ABSTRACT
Introduction: Electroconvulsive treatment is a treatment where seizures are electrically induced in patients of psychiatric disorder for therapeutic impact. Electric current in ECT can cause severe haemodynamic disturbances. Administration of anaesthetic agents can cause attenuation of physilogical disturbances. To studyAims & Objectives: impact of Thiopentone Sodium, Propofol and Etomidate on haemodynamics and seizure duration when used as anesthetic agents for ECT. After ethical clearance and written informed consent of patient andMaterials &Methods: surrogates the study was conducted on 90 patients aged 18-65 yrs with no comorbidities other than the psychiatric disorder under treatment. In our study we concluded that Propofol was better than Thiopentone SodiumConclusion: and Etomidate for anaesthesia during ECT. Etomidate provided the advantage of more haemodynamic stability and faster recovery. Propofol provided smoother induction and recovery with moderate seizure duration. Thiopentone on the other hand provided low seizure duration rendering it less effective therapeutically( probably due to its intrinsic antiepileptic property) and with more haemodynamic fluctuations.
ABSTRACT
Aim: Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic agent that is frequently used. However, it has a disadvantage that it causes pain during injection. This pain can be quite uncomfortable for patients. Propofol preparations containing oil emulsion at various concentrations have been produced to relieve pain. We aimed to compare the effects of preparations with different propofol concentration, lipid content and lipid chain structure Propofol 1% and Propofol 2% on injection pain and hemodynamic response. Study Design: Prospective, randomized and single-blind study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University Hospital, between July 2019- December 2019. Methodology: Patients aged 18-65 years, who underwent general anesthesia for elective hysteroscopy were included. In our study, one group (Group P1) was given propofol 1% and the other group (Group P2) was given propofol 2%. The patient's pain was evaluated and recorded at the 5th, 10th and 15th seconds according to the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Results: One hundred patients were evaluated. The mean pain scores of the patients were 0.24 (0-2) at the 5th second, 0.96 (0-3) at the 10th second and, 1.22 (0-3) at the 15th second in Group P1, 0.92 (0-3) at the 5th second, 1.76 (0-3) at the 10th second and, 2.00 (0-3) at the 15th second in Group P2. These values were statistically significant (P< 0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the approach of increasing the lipid content by increasing the propofol concentration applied in this study is not sufficient to reduce the incidence of pain, and that the fatty acid chain length, as well as the propofol concentration, are among the important factors affecting the formation of pain.
ABSTRACT
Background: The conventional drug regimen of sedation for patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) is propofol or midazolam. Dexmedetomidine is a newer drug for sedation with a better clinical profile. We conducted this study to compare the sedative efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in patients after head and neck cancer surgeries requiring mechanical ventilation. Methods:After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 80 patients undergoing head and neck onco?surgery were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated to group I[1 mg/kg of bolus propofol over 15minutes followed by infusion of 1 mg/kg/hour titrated by increasing or decreasing the infusion dose to Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) 2� or group II (a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.4 礸/kg/hour titrated to desired sedation level). The RSS, behavioral pain scale (BPS), heart rate, blood pressure, fentanyl consumption, additional sedative agent, extubation time, length of ICU stays, mechanical ventilation duration, side effects, and patient抯 satisfaction were noted. Results: Total fentanyl required was 0.56 � 0.13 礸/kg/hour in group II and 0.58 � 0.18 礸/kg/hour in group I(P = 0.75). Extubation time, RSS, BPS, patient satisfaction, and ICU duration were similar in both the groups. The incidence of hemodynamic?related adverse effects were 41.67% in group II and 11.11% in group I (P = 0.006). Conclusion: The fentanyl requirement was comparable in both the groups in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased incidence of bradycardia and hypotension as compared to the propofol group. Propofol should be the preferred sedative for postoperative mechanical ventilation after head and neck onco?surgeries.
