ABSTRACT
Objective:To clarify the medical security plan and its practical effects at the main venue of the 19th Hangzhou Asian Games.Methods:The plan described the medical security implementation plan of the main venue of the 19th Asian Games in Hangzhou (organizational management and operation mechanism, medical security operation system, standardized training and support processes, application of Asian Games intelligent first aid security system, and so on). And through high-facticity simulation verify the operation effect of the main venue's medical support (team mode and response time). Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the medical security program verified through the effect of medical services (quantity, disease types, transfers, etc.) during the Asian Games and Asian Paralympic Games.Results:The medical security team of the main venue of the 19th Hangzhou Asian Games included the management team and the operation team, of which consisted of 44 medical staffs (22 doctors and 22 nurses); and were deployed to 16 different security positions. It was also accompanied with 16 volunteers to assist medical staff to transport patients. In addition, a total of 300 medical observers were enrolled in audience area to assist rapid identification, intervention, and collaborative diagnosis and treatment with the medical team. Medical security teams were arranged to cover all the audience areas who can arrive at the patient's area within 2 minutes after receiving orders, transfer the patient to the ambulance’s site in 8 minutes, and transport the patient to a designated hospital within 10-20 minutes. During the Asian Games and Asian Paralympic Games, the medical-care team treated a total of 3 742 patients, including 9 patients transported from medical service sites of the audience area to the stadium infirmary, as well as 83 patients referred to the designated hospital.Conclusions:The medical security implementation plan for the main venues of the Asian Games provides good medical security for the Asian Games and Asian Paralympic Games. It also provides theoretical and practical experience for the development of the medical security system for international events in future.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the difference of brain function remodeling in patients with differ-ent motor ability and record the brain function index of patients returning to exercise 2 years after an-terior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACLR).Methods Patients undergoing ACLR in year 2017 and 2018(2 years after ACLR)were selected and randomly divided into a return-to-exercise(CP,n=7)group,a non-return-to-exercise(NP,n=7)group.Moreover,8 healthy counterparts of the CP group were chosen into a healthy control(HC)group.Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging(rs-fMRI)was used to obtain the blood oxygen level dependent signals,and the amplitude of low-frequen-cy fluctuation(ALFF)was computed across the typical band(0.01～0.08 Hz),sub-band Slow-4(0.027～0.073 Hz)and Slow-5(0.01～0.027 Hz).Meanwhile,brain maps were obtained and two-sample t-tests were performed among different groups(P<0.005).Results In the typical frequency band,the average ALFF value was higher in the CP and HC groups than the NP group for the Cerebelum_Crus1,but lower in the CP group than the NP group for the Occipital_Mid,higher in the CP group than the HC group for the Putamen and higher in the NP group than the HC group for the Frontal_Mid_Orb.More-over,in the Slow-4 band,the ALEF level was lower in the CP group than the NP group for the Oc-cipital_Mid,higher in the CP group than the HC group for the Putamen,and higher in the NP group than the HC group for the Frontal_Mid_Orb and cerebellum_Crus2.However,in the Slow-5 band,the ALEF values were higher in the CP group than the NP group for the Occipital_Inf and Precen-tral,but lower for the caudate.In the same band,those values were higher in the CP group than in the HC group for the Cerebellum_Crus1,but lower in the NP group than the HC group for the Cere-bellum_Crus1 and Supp_Motor_Area,and higher in the NP group than the HC group for the Fron-tal_Mid_Orb.Conclusion The patients returning to exercise after ACLR have higher cerebellar remodel-ing and lower visual compensation than those not,and display higher basal ganglia and cerebellar nerve remodeling than healthy controls,suggesting that functional compensation occurs in the former pa-tients.Moreover,Slow-4,Slow-5 and other sub-bands can complement the classical frequency bands and are worthy of further study.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the effectiveness and safety of all-suture anchors and single-row suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 50 patients with rotator cuff tear admitted to Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between July 2019 and September 2021. They were divided into two groups according to the random table: 25 patients to receive repair with single-row suture anchors (control group) and the other 25 with all-suture anchors (trial group). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and shoulder range of motion were compared between the two groups before surgery, at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up. The rotator cuff retear rate of the two groups was evaluated according to Sugaya classification at 6 months after surgery. Breakage or anchor loosening during surgery, healing of incision and presence of infections or neurological complications after surgery, and change of the anchor position and periosteal reaction at the insertion site at 3 and 6 months after surgery were observed in the two groups.Results:A total of 50 patients with rotator cuff tear were involved in this study, including 17 males and 33 females, aged 40-73 years [(59.1±10.3)years]. All patients were followed up for 6-9 months [(6.7±1.0)months]. The differences in VAS, UCLA shoulder score, ASES score, and shoulder range of motion between the two groups were statistically insignificant before surgery (all P>0.05). The VAS at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up in the control group was 2.0 (2.0, 4.0)points and 2.0 (0.0, 2.0)points, respectively, with no statistical differences from 2.0 (2.0, 2.0)points and 2.0 (0.0, 2.0)points in the trial group (all P>0.05). In the control group, the UCLA shoulder score and ASES score at 3 months after surgery and the ASES score at the last follow-up were (25.1±4.5)points, 78.8 (71.6, 85.8)points and 85.8 (85.8, 93.0)points, respectively, with no statistical differences from (26.8±4.7)points, 85.8 (82.3, 85.8)points, and 92.8 (85.8, 100.0)points in the trial group (all P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the UCLA shoulder score of the control group was (29.2±3.9)points, which was lower than that of the trial group [(31.6±2.4)points] ( P<0.05). The differences in shoulder motion between the two groups at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The VAS, UCLA shoulder score, and ASES score at 3 months after surgery and at the last followup in both groups were significantly improved compared to their preoperative values (all P<0.05); further improvements were observed at the last follow-up compared with those at 3 months after surgery (all P<0.05). The rotator cuff retear rate at 6 months after surgery was 16.7% (4/24) in the control group, not statistically different from 4.3% (1/23) in the trial group ( P>0.05). There were no incidences of anchor loosening or breakage during surgery. All incisions were healed after surgery, with no infections or neurological complications. No grades II to III periosteal reactions at the anchor insertion sites were observed in either group at 3, 6 months after surgery. The percentage of patients with grade 0 periosteal reaction at the anchor insertion site at 3 months after surgery was 4.2% (1/24) in the control group, significantly lower than 30.4% (7/23) in the trial group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:All-suture anchors and single-row suture anchors are effective in rotator cuff repair, but the former results in better shoulder function and fewer periosteal reactions in the anchor insertion site in the early stage.