocytes. NPC1L1 is a molecular target of ezetimibe, an agent for hypercholesterolemia. Recently, NPC1L1 inhibition has been shown to prevent metabolic disorders such as fatty liver disease, obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. In this review, the identification and characterization of NPC1L1, NPC1L1-dependent cholesterol transport, the relationship with pathogenesis of metabolic disease and its newly introduced function for virus entry are discussed.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Atherosclerotic Disease

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, and is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. The prevalence of heterozygous FH is one in five hundred people. Owing to dysfunctional low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors due to genetic mutations, serum low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are considerably increased from birth. FH is clinically diagnosed by confirmation of family history and characteristic findings such as tendon xanthoma or xanthelasma. Thus, clinical concern and suspicion are important for early diagnosis of the disease. Current guidelines recommend lowering LDL-C concentration to at least 50% from baseline. Statins are shown to lower LDL-C levels with high safety, and thus, have been the drug of choice. However, it is difficult to achieve an ideal level of LDL-C with a single statin therapy in the majority of FH patients. Alternatively, lipid lowering combination therapy with the recently-introduced ezetimibe has shown more encouraging results.

Hypolipidaemic and anti-inflammatory effects of fixed dose combination of atorvastatin plus ezetimibe in Indian patients with dyslipidaemia

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>We aimed to assess the efficacy of fixed dose combination of atorvastatin plus ezetimibe in Indian patients with dyslipidaemia.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A double-blind study was conducted to assess the effect of fixed dose combination of ezetimibe 10 mg plus atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid profile, oxidised low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and soluble intercellular cell adhesion molecule (sICAM) in dyslipidaemic patients with or at high risk of coronary artery disease, and compare it with atorvastatin 10 mg monotherapy. 30 patients were randomised to receive ezetimibe plus atorvastatin or atorvastatin once daily for four weeks.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 30 patients, 10 men and 5 women (mean age 54.3 ± 1.6 years) received ezetimibe plus atorvastatin, while 13 men and 2 women (mean age 53.7 ± 2.8 years) received only atorvastatin. The combination treatment significantly reduced total cholesterol (percentage treatment difference -14.4 ± 6.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.0 to -27.7; p = 0.041) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C; percentage treatment difference -19.9 ± 6.1, 95% CI -7.4 to -32.4; p = 0.003) compared to atorvastatin monotherapy. 13 patients on combination treament achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program target for LDL-C as compared to 9 patients on atorvastatin monotherapy (p = 0.032). Significant reductions in very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, ox-LDL and sICAM were observed with combination treatment compared to atorvastatin monotherapy. However, no significant change was seen in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or hsCRP levels between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Combination treatment with atorvastatin and ezetimibe had relatively better lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory efficacy than atorvastatin monotherapy.</p>

Change in cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in patients with coronary heart disease after combination therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Statins and ezetimibe have been reported to change the balance of cholesterol metabolism, but few studies have been performed on Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in cholesterol metabolism markers in patients with coronary heart disease.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Forty-five patients with coronary heart disease were treated with 20 mg/d of simvastatin for four weeks. Subjects were then divided into two different therapy groups according to whether they reached the target values for total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Patients who reached the target values remained on simvastatin and those who did not reach the target values took a combination of simvastatin plus 10 mg/d ezetimibe until the 12th week. The concentrations of cholesterol synthesis markers (lathosterol and desmosterol) and absorption markers (campesterol and sitosterol) were measured on the 1st, 4th, and 12th week of the study by gas chromatography.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>After treatment with simvastatin for four weeks, the levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased significantly compared to levels measured during the 1st week (P < 0.05). On the 12th week the levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol had decreased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to levels during the 4th week. By the 12th week the levels of campesterol and sitosterol in the combination group had decreased significantly (P < 0.05) compared with levels measured during the 4th week.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Coronary heart disease patients with high cholesterol synthesis at baseline might gain a greater benefit from simvastatin treatment. Combination therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with low cholesterol synthesis at baseline might increase the success rate of lipid-lowering through decreasing the absorption of cholesterol.</p>

Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies

Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies.

