Diagnostic efficiency of existing guidelines and the AI-SONIC™ artificial intelligence for ultrasound-based risk assessment of thyroid nodules.

Introduction: The thyroid ultrasound guidelines include the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, Chinese-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology, European-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, American Thyroid Association, and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of the six ultrasound guidelines vs. an artificial intelligence system (AI-SONICTM) in differentiating thyroid nodules, especially medullary thyroid carcinoma. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, or benign nodules who underwent nodule resection between May 2010 and April 2020 at one hospital. The diagnostic efficacy of the seven diagnostic tools was evaluated using the receiver operator characteristic curves. Results: Finally, 432 patients with 450 nodules were included for analysis. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines had the best sensitivity (88.1%) and negative predictive value (78.6%) for differentiating papillary thyroid carcinoma or medullary thyroid carcinoma vs. benign nodules, while the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology guidelines had the best specificity (85.6%) and positive predictive value (89.6%), and the American Thyroid Association guidelines had the best accuracy (83.7%). When assessing medullary thyroid carcinoma, the American Thyroid Association guidelines had the highest area under the curve (0.78), the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System guidelines had the best sensitivity (90.2%), and negative predictive value (91.8%), and AI-SONICTM had the best specificity (85.6%) and positive predictive value (67.5%). The Chinese-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System guidelines had the best under the curve (0.86) in diagnosing malignant tumors vs. benign tumors, followed by the American Thyroid Association and Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology guidelines. The best positive likelihood ratios were achieved by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology guidelines and AI-SONICTM (both 5.37). The best negative likelihood ratio was achieved by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines (0.17). The highest diagnostic odds ratio was achieved by the American Thyroid Association guidelines (24.78). Discussion: All six guidelines and the AI-SONICTM system had satisfactory value in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules.

Brain metastases in Japanese NSCLC patients: prognostic assessment and the use of osimertinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors-retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The Graded Prognostic Assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA) has not been validated for use with Japanese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM) and the factors impacting survival need to be assessed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 294 NSCLC patients who were newly diagnosed with BM between 2013 and 2020 and had received radiotherapy for BM initially at the Hokkaido Cancer Center. We evaluated the effect on the prognosis of Lung-molGPA items, the expression of PD-L1 (classified as high, low, and no expression), and the treatment history. The main outcome was the survival measured from the day of the diagnosis of BM, and log-rank tests were performed to evaluate the results. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) times for adenocarcinoma by groups of GPA scores (0‒1.0, 1.5‒2.0, 2.5‒3.0, and 3.5‒4.0) were 5.5, 14.8, 28.3, and 39.0 months (p < 0.0001), respectively. The median survival times for non-adenocarcinoma by groups of GPA scores (0‒1.0, 1.5‒2.0, and 2.5‒3.0) were 3.2, 11.0, and 16.0 months (p = 0.0011), respectively. In adenocarcinoma patients with gene mutations, osimertinib significantly improved the outcome (median OS: 34.2 and 17.6 months with and without osimertinib, respectively (p = 0.0164)). There was no significant difference in the OS between patients who were initially treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitor for BM and those who initially received radiotherapy (p = 0.5337). In patients tested for PD-L1 expression, the median survival times after the diagnosis of BM were 5.6, 22.5, and 9.3 months for the high-, low- and no-expression groups (p = 0.2198), respectively. Also, in patients with high PD-L1 expressions, those with ICI had survival (median OS, 8.6 months) than those without (median OS, 3.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that Lung-molGPA successfully classified Japanese NSCLC patients with BM by the prognosis. Osimertinib prolonged survival of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with BM, and ICI was effective in patients with high PD-L1 expressions.

