Efectos adversos de lopinavir/ritonavir en enfermedad grave por coronavirus (COVID-19) / Adverse effects of lopinavir/ritonavir in critically ill patients with COVID-19

Resumen Durante el transcurso de la pandemia causada por el virus SARS-CoV-2 se han utilizado diferentes fármacos como potenciales tratamientos específicos con el objetivo de lograr mejoría clínica y/o disminuir la mortalidad de los afectados, pero al tratarse de una enfermedad hasta ahora desconocida, la evidencia acerca de su seguridad y eficacia se va construyendo a medida que se los prescribe. La farmacovigilancia intensiva en este contexto permite detectar eventos adversos y mediante su reporte y análisis inferir el perfil de seguridad en cada indicación. Se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, en un único centro, en el cual se relevaron los eventos adversos en 23 pacientes adultos en estado crítico, de los cuales 18 recibieron lopinavir/ ritonavir como tratamiento empírico, entre el 15 de marzo y el 15 de junio de 2020, durante su internación en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Se describe el tipo de eventos adversos, su gravedad y si fueron motivo de suspensión del tratamiento. Los resultados del presente análisis muestran una alta tasa de eventos adversos (10/23, 43%) entre los que recibieron lopinavir/ritonavir, llevando en la mayoría de los casos a la decisión de suspender el mismo antes de completar el tratamiento. Aun con las limitaciones propias del reducido número de casos, la divulgación de dichos resultados aporta evidencia para definir el perfil de seguridad de la combinación lopinavir / ritonavir usado en enfermedad grave por SARS-CoV-2.

Abstract During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic many drugs have been used as potential treatments in order to improve the clinical outcome and reduce the mortality. But since it is a currently unknown disease, the evidence about efficacy and safety is built as the drugs are prescribed. In this context, intensive pharmacovigilance allows early detection of adverse events, and thereby infer the safety profile of the indication. We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study involving adult patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. All adverse events detected in 23 patients in the Intensive Care Unit between March 15 and June 15, 2020 were registered. We describe type and severity of the adverse events and if treatment suspension was needed. The results show a high rate of adverse events (10/23, 43%) in treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir. In most cases early treatment suspension was required. Even though the limitations of our study derived from the small sample size, these results could help in building evidence about the safety of using lopinavir/ritonavir for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Lopinavir/ritonavir for COVID-19: a living systematic review / Lopinavir/ritonavir para COVID-19: una revisión sistemática viva

Objective: Provide a timely, rigorous, and continuously updated summary of the evidence on the role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted searches in the special L·OVE (Living OVerview of Evidence) platform for COVID-19, a system that performs regular searches in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and other 33 sources. We searched for randomized trials and non-randomized studies evaluating the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir versus placebo or no treatment in patients with COVID-19. Two reviewers independently evaluated potentially eligible studies, according to predefined selection criteria, and extracted data using a predesigned standardized form. We performed meta-analyses using random-effect models and assessed overall certainty in evidence using the GRADE approach. A living, web-based version of this review will be openly available during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Our search strategy yielded 862 references. Finally, we identified 12 studies, including two randomized trials, evaluating lopinavir/ritonavir, in addition to standard care versus standard care alone in 250 adult inpatients with COVID-19. The evidence from randomized trials shows lopinavir/ritonavir may reduce mortality (relative risk: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 1.3; low certainty evidence), but the anticipated magnitude of the absolute reduction in mortality, varies across different risk groups. Lopinavir/ritonavir also had a slight reduction in the risk of requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, developing respiratory failure, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, it did not lead to any difference in the duration of hospitalization and may lead to an increase in the number of total adverse effects. The overall certainty of the evidence was low or very low. Conclusions: For severe and critical patients with COVID-19, lopinavir/ritonavir might play a role in improving outcomes, but the available evidence is still limited. A substantial number of ongoing studies should provide valuable evidence to inform researchers and decision-makers soon.

