Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 427
Filter
1.
Respirar (Ciudad Autón. B. Aires) ; 16(1): 59-66, Marzo 2024.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1551217

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 puede presentar síndrome de distrés res-piratorio agudo con requerimiento de ventilación mecánica prolongada y retraso en la realización de traqueostomía. Esto trae como consecuencia un incremento en casos de estenosis traqueal y la necesidad de métodos menos invasivos para su abordaje. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, desde marzo 2020 hasta diciem-bre 2021 en el Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia, en adultos con estenosis traqueal postintubación asociado SARS-CoV-2. Se realizó análisis univariado entre los grupos con infección o no por SARS-CoV-2 como control, y reintervención, grado de estenosis, uso de inyección intramucosa con dexametasona intratraqueal o múltiples estenosis como desenlaces de importancia. Se usó test exacto de Fisher, t Student y Man-Whitney según la naturaleza de variables. Se consideró p estadísticamente significativo menor a 0.05.Resultados: Se identificaron 26 pacientes, 20 tenían COVID-19 y 6 no. Se encontraron diferencias en edad (p=0,002), epilepsia (p=0,007) y estenosis múltiple (p= 0,04). En 85% de los casos se utilizó láser blue más dilatación con balón pulmonar, en 35% inyección intramucosa con dexametasona intratraqueal y reintervención en 35%, sin diferencias significativas entre grupos. Conclusiones: Se observó un incremento tres veces mayor de pacientes con estenosis múltiple en el grupo de infección por COVID-19, así mismo se encontró que el método más utilizado en este grupo para la recanalización fue el uso de láser blue más dilatación con balón pulmonar y la innovación en el uso de inyección intramucosa.


Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome with a prolonged need for mechanical ventilation and delayed tracheostomy, resulting in an increase in cases of tracheal stenosis and the necessity for less invasive approaches.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2020 to December 2021 at the Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia, focusing on adults with post-intubation tracheal stenosis associated with SARS-CoV-2. Univariate analysis was performed between groups with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection as a control, considering reintervention, degree of stenosis, use of intratracheal steroids, or multiple stenoses as important outcomes. Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whit-ney test were employed based on the nature of variables. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: A total of 26 patients were included, with 20 having COVID-19 and 6 without. Significant differences were found in age (p=0.002), epilepsy (p=0.007), and multiple stenosis (p=0.04). In 85% of cases, laser blue plus balloon pulmonary dilation was used, intratracheal dexamethasone in 35%, and reintervention in 35%, with no significant differences between groups.Conclusions: A threefold increase in subglottic stenosis was observed during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with more instances of multiple stenosis and predominantly the use of laser blue plus balloon pulmonary dilation as a successful recanalization technique. There was a higher use of intratracheal dexamethasone in this group compared to oth-er pathologies causing tracheal stenosis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn , Tracheal Stenosis/complications , Dyspnea , COVID-19/complications , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Tracheostomy/methods , Colombia , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Rev. epidemiol. controle infecç ; 14(1): 31-37, jan.-mar. 2024. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1567545

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: bacterial resistance is an important public health problem worldwide and is related to the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials, limiting the available therapeutic options. The COVID-19 pandemic aggravated this scenario, since the lack of a standardized therapy led to a considerable increase in the prescription of these drugs. Therefore, we proposed to investigate the prevalence of bacterial infections and the profile of antimicrobial resistance in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 as well as to point out possible risk factors. Methods: a retrospective study based on the analysis of medical records of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 over the age of 18. Information such as age, gender, length of stay, hospitalization unit, bacterial species and resistance profile and previous use of antimicrobials by patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were collected and analyzed using Excel® 2016. Results: of the 268 patients with COVID-19, 162 had suspected bacterial infections, and 26 patients (9.7%) were confirmed from positive cultures. Furthermore, around 80% of these patients underwent empirical treatment with antimicrobials, the majority of whom were male and admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. A total of 32 bacterial isolates were recovered, of which 59.4% were resistant to at least one class of antimicrobials, with 21.8% being multidrug resistant. Conclusion: despite the low percentage found of patients with COVID-19 who had bacterial infections and of these 21.8% were by multidrug-resistant bacteria, the reinforcement in infection prevention policies and the adequate management in the release of antimicrobials is necessary to reduce the hospital dissemination rates of such bacteria.(AU)


Justificativa e Objetivos: a resistência bacteriana é um importante problema de saúde pública mundial relacionado ao uso indiscriminado de antimicrobianos, limitando as opções terapêuticas disponíveis. A pandemia de COVID-19 agravou esse cenário, uma vez que a falta de uma terapia padronizada resultou no aumento considerável na prescrição desses fármacos. Diante disso, propôs-se investigar a prevalência de infecções bacterianas e o perfil de resistência aos antimicrobianos em pacientes diagnosticados com COVID-19, bem como apontar possíveis fatores de risco. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo baseado na análise de prontuários de pacientes internados com COVID-19 com idade superior a 18 anos. Informações como idade, gênero, tempo de internação, unidade de internação, espécie bacteriana e perfil de resistência e uso prévio de antimicrobianos pelos pacientes diagnosticados com COVID-19 foram coletadas e analisadas pelo software Excel® 2016. Resultados: dos 268 pacientes com COVID-19, 162 apresentaram suspeitas de infecções bacterianas, sendo 26 pacientes (9,7%) confirmados a partir de culturas positivas. Ainda, cerca de 80% desses pacientes realizaram tratamento empírico com antimicrobianos, sendo a maioria do sexo masculino e internados em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Foram recuperados um total de 32 isolados bacterianos, dos quais 59,4% apresentaram resistência a pelo menos uma classe de antimicrobianos, sendo 21,8% multidroga resistente. Conclusão: apesar do baixo percentual encontrado de pacientes com COVID-19 que apresentaram infecções bacterianas e, desses, 21,8% serem causados por bactérias multirresistentes, o reforço nas políticas de prevenção de infecções e o adequado gerenciamento na liberação de antimicrobianos se fazem necessários para a redução das taxas de disseminação hospitalar de tais bactérias.(AU)


Justificación y Objetivos: la resistencia bacteriana es un importante problema de salud pública en todo el mundo y está relacionada con el uso indiscriminado de antimicrobianos, lo que limita las opciones terapéuticas disponibles. La pandemia por COVID-19 agravó este escenario, ya que la falta de una terapia estandarizada llevó a un aumento considerable en la prescripción de estos fármacos. Por ello, nos propusimos investigar la prevalencia de infecciones bacterianas y el perfil de resistencia antimicrobiana en pacientes diagnosticados de COVID-19, así como señalar posibles factores de riesgo. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo basado en el análisis de historias clínicas de pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 mayores de 18 años. Información como edad, sexo, duración de la estadía, unidad de hospitalización, especies bacterianas y perfil de resistencia y uso previo de antimicrobianos por parte de pacientes diagnosticados con COVID-19 fueron recopiladas y analizadas mediante el software Excel® 2016. Resultados: de los 268 pacientes con COVID-19, 162 tenían sospecha de infección bacteriana, con 26 pacientes (9,7%) confirmada a partir de cultivos positivos. Además, alrededor del 80% de estos pacientes recibieron tratamiento empírico con antimicrobianos, la mayoría de los cuales eran hombres e ingresaron en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Se recuperaron un total de 32 aislados bacterianos, de los cuales el 59,4% eran resistentes a al menos una clase de antimicrobianos y el 21,8% eran resistentes a múltiples fármacos. Conclusión: a pesar del bajo porcentaje encontrado de pacientes con COVID-19 que presentaron infecciones bacterianas, y de éstas cerca del 21,8% fueron por bacterias multirresistentes, es necesario reforzar las políticas de prevención de infecciones y una gestión adecuada en la liberación de antimicrobianos para reducir las tasas de diseminación hospitalaria de dichas bacterias.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Bacterial Infections , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Cross Infection , COVID-19/complications , Inpatients
3.
Rev. epidemiol. controle infecç ; 14(1): 66-74, jan.-mar. 2024. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1567620