18-Fluoride fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is impactful in newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has a dismal prognosis. Surgical resection increases survival but is reliant on accurate detection and staging of disease. In overseas studies, 18 F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to have high diagnostic accuracy and staging utility, but local data remain sparse, in part because the technique has hitherto been unfunded via the Medicare benefits schedule. Although Commonwealth funding for rare tumours (including of the pancreas) has been recently approved to commence in late 2022, the proposed item descriptor wording implies that PET should lead to a significant change in management. Accordingly, the aims of this study are to characterize PET findings in newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma using standard parameters, such as the SUVmax , and assess the proportion of cases in which PET altered initial management planning. METHODS: We analysed the PET findings of these cancers (presence and degree of metabolic activity in the primary lesion, as well as within malignant nodal and metastatic lesions) and compared the pre- and post-PET management plans of the referring specialists. RESULTS: Of 51 patients we found that (a) increasing SUVmax of the primary lesion correlated with an increase in disease stage (r-value = 0.335; P-value = 0.016), and (b) PET contributed to a significant change in management in 35% of patients. CONCLUSION: In newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma, parameters in PET correlate with disease stage and the overall findings contribute to a significant management change in about 35% of patients.

Assessment of RANK/RANK-L prevalence and clinical significance in NSCLC European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort and SPLENDOUR randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of RANK/L expression, in both a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-III NSCLC (Lungscape) and a randomized clinical trial-cohort (SPLENDOUR) of advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy alone or in combination with denosumab. METHODS: RANK-L expression was assessed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) in Lungscape and whole sections in SPLENDOUR, using immunohistochemistry, with H-scores values > 0 indicating positivity. Prevalence of RANK positivity and its association with clinicopathological characteristics, and patient outcome was explored in a subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort and in SPLENDOUR. Also investigated were the prevalence of RANK overexpression (proportion of positive cancer cells ≥ 50%) in the Lungscape cohort, and RANK-L in the SPLENDOUR trial. RESULTS: In the Lungscape cohort, RANK expression was assessed at a median follow-up of 46 months (N = 488 patients; 4 centers); 35% were female, 44/49/6% adenocarcinomas (AC)/squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)/other, 48/27/25% with stage I/II/III. Median RFS/TTR/OS were 58/Not reached/74 months. Prevalence of RANK expression was 31% (95%CI:27%-35%); significantly higher in AC: 50% (95%CI:43%-57%) vs SCC: 12% (95%CI:8%-16%) (p < 0.001); more frequent in females (42% vs 25%, p < 0.001) and tumors ≤ 4 cm (35.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.0065). No association with outcome was found. In the SPLENDOUR trial (463 patients), the prevalence of membranous and cytoplasmic RANK positivity was 34% (95%CI:30%-38%) and 9% (95%CI:7%-12%), respectively, while prevalence for RANK-L was 5% (95%CI:3%-7%) and 36% (95%CI:31%-40%), respectively. Cytoplasmic RANK-L positivity was more common among females (47% vs 31%, p = 0.001) and in non-SCC histology (45% vs 10%, p < 0.0001). At the pre-specified 1% significance level, no prognostic or predictive effect was found. CONCLUSIONS: Both cohorts indicate that RANK expression is more common in adenocarcinoma/non-squamous NSCLC and in female patients. No prognostic effect is found, and in the clinical trial involving addition of denosumab to chemotherapy no predictive effect is detected.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Versus Upfront Surgery in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has an overall 5-year survival rate of 10%. The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation is debated in resectable disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (NACRT) versus upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy (USR) in resectable PC. METHODS: A decision tree model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of NACRT versus USR. Values from the published literature populate the tree: costs from Medicare (FY2021) reimbursements, and morbidity and survival data for quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who qualified for resection were included. The ICER was the primary outcome. The model was validated using one-way and two-way deterministic, as well as probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The base case was modeled using a 65-year-old male. NACRT yielded 1.61 QALYs at $45,483.52 USD. USR yielded 1.47 QALYs at a discount of $6,840.96 USD. The ICER was $48,130 USD, which favors NACRT. One-way sensitivity analyses upheld these results except when ≤ 21.0% of NACRT patients proceeded to surgery and when ≤ 85.4% of NACRT patients were resectable at surgery. Two-way sensitivity analyses also favored NACRT except in cases when the proportion of resected disease after NACRT decreased. NACRT was favored in 94.3% of 100,000 random-sampling simulations. CONCLUSION: It is more cost-effective to administer NACRT before surgery for patients with resectable PC. On the basis of sensitivity analyses, USR with adjuvant therapy is only favored if rates of resection and eligibility for resection after NACRT decrease. NACRT should be considered in all patients unless there is an absolute contraindication.

