ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: Los sistemas de salud se desarrollan en ámbitos complejos y con fallas constantes (incertidumbre, asimetría de información, problema de relación de agencia e inducción de demanda). Estas fallas determinan las relaciones e incentivos entre los actores y se basan en la imperfección del sector. Frente a ello, los mecanismos de pago regulan aspectos del comportamiento e incentivos del sistema, participando como instrumentos de compra de atenciones de salud a prestadores, mediados por los seguros de salud en representación de los usuarios. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar los elementos básicos de las tipologías más frecuentes de los mecanismos de pago con el propósito de para apoyar la labor de los prestadores en su relación con pagadores. MÉTODOS: Se condujo una revisión dirigida de la evidencia en PubMed, Google, Google Scholar y selección estratégica en bola de nieve. Los mecanismos de pago están conformados por tres variables microeconómicas clásicas fijas o variables: precio, cantidad y gasto; y dimensiones temporales utilizadas para analizar sus atributos y efectos. De la combinación de estas variables surgen distintos mecanismos. RESULTADOS: Entre los más utilizados se describen: pago por servicio, presupuesto global, Bundled Payments, grupos relacionados de diagnóstico, per cápita, pago por desempeño y acuerdos de riesgo compartido. Dentro de sus variables ha cobrado importancia una cuarta, el riesgo financiero. CONCLUSIONES: Los mecanismos de pago resultan esenciales para concatenar esfuerzos sanitarios con la práctica clínica. Permiten regular relaciones entre seguros, prestadores y usuarios. Dependiendo de la arquitectura del mecanismo, estas pueden tornarse beneficiosas o entorpecer el cumplimiento de los objetivos del sistema sanitario.
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems are developed in imperfect scenarios, in which there are constant failures (uncertainty, information asymmetry, agency relationship problem, and supply-induced demand). These failures, based on the imperfection of the sector, determine the relationships and incentives between the actors. It is within this context that payment mechanisms regulate aspects of the system behavior and incentives, acting as instruments for the purchasing of health care from providers, mediated by health insurance on behalf of users. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the basic elements of most frequent payment mechanisms to help providers in their relationship with payers. METHODS: A review of the evidence was conducted in PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and strategic snowball selection. Payment mechanisms consist of three classical microeconomics variables, fixed or variable: price, quantity, and expense. Time dimensions are used to analyze their attributes and effects. Different mechanisms emerge from the combination of these variables. RESULTS: Among the most used are: Fee-For-Service, Global Budget, Bundled Payments, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Per-capita, Performance Pay, and Risk-Sharing Agreements. A fourth has also gained importance: Financial Risk. CONCLUSIONS: Payment mechanisms are essential to link health efforts with clinical practice. They make it possible to regulate relationships between insurers, providers, and users, which, depending on the architecture of the mechanism, can become beneficial or hinder the fulfillment of the objectives of the health system.
Subject(s)
Humans , Fee-for-Service Plans , Delivery of Health Care , Diagnosis-Related GroupsABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN Los mecanismos de pago corresponden a la operacionalización de la función de compra en salud, incentivando comportamientos en los proveedores de servicios sanitarios. Resulta pertinente preguntarse cómo afectan la vía de resolución del parto, considerando el aumento generalizado en índices de cesárea a nivel global. OBJETIVO: Describir los mecanismos de pago existentes para la atención del parto en países miembros y no miembros de la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. MÉTODOS: Revisión sistemática exploratoria (scoping review). Se adoptaron los cinco pasos metodológicos del Joanna Briggs Institute. La búsqueda se realizó por las investigadoras de forma independiente, logrando la confiabilidad interevaluador (κ 0,96) en bases de datos electrónicas, otras fuentes de información, sitios web gubernamentales y no gubernamentales. Se tamizó en tres niveles, considerando literatura no mayor a 10 años de antigüedad, idioma inglés y español. Se analizaron los resultados considerando el funcionamiento del mecanismo de pago y sus efectos en prestado-res, seguros y beneficiarias. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo evidencia de 34 países (50% pertenecientes a la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico). El 64% con uso de más de un mecanismo de pago para el parto. Entre los mecanismos más utilizados están: grupos relacionados de diagnósticos (47,6%), pago por resultados (23,3%), pago por servicios (16,6%) y pago fijo prospectivo (13,3%). CONCLUSIÓN: Los países recurren a la arquitectura de los mecanismos de pago para mejorar indicadores en salud materno-perinatales. Es necesario explorar cuál sería la mejor combinación de mecanismos que mejora la provisión de atenciones de salud y bienestar de la población, en el campo de la salud sexual y reproductiva.