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Since its appearance in 2019, multiple risk factors have been identified for presenting a severe form of COVID-19 and different vaccines have also been developed to prevent severe manifestations. However, despite a vaccination history, some cases progress to complications or even death. The objective of this study was to determine the strength of the association between the severity of COVID-19 and the history of vaccination in patients treated at a public reference hospital in Mexico City. Methods: This was a non-experimental, retrospective, and analytical epidemiological study of cases and controls. The study population was people treated at a concentration hospital for COVID-19 care between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, in Mexico City. Results: 132 participants (44 cases and 88 controls) were included in the study. The risk factors most strongly associated with COVID-19 severity were age greater than or equal to 60 years, presenting 22 breaths per minute at the first medical evaluation, systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 millimeters of mercury, and a history of at least one chronic comorbidity. However, vaccination history was associated with 94% (OR 0.06) lower odds of developing severe COVID-19 compared to those without a history of vaccination, regardless of the presence of associated risk factors. Conclusion: Lacking a history of vaccination and presenting any of the identified risk factors confer higher odds of developing severe forms of the disease.(AU)


Justificativa e Objetivos: Desde o seu aparecimento em 2019, foram identificados múltiplos fatores de risco para a apresentação de uma forma grave de COVID-19 e foram desenvolvidas diferentes vacinas para prevenir o aparecimento de manifestações graves. No entanto, apesar de um histórico de vacinação, alguns casos podem evoluir para complicações ou mesmo para a morte. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a força de associação entre a gravidade da COVID-19 e o histórico de vacinação em pacientes atendidos em um hospital público de referência na Cidade do México. Métodos: Estudo epidemiológico não-experimental, retrospectivo e analítico, de casos e controles. A população do estudo foram indivíduos atendidos em um hospital de concentração para atendimento à COVID-19 entre 1 de julho de 2021 e 30 de junho de 2022, na Cidade do México. Resultados: 132 participantes (44 casos e 88 controles) foram incluídos no estudo. Os fatores de risco mais fortemente associados à gravidade da COVID-19 foram idade superior ou igual a 60 anos, apresentar 22 respirações por minuto na primeira avaliação médica, pressão arterial sistólica superior ou igual a 140 milímetros de mercúrio e histórico de pelo menos uma comorbidade crônica. No entanto, histórico de vacinação foi associado a uma probabilidade 94% (OR 0,06) menor de desenvolver COVID-19 grave em comparação com aqueles sem histórico de vacinação, independentemente da presença de fatores de risco associados. Conclusão: A ausência de histórico de vacinação e a presença de algum dos fatores de risco identificados conferem maiores probabilidades de desenvolver formas graves da doença.(AU)


Justificación y Objetivos: Desde su aparición en 2019, se han identificado múltiples factores de riesgo para presentar una forma grave de COVID-19 y también se han desarrollado distintas vacunas que previenen la aparición de manifestaciones de gravedad. Sin embargo, a pesar del antecedente de vacunación, algunos casos se complican o incluso fallecen. El objetivo del este estudio fue determinar la fuerza de asociación entre la gravedad de la COVID-19 con el antecedente de vacunación en pacientes atendidos en un hospital público de referencia de la Ciudad de México. Métodos: Estudio epidemiológico no experimental, retrospectivo y analítico, de casos y controles. La población de estudio fueron personas atendidas en un hospital de concentración para la atención de COVID-19 entre el 1 de julio de 2021 y el 30 de junio de 2022 en la Ciudad de México. Resultados: 132 participantes (44 casos y 88 controles) fueron incluidos en el estudio. Los factores de riesgo más fuertemente asociados con la gravedad de la COVID-19 fueron la edad mayor o igual a 60 años, presentar 22 respiraciones por minuto en la primera valoración médica, tensión arterial sistólica mayor o igual a 140 milímetros de mercurio y el antecedente de al menos una comorbilidad crónica. No obstante, el antecedente de vacunación se asoció con 94% (RM 0.06) menos posibilidades de desarrollar COVID-19 grave con respecto a aquellos sin antecedente vacunal, independientemente de la presencia de los factores de riesgo asociados. Conclusión: carecer del antecedente de vacunación y presentar alguno de los factores de riesgo identificados confieren las mayores posibilidades de presentar formas graves de la enfermedad.(AU)