ABSTRACT
Background: The present study aimed to compare hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure) and adverse effects (injection pain, myoclonus, postoperative nausea/vomiting) between Etomidate and propofol groups. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: Etomidate Group E and a Propofol Group P. All hemodynamic data were measured during induction, intubation, and post-intubation up to 15 min. Intravenous cortisol levels were measured at baseline, just after induction and at 24 hours after induction. Results: At 3 min and 5 min SBP was decreased by 22.04% and 18.39% in Group P. At 3 min there was fall in DBP by 20.13% in group P whereas there was an increase in group E by 0.13% which is statistically significant (p<0.001). At 1 min, 3 min and 5 min after intubation, fall in the MAP by 26.07%, 21.08% and 18.60% in group P and 0.77%, 0.42% and 1.30% in group E (p value <0.001). Serum cortisol level immediate after surgery was decrease (54%) in Group E (p value <0.001). In Group P, 40% of the patients and in group E 16.66 % of the patients complained of pain on injection (p value 0.046). Conclusions: The cortisol suppression by Etomidate may be beneficial for intubation stress response. Etomidate is better for its hemodynamic stability over propofol.
ABSTRACT
Green urine is a rare and harmless side effect of propofol administration, occurring in less than 1% of cases. Urine discoloration following a single propofol bolus for induction of anesthesia is uncommon, benign, and entirely reversible upon cessation of propofol. Here, we present a case of green urine induced by a single dose (bolus) of propofol and discuss other potential endogenous and exogenous factors that could cause urine discoloration. Our case report aims to raise awareness among intensivists, physicians, and patients, helping to avoid unnecessary laboratory testing, initiating empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics, and anxiety associated with this unusual presentation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Propofol has emerged as an induction agent of choice over the past two decades due to its quick, smooth induction and rapid recovery. The main concern for an anesthesiologist is the hemodynamic instability caused by the standard induction dose of propofol (2–3 mg/kg). Material & Methods: A prospective randomized, double blind control study was conducted where 120 patients (20-60 years) were divided into 3 groups. Group A received 0.4 mg/kg of propofol injection diluted with Normal Saline to make total amount to 5 ml (priming ), Group B received 0.03 mg/kg midazolam injection diluted with Normal Saline to make a total amount of 5ml (co-induction) while as Group C received 5 ml of Normal Saline(control). We compared the total dose of propofol requirement for induction of anaesthesia in all the 3 groups, taking loss of verbal contact as the end point. Total dose and induction dose of propofol is different in all groups as 30 mg propofol is followed y 10 mg increments every 10 seconds till loss of verbal contact. and Additionally, changes in haemodynamic status like blood pressure and heart rate at various intervals were studied and compared among the groups. Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, weight and American Society of Anesesthesiologists Physical Status. The dose of propofol required to induce anesthesia was1.77 mg/kg in propofol group, 1.46 mg/kg in midazolam group and 2.87 mg/kg in the control group. There were less hemodynamic changes in midazolam group compared to the other two. Conclusion: Co-induction with midazolam is more effective than propofol priming and standard propofol induction in reducing the dose of propofol induced anaesthesia & associated with minimum hemodynamic alterations. From the present study we concluded that propofol priming and midazolam- propofol co-induction significantly decreases the average induction dose of propofol with better hemodynamic stability and least adverse effects. However, the greater decrease in induction dose of propofol and better hemodynamics were seen with the midazolam- propofol co-induction.
ABSTRACT
Background: Intense bleeding during general anesthesia is the major limitation during ACDF surgery. It affects operative eld visibility and increases complications. Hypotensive anesthesia is preferred to improve surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efcacy of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine infusion for hypotensive anesthesia in patients undergoing ACDF surgery. To compare the efcacy and safety of Objective: Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for hypotensive anesthesia in ACDF surgeries. This prospective Materials and methods: randomized trial was conducted in 60 adult patients who were scheduled for ACDF under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group P (n = 30) received Propofol infusion of 100-150mcg/kg/min and group D (n = 30) received dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1 mcg/kg diluted in 10 mL 0.9% saline to be infused over 10 min after induction, followed by maintenance infusion of 0.4-0.8 mcg/kg/h. The infusions were titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 60 and 70 mm Hg. Hemodynamic control, Intraoperative blood loss, Quality of the surgical eld and patient recovery were recorded. In our study, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate were signi Results: cantly lower in group D throughout the surgery than in group P. Blood loss was signicantly higher in group P (615.18 ± 18.15 ml) than in group D (480.50 ± 14.50 ml). The Surgical eld visibility was comparable between the groups. The awakening time was signicantly shorter in group D than group P. In our study, we observed that both Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Conclusion: are efcacious and safe for controlled hypotension during ACDF; however, Dexmedetomidine provides better hemodynamic control and is associated with lesser degree of sedation without any signicant adverse effects.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of midazolam and dexmedetomidine/propofol for the sedation of critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment. METHODS Retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials. gov, China Journal Full Text Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang database and China Biomedical Literature Database, the data on the efficacy and safety of midazolam and dexmetomidine/propofol for the sedation of critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation were collected from the establishment of the database to March 31, 2023. After extracting data from clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria, the meta-analysis was conducted by using the RevMan 5.3 statistical software. RESULTS A total of 31 literature were included, with a total of 2 765 patients. Results of meta-analysis showed that the mechanical ventilation time [MD=14.13, 95%CI (13.75, 14.52), P<0.000 01] and the length of hospitalization in the intensive care unit [MD=0.92, 95%CI (0.54, 1.30), P<0.000 01] of patients in the midazolam group was longer than dexmedetomidine/ propofol group. The incidence of bradycardia in midazolam group was lower dexmedetomidine/propofol group [OR=0.60, 95%CI (0.41, 0.90), P=0.01], but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between the two groups [OR=0.69, 95%CI (0.47, 1.01), P=0.06]. The incidence of delirium [OR=3.88, 95%CI (2.74, 5.49), P<0.000 01], ventilator- associated pneumonia [OR=2.32, 95%CI (1.19, 4.51), P=0.01], and respiratory depression [OR=5.70, 95%CI (3.09, 10.52), P<0.000 01] in midazolam group were higher than dexmedetomidine/propofol group. CONCLUSIONS Compared with dexmedetomidine/propofol, midazolam increases patients’ mechanical ventilation time and the length of hospitalization in the intensive care unit in terms of efficacy, and increases the risk of delirium and pulmonary complications in terms of safety, but has a smaller cardiovascular impact.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To establish a method for the determination of propofol concentration in human plasma and apply it in patients with lymphedema. METHODS The concentration of propofol was determined by UPLC-MS/MS after protein precipitation of plasma samples using thymol as internal standard. The sample was eluted on a Kinetex C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile (A)-water (B) for gradient elution at the flow rate of 200 μL/min. The sample size was 5 μL, and the column temperature was set at 40 ℃. The sample chamber temperature was 15 ℃. Using multi-reaction monitoring mode, the ion pairs for quantitative analysis were m/z 177.0→161.2 (propofol) and m/z 149.0→133.1 (internal standard), respectively. The above method was used to determine the plasma concentration of propofol in 6 patients with lymphedema. RESULTS The linear range of propofol was 50-5 000 ng/mL (r=0.995 0). RSDs of within- and between-batch precision were not more than 8.08%; no endogenous interference, carryover effect, or dilution effect was observed in blank plasma. The extraction recovery ranged from 89.80% to 93.73%, and matrix effects were within the range of 97.93%-101.73%. RSDs of the stability test were all lower than 3.27%. During intraoperative TCI 2-30 min, the plasma concentration of propofol in 6 patients was maintained in the range of 1 865.3-6 056.2 ng/mL, and the propofol was almost excreted within 4-8 h after operation. CONCLUSIONS The established UPLC-MS/MS method in this study can achieve the determination of propofol and a simple and fast sample pretreatment process without derivatization; it is proved to be suitable for the concentration monitoring of propofol in plasma samples of patients with lymphedema.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the protective effect and mechanism of propofol on the blood-brain barrier in rats with cerebral ischemia.Methods A total of 48 10-week-old male SD rats were randomly divided into the sham group,the cerebral ischemia group,the propofol group and the propofol+LY294002 group.Twenty-four hours before the induction of the model,the rats in the propofol+LY294002 group were intracerebroventricularly injected with PI3K inhibitor LY294002(0.3 mg·kg-1),and the rats in the other groups were administrated with saline(10 μL).Rats in the cerebral ischemia group,the propofol group and the propofol+LY294002 group established cerebral ischemia models by carotid artery occlusion.Rats in the sham group only isolated the common carotid artery and ligated the external carotid artery without other treatment.During the modeling period,the rats in the propofol group and the propofol+LY294002 group were given propofol(10 mg·kg-1)via the tail vein,and the sham group and the propofol group were treated with saline.After 24 hours,the neurological function of rats was evaluated by Zea Longa method;the area of cerebral infarction was detected by TTC staining;the degree of cerebral edema was detected by the dry-wet weight method.EB tracer method was used to evaluate the integrity of the blood-brain barrier;ELISA was used to detect inflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid;Western blot was used to detect the expression of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway proteins and blood-brain barrier tight junction proteins Claudin-5 and Occludin.Results Cerebral ischemia led to the increase of neurological function scores and local infarction of brain tissues in rats.Compared with the sham group,the EB content in the brain tissue of rats in the cerebral ischemia group increased,the degree of brain edema increased,and the content of inflammatory cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid increased.And the use of propofol could significantly decrease the neurological function scores,reduce the area of cerebral infarction,inhibit EB penetrating blood-brain barrier,reduce the degree of brain edema,reduce the release of inflammatory cytokines,and up-regulate the expression of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway proteins and tight junction proteins Claudin-5 and Occludin.LY294002 significantly reversed the above effects of propofol.Conclusion Propofol can maintain the expression of tight junction proteins Claudin-5 and Occludin through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway,protect the structural and functional integrity of blood-brain barrier,reduce the degree of brain edema,prevent other inflammatory cytokines into the brain tissue,reduce cerebral infarction,and alleviate the neurological functional damage caused by cerebral ischemia.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical effect and safety of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients.Methods 188 elderly patients who were scheduled to undergo painless gastroenteroscopy from October 2021 to February 2023 were selected and divided into group A,group B,group C,and group D by random number table method,with 47 cases in each group.The group A,group B and group C were used remimazolam 0.2,0.3 and 0.4 mg/kg,and alfentanil 3 μg/kg respectively,and the remimazolam 2.5 mg/time was added during the operation.The group D was used propofol 1.5 mg/kg and alfentanil 3 μg/kg,and a single dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg was added during the operation.The hemodynamics at different time points[3 min before anesthesia administration(T0),immediately after endoscopy(T1),3 min after endoscopy(T2),at the end of examination(T3),at the time of awakening(T4)],anesthesia onset time,sedation success rate,gastrointestinal endoscopy time,awakening time,time to leave the observation room and intraoperative/postoperative complications were compared,and the test results of neurobehavioral cognitive state examination(NCSE)were compared at different times.Results The percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation(SpO2)at T1 and T2 time point were higher than group C and group D,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)among group A,group B,group C and group D at each time point(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in SpO2 between group A and group B at each time point(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of sedation,gastrointestinal endoscopy examination time and time of leaving the observation room among the four groups(P>0.05),but the onset time of anesthesia in group A was longer than that in group B,group C and group D,and the awakening time in group A and group B was shorter than that in group C and group D,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in awakening time between group A and group B(P>0.05).The incidence rate of bradycardia in group A and group B was lower than in group D,and the incidence rates of hypoxemia,respiratory depression,hypotension,and dizziness in group A were lower than those in group D,and the incidence rate of injection pain in group A,group B and group C was lower than that in group D,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 10 minutes of complete wakefulness,there was no statistically significant difference in the passing rates of calculation ability and the memory tests between group A and group B(P>0.05),but the passing rates of calculation ability and memory test in group A were higher than those in group C and group D,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion During painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients,the sedative effect of using 0.3 mg/kg remimazolam combined with alfentanil is good,and it has stable hemodynamics,and the occurrence rate of complications such as bradycardia and espiratory depression is low,and the early postoperative cognitive function is recovered well.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the impact of patients ages on propofol dosage in painless gastroscopy.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 158 painless gastroscopy patients from January 2017 to June 2020.They were divided into the young group(18~44 years old,n = 57),the middle-aged group(45~59 years old,n = 51),and the elderly group(≥60 years old,n = 50)based on their age.The anesthesia status and safety of each group were compared.Results The results showed that the dosage of propofol,average total dosage of propofol,MAP,HR,RR,SpO2 levels in the young group were higher than those in the middle-aged and elderly groups when consciousness disappeared,and the middle-aged group was higher than the elderly group;The onset time,anesthesia recovery time,orientation recovery time,and departure time in the young group of patients were shorter than those in the middle-aged and elderly groups,and the middle-aged group was shorter than the elderly group(P<0.05).The incidence of airway obstruction,hypoxemia,mandible support,mask ventilation,adverse cardiovascular events,sedation related adverse events,and incidence of obstructed endoscopy in the elderly group were higher than those in the young and middle-aged groups.The incidence of smooth endoscopy was lower than that in the young and middle-aged groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Aging may increase the dosage of propofol in patients underwent painless gastroscopy under anesthesia,prolong the onset time,anesthesia recovery time,orientation recovery time,and departure time,increase stress reactions and adverse reactions,and strengthen monitoring for elderly patients in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the anesthetic effect and safety of Ciprofol and Propofol combined with Fentanyl in painless bronchoscopy for conscious patients in intensive care unit(ICU).Methods 60 conscious patients who underwent painless bronchoscopy from October 2022 to January 2023 were selected.According to the random number table method,30 cases were divided into the control group(Propofol 1.5 mg/kg + Fentanyl 1 μg/kg)and 30 cases were divided into the experimental group(Ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 1 μg/kg).Systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,heart rate,respiratory frequency,and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation(SpO2)were recorded before anesthesia(T1),during the examination(T2),and at the completion of the examination(T3)in the two groups,and the success rate of induction of general anesthesia,the time of induction of anesthesia,the time of bronchoscopy,the time of eye-opening,the total dosage of medications used,the incidence of injection pain,and the incidence of intraoperative adverse reactions(hypotension,respiratory depression,bradycardia,and bucking)in the two groups were compared.Results Analysis of the data revealed significant group,time,and interaction effects for systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,heart rate,and respiratory frequency at different time points(P<0.05).The experimental group had a shorter induction time of anesthesia[1.40(1.10,1.62)min]in comparison to the control group[1.60(1.30,2.10)min](P<0.05),and the experimental group required a less amount of drug to achieve the desired outcome[(21.40±1.82)mg]compared to the control group[(78.75±6.71)mg](P<0.05).Furthermore,the incidence of injection pain(3.33%)and respiratory depression(6.67%)was significantly reduced in the experimental group compared to the control group(36.67%)and(30.00%)(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of Ciprofol in combination with Fentanyl has been found to provide effective anesthesia during bronchoscopy,while also increasing safety and decreasing the incidence of adverse events.It is worthy of clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of intravenous dexmedetomidine(Dex)combined with targeted infusion of remifentanil in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)anesthesia in older adult patients.Methods From January to August 2021,98 older adult patients(≥65 years old)undergoing ERCP were randomly divided into TRP and TRD groups.The TRP group was anesthetized with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil and the TRD group was treated with Dex combined with target-controlled infusion of remifentanil.mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),electrocardiogram(ECG),respiratory rate(RR),pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2),bispectral index(BIS)before anesthesia induction(T0),immediately after induction of anesthesia(T1),endoscopic introduction(T2),duodenal papilla intubation(T3),endoscopy withdrawal(T4)and postoperative awakening(T5)were observed.Arterial blood gas analysis at different time points(T0,every 15 min after anesthesia induction and T5),PaO2,and PaCO2,were recorded at the above mentioned time points;and the remifentanil concentration in target-controlled infusion,operation time,recovery time(from infusion of remifentanil to consciousness recovery),anesthesia recovery time(from consciousness recovery to leaving the operating room),intraoperative body movement,Aldrete scores out of the room,Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)at 60 min after surgery,occurrence of post-operative adverse reactions,as well as the satisfaction of anesthesiologists,endoscopists,and patients were recorded.Results Compared with the TRP group,MAP at T1 and T3,SpO2 and RR at T1,T2,T3,and T4,and BIS at T2,T3,T4,and T5 increased,whereas HR at T1,T2,T3,and T4 decreased;the number of mandibular rests,incidence of hypoxemia,Aldrete score,and satisfaction increased,whereas the VAS score at 60 min after surgery decreased in the TRD group(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative adverse reactions,PaO2 and PaCO2,target-controlled infusion remifentanil concentration,operation time,recovery time,and anesthesia recovery time between the two groups.Conclusion Compared with the target-controlled infusion of propofol-remifentanil,intravenous infusion of Dex combined with target-controlled infusion of remifentanil can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia in older adult patients during ERCP surgery,and the anesthesia regimen can meet the anesthesia needs of ERCP surgery,which is safe and feasible.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of propofol on pyroptosis and A549 cells via the NLRP3/ASC/caspase-1 pathway.Methods Establish a three-dimensional culture model of A549 tumor cells using ultra-low attachment plates,A549 cells were cultured using ultra-low adsorption culture plates to establish a three-dimensional culture model.The CCK-8 method was used to detect the effect of propofol on A549 cell proliferation;the inflammatory factors interleukin(IL)-18,IL-1β,and IL-6 were detected in the A549 lung cancer cell supernatants using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays;western blotting was used to detect the expression levels of pyrolysis-asso-ciated proteins NLRP3,ASC,caspase-1,GSDMD-N,and IL-1β in A549 lung cancer cells in each group.Results Compared to the blank control group,the survival rate of A549 cells in low,medium,and high concentrations of propofol in each group decreased in turn(P<0.05);the levels of inflammatory factors IL-18,IL-1β,and IL-6 in the A549 cell supernatant,and scorch related protein NLRP3,ASC,caspase-1,GSDMD-N,and IL-1β increased with the increased propofol concentrations(P<0.05).Conclusion The three-dimensional culture model of lung cancer A549 cells was successfully established using the ultra-low adsorption culture method.Propofol can promote cell apoptosis and inhibit the pyroptosis of A549 lung cancer cells via activating the NLRP3/ASC/caspase-1 pathway.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background and objective: Anesthesia induction can produce severe propofol dose-dependent hypotension. Fentanyl coadministration reduces the catecholaminergic response to orotracheal intubation allowing propofol dose reduction. The aim of this study is to determine whether the hemodynamic response is improved by increasing the time between fentanyl and propofol administration and reducing the dose of the latter without increasing the time to achieve optimal hypnosis. Methods: After approval by the Research Ethics Committee, patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with endotracheal intubation were randomized by a computer-generated table into six time-dose groups (1 or 2 minutes/1, 1.5, or 2mg.kg-1 of propofol). Patients with high bronchoaspiration risk, a difficult airway, hemodynamic instability, or anesthetic allergies were excluded. After giving intravenous fentanyl (2 μg.kg-1 ), each group received different doses of propofol after 1 or 2 minutes. Non-invasive blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured at pre-induction, pre-intubation, and post-intubation. Time to hypnosis (bispectral index < 60) was also recorded. Results: Of the 192 recruited patients, 186 completed the study (1 min group n = 94; 2 min group n = 92). It was observed that HR and BP decreased after propofol administration and increased after intubation in all groups (p<0.0001). In patients over 55 years, the 2 min - 2 mg.kg-1 group showed the greatest systolic BP reduction (36 ± 12%) at pre-intubation, while the 1 min - 1.5 mg.kg-1 group showed the least hemodynamic alteration between pre- and post-intubation (-4 ± 13%). No significant differences were found in younger patients or in the time to reach hypnosis between the six groups. While no cases of severe bradycardia were recorded, 5,4% of the sample required vasopressors. Conclusion: Increasing the time between the administration of fentanyl and propofol by up to two minutes results in greater hypotension in patients over 55 years.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: This randomized and controlled prospective study tested the hypothesis that closed-loop Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) of propofol would be associated with better system performance when compared with open-loop controlled delivery of propofol. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective breast surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: a closed-loop group, in which propofol infusion was performed by a closed-loop TCI system that used the Bispectral Index (BIS) as a feedback parameter to titrate the rate of propofol infusion, and an open-loop group, in which propofol infusion was performed manually and guided by the bispectral index. Results: A total of 156 patients were recruited for this study (closed-loop group n = 79; open-loop group n = 77). The Global Score (GS) of the closed-loop group was lower than that of the open-loop group (34.3 and 42.2) (p = 0.044). The proportions of time with a BIS value between 40 and 60 were almost identical in the closed-loop group and the open-loop group (68.7 ± 10.6% and 66.7 ± 13.3%) (p = 0.318). The individuals in the closed-loop group consumed more propofol compared with those in the open-loop group (7.20 ± 1.65 mg.kg−1.h−1 vs. 6.03 ± 1.31 mg.kg−1.h−1, p < 0.001). No intraoperative recall, somatic events or adverse events occurred. No significant difference in heart rate was observed between the two groups (p = 0.169). Conclusion: The closed-loop protocol was associated with lower BIS variability and lower out-of-range BIS values, at the cost of a greater consumption of propofol when compared to the open loop group. Register number:ChiCTR-INR-17010399.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: Intravenous non-volatile anaesthetics like propofol are commonly used in cardiac surgeries across several countries. Volatile anaesthetics like isoflurane may help in protecting the myocardium and minimize ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Hence, we did this review to compare the cardioprotective effect of isoflurane and propofol among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: We conducted a search in the databases Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (or MEDLINE), Embase, PubMed Central®, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception until April 2021. We carried out a meta-analysis with random-effects model and reported pooled risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) depending on the type of outcome. Results: We analysed 13 studies including 808 participants. Almost all were low-quality studies. For cardiac index, the pooled SMD was 0.14 (95% CI: -0.22 to 0.50); for cardiac troponin I, pooled SMD was 0.10 (95% CI: -0.28 to 0.48). For mortality, the RR was 3.00 (95% CI: 0.32 to 28.43); for MI, pooled RR was 1.58 (95% CI: 0.59 to 4.20); and for inotropic drug use, pooled RR was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.21). For length of intensive care unit stay, the pooled SMD was 0.13 (95% CI: -0.29 to 0.55), while pooled