INTRODUCTION: Payment mechanisms serve to put into operation the function of purchasing in health. Payment mechanisms impact the decisions that healthcare providers make. Given this, we are interested in knowing how they affect the generalized increase of C-section rates globally. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to describe existing payment mechanisms for childbirth in countries members of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and non-members. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following the five methodological steps of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search was conducted by researchers independently, achieving inter-reliability among raters (kappa index, 0.96). We searched electronic databases, grey literature, and governmental and non-governmental websites. We screened on three levels and included documents published in the last ten years, in English and Spanish. RESULTS: were analyzed considering the function of the reimbursement mechanism and its effects on providers, payers, and beneficiaries. Results Evidence from 34 countries was obtained (50% OECD members). Sixty-four percent of countries report the use of more than one payment mechanism for childbirth. Diagnosis-Related Groups (47.6%), Pay-for-performance (23.3%), Fee-for-service (16.6%) and Fixed-prospective systems (13.3%) are among the most frequently used mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Countries use payment mechanism architecture to improve maternal-perinatal health indicators. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the best combination of mechanisms that improve the provision of health care and welfare of the population in the field of sexual and reproductive health.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cesarean Section/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive/economics , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentABSTRACT
Antecedentes: Más allá del pago por cápita, desde 2009 el Plan de Salud del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires reconoció a los médicos de familia el pago por prestación de intervenciones psicosociales de cuarenta minutos de duración realizadas para promover el bienestar y la autonomía de sus pacientes. Objetivos: Describir los problemas que motivaron estas intervenciones y las redefiniciones diagnósticas que realizaron estos profesionales. Métodos: Fueron revisadas las fichas estructuradas de registro de 482 intervenciones psicosociales realizadas durante 2011 y codificadas mediante la Clasificación Internacional de la Atención Primaria (CIAP-2). Resultados: Los motivos de consulta más frecuentes fueron los sentimientos depresivos y/o de ansiedad (33,25 %), problemas familiares y/o vinculados a crisis vitales (16 %), dolor (9,56 %) y cansancio (2,91 %). Entre las redefiniciones diagnósticas predominaron las crisis vitales (15,45 %), los problemas de la relación conyugal o con hijos (14,61 %), y los trastornos depresivos y/o de ansiedad (27 %). Conclusiones: nuestro modelo de trabajo contribuyó a que en una gran proporción de pacientes que había consultado por dolor u otros síntomas generales, detectáramos, abordáramos y documentáramos el proceso de atención de problemas de la esfera psicosocial, que suele ser subregistrado con el abordaje biomédico clásico. (AU)
Background: Beyond capitation payment, since 2009 Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Health Maintenance Organization incorporated "structured primary care psychosocial interventions" as a fee for service practice. They last 40 minutes and are undertaken by family physicians with the aim of improving the wellbeing of their patients and helping them to strengtheningtheir autonomy. Objectives: To identify chief complaints and problems (re)definitions carried out by family physicians. Methodology: 482 medical records written during 2011 were reviewed and coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2). Results: Most frequent chief complaints were depressive and/or anxious feelings (33.25 %), family problems and/or phasesof adult life problems (16 %), pain (9.56 %) and fatigue (2.91 %). Most common problem (re)definitions were life events(15.45 %), followed by marital or childrelated problems (14.61 %), and depressive and/or anxiety disorders (27 %). Conclusions: Our working model enabled us to identify, address and document psychosocial problems which are often underreported within the classical biomedical approach in a large proportion of patients whose chief complaint were painor other general symptoms. (AU)
Subject(s)
Physicians, Family/trends , Primary Health Care/methods , Psychosocial Support Systems , Anxiety , Pain , Physicians, Family/economics , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Fee-for-Service Plans/organization & administration , Psychosocial Impact , Depression , Family Conflict , Fatigue , Health Promotion/supply & distributionABSTRACT
This study identified the explanatory power of the Korean rehabilitation patient group (KRPG) v1.1 for acquired brain injury (ABI) on medical expenses in the rehabilitation hospitals and the correlation of functional outcomes with the expenses. Here, the design is a retrospective analysis from the claim data of the designated rehabilitation hospitals. Data including KRPG information with functional status and medical expenses were collected from 1 January and 31 August 2018. Reduction of variance (R2) was statistically analyzed for the explanation power of the KRPG. Association between functional status and the medical expenses was carried out using the Spearman's rank order correlation (rho). From the claim data of 365 patients with ABI, the KRPG v1.1 explained 8.6% of variance for the total medical expenses and also explained 9.8% of variance for the rehabilitation therapy costs. Cognitive function and spasticity showed very weak correlation with the total medical expenses (rho = −0.17 and −0.14, respectively). Motor power and performance of activities of daily living were associated weakly (rho = −0.27 and −0.30, respectively). The KRPG and related functional status in ABI reflects the total medical expenses and rehabilitation therapy costs insufficiently in the designated rehabilitation hospitals. Thus, the current KRPG algorithm and variables for ABI may need to be ameliorated in the future.