Subject(s)
Public Health , Mass Vaccination , Vaccination , Patient Acuity , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/complications
4.
Rev. ADM ; 81(1): 11-15, ene.-feb. 2024. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1555721

ABSTRACT

Introducción: un nuevo tipo de coronavirus que se nombró SARSCoV-2, responsable de la enfermedad por COVID-19, tuvo esparcimiento rápido en el mundo, por alta transmisión que resultó en pandemia. Se registraron 2'397,216 casos confirmados, con 162,956 defunciones en el mundo, de acuerdo con la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), en abril de 2020. Sin embargo, la hipertensión afecta a 40% de adultos, lo que significa que alrededor de 250 millones de personas padecen de presión alta. La OMS, de acuerdo con sus reportes, refiere que la hipertensión es el factor de riesgo número uno de muerte. Uno de cada cuatro mexicanos padece hipertensión arterial. Objetivos: establecer la incidencia de la hipertensión arterial sistémica posterior a padecer COVID-19 en pacientes de la Unidad de Medicina Familiar (UMF) No. 48. Material y métodos: es un estudio transversal, observacional y descriptivo, conformado por 3,238 pacientes con diagnóstico de COVID-19 positivo, de ambos sexos, con edades entre 18 y 70 años. Por medio de la fórmula para poblaciones infinitas se obtiene una muestra de 348 pacientes. Se realizó revisión de expedientes en el Sistema de Información de Medicina Familiar, versión 6.2, para obtención de la información correspondiente. Resultados: 27 pacientes diagnosticados con hipertensión arterial posterior al diagnóstico de COVID-19, 52% del sexo masculino y 48% del femenino, con media de edad de 39 años, 74% correspondió a enfermedad leve por COVID-19 y 26% a enfermedad moderada. Se documenta mediana de ocho días por periodo de infección por COVID-19. En el círculo femenino el promedio de la aparición de hipertensión arterial fue de 13 meses y en el masculino la media de desarrollo de hipertensión arterial posterior a COVID-19 fue de seis meses (AU)


Introduction: a new type of coronavirus that was named SARSCoV-2, responsible for the COVID-19 disease, with rapid spread in the world, due to high transmission that resulted in pandemic. There were 2'397,216 confirmed cases, with 162,956 deaths in the world, according to the WHO in April 2020. However, hypertension affects 40% of adults and means that around 250 million people suffer from high blood pressure. The WHO, according to its reports, refers that hypertension is the number one risk factor for death. One in four Mexicans suffers from high blood pressure. Objectives: to establish the incidence of systemic arterial hypertension after suffering from COVID-19 in patients of the UMF No. 48. Material and methods: it is a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study, consisting of 3,238 patients with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis of both sexes, aged 18-70 years. Through the formula for infinite populations a sample of 348 patients is obtained. Will proceed with review of files in the Family Medicine Information System, version 6.2, to obtain the corresponding information. Results: 27 patients diagnosed with hypertension after the diagnosis of COVID-19, 52% of the male sex and 48% of the female sex, with a mean age of 39 years; 74% corresponds to a mild illness by COVID-19 and 26% to moderate disease. A median of 8 days per period of infection by COVID-19 is documented. In the female circle, the average onset of hypertension was 13 months and as for the male sex, the mean development of hypertension after COVID-19 was six months (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Hypertension/etiology , Time Factors , Angiotensins , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/physiology , Age and Sex Distribution , Patient Acuity , Hypertension/epidemiology , Mexico/epidemiology
5.
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics ; (12): 55-59, 2024.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1013249