Economic evaluation of FLOT and ECF/ECX perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin plus docetaxel (FLOT) was recommended by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for gastric cancer (2018 edition) for patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (class IIA). However, the economic impact of FLOT chemotherapy in China remains unclear. The analysis aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of FLOT versus epirubicin, cisplatin plus fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) in patients with locally advanced resectable tumours. DESIGN: We developed a Markov model to compare the healthcare and economic outcomes of FLOT and ECF/ECX in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Costs were estimated from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. Clinical and utility inputs were derived from the FLOT4 phase II/III clinical trial and published literature. Sensitivity analyses were employed to assess the robustness of our result. The annual discount rate for costs and health outcomes was set at 5%. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) was calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The base-case analysis found that compared with ECF/ECX, the use of FLOT chemotherapy was associated with an additional 1.08 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of US$851/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis results suggested that the HR of overall survival and progression-free survival had the greatest impact on the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that FLOT was more likely to be cost-effective compared with ECF/ECX at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$31 513/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with locally advanced resectable tumours, the FLOT chemotherapy is a cost-effective treatment option compared with ECF/ECX in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01216644.

Molecular subtyping based on TRP family and prognostic assessment for TRP-associated lncRNAs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels have high permeability to Ca2+ ions because they are non-selective ion channels. TRP channels have been implicated in tumor onset and progression, proliferation, and migration in recent years. However, the prognostic value of genes related to TRP and their specific mechanism in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) are yet to be understood. METHODS: Public databases such as TCGA and GEO were used to retrieve data on gene expression and clinical information of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma for our study. ConsensusClusterPlus package was used for unsupervised clustering analysis. The microenvironment cell population (MCP)-counter approach was employed to measure the immune cells infiltration status. The Pearson correlation was performed to identify TRP-associated lncRNAs. RESULTS: Initially, we separated PAAD patients into three clusters depending on TRP-related genes, and of the three clusters, cluster B showed the least immune cell infiltration, which was correlated with poor prognosis. Moreover, GSVA enrichment analysis further revealed that cluster A was subjected to a considerable enrichment in carcinogenic signaling pathways, whereas cluster C was enriched in immune-related pathways. Then, using TRP-associated lncRNAs as a starting point, we constructed a prognostic risk model for PAAD patients that could efficiently predict their prognosis. Further, GSEA revealed that cancer-related pathways, for instance, the cell cycle, p53 signaling pathway, etc. were considerably enriched in the high-risk group. In addition, we looked into the link between the prognostic model and the immunological microenvironment. Lower cytotoxic lymphocytes, NK cells, CD8 T cells, and endothelial cells infiltration were found to be associated with high risk using the MCP-counter algorithm. The expression of CD274, POLE2, MCM6, and LOXL2 was also found to be higher in the high-risk group. TMB was also considerably greater in high-risk individuals, indicating that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy may benefit them more. Lastly, qRT-PCR further confirmed the differential expression of these prognostic TRP-associated lncRNAs, indicating that these lncRNAs play an imperative role in PAAD tumorigenesis. CONCLUSION: TRP family genes may represent a new class of candidate molecular markers of the occurrence and progression of PAAD. Risk models based on TRP-associated lncRNAs could provide important new references for immunotargeted therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Prognostic risk assessment model and drug sensitivity analysis of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) based on immune-related lncRNA pairs.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify and screen long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) associated with immune genes in colon cancer, construct immune-related lncRNA pairs, establish a prognostic risk assessment model for colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), and explore prognostic factors and drug sensitivity. METHOD: Our method was based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). To begin, we obtained all pertinent demographic and clinical information on 385 patients with COAD. All lncRNAs significantly related to immune genes and with differential expression were identified to construct immune lncRNA pairs. Subsequently, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and Cox models were used to screen out prognostic-related immune lncRNAs for the establishment of a prognostic risk scoring formula. Finally, We analysed the functional differences between subgroups and screened the drugs, and establish an individual prediction nomogram model. RESULTS: Our final analysis confirmed eight lncRNA pairs to construct prognostic risk assessment model. Results showed that the high-risk and low-risk groups had significant differences (training (n = 249): p < 0.001, validation (n = 114): p = 0.022). The prognostic model was certified as an independent prognosis model. Compared with the common clinicopathological indicators, the prognostic model had better predictive efficiency (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.805). Finally, We have analysed highly differentiated cellular pathways such as mucosal immune response, identified 9 differential immune cells, 10 sensitive drugs, and establish an individual prediction nomogram model (C-index = 0.820). CONCLUSION: Our study verified that the eight lncRNA pairs mentioned can be used as biomarkers to predict the prognosis of COAD patients. Identified cells, drugs may have an positive effect on colon cancer prognosis.