Subject(s)
Humans , Activities of Daily Living , Brain Diseases , Brain Injuries , Brain , Cognition , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Fee-for-Service Plans , Muscle Spasticity , Neurological Rehabilitation , Rehabilitation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As of July 2015, per diem payment was changed from fee for service Therefore, this study aims to analyse changes in medical charges and medical services before and after enforcement of the palliative care, targeting palliative care wards in a general hospital, and provide basic data needed for development of per diem payment. METHODS: The subjects of the study were a total of 610 cases consisting of 351 patients of service fee who left hospital (died) from July 2014 to June 2016 and 259 ones of per diem payment at Chosun University Hospital in Gwangju Metropolitan City. RESULTS: The results are summarized as follows. First, after the palliative care system was applied, benefit medical service charges and insurance increased significantly (p<0.001). As benefit medical service charges increased, benefit private insurance payment increased significantly (p<0.001). Second, after the per diem payment was applied, total private insurance payment to medical institutes decreased significantly (p=0.050) and non-benefit also decreased significantly (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: It is suggested that additional rewards in the obligatory palliative care items should be continuously remedied and monitored to provide good quality hospice palliative care.
Subject(s)
Humans , Academies and Institutes , Fee-for-Service Plans , Fees and Charges , Hospices , Hospitals, General , Insurance , Palliative Care , RewardABSTRACT
The fee-for-service system is used as the main payment system for health care providers in Korea. It has been argued that it can't reflect differences in the medical practice costs across regions because the fee schedule is calculated based on the average cost. So, some researchers and providers have disputed that there is need for adopting geographic practice cost index (GPCI) used in the United States for the Medicare program for the elderly to the fee-for-service payment system. This study performed to identify whether the difference in the practice costs among regions exists or not and to examine the feasibility of applying GPCI to Korea payment system. For this purpose, we calculated modified-GPCI and examined considerations to introduce GPCI in Korea. First we identified available data to calculate GPCI. Second, we made applicable GPCI equations to Korea payment system and computed it based on four types of regions (metropolitan, urban, suburban, and rural). We also categorize the regions based on the availability of the medical resources and the capability of utilizing them. As a result, we found that there wasn't any significant difference in the GPCI by regional types in general, but the indices of rural areas (0.91–0.98) was relatively low compared to the indices of other regions (0.96–1.07). Considering the need to use GPCI floor, the pros and cons of using GPCI, and the concern of the regional imbalance of resources, the introduction of GPCI needs to be carefully considered.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Fee Schedules , Fee-for-Service Plans , Health Personnel , Korea , Medicare , Relative Value Scales , United StatesABSTRACT
Resumo Objetivo Propor modelo alternativo ao faturamento hospitalar de pagamento por procedimento para pagamento por pacotes de serviço. Métodos Trata-se de uma pesquisa exploratório-descritiva, documental, baseada em dados secundários, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado em três etapas: I-levantamento de custos hospitalares; II-escolhas dos protocolos de atendimento; III-elaboração de pacotes de serviço. Para isso, foi analisado o comportamento dos custos hospitalares do serviço de parto de um hospital materno infantil público no período de 2014 a 2016. Também foram considerados protocolos para formar pacotes de serviços, com base nas indicações de parto do Ministério da Saúde e Conitec, nos indicadores QALY e de segurança do paciente. Resultados Considerando o estado de saúde da paciente, foi possível montar 3(três) pacotes de serviços, classificados como pacotes 1, 2 e 3, sendo a gestante de risco habitual classificada como pacote 1 com um custo médio de R$9.652,63; a gestante de alto risco, classificada como pacote 2 apresentou um custo médio de R$ 18.557,99; e a gestante de risco extremo, classificada como tipo 3 apresentou um custo médio de R$ 41.386,49. Conclusão Ao entrar em um hospital, a parturiente será classificada conforme o grau de risco apresentado. Com isso, tanto a paciente quanto os provedores de saúde saberiam o custo estimado do seu atendimento. Isso diminuiria a quantidade de procedimentos registrados pela assistência, permitindo dedicar mais tempo para a paciente, seguindo protocolos de atendimento padronizados. O caso pode ser replicado em qualquer instituição pública ou privada, levando-se em consideração os seus custos e os indicadores de qualidade da unidade.