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) related to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 11 children with MIS-C, who were admitted to the Department of Pediatrics of Peking University First Hospital from December 2022 to January 2023. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and follow-up of MIS-C were summarized in this study. Results: The 11 cases contained 7 boys and 4 girls, with an age of 4.4 (2.0, 5.5) years on admission. All the patients had fever, with a duration of 7(5, 9) days. Other clinical manifestations included rash in 7 cases, conjunctival hyperemia in 5 cases, red lips and raspberry tongue in 3 cases, lymphadenopathy in 3 cases, and swollen fingers and toes in 2 cases. There were 8 cases of digestive symptoms, 8 cases of respiratory symptoms, and 3 cases of nervous system symptoms. Eight patients had multi-system injuries, and one of them had shock presentation. All 11 patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BF.7 variant. The laboratory examination results showed that all cases had elevated inflammatory indicators, abnormal coagulation function and myocardial damage. Six patients had elevated white blood cell counts, 5 cases had liver function abnormalities, 3 cases had kidney function abnormalities, and 8 cases had coronary artery involvement. All 11 patients received anti-infection treatment, of which 3 cases received only 2 g/kg intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), while the remaining 8 cases received a combination of IVIG and 2 mg/(kg·d) methylprednisolone. Among the 8 cases with coronary artery disease, 6 cases received low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation therapy. All patients were followed up in 2 weeks after being discharged, and their inflammatory markers had returned to normal by that time. The 8 cases with coronary artery disease and 3 cases with pneumonia showed significant improvement or back to normal at the 4-week follow-up. All patients had no new complications or comorbidities during follow-up of more than 3 months. Conclusions: MIS-C may present with Kawasaki disease-like symptoms, with or without gastrointestinal, neurological, or respiratory symptoms. Elevated inflammatory markers, abnormal coagulation function, and cardiac injury contribute to the diagnosis of MIS-C. IVIG and methylprednisolone were the primary treatments for MIS-C, and a favorable short-term prognosis was observed during a follow-up period of more than 3 months.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , Coronary Artery Disease , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , Connective Tissue Diseases , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy
6.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 83: e0004, 2024. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535601

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT This report was aimed at presenting a case of neurotrophic keratitis and concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient who has recently undergone a corneal DALK transplant. One month after corneal transplantation with adequate corneal epithelialization, the patient presented neurotrophic keratitis with a torpid course of the corneal transplant coinciding with a SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an excessive host immune response. In addition, the patient presented a re-positivization of nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction of SARS-CoV-2 with past disease after starting treatment with autologous serum eye drops. The implications at the ophthalmological level of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be clarified as the time the illness progresses and we learn more about how it acts. In this case, the disparity of signs and symptoms, the antecedent of corneal surgery, and the possibility of a herpetic infection as a cause of the primary leukoma suggested neurotrophic keratitis. Nonetheless, the involvement of systemic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the process, triggering an excessive host immune response at the corneal level with an increase in inflammatory cytokines must be taken into account. No relationship was found between treatment with autologous serum and re-positivization of nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction, presenting the patient a favorable response to treatment.