Objetivo: Esta revisión sistemática viva tiene como objetivo entregar un resumen oportuno, riguroso y constantemente actualizado de la evidencia disponible sobre los efectos de lopinavir/ritonavir en pacientes con COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en la plataforma L·OVE COVID-19 (Living OVerview of Evidence), un sistema que mantiene búsquedas regulares en PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) y otras 33 fuentes. Se buscaron ensayos aleatorios y estudios no aleatorios que evaluaran el uso de lopinavir/ritonavir versus placebo o ningún tratamiento en pacientes con COVID-19. Dos revisores evaluaron de forma independiente los artículos potencialmente elegibles, de acuerdo con criterios de selección predefinidos, y extrajeron los datos mediante un formulario estandarizado. Los resultados fueron combinados mediante un metanálisis utilizando modelos de efectos aleatorios y evaluamos la certeza de la evidencia utilizando el método GRADE. Una versión viva de esta revisión estará disponible durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Resultados: La búsqueda inicial arrojó 862 referencias. Finalmente, identificamos 12 estudios incluyendo 2 ensayos aleatorios, que evaluaban lopinavir/ritonavir adicionado al tratamiento estándar versus tratamiento estándar en 250 pacientes adultos hospitalizados con COVID-19. Los resultados provenientes de los ensayos aleatorios muestran que el uso de lopinavir/ritonavir puede reducir la mortalidad (riesgo relativo: 0,77; intervalo de confianza 95%: 0,45 a 1,3; certeza de evidencia baja), pero la magnitud de la reducción absoluta de la mortalidad varía según los diferentes grupos de riesgo. El uso de lopinavir/ritonavir mostró además una ligera reducción en el riesgo de requerir ventilación mecánica invasiva, desarrollar insuficiencia respiratoria o síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda. No se observó diferencias en la duración de la hospitalización y su uso puede producir un aumento en el número de efectos adversos totales. La certeza global de la evidencia fue baja o muy baja. Conclusiones: Para pacientes graves y críticos con COVID-19, el uso de lopinavir/ritonavir podría desempeñar un papel en la mejora de los resultados, pero la evidencia disponible aún es limitada. La gran cantidad de estudios en curso deberían proporcionar evidencia valiosa para informar a los investigadores y los tomadores de decisiones en el futuro cercano.

Factors associated to modification of first-line antiretroviral therapy due to adverse events in people living with HIV/AIDS

ABSTRACT Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has modified the outcome of patients with HIV infection, providing virological control and reducing mortality. However, there are several reasons as to why patients may discontinue their antiretroviral therapy, with adverse events being one of the main reasons reported in the literature. This is a case-control nested in a cohort of people living with HIV/AIDS, conducted to identify the incidence of ART modification due to adverse events and the associated factors, in two referral services in Recife, Brazil, between 2011 and 2014. Of the modifications occurred in the first year of ART, 25.7% were driven by adverse events. The median time elapsed between initiating ART and the first modification due to adverse events was 70.5 days (95% CI: 26-161 days). The main adverse events were dermatological, neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal. Dermatological events were the earliest to appear after initiating ART. Efavirenz was the most prescribed and most modified drug during the study period. The group of participants who used zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz had a 2-fold greater chance (adjusted OR: 2.16 95% CI: 1.28-3.65) of switching ART due to adverse events when compared to the group that used tenofovir with lamivudine and efavirenz.

La evidencia en tiempos de coronavirus (COVID-19) / Evidence in times of coronavirus (COVID-19)