Resumen Objetivo Proponer un modelo alternativo a la facturación hospitalaria por procedimientos de paquetes de servicios. Métodos Investigación exploratorio-descriptiva, documental, basada en datos secundarios, de abordaje cuantitativo, realizada en tres etapas: I-relevamiento de costos hospitalarios; II-elección de protocolos de atención; III-elaboración de paquetes de servicio. Se analizó el comportamiento del costo hospitalario del servicio de parto de un hospital Maternoinfantil público entre 2014 y 2016. También se consideraron protocolos para conformar paquetes de servicio según indicaciones de parto del Ministerio de Salud y el Conitec, en los indicadores QALY y de seguridad del paciente. Resultados Considerando el estado de salud del paciente, pudieron elaborarse 3 (tres) paquetes de servicios, clasificados como 1, 2 y 3, habiéndose considerado a la parturienta con riesgo normal como paquete 1 con costo promedio de R$9.652,63; la parturienta de alto riesgo fue clasificada como paquete 2, presentando costo promedio de R$18.557,99; la parturienta con riesgo extremo fue clasificada como paquete 3, presentando costo promedio de R$41.386,49. Conclusión En su admisión, la parturienta será clasificada según el grado de riesgo. Así, tanto la paciente como los proveedores de salud conocerán el costo estimado de su atención. Eso disminuiría la cantidad de procedimientos registrados en la atención, permitiendo dedicarle mayor tiempo a la paciente, siguiendo protocolos de atención estandarizados. El caso puede replicarse en cualquier institución pública o privada, considerando sus costos y los indicadores de calidad de la unidad.
Abstract Objective To propose an alternative model to hospital fee-for-service billing by using bundled service charges. Methods This was documentary, exploratory, descriptive research based on secondary data, using a quantitative approach, conducted in three stages: I - hospital cost survey; II - choice of caring protocols; III - development of bundled services. The hospital costs of the birthing service in a public maternity hospital were analyzed from 2014 to 2016. Protocols were also considered to create bundled services, based on the birth indications of the Ministry of Health and the National Commission for Incorporation of Technologies (Conitec), in the quality-adjusted life-year indicators (QALY and patient safety indicators. Results Considering the patient's state of health, three bundles were developed, classified as Bundle 1, 2 and 3. The normal risk pregnant woman was classified as Bundle 1, with an mean cost of R$9,652.63; the high-risk pregnant woman was classified as Bundle 2, presenting a mean cost of R$18,557.99; and, the extreme-risk pregnant woman was classified as Bundle 3, with a mean cost of R$41,386.49. Conclusion When hospitalized, the parturient is classified according to the level of risk present. Therefore, both the patient and the health providers can estimate the costs associated with specific levels of care. This strategy can reduce the amount of documentation, allowing more time for patient care, following standardized care protocols. The methodology can be replicated in any public or private institution, taking into account its costs, and the quality indicators for care.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Women's Health , Competitive Medical Plans , Hospital Costs , Fee-for-Service Plans , Basic Health Services , Parturition , Secondary Data Analysis , Hospital Administration , Income , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Evaluation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
Globally, efforts are being made to develop and strengthen a palliative care policy to support a comprehensive healthcare system. Korea has implemented a hospice and palliative care (HPC) policy as part of a cancer policy under the 10 year plan to conquer cancer and a comprehensive measure for national cancer management. A legal ground for the HPC policy was laid by the Cancer Control Act passed in 2003. Currently in the process is legislation of a law on the decision for life-sustaining treatment for HPC and terminally-ill patients. The relevant law has expanded the policy-affected disease group from terminal cancer to cancer, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic liver disease/liver cirrhosis. Since 2015, the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme reimburses for HPC with a combination of the daily fixed sum and the fee for service systems. By the provision type, the HPC is classified into hospitalization, consultation, and home-based treatment. Also in place is the system that designates, evaluates and supports facilities specializing in HPC, and such facilities are funded by the NHI fund and government subsidy. Also needed along with the legal system are consensus reached by people affected by the policy and more realistic fee levels for HPC. The public and private domains should also cooperate to set HPC standards, train professional caregivers, control quality and establish an evaluation system. A stable funding system should be prepared by utilizing the long-term care insurance fund and hospice care fund.