RESUMO O objetivo deste relato foi apresentar um caso de ceratite neurotrófica e infecção concomitante por SARS-CoV-2 em paciente submetido recentemente a transplante de córnea DALK. Um mês após o transplante de córnea com adequada epitelização da córnea, o paciente apresentou ceratite neurotrófica com curso tórpido do transplante de córnea, coincidindo com infecção por SARS-CoV-2, com resposta imune excessiva do hospedeiro. Além disso, o paciente apresentou repositivização da reação em cadeia da polimerase nasofaríngeo de SARS-CoV-2, com doença pregressa após iniciar tratamento com colírio de soro autólogo. As implicações a nível oftalmológico da infecção por SARS-CoV-2, podem ser esclarecidas à medida que a doença progride e aprendemos mais sobre sua forma de atuação. Neste caso, a disparidade de sinais e sintomas, o antecedente de cirurgia de córnea e a possibilidade de infecção herpética como causa do leucoma primário sugeriram ceratite neurotrófica. No entanto, deve-se levar em consideração o envolvimento da infecção sistêmica por SARS-CoV-2 no processo, desencadeando uma resposta imune excessiva do hospedeiro no nível da córnea, com aumento de citocinas inflamatórias. Não foi encontrada relação entre o tratamento com soro autólogo e a repositivização da reação em cadeia da polimerase nasofaríngea, apresentando ao paciente uma resposta favorável ao tratamento.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Corneal Ulcer/diagnosis , Corneal Ulcer/therapy , Corneal Transplantation , Keratoplasty, Penetrating , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications , Immune Adherence Reaction , Corneal Ulcer/etiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Azithromycin , Cefixime , Serum , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Slit Lamp Microscopy , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Hydroxychloroquine , Immunity , Keratitis
7.
Rev. Nutr. (Online) ; 37: e230129, 2024. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1559145

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective This survey aims atreviewing the journalistic narratives of the newspaper Folha de São Paulo (digital edition) about hunger in Brazil during the 2020 pandemic period. It is known that journalism plays an important role in keeping the public informed and in helping to contribute to the shaping of society's opinion. Despite hunger being a structural phenomenon in this country, little is published in the mainstream media discussing the magnitude of the problem and the articulation of measures taken in the three government spheres (federal, state and municipal), to ensure access to food to the most vulnerable populations. Method News excerpts addressing hunger as the main topic were selected from Folha de São Paulo daily newspaper and were highlighted based on reading keys (n=11, published between March and December 2020). Results In all the selected articles, the newspaper addressed the cause of hunger from the perspective of the pandemic (passing event and manifestation). Issues linked to the economic and social crisis experienced in the country were not emphasized. This form of covering hunger in news articles can enhance the idea that the poor are the result of the currently spreading fatality. Conclusion Finally, from these first results we could infer that the newspaper, when addressing hunger in Brazil in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, sought to construct a biased reality that hunger was derived from the health crisis, at the same time that it presents the hungry people narratives as a discursive strategy to sensitize the reader to Folha de São Paulo intentions.


RESUMO Objetivo A nota tem como objetivo examinar as narrativas jornalísticas do jornal Folha de São Paulo (digital) sobre a fome no Brasil, no período pandêmico de 2020, uma vez que se compreende que as narrativas jornalísticas têm um papel importante na formação de opinião da sociedade. Apesar da fome ser um fenômeno estrutural no país, pouco se vê nos grandes meios de comunicação o debate sobre a magnitude dos problemas e articulação de medidas governamentais nas três esferas de gestão (federal, estadual e municipal), que possam assegurar o acesso à alimentação adequada e saudável dos mais vulneráveis. Método Foram selecionadas notícias na Folha de São Paulo que tratavam da fome como pauta principal, sendo analisadas com base em chaves de leitura (n=11, divulgadas entre março e dezembro de 2020). Resultados Em todas as matérias selecionadas o jornal abordou a causa da fome a partir da perspectiva da pandemia (acontecimento e manifestação passageira). As questões vinculadas à crise econômica e social vivenciada no país não foram enfatizadas. A forma de acionar os famintos nas matérias pode reforçar a ideia de que os pobres são fruto da fatalidade que se propaga. Conclusão Por fim, os resultados iniciais permitem inferir que o jornal ao editar a fome no Brasil, no primeiro ano da pandemia de COVID-19, procurou construir uma realidade enviesada de que a fome é derivada de uma crise sanitária ao mesmo tempo que apresenta as narrativas dos famintos como estratégia discursiva para sensibilizar o leitor em relação às suas intenções.