La respuesta terapéutica a ezetimiba en ratones C57BL/6 es mediada por cambios en la expresión de NPC1L1, ABCG5 y ABCG8 en el enterocito / Therapeutic response to ezetimibe in C57BL/6 mice is mediated by changes in NPC1L1, ABCG5 and ABCG8 expression in the enterocyte

Las proteínas NPC1L1, ABCG5 y ABCG8 participan en la absorción intestinal de colesterol. Ezetimiba inhibe este proceso bloqueando a NPC1L1, sin embargo, su efecto sobre ABCG5 y ABCG8 aún no está claro. Así, el objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar en ratones C57BL/6 con hipercolesterolemia inducida por dieta y tratados con ezetimiba, la expresión de NPC1L1, ABCG5 y ABCG8 mediante PCR en tiempo real y Western blot, en 3 grupos de animales: 1, dieta hipercolesterolémica D12336; 2, dieta D12336 más 5 mg/kg/día de ezetimiba; 3, dieta control. El nivel sérico de colesterol total fue significativamente diferente entre los grupos estudiados (control: 1,85 +/- 0,49 mmol/L; dieta D12336: 3,11 +/- 0,73 mmol/L; ezetimiba: 2,11 +/- 0,50 mmol/L, P = 0,001). La expresión génica de NPC1L1 aumentó 5,4 veces en el grupo que recibió la dieta D12336 (P = 0,003). Por otro lado, la expresión génica de ABCG5 y ABCG8 no fue diferente en el grupo con hipercolesterolemia (P = 0,239 y P = 0,201, respectivamente). Después del tratamiento con ezetimiba, la expresión génica de ABCG5 se incrementó 15,6 veces (P = 0.038). No hubo diferencias significativas en la expresión génica de NPC1L1 (P = 0,134) y ABCG8 (P = 0,067). En relación a la expresión proteica, la dieta D12336 incrementó los niveles de expresión de NPC1L1 (P = 0,022) y ABCG5 (P = 0,008); el tratamiento con ezetimiba incrementó los niveles de NPC1L1 (P = 0,048) y redujo los niveles de ABCG5 (P = 0,036) y ABCG8 (P = 0,016). En conclusión, nuestros resultados sugieren que tanto la dieta hipercolesterolémica como el tratamiento con ezetimiba, en un modelo experimental, afectan los niveles de expresión de NPC1L1, ABCG5 y ABCG8, sugiriendo que ABCG5 y ABCG8 están involucrados en la respuesta hipolipemiante a este fármaco. No obstante, el mecanismo mediante el cual se explica esta interacción requiere de un futuro estudio.

Proteins NPC1L1, ABCG5 and ABCG8 are involved in the intestinal absorption of cholesterol. Ezetimibe inhibits this process by blocking NPC1L1, however, its effect on ABCG5 and ABCG8 is not yet clear. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate in C57BL / 6 mice with diet-induced hypercholesterolemia treated with ezetimibe, the expression of NPC1L1, ABCG5 and ABCG8 by real time PCR and Western blot, in 3 groups of animals: 1, diet hypercholesterolemic D12336, 2, D12336 diet plus 5 mg/kg/ day of ezetimibe, 3, diet control. The serum level of total cholesterol was significantly different between groups (control: 1.85 +/- 0.49 mmol / L; diet D12336: 3.11 +/- 0.73 mmol / L; ezetimibe: 2.11 +/- 0.50 mmol / L, P = 0.001). NPC1L1 gene expression increased 5.4-fold in the group receiving the diet D12336 (P = 0.003). Furthermore, the gene expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 was not different in the group with hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.239 and P = 0.201, respectively). After treatment with ezetimibe, ABCG5 gene expression was increased 15.6 times (P = 0.038). No significant differences in gene expression of NPC1L1 (P = 0.134) and ABCG8 (P = 0.067). Regarding protein expression, the D12336 diet increased the levels of expression of NPC1L1 (P = 0.022) and ABCG5 (P = 0.008), treatment with ezetimibe increased the levels of NPC1L1 (P = 0.048) and reduced levels of ABCG5 (P = 0.036) and ABCG8 (P = 0.016). In conclusion, our results suggest that both hypercholesterolemic diet as treatment with ezetimibe, in an experimental model, affect the expression levels of NPC1L1, ABCG5 and ABCG8, suggesting that ABCG5 and ABCG8 are involved in lipid-lowering response to this drug. However, the mechanism by which this interaction is explained requires further study.

Effect of five single nucleotide polymorphisms of ABCG5 and ABCG8 genes on eLipid-lowering response / Efecto de cinco polimorfismos de los genes ABCG5 y ABCG8 sobre la respuesta hipolipemiante a ezetimiba

In this study we evaluated the possible association between five single nucleotide polymorphisms in ABCG5 (rs6720173) and ABCG8 (rs11887534, rs4148211, rs4148217 and rs6544718) genes and ezetimibe response in Chilean hypercholesterolemic subjects. A total of 60 non-related hypercholesterolemic subjects, aged 18 to 65 years old were included in this study. These subjects were treated with ezetimibe (10mg/day) during one month. The ABCG5 and ABCG8 genotypes were assessed by PCR-RFLP. The genotype distribution of the ABCG5/ABCG8 polymorphisms was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Our results showed that the investigated polymorphisms were not associated with the response to ezetimibe. Nevertheless, the T allele of rs6544718 polymorphism was related to higher baseline levels of LDL-cholesterol (p<0.001). In addition, the G allele for the rs4148211 polymorphism was associated with greater baseline concentrations of triglycerides (P=0.019). This allele was also associated with lower concentrations of HDL-cholesterol (P=0.027), after ezetimibe treatment. Our results suggest that the studied polymorphisms do not affect the therapeutic response to ezetimibe in the evaluated subjects.

En este estudio se evaluó la posible asociación entre cinco polimorfismos de nucleótido único en los genes ABCG5 (rs6720173) y ABCG8 (rs11887534, rs4148211, rs4148217 y rs6544718) y la respuesta a ezetimiba en pacientes hipercolesterolémicos chilenos. Un total de 60 individuos hipercolesterolemicos, no relacionados, con edades entre 18 y 65 años fueron incluidos. Estos sujetos fueron tratados con ezetimiba (10mg/día) durante un mes. Los genotipos de ABCG5 y ABCG8 fueron evaluados por PCR-RFLP. La distribución de genotipos de los polimorfismos de ABCG5/ABCG8 se encontraba en equilibrio de Hardy-Weinberg. Nuestros resultados mostraron que los polimorfismos estudiados no se asociaron con la respuesta a la ezetimiba. Sin embargo, el alelo T del polimorfismo rs6544718 fue relacionado con niveles basales elevados de LDL-colesterol (p <0,001). Además, el alelo G para el polimorfismo rs4148211 se asoció con una mayor concentración basal de triglicéridos (p = 0,019). Este alelo también se asoció con concentraciones más bajas de HDL-colesterol (p = 0,027), después del tratamiento con ezetimiba. Nuestros resultados sugieren que los polimorfismos estudiados no afectan a la respuesta terapéutica a la ezetimiba en los sujetos evaluados.

Effect of ezetimibe on remnant-like particle cholesterol in subjects with metabolic syndrome

To investigate the influence of ezetimibe monotherapy on remnant-like particle cholesterol [RLP-C] in subjects with metabolic syndrome [MetS]. Ezetimibe [10 mg/daily] was prescribed over a 12-week period for hypercholesterolemic subjects divided into groups with MetS [n = 28; male/female = 13/15; mean age 67 years] and without MetS [n = 22; male/female = 9/13; mean age 66 years]. In the pre- and post-treatment phases, BMI, blood pressure and fasting blood levels of glucose, lipid panels and RLP-C were measured. The group with MetS showed significantly higher RLP-C levels than the group without MetS [median level: 0.18 vs. 0.12 mmol/l [7.1 vs. 4.4 mg/dl], p < 0.01] in the pre-treatment phase. In the post-treatment phase, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly reduced in both groups to a similar level [p < 0.001 in both], while there was a significantly greater reduction in RLP-C in the group with MetS than the group without MetS [median level: 0.12 vs. 0.11 mmol/l [4.8 vs. 4.1 mg/dl], p < 0.05]. This difference in RLP-C remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors. Ezetimibe monotherapy may be associated with a greater reduction in RLP-C levels in subjects with MetS than in those without MetS

Progress of Niemann-Pick type C1 Like 1 on cholesterol metabolism / 生理学报

The polytopic transmembrane protein, Niemann-Pick type C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1), is the key point of exogenous cholesterol absorption and plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism. However, the molecular mechanism of NPC1L1's role in cholesterol uptake remains unclear. NPC1L1 expression is highly regulated by a variety of molecular actors. Nuclear receptors regulate NPC1L1 expression through its promoter region. Polyunsaturated fatty acids down-regulates NPC1L1 expression by the way of sterol regulatory element binding protein 2 (SREBP2). In addition, curcumin and sphingosine-phosphate take part in the regulation of NPC1L1 expression. NPC1L1 has been recognized as an essential protein for sterol absorption and is the molecular target of ezetimibe. Moreover, inhibition of the expression of NPC1L1 has been shown to have beneficial effects on components of the metabolic syndrome. The recent progress in the structure, function and regulation of NPC1L1 is reviewed.

