Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
National Journal of Andrology ; (12): 435-439, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-305813

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the clinical effects of transurethral detaching resection (TUDRP) and plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate (PKRP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We collected by the single blind method the clinical data of 81 cases of BPH treated by PKRP (n=41) and TUDRP (n=40), and compared the two groups of patients in their age, preoperative prostate volume, weight of the resected gland, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, time of postoperative Foley's catheter retention, and pre- and post-operative IPSS.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The post-operative IPSS was significantly higher in the PKRP than in the TUDRP group (9.95 +/- 1.54 vs. 8.70 +/- 1.13, t = 0.0029, P = 0.0059).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>TUDPR has a better clinical effect than PKRP in the treatment of BPH.</p>


Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia , General Surgery , Single-Blind Method , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL