ABSTRACT
Background: Augmentation rhinoplasty is a popular yet challenging procedure that aims to improve both the nasal appearance and quality of life of patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the satisfaction and outcome after augmentation rhinoplasty at a tertiary care hospital in Kashmir valley. Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kashmir valley among patients who underwent the procedure using autologous cartilage grafts at the ENT department from October 2021 to December 2021. The sample size was 56. The patients age, gender, pre-operative findings, surgical techniques, post-operative outcomes, complications, and corrective interventions were recorded. The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients' pre and post-operative status, with outcome assessed three months after surgery. Results: The present study included 56 patients which comprised of 39 (69.64%) males. The mean age of patients was 41±9.6 years. The indication for surgery was a mix of aesthetic and functional reasons in 56% subjects with 78% undergoing a primary surgery. The mean pre-operative score on the ROE questionnaire was 9.21±0.8 which improved to a mean score of 19.56±1.1 at three months after surgery. Overall 75% (42/56) patients reported a post operative ROE score of ?80%. There was a significant improvement in all domains assessed by the ROE questionnaire, including appearance and function. Conclusions: Augmentation rhinoplasty can provide satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients with nose deformities with consistent improvement across all domains related to aesthetics and functionality.
ABSTRACT
Background: Augmentation rhinoplasty is a popular yet challenging procedure that aims to improve both the nasal appearance and quality of life of patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the satisfaction and outcome after augmentation rhinoplasty at a tertiary care hospital in Kashmir valley. Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kashmir valley among patients who underwent the procedure using autologous cartilage grafts at the ENT department from October 2021 to December 2021. The sample size was 56. The patients age, gender, pre-operative findings, surgical techniques, post-operative outcomes, complications, and corrective interventions were recorded. The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients' pre and post-operative status, with outcome assessed three months after surgery. Results: The present study included 56 patients which comprised of 39 (69.64%) males. The mean age of patients was 41±9.6 years. The indication for surgery was a mix of aesthetic and functional reasons in 56% subjects with 78% undergoing a primary surgery. The mean pre-operative score on the ROE questionnaire was 9.21±0.8 which improved to a mean score of 19.56±1.1 at three months after surgery. Overall 75% (42/56) patients reported a post operative ROE score of ?80%. There was a significant improvement in all domains assessed by the ROE questionnaire, including appearance and function. Conclusions: Augmentation rhinoplasty can provide satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients with nose deformities with consistent improvement across all domains related to aesthetics and functionality.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the improvement of nasal appearance, symptoms and psychological burden in patients with secondary cleft rhinoplasty by using retrospective research methods, through preoperative and postoperative questionnaires.Methods:Twenty-three cleft lip patients that underwent surgery in our unit since April 2016 were enrolled in this study. The self-designed questionnaire was used to explore the changes of patients before and after the operation. The questionnaire star was utilized to collect the data, and after the data was sorted and summarized, SPSS 20.0 was used for analysis and statistics.Results:The average follow-up time was 28.9 months. The total score of ROE satisfaction before surgery was 46.74 points, while after surgery it reached 63.04 points ( t=4.10, P<0.01); the self-scores of nasal shape were significantly improved after surgery; but there was no significant change in the ventilation function in the VAS scale before and after the operation; the nasal symptoms and psychological status in the SNOT-22 questionnaire, such as, nasal congestion, embarrassment, depression, restlessness and irritability, were significantly improved ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Our semi-autonomous designed questionnaire can be used to effectively evaluate the satisfaction, nasal shape, and symptoms of patients with nasal deformity secondary to cleft lip. Data analysis shows that our secondary cleft lip rhinoplasty for cleft lip and palate can improve patients′ satisfaction after the repair, as well as nose shape and function, at the same time the psychological burden caused by it.