SMD for mechanical ventilation time was -0.02 (95% CI: -0.54 to 0.51). Conclusion: Isoflurane did not have significant cardioprotective effect compared to propofol following CABG. Hence, the anaesthetists need to check some viable alternatives to manage these patients and reduce the rate of postoperative complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the application effect of ciprofol-alfentanil in short urological surgery.Methods A total of 80 patients who were to undergo urological general anesthesia surgery in this hospital were divided into two groups by random number method:ciprofol-alfentanil group(group C)and propofol-alfentanil group(group P).Group C was injected with ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg,group P was injected with propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg,and when the bispectral index(BIS)was<60,the intravenous injection of alfen-tanil(10 μg/kg)and rocuronium bromide(0.6 mg/kg)was continued.When the modified alertness/sedation score(MOAA/S score)was 0,the laryngeal mask was placed and mechanical ventilation was used.During the maintenance period,ciprofol 0.8-1.2 mg·kg-1·h-1 was infused intravenously in group C,and propofol 4-6 mg·kg-1·h-1 was infused intravenously in group P.The heart rate(HR),blood pressure(BP),oxygen saturation(SpO2),end-tidal carbon dioxide(PetCO2),BIS and MOAA/S score were recorded at the begin-ning of anesthesia induction(T0),laryngeal mask insertion(T1),ureteroscopy entry(T2),10 min after sur-gery(T3)and the end of surgery(T4).The consciousness disappearance time,operation time,anesthesia re-covery time,drug dosage,injection pain during induction,hypotension,bradycardia and other adverse reactions during the operation were recorded.Results There was no significant difference in HR,SpO2,PetCO2,BIS value,MOAA/S score,operation time,consciousness disappearance time,and anesthesia recovery time be-tween the two groups at each time point(P>0.05).The dosage of sedative drugs in group C was less than that in group P(P<0.05).Compared with group P,systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure at T1-T3 and diastolic blood pressure at T4 increased in group C(P<0.05).Compared with T0,systolic blood pressure at T1-T4 in group C and group P decreased,diastolic blood pressure at T2-T4 in group C de-creased,and diastolic blood pressure at T1-T4 in group P decreased(P<0.05).Compared with group P,the injection pain and the incidence of intraoperative hypotension were reduced in group C(P<0.05).Conclusion Cipro-fol-alfentanil is superior to propofol-alfentanil in short urological surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the improved effect of propofol on vascular hyporeactivity in septic rats and its underlying mechanism.Methods A total of 96 SD rats(12 weeks old,both genders,weighing 200~220 g)were randomly divided into sham group(n=16),sepsis group(n=16,cecal ligation and puncture),propofol group(n=16),propofol+ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 group(n=16),propofol+PKCαinhibitor GO6976 group(n=16),propofol+IP3 inhibitor 2-APB group(n=8)and propofol+gap junction inhibitor metoclopramide sodium(Movens)group(n=8).In vitro vascular ring reactivity and vascular calcium sensitivity were measured to observe the improved effects of propofol on vascular hyporeactivity in septic rats and its relationships with RhoA/ROCK,PKCα,IP3 and cell gap junction.Results Determination of in vitro vascular ring and calcium sensitivity showed that the contractile reactivity to norepinephrine(NE)and to calcium sensitivity were significantly decreased in the arterial rings isolated from the septic rats compared with those from the sham group,with the dose-response curve shifting to the right,and most significant decrease by 51.42%in the superior mesenteric artery(SMA,P<0.05).Propofol treatment significantly improved the hyporeactivity and calcium sensitivity of the vessels isolated from the septic rats,especially those of the femoral artery with a recovery rate of 89.57%(P<0.05).In comparison with the propofol group,the dose-response curves of the propofol+Y-27632 group and the propofol+GO6976 group were shifting to right,indicating that Y-27632 and GO6976 could significantly inhibit the amelioration of propofol on calcium sensitivity of SMA in severely septic rats with an inhibitory rate of 146.95%and 88.63%(P<0.05),respectively.Isolated vascular reactivity measurement demonstrated that Y-27632 and Movens treatment significantly antagonized the ameliorated role of propofol on hyporeactivity of blood vessels from the septic rats with an inhibitory rate of 40.79%and 169.90%(P<0.05),separately,while no such effect was observed in the propofol+GO6976 and propofol+2-APB groups.Conclusion Propofol treatment can significantly improve vascular hyporeactivity of septic rats,which may attribute to the increase of vascular calcium sensitivity through RhoA/ROCK pathway.