Trimodality Therapy vs Definitive Chemoradiation in Older Adults With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of trimodality therapy vs definitive chemoradiation for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer in older adults is uncertain. Existing trials lack generalizability to older adults, a population with heightened frailty. We sought to emulate a hypothetical trial comparing these treatments using real-world data. METHODS: A cohort of adults aged 66-79 years diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2017 was identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. The clone-censor-weight method was leveraged to eliminate time-related biases when comparing outcomes between treatments. Outcomes included overall mortality, esophageal cancer-specific mortality, functional adverse events, and healthy days at home. RESULTS: A total of 1240 individuals with adenocarcinomas and 661 with squamous cell carcinomas were identified. For adenocarcinomas, the standardized 5-year risk of mortality was 73.4% for trimodality therapy and 83.8% for definitive chemoradiation (relative risk [RR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.95). Trimodality therapy was associated with mortality risk reduction for squamous cell carcinomas (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.70 to 1.01). The 1-year incidence of functional adverse events was higher in the trimodality group (adenocarcinomas RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.65; squamous cell carcinomas RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.49). Over 5 years, trimodality therapy was associated with 160 (95% CI = 67 to 229) and 177 (95% CI = 51 to 313) additional home days in individuals with adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with definitive chemoradiation, trimodality therapy was associated with reduced mortality but increased risk of function-related adverse events. Discussing these tradeoffs may help optimize care plans.

Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Cancer in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: Rising Global Incidence and Unique Challenges.

The global incidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma is stable or decreasing overall; however, the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients aged <50 years is increasing. Although some of this increase is due to hereditary cancer syndromes, this is not the sole explanation. Patients with early-onset rectal cancer in particular have unique disease patterns and face distinct challenges in their treatment. Molecular patterns of disease in this patient cohort are noteworthy and often represent an opportunity to target these cancers more effectively. Recent and ongoing trials focusing on minimizing toxicities and necessary therapy modalities and maximizing response and patient outcome are of paramount importance in this patient population. Additional resources are needed for this patient population, including fertility counseling and preservation, financial guidance, genetic counseling, and psychosocial support.

Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis (CTTA) for predicting the histopathological differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and to compare non-contrast-enhanced CTTA texture features between primary PDAC and hepatic metastases of PDAC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 120 patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC. Sixty-five patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of primary PDAC, while 55 patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of hepatic PDAC metastasis. All lesions were segmented in non-contrast-enhanced CT scans for CTTA based on histogram analysis, co-occurrence matrix, and run-length matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted for 372 texture features using Mann-Whitney U test, Bonferroni-Holm correction, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three features were identified that differed significantly between histopathological G2 and G3 primary tumors. Of these, "low gray-level zone emphasis" yielded the largest AUC (0.87 ± 0.04), reaching a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.83, respectively, when a cut-off value of 0.482 was applied. Fifty-four features differed significantly between primary and hepatic metastatic PDAC. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast-enhanced CTTA of PDAC identified differences in texture features between primary G2 and G3 tumors that could be used for non-invasive tumor assessment. Extensive differences between the features of primary and metastatic PDAC on CTTA suggest differences in tumor microenvironment.