Subject(s)
Humans , Caregivers , Comprehensive Health Care , Consensus , Fee-for-Service Plans , Fees and Charges , Fibrosis , Financial Management , Financing, Government , Hospice Care , Hospices , Hospitalization , Insurance, Long-Term Care , Jurisprudence , Korea , Liver , National Health Programs , Palliative Care , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveABSTRACT
Background: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Glittre ADL-test (GT) are used to assess functional capacity and exercise tolerance; however, the reproducibility of these tests needs further study in patients with acute lung diseases. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the 6MWT and GT performed in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung diseases. Method: 48 h after hospitalization, 81 patients (50 males, age: 52±18 years, FEV1: 58±20% of the predicted value) performed two 6MWTs and two GTs in random order on different days. Results: There was no difference between the first and second 6MWT (median 349 m [284-419] and 363 m [288-432], respectively) (ICC: 0.97; P<0.0001). A difference between the first and second tests was found in GT (median 286 s [220-378] and 244 s [197-323] respectively; P<0.001) (ICC: 0.91; P<0.0001). Conclusion: Although both the 6MWT and GT were reproducible, the best results occurred in the second test, demonstrating a learning effect. These results indicate that at least two tests are necessary to obtain reliable assessments. .
Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty, Replacement/rehabilitation , Cohort Studies , Fractures, Bone/rehabilitation , Inpatients , Medicare/standards , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Patient Discharge , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/rehabilitation , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Issues concerning with the classification accuracy of Korean Outpatient Groups (KOPGs) have been raised by providers and researchers. The KOPG is an outpatient classification system used to measure casemix of outpatient visits and to adjust provider risk in charges by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in managing insurance payments. The objective of this study were to refine KOPGs to improve the classification accuracy and to evaluate the refinement. METHODS: We refined the rules used to classify visits with multiple procedures, newly defined chemotherapy drug groups, and modified the medical visit indicators through reviews of other classification systems, data analyses, and consultations with experts. We assessed the improvement by measuring % of variation in case charges reduced by KOPGs and the refined system, Enhanced KOPGs (EKOPGs). We used claims data submitted by providers to the HIRA during the year 2012 in both refinement and evaluation. RESULTS: EKOPGs explicitly allowed additional payments for multiple procedures with exceptions of packaging of routine ancillary services and consolidation of related significant procedures, and discounts ranging from 30% to 70% were defined in additional payments. Thirteen chemotherapy drug KOPGs were added and medical visit indicators were streamlined to include codes for consultation fees for outpatient visits. The % of variance reduction achieved by EKOPGs was 48% for all patients whereas the figure was 40% for KOPGs, and the improvement was larger in data from tertiary and general hospitals than in data from clinics. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement in the performance of the KOPG was achieved by refining payments for visits with multiple procedures, defining groups for visits with chemotherapy, and revising medical visit indicators.