La pandemia de COVID-19 está generando información epidemiológica y clínica en una escala sin precedentes para una enfermedad de reciente aparición. Aunque ya se han iniciado numerosos ensayos clínicos de fármacos antiguos y nuevos como potenciales antivirales específicos, la mayor parte de la información publicada hasta ahora carece de los controles básicos para la evaluación de la eficacia de un medicamento. Los medios de comunicación amplifican estos resultados preliminares y suman presión a los médicos asistenciales y a los decisores de políticas públicas. Este artículo revisa las pruebas disponibles sobre los cuatro tratamientos antivirales específicos más prometedores: hidroxicloroquina, lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesvir e interferones alfa y beta. Se comprueba en todos ellos que no hay demostración suficiente de eficacia como para recomendar su uso fuera de una investigación experimental adecuadamente controlada. En el uso individual de un medicamento no hay forma de saber si está beneficiando o perjudicando al paciente. Es erróneo asumir que la eventual curación se debe al fármaco y un mal desenlace debe atribuirse a la enfermedad. Sólo la comparación entre grupos de pacientes asignados al tratamiento experimental o a un control adecuado permite conocer la eficacia y seguridad de las intervenciones. El desafío es conciliar la urgencia de actuar con la generación de nuevos conocimientos.Aunque no resulta sencillo organizar ensayos clínicos en este contexto, las instituciones pueden sumarse a los proyectos en marcha a nivel nacional e internacional. El uso de estos fármacos debe considerarse experimental, por lo que es necesario obtener el consentimiento informado del paciente. (AU)

The COVID-19 pandemic is generating epidemiological and clinical information on an unprecedented scale for a newly emerging disease. Although numerous clinical trials of old and new drugs as potential specific antivirals have already been started, most of the information published so far lacks basic controls for evaluating drug efficacy. The media amplify these preliminary results and add pressure to doctors and policymakers. This article reviews the available evidence for the four most promising specific antiviral treatments: hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir / ritonavir, remdesvir, and alpha and beta interferons. The findings show that none of them has sufficient demonstration of efficacy to recommend its use outside ofthe adequately controlled experimental study. In the individual use of a drug there is no way of knowing if it is benefiting orharming the patient. It is wrong to assume that the eventual cure is due to the drug and a poor outcome must be attributed to the disease. Only the comparison between groups of patients assigned to the experimental treatment or to an adequate control can establish the efficacy and safety of the interventions. The challenge is to reconcile the urgency to act with the generation of new knowledge. Although it is not easy to organize clinical trials in this context, the institutions can join theongoing projects at the national and international levels. The use of these drugs should be considered experimental, so it is necessary to obtain the informed consent of the patient. (AU)

Use of lopinavi//ritonavir associated with ergoamine resulting in foot amputattion: brief communicatoon / Uso de lopinavir/ritonavir associado com ergotamina resultando em amputação de pé: comunicação breve

A 32-year-old female, was diagnosed in 2004 with a C1 HIV1 infection, using zidovudine/lamivudine 300/150 mg BID and lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg BID, in addition to prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 800/160 mg QD, but no prophylaxis with macrolide antibiotics. The patient presented with a severe headache and was prescribed two capsules of the anti-migraine drug Ormigrein™, which contained ergotamine tartrate 1 mg, caffeine 100 mg, paracetamol 220 mg, hyoscyamine sulfate 87.5 mcg, and atropine sulfate 12.5 mcg. Afterwards she was prescribed one capsule of Ormigrein every 30 minutes for a total of six capsules a day. The patient took the medication as prescribed but developed a pain in her left ankle three days later, which evolved to the need for amputation.

Mulher de 32 anos infectada pelo HIV 1, vinha utilizando zidovudina/lamivudina 300/150 mg um comprimido duas vezes ao dia e lopinavir/ritonavir 200/50 mg dois comprimidos duas vezes ao dia e profilaxia com sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim 800/160 mg uma vez ao dia, sem profilaxia com macrolídeos. A paciente apresentou enxaqueca severa com prescrição da associação tartarato de ergotamina 1 mg, cafeína 100 mg, paracetamol 220 mg, sulfato de hiosciamina 87,5 mcg, sulfato de atropina 12,5 mcg, dois comprimidos na crise, seguido de um comprimido a cada 30 minutos, com no máximo seis comprimidos ao dia. A paciente ingeriu seis comprimidos em um dia, surgindo uma dor em tornozelo esquerdo três dias depois, que evoluiu para ergotismo e amputação do pé.