Effect of atorvastatin, with or without ezetimibe, on serum lipid profile and ALT in hyperlipidemic patients

Hyperlipidaemia is raised serum levels of one or more of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein and triglycerides. Many drugs have been used for the treatment of this disorder. This work compares the effects of atorvastatin with or without ezetimibe on lipid profile, atherogenic index and serum alanine aminotransferase. This study covers 90 subjects, 60 untreated hyperlipidemic patients, and 30 healthy subjects. Patients were divided into 2 groups, the first group included 30 patients treated with atorvastatin 20 mg/day alone, the second group included 30 patients treated with a combination of 2 drugs [atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg] taken daily at night. Serum lipid profile, atherogenic index and serum alanine amniotransferase were measured after 12 hours fasting for the patients in 3 intervals: before, and after 8 weeks and 16 weeks of treatment. After therapy for both groups of patients, as compared to the levels before treatment, has shown that serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly reduced while high density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly increased. Serum alanine aminotransferase increased by both groups of treatment with no significant difference between the two modes of treatment which has the same findings in comparison to the control group. Combination of atorvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg daily, is more effective than atorvastatin 20 mg taken alone

[Stability study of ezetimibe in raw material and tablets]

Stress conditions were applied on the tested drug [Ezetimibe] according to ICH guidelines. Degradation was found to occur in basic conditions and to much less extent in acidic conditions. The tested compound was stable in light and thermal stress conditions. The analytical validated RP-HPLC method, which has been developed for assaying Ezetimibe previously, is used as stability indicating method. The assay was performed using a C18 column and a mobile phase consist of 50% Acetonitril and 50% buffer [10mm potassium phosphate, pH=2.5 adjusted using phosphoric acid]. The flow rate was 1 ml/min and the analyte was determined using a UV detector at 240 nm. The developed analytical procedure was able to separate the drug from its degradation products, and it was a stability indicating method. Several batches of local manufactured Ezetimibe tablets with different manufacturing dates were assayed. No degradation products were observed in all tested samples, which indicates the stability of Ezetimibe tables in the current conserving conditions

Effects of Ezetimibe Added to Ongoing Statin Therapy on C-Reactive Protein Levels in Hypercholesterolemic Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ezetimibe alone does not decrease C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in hypercholesterolemic patients. However, several reports have suggested that ezetimibe might potentiate the effect of statin not only on cholesterol but also on CRP when administered together. We investigated the effect of ezetimibe on CRP levels in patients taking statins. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients who had not achieved recommended low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with statin therapy were divided into two groups, the ezetimibe group (n=60) and the control group (n=60). A third group of hypercholesterolemic patients without statin therapy was treated with statin (n=59). Patients with CRP level 10 mg/L were excluded. Lipid and CRP levels were measured before therapy commenced, and after 2 months of therapy. RESULTS: Ezetimibe decreased cholesterol and LDL-C levels by 20.2% (p=0.000) and 28.1% (p=0.000) respectively. However, ezetimibe did not reduce CRP levels (from 0.83+/-0.68 to 1.14+/-1.21 mg/dL, p=0.11). CRP levels remained unchanged in the control group (p=0.42). In contrast, statin lowered CRP levels (from 0.82+/-0.73 to 0.65+/-0.57 mg/dL, p=0.008). In patients taking statins, changes in CRP levels were not associated with changes in LDL-C (r=-0.02, p=0.87), but with baseline CRP levels (r=-0.38, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe failed to reduce CRP levels in hypercholesterolemic patients taking statins despite significant reduction of LDL-C. This finding suggests that the anti-inflammatory effect of statin may not be secondary to cholesterol reduction, but via other mechanisms.