Real-time Tracking and Classification of Tumor and Nontumor Tissue in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Resection Margin Assessment.

Importance: Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract remain a major contributor to the global cancer burden. The accurate mapping of tumor margins is of particular importance for curative cancer resection and improvement in overall survival. Current mapping techniques preclude a full resection margin assessment in real time. Objective: To evaluate whether diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) on gastric and esophageal cancer specimens can differentiate tissue types and provide real-time feedback to the operator. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective ex vivo validation study. Patients undergoing esophageal or gastric cancer resection were prospectively recruited into the study between July 2020 and July 2021 at Hammersmith Hospital in London, United Kingdom. Tissue specimens were included for patients undergoing elective surgery for either esophageal carcinoma (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) or gastric adenocarcinoma. Exposures: A handheld DRS probe and tracking system was used on freshly resected ex vivo tissue to obtain spectral data. Binary classification, following histopathological validation, was performed using 4 supervised machine learning classifiers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data were divided into training and testing sets using a stratified 5-fold cross-validation method. Machine learning classifiers were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and the area under the curve. Results: Of 34 included patients, 22 (65%) were male, and the median (range) age was 68 (35-89) years. A total of 14 097 mean spectra for normal and cancerous tissue were collected. For normal vs cancer tissue, the machine learning classifier achieved a mean (SD) overall diagnostic accuracy of 93.86% (0.66) for stomach tissue and 96.22% (0.50) for esophageal tissue and achieved a mean (SD) sensitivity and specificity of 91.31% (1.5) and 95.13% (0.8), respectively, for stomach tissue and of 94.60% (0.9) and 97.28% (0.6) for esophagus tissue. Real-time tissue tracking and classification was achieved and presented live on screen. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides ex vivo validation of the DRS technology for real-time differentiation of gastric and esophageal cancer from healthy tissue using machine learning with high accuracy. As such, it is a step toward the development of a real-time in vivo tumor mapping tool for esophageal and gastric cancers that can aid decision-making of resection margins intraoperatively.

Recent advances in multidisciplinary therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJA) have long been associated with poor prognosis. With changes in the spectrum of the disease caused by economic development and demographic changes, the incidence of EAC and EGJA continues to increase, making them worthy of more attention from clinicians. For a long time, surgery has been the mainstay treatment for EAC and EGJA. With advanced techniques, endoscopic therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and other treatment methods have been developed, providing additional treatment options for patients with EAC and EGJA. In recent decades, the emergence of multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) has enabled the comprehensive treatment of tumors and made the treatment more flexible and diversified, which is conducive to achieving standardized and individualized treatment of EAC and EGJA to obtain a better prognosis. This review discusses recent advances in EAC and EGJA treatment in the surgical-centered MDT mode in recent years.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Chinese Patients With Advanced Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Introduction: Two targeted drugs (apatinib and lenvatinib) show clinical efficacy in first-line treatment of Chinese patients with radioactive advanced iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) and are recommended by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Considering the high clinical cost of long-term vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor administration and to determine which of the two targeted drugs is preferable, we opted to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and network meta-analysis (NMA). Material and Methods: The results of NMA and CEA included in the two phase III randomized clinical trials REALITY (NCT03048877) and Study-308 (NCT02966093), in which Bayesian NMA and CEA were performed on 243 and 149 Chinese patients, respectively, were retrieved. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) for apatinib versus lenvatinib were determined by NMA. CEA involved the development of a 20-year Markov model to obtain the total cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and this was followed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Results: Compared with lenvatinib, apatinib therapy provided a 0.837 improvement in QALY and $6,975 reduction in costs. The hazard ratio of apatinib versus lenvatinib and the cost of the targeted drugs had a significant impact on the model. According to the sensitivity analysis, apatinib was more cost-effective and had no correlation with willingness-to-pay in China. Subgroup analysis showed that apatinib maintained PFS more economically. Conclusion: NMA and CEA demonstrated that apatinib was more cost-effective compared to lenvatinib in the first-line treatment of Chinese RAIR-DTC patients.