Subject(s)
Humans , Classification , Drug Therapy , Fee-for-Service Plans , Fees and Charges , Health Care Costs , Hospitals, General , Information Systems , Insurance , Insurance Claim Review , Insurance, Health , Outpatients , Product Packaging , Prospective Payment System , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
This article overviews currently available options for rewarding peer reviewers. Rewards and incentives may help maintain the quality and integrity of scholarly publications. Publishers around the world implemented a variety of financial and nonfinancial mechanisms for incentivizing their best reviewers. None of these is proved effective on its own. A strategy of combined rewards and credits for the reviewers1 creative contributions seems a workable solution. Opening access to reviews and assigning publication credits to the best reviews is one of the latest achievements of digitization. Reviews, posted on academic networking platforms, such as Publons, add to the transparency of the whole system of peer review. Reviewer credits, properly counted and displayed on individual digital profiles, help distinguish the best contributors, invite them to review and offer responsible editorial posts.
Subject(s)
Humans , Communication , Fee-for-Service Plans , Peer Review, Research , Periodicals as Topic , Publishing , Reward , ScienceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Korean National Health Insurance is based on 'fee for service' system, but recently 7 groups of diseases were forcibly applied to diagnosis related groups (DRG) system. In these 7 group of diseases, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were included in the otorhinolaryngology field. The objective of this research is to estimate the invested medical costs, profit and loss, and improvement points for the disease groups according to DRG and 'fee for service' system. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We investigated 1,377 subjects who underwent tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy based on DRG between January 2011 to December 2013 at our hospital. The profit and loss of medical costs were calculated according to medical record data, medical service fee, and activity based costing (ABC). RESULTS: The total of 1,377 subject comprised of 905 patients younger than 17 years-old and 472 patients older than 18 years-old. A main moderate complication that was not one of the DRG diseases, postoperative bleeding, was only found in 19 patients (1.38%). Profit related to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy studied for a 3 year-period was higher in the DRG system than in the 'fee for service' system; however, profit was reported as 62.9-67.5% of the actual prime costs. CONCLUSION: DRG system for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy seems to have higher compensation rate than the 'fee for service' system does. However, the system is still insufficient to compare profit with the input medical cost. Furthermore, the present system of disease grouping needs to be improved to reflect actual medical prime costs.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adenoidectomy , Compensation and Redress , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Fee-for-Service Plans , Fees and Charges , Hemorrhage , Medical Records , National Health Programs , Otolaryngology , TonsillectomyABSTRACT
Strengthening primary care has always been a major policy issue in most developed countries to achieve the health care system's goals, and policy makers continuously try to use payment system as an effective tool to improve overall performance of primary care. In this paper, we examined the various payment methods and growing trends in primary care payment system in some developed countries. Overall, a common form of payment for primary care doctors is a blend of fee-for-service (FFS), capitation, and pay-for-performance (P4P). In addition, many countries are still in the way of many new trials to find the right way to provide primary care service effectively, to meet the complex health care needs of populations. In Korea, primary care system is not well-established, and other institutional arrangements are not in good conditions for primary care, either. FFS, which is a dominant payment method in Korea, is not favorable for achieving good attributes of primary care. Mixing various payment components, like capitation, P4P to current FFS is essential to provide the optimal incentive structures for primary care physicians. Also, new models to encourage doctor-patient relationships with appropriate P4P mechanisms could be used as an early step in reforming primary care payment system gradually.
Subject(s)
Humans , Administrative Personnel , Delivery of Health Care , Developed Countries , Fee-for-Service Plans , Korea , Motivation , Physicians, Primary Care , Primary Health Care , Reimbursement, IncentiveABSTRACT
Existen diferentes modalidades para recibir las remuneraciones en carreras liberales como odontología. En general, el pago se hace por acciones realizadas o por el tiempo dedicado a ejecutarlas. En algunos casos el monto del pago está directamente relacionado con el diagnóstico realizado al paciente. ¿Existe un conflicto de interés en alguna de las modalidades? Para responder esta pregunta se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica sobre el tema, encontrándose escasa literatura al respecto. A partir de lo revisado podemos concluir que la existencia del conflicto de interés no es el problema, la resolución del mismo es el que aporta la dimensión ética al tema de las remuneraciones.