Comparison of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg Versus Atorvastatin 20 mg in Achieving a Target Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Goal for Patients With Very High Risk

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although recent lipid-lowering therapies are effective in reducing low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, many patients treated with lipid-lowering agents do not achieve target LDL-C levels, especially in very high risk patients. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg and atorvastatin 20 mg on achieving a target LDL-C goal in very high risk patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 74 patients with very high risk were enrolled in the study. Very high risk patients were defined as patients that displayed established cardiovascular disease with multiple major risk factors, poorly controlled risk factors, multiple risk factors of the metabolic syndrome and acute coronary syndromes. Patients were randomized into two groups: ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (n=36) and atorvastatin 20 mg (n=38). Follow-up lipid profile was obtained 6 weeks later. A target goal of LDL-C was defined as less than 70 mg/dL at follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and laboratory data were similar between the two groups. Achieving a target LDL-C goal was observed in 41.7% of Group 1 and 44.7% of Group 2 at 6 weeks (p=0.82). Changes in other lipid profiles were not significantly different but the tolerability of the two groups was similar. CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg and atorvastatin 20 mg showed similar effects in achieving target LDL-C levels in patients with very high risk.

Development and validation of spectrophotometeric method for simultaneous determination of simvastatin and ezetimibe in tablet formulations

A versatile, accurate, precise and economic method for simultaneous determination of simvastatin and ezetimibe in fixed dose combination products was developed. The absorbance values at 236 nm and 234 nm of over line spectrum was used for the estimation of simvastatin and ezetimibe, respectively without mutual interference. This method obeyed Beer's law in the concentration range of 4 - 16 micro g /ml for simvastatin and 4- 16 micro g /ml for ezetimibe. The results of analyses have been validated statistically for linearity, accuracy and precision of the proposed method

Effects of Combined Therapy with Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in a Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model

The aim of this study was to examine the anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in a porcine coronary restenosis model. Pigs were randomized into two groups in which the coronary arteries (23 pigs) had DES. Stents were deployed with oversizing (stent/artery ratio 1.3:1) in porcine coronary arteries. Fifteen pigs were taken 10/20 mg of E/S and eight pigs were not taken E/S. Histopathologic analysis was assessed at 28 days after stenting. In neointima, most inflammatory cells were lymphohistiocytes. Lymphohistiocyte count was not different between two groups (337+/-227 vs. 443+/-366 cells, P=0.292), but neointima area was significantly smaller (1.00+/-0.49 mm2 vs. 1.69+/-0.98 mm2, P=0.021) and percent area stenosis was significantly lower (23.3+/-10% vs. 39+/-19%, P=0.007) in E/S group compared with control group. There were no significant differences in fibrin score (1.99+/-0.79 vs. 1.81+/-0.88, P=0.49), endothelial score (1.75+/-0.66 vs. 1.80+/-0.59, P=0.79), and the percent of endothelium covered lumen (43+/-21% vs. 45+/-21%, P=0.84) between E/S group and control group. Combined therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin inhibits neointimal hyperplasia, but does not inhibit inflammatory infiltration and arterial healing after DES implantation in a porcine coronary restenosis model.

Effects of Statins on the Epicardial Fat Thickness in Patients with Coronary Artery Stenosis Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comparison of Atorvastatin with Simvastatin/Ezetimibe

BACKGROUND: Epicardial fat is a visceral thoracic fat and known to be related with presence of dyslipidemia and coronary arterial stenosis. We evaluated the effects and differences of statins on epicardial fat thickness (EFT) in patients underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive patients underwent successful PCI and scheduled six to eight-months follow-up coronary angiography from March 2007 to June 2009. EFT was measured by echocardiography twice at the time of PCI and the follow-up coronary angiography. We included 145 patients (58 females; mean, 63.5 +/- 9.5 years). RESULTS: Of the 145 patients, 82 received 20 mg of atorvastatin (atorvastatin group) and 63 medicated with 10 mg of simvastatin with 10 mg of ezetimibe (simvastatin/ezetimibe group). With statin treatments, total cholesterol concentration (189.1 +/- 36.1 to 143.3 +/- 36.5 mg/dL, p < 0.001), triglycerides (143.5 +/- 65.5 to 124.9 +/- 63.1 mg/dL, p = 0.005), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (117.4 +/- 32.5 to 76.8 +/- 30.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and EFT (4.08 +/- 1.37 to 3.76 +/- 1.29 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly decreased. Atorvastatin and simvastatin/ezetimibe showed similar improvements in the cholesterol profiles. However, atorvastatin decreased EFT more significantly than simvastatin/ezetimibe (EFT change 0.47 +/- 0.65 in the atorvastatin vs. 0.12 +/- 0.52 mm in the simvastatin/ezetimibe group; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, the atorvastatin group showed significant reduction in EFT than in the simvastatin/ezetimibe group. This might be originated from the statin difference. More large, randomized study will be needed to evaluate this statin difference.