Patterns of care amongst older adults diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Since the early 2010s, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy (trimodal therapy) has been a recommended treatment for patients diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, it may also add treatment-related toxicity, particularly for older adults with significant comorbidity and frailty burdens. We examined contemporary patterns of care in older adults, which have not been well characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database to identify a cohort of US adults aged 66 years and older diagnosed with incident locally advanced esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2017. Calendar year age-standardized percentages of treatment receipt were calculated. Joinpoint regression was used to detect temporal trends in treatment receipt. Descriptive associations between patient factors and treatment were assessed. Trend analyses quantified how the percentage of trimodal and definitive chemoradiation (no surgery) patients receiving cisplatin-based, carboplatin-based, and other chemotherapy regimens evolved over time. RESULTS: In total, 4332 adults aged ≥66 years with locally advanced esophageal cancer were included. The age-standardized percentage of patients receiving trimodal therapy increased from 16.7% in 2004 to 26.1% in 2017 (annual percent change = 3.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-6.4%) in adenocarcinomas and from 7.3% in 2004 to 9.1% in 2017 (annual percent change = 0.4%; 95% CI, -4.1%-5.1%) in squamous cell carcinomas. By 2017, definitive chemoradiation became the most frequently used treatment modality for adenocarcinomas (49.8%; 95% CI, 43.5-56.0) and squamous cell carcinomas (59.5%; 95% CI, 50.8-68.2). Patients with higher comorbidity and frailty burdens were less likely to be treated with trimodal therapy. Amongst patients receiving chemoradiation as part of their treatment, a large and swift channeling away from cisplatin and towards carboplatin-based regimens was observed. DISCUSSION: In practice, definitive chemoradiation is the most commonly received treatment by older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Four out of five older adults do not receive trimodal therapy, some of whom are potentially undertreated.

A Signature Based on Costimulatory Molecules for the Assessment of Prognosis and Immune Characteristics in Patients With Stomach Adenocarcinoma.

Although costimulatory molecules have been shown to boost antitumor immune responses, their significance in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the gene expression patterns of costimulatory molecule genes in patients with STAD and develop a predictive signature to aid in therapy selection and outcome prediction. We used 60 costimulatory family genes from prior research to conduct the first complete costimulatory molecular analysis in patients with STAD. In the two study groups, consensus clustering analysis based on these 60 genes indicated unique distribution patterns and prognostic differences. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and Cox regression analysis, we identified nine costimulatory molecular gene pairs (CMGPs) with prognostic value. With these nine CMGPs, we were able to develop a costimulatory molecule-related prognostic signature that performed well in an external dataset. For the patients with STAD, the signature was proven to be a risk factor independent of the clinical characteristics, indicating that this signature may be employed in conjunction with clinical considerations. A further connection between the signature and immunotherapy response was discovered. The patients with high mutation rates, an abundance of infiltrating immune cells, and an immunosuppressive milieu were classified as high-risk patients. It is possible that these high-risk patients have a better prognosis for immunotherapy since they have higher cytolytic activity scores and immunophenoscores of CTLA4 and PD-L1/PD-L2 blockers. Therefore, our signature may help clinicians in assessing patient prognosis and developing treatment plans.

Treatment Inequity: Examining the Influence of Non-Hispanic Black Race and Ethnicity on Pancreatic Cancer Care and Survival in Wisconsin.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated race and ethnicity-based disparities in first course treatment and overall survival among Wisconsin pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: We identified adults diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System from 2004 through 2017. We assessed race and ethnicity-based disparities in first course of treatment via adjusted logistic regression and overall survival via 4 incremental Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The study included 8,490 patients: 91.3% (n = 7,755) non-Hispanic White; 5.1% (n = 437) non-Hispanic Black, 1.8% (n = 151) Hispanic, 0.6% Native American (n = 53), and 0.6% Asian (n = 51) race and ethnicities. Non-Hispanic Black patients had lower odds of treatment than non-Hispanic White patients for full patient (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65) and Medicare cohorts (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.55). Non-Hispanic Black patients had lower odds of receiving surgery than non-Hispanic White patients (full cohort OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48-0.92]; Medicare cohort OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.34-0.93]). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced worse survival than non-Hispanic White patients in the first 2 incremental Cox proportional hazard regression models (model II HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31). After adding insurance and treatment course, non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients experienced similar survival (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.09). CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black patients were almost 50% less likely to receive any treatment and 33% less likely to receive surgery than non-Hispanic White patients. After including treatment course, non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patient survival was similar. Increasing non-Hispanic Black patient treatment rates by addressing structural factors affecting treatment availability and employing culturally humble approaches to treatment discussions may mitigate these disparities.