There are different modalities to receive remunerations in liberal careers such as dentistry. In general, payment is done for actions carried out by time dedicated to execute them. In some cases, the amount of payment is directly related to the diagnosis of the patient. There is a conflict of interest in some of these modalities? To answer this question a bibliographical search was carried out on the topic, finding scarce literature on it. From the revised material, we can conclude that the problem is not the existence of a conflict of interest, but what brings an ethical dimension to the topic of remunerations is its resolution.
Existem diferentes modalidades para receber as remunerações em carreiras liberais como odontologia. Em geral, o pagamento se faz por ações realizadas ou pelo tempo dedicado a executá-las. Em alguns casos o montante do pagamento está diretamente relacionado com o diagnóstico realizado ao paciente. Existe um conflito de interesse em alguma das modalidades? Para responder esta pergunta se realizou uma busca bibliográfica sobre o tema, encontrando-se escassa literatura a respeito. A partir do que foi revisado podemos concluir que a existência do conflito de interesse não é o problema, a resolução do mesmo é o que aporta a dimensão ética ao tema das remunerações.
Subject(s)
Ethics, Dental , Fees, Dental , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/economics , Remuneration , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Conflict of Interest , Dental Care , Dentists , Fee-for-Service Plans , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/ethicsABSTRACT
Desde os anos 50, os fatores de risco para as doenças cardiovasculares passaram a ser valorizados. O gerenciamento de doenças cardiovasculares (PGC) busca a construção da autonomia e melhoria da qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Em alguns países, para alcançar esses objetivos, tem sido apontada a utilização de programas de pagamento por desempenho (PPP) aos médicos como um dos elementos de melhoria nos processos e nos resultados dos pacientes e na condição de remuneração. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar o ponto de vista dos médicos sobre a implantação dos pagamentos por desempenho vinculados ao PGC em uma operadora de plano de saúde. Trata-se de investigação de caráter qualitativo, do tipo estudo de caso, apresentando entrevistas semiestruturadas com médicos participantes ou não do PGC, em setembro de 2009, tendo como referência as ações implantadas em 2008. Foram entrevistados 23 médicos (14 homens e 09 mulheres). Como resultado foi observado que o incentivo financeiro é reconhecido pelos médicos como importante, mas não determinante da inclusão de pacientes no PGC. O principal motivo apresentado foi a organização do cuidado, no qual o paciente é mais bem acompanhado e controlado, e o trabalho médico, avaliado segundo parâmetros preestabelecidos. O PGC e o PPP têm potencial de transformação do cuidado em saúde. O trabalho multidisciplinar e a maior produtividade nos atendimentos no consultório foram os principais efeitos positivos identificados. Outros estudos são necessários para acompanhar a evolução e os efeitos do pagamento por desempenho no trabalho médico.
Since the '50s, people began to give increasing value to the risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The management of cardiovascular disease (CMP) seeks the construction of patient autonomy and improved quality of life. In some countries, to reach these goals, the use of pay-per-performance (PPP) to physicians has been mentioned as one of the elements of improvement in the process, in patient outcomes and in remuneration conditions. Our goal is to study the medical perspective of the implementation of performance payment linked to the CMP. This is a qualitative research, a case study, using semi-structured interviews with PGC participating and non-participating doctors. The interviews were conducted in September 2009, based on the actions implemented in 2008. We interviewed 23 doctors (14 men and 9 women). The main reason cited for the inclusion of CMP patients was the organization of their care, in which the patient is well controlled and monitored and medical work is evaluated by pre-established parameters. The financial incentive is recognized as important but not determining of the inclusion of patients. The CMP and the PPP have the potential to transform health care, improving outcome indicators. Multidisciplinary work and increased productivity in appointments in the practice were the main positive effects identified. Further studies are required to observe the progress and effects of performance payment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Health Human Resource Evaluation , Physician Incentive Plans/trends , Fee-for-Service Plans/trends , Supplemental Health , Case Reports , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Medical insurance, which is mandatory in Korea, has been progressed in the way of expanding the relevant population and intensifying the guarantee. However, rapid increases in medical expenses led national health insurance into a state of financial crisis. The government considered the reason of financial crisis as fee-for-service and started reorganizing the terms of payment from fee-for-service to case-payment. Therefore, an expanded diagnosis related group (DRG) payment system is carried out to decrease the expense on health and to secure financial stability. At the same time, the new case-payment system, apposite to the medical case in Korean society, is under demonstration. DRG payment system is in execution for the 7 disease entities of the four departments requested for now. However, it is supposed to be carried out in all the hospitals from the second half of 2012 and be expanded