Novel recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone in aiding postoperative assessment of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer-phase I/II study.

PURPOSE: Thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) inevitably induced hypothyroidism in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH, ZGrhTSH) as an alternative of THW in China. METHODS: Totally, 64 DTC patients were enrolled with 24 in the dose-escalation cohort equally grouped into 0.9 mg × 1 day, 0.9 mg × 2 day, 1.8 mg × 1 day, and 1.8 mg × 2 day dosage, and 40 further enrolled into 0.9 mg × 2 day dose-expansion cohort. All patients underwent both ZGrhTSH phase and levothyroxine (L-T₄) withdrawal phase for self-comparison in terms of TSH levels, the radioactive iodine (RAI) uptake, stimulated thyroglobulin level, and the quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In ZGrhTSH phase, no major serious adverse events were observed, and mild symptoms of headache were observed in 6.3%, lethargy in 4.7%, and asthenia in 3.1% of the patients, and mostly resolved spontaneously within 2 days. Concordant RAI uptake was noticed in 89.1% (57/64) of the patients between ZGrhTSH and L-T₄ withdrawal phases. The concordant thyroglobulin level with a cut-off of 1 µg/L was noticed in 84.7% (50/59) of the patients without the interference of anti-thyroglobulin antibody. The QoL was far better during ZGrhTSH phase than L-T₄ withdrawal phase, with lower Billewicz (- 51.30 ± 4.70 vs. - 39.10 ± 16.61, P < 0.001) and POMS (91.70 ± 16.70 vs. 100.40 ± 22.11, P = 0.011) scores which indicate the lower the better. Serum TSH level rose from basal 0.11 ± 0.12 mU/L to a peak of 122.11 ± 42.44 mU/L 24 h after the last dose of ZGrhTSH. In L-T₄ withdrawal phase, a median of 23 days after L-T₄ withdrawal was needed, with the mean TSH level of 82.20 ± 31.37 mU/L. The half-life for ZGrhTSH clearance was about 20 h. CONCLUSION: The ZGrhTSH held the promise to be a safe and effective modality in facilitating RAI uptake and serum thyroglobulin stimulation, with better QoL of patients with DTC compared with L-T₄ withdrawal.

Post-neoadjuvant assessment of tumour budding according to ITBCC subgroups delivers stage- and regression-grade independent prognostic information in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma.

Tumour budding (TB) has been associated with adverse clinicopathological factors and poor survival in a plethora of therapy-naïve carcinoma entities including gastric adenocarcinoma (GC). As conventional histopathological grading is usually omitted in the post-neoadjuvant setting of GC, our study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of TB in GCs resected after neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated TB according to the criteria from the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 167 post-neoadjuvant resections of intestinal-type GC and correlated the results with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological parameters. GCs were categorised into Bd1 (0-4 buds, low TB), Bd2 (5-9 buds, intermediate TB), and Bd3 (≥10 buds, high TB). Carcinomas with intermediate and high TB were significantly enriched in higher ypTNM stages and strongly associated with reduced 5-year OS in univariable analyses (p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses including sex, age, resection status, UICC stage, and tumour regression grading, TB remained a stage-independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001, hazard ratio Bd2: 2.60, Bd3: 4.74). The assessment of TB according to the ITBCC criteria provides valuable prognostic information in the post-neoadjuvant setting of intestinal-type GC and may be a considerable substitute for the conventional grading system in GCs after neoadjuvant therapy.