to all the general hospitals from 2013. The new case-payment system is under development because it is difficult to apply DRG to all disease entities. These shake-ups in the payment system will be conducted from the year 2015, combining both the DRG and new case-payment system. Basically, the introduction of the new case-payment system will cause doctors' passive attitude in the treatment of patients. This would be an especially serious problem for the department of surgery whose charge for operation is very low. It would be worse for the vascular surgeons because only 80% of operational or interventional procedures will be compensated, the fee for ultrasound is included in the new case-payment system, and age-related severity is not reflected in the disease entity. If relaunch is inevitable, vascular surgeons should understand the new case-payment system exactly and point out the problems. Also, standard guidelines on treatment per procedure should be set up and used for the established case-payment system, which would be helpful in reducing unnecessary medical expenses.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Fee-for-Service Plans , Fees and Charges , Hospitals, General , Insurance , Korea , National Health ProgramsABSTRACT
With the adoption of national health insurance in 1977, Korea has been utilizing fee-for-service payment with contract-based healthcare reimbursement system in 2000. Under the system, fee-for-service reimbursement has been accused of augmenting national healthcare expenditure by excessively increasing service volume. The researcher examined in this paper two major alternatives including diagnosis related group-based payment and global budget to contemplate the future of reimbursement system of Korean national health insurance. Various literature and preceding studies on pilot project and actual implementation of Neo-KDRG were reviewed. As a result, DRG-based payment was effective for healthcare cost control but low in administrative efficiency. Global budget may be adequate for cost control and improving the quality of healthcare and administrative efficiency. However, many healthcare providers disagree that excess care arising from fee-for-service payment alone has led to financial deterioration of national health insurance and healthcare institutions should take responsibility with global budget payment as an appropriate solution. Dissimilar payment systems may be applied to different types of institutions to reflect their unique attributes, and this process can be achieved step-by-step. Developing public sphere among the stakeholders and striving for consensus shall be kept as collateral to attain the desirable reimbursement system in the future.
Subject(s)
Humans , Budgets , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Forecasting , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , National Health Programs/economics , Republic of KoreaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-based payment on the length of stay and the number of outpatient visits after discharge in for patients who had undergone caesarean section. METHODS: This study used the health insurance data of the patients in health care facilities that were paid by the Fee-For-Service (FFS) in 2001-2004, but they participated in the DRG payment system in 2005-2007. In order to examine the net effects of DRG payment, the Difference-In-Differences (DID) method was adopted to observe the difference in health care utilization before and after the participation in the DRG payment system. The dependent variables of the regression model were the length of stay and number of outpatient visits after discharge, and the explanatory variables included the characteristics of the patients and the health care facilities. RESULTS: The length of stay in DRG-paid health care facilities was greater than that in the FFS-paid ones. Yet, DRG payment has no statistically significant effect on the number of outpatient visits after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study that DRG payment was not effective in reducing the length of stay can be related to the nature of voluntary participation in the DRG system. Only those health care facilities that are already efficient in terms of the length of stay or that can benefit from the DRG payment may decide to participate in the program.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Ambulatory Care/economics , Cesarean Section/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Insurance Claim Review , Length of Stay/economicsABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Medical consortium is a specific vertical integration model of regional medical resources. To improve medical resources utilization and control the health insurance costs by fee-for-service plans (FFS), capitation fee and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), it is important to explore the attitudes of doctors towards the different health insurance payment in the medical consortium in Shanghai.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A questionnaire survey was carried out randomly on 50 doctors respectively in 3 different levels medical institutes.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The statistical results showed that 90% of doctors in tertiary hospitals had the tendency towards FFS, whereas 78% in secondary hospitals towards DRGs and 84% in community health centers towards capitation fee.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>There are some obvious differences on doctors' attitudes towards health insurance payment in 3 different levels hospitals. Thus, it is feasible that health insurance payment should be supposed to the doctors' attitudes using the bundled payments along with the third-party payment as a supervisor within consortium.</p>