Subject(s)
Hunger , News , Newspapers as Topic , Brazil , Food Insecurity , COVID-19/complications , Government
8.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1565514

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Numerosos estudios han reportado que la gravedad de la COVID-19 está más asociada con altos niveles de proteína C reactiva que en la enfermedad no grave; sin embargo, existen controversias en los resultados. Objetivo: Determinar si la proteína C reactiva es un biomarcador de gravedad en pacientes con COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo descriptivo en 148 pacientes ingresados en el Hospital Provincial General Camilo Cienfuegos de Sancti Spíritus en el mes de junio de 2021. La variable analizada fue proteína C reactiva. Se comparó la media entre grupos: graves y no graves mediante la prueba t Student para muestras independientes con un nivel de significación de 0,05. La capacidad predictora del biomarcador se determinó con el análisis de la curva ROC. Se evaluó la exactitud diagnóstica. Resultados: El valor medio de proteína C reactiva en el grupo de los graves y no graves fue 106,73 (88,43-125,03) y 26,87 (23,51-30,23), respectivamente; con diferencias altamente significativas. El área bajo la curva ROC fue de 0,991 (0,975-1,000). La mayor sensibilidad y la menor razón de falsos positivos para discriminar entre ambos grupos se encontró en 47,1 mg/L. Conclusiones: La capacidad predictora de gravedad de la prueba fue excelente. El punto de corte óptimo para definir la probabilidad de evolucionar hacia la gravedad de un paciente fue de 47,1 mg/L. La cuantificación de este parámetro bioquímico podría optimizar estrategias diagnósticas y terapéuticas.


Introduction: Several studies have reported that severe COVID-19 is associated with higher levels of C reactive protein than mild disease; however, there are controversy in the results. Objective: To determine whether C-reactive protein is a biomarker of severity in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study was carried out on 148 inpatients at Camilo Cienfuegos Hospital, in Sancti Spíritus. The variable analyzed was C-reactive protein. The mean between groups: severe and non-severe, was compared using t Student test for independent samples with a significance level of 0.05. Predictive capacity of the biomarker by ROC curve analysis was determined. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated. Results: The mean value of C-reactive protein in the severe an non severe groups was 106.73 (88.43-125.03) and 26.87 (23.51-30.23), respectively; with highly significant differences. The area under the ROC curve was 0.991(0.975-1.000). The highest sensitivity and the lowest rate of false positive to discriminate between both groups was found at 47.1 mg/L. Conclusions: The severity predictive capacity of the test was excellent. The optimal cut-off point to define when a patient was likely to progress to severity was 47.1 mg/L. The quantification of this biochemical parameter could optimize diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.


Subject(s)
Humans , COVID-19/complications , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Retrospective Studies
9.
Educ. med. super ; 382024. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | CUMED, LILACS | ID: biblio-1564476

ABSTRACT

Introducción: En el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19 surgen las secuelas discapacitantes, aún por dimensionar, que acompañarán los próximos años. En relación con esta temática deben dirigirse acciones con enfoque multidisciplinario, donde la salud pública y el sistema educativo aporten el conocimiento y la metodología para su enfrentamiento. Objetivo: Elevar el nivel de conocimiento sobre las secuelas discapacitantes pos-COVID-19 en estudiantes de medicina. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio cuasi-experimental de intervención educativa en estudiantes de quinto año de medicina de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Camagüey, desde la asignatura Salud Pública, durante el período abril-mayo de 2023. Del universo de 23 estudiantes se seleccionó una muestra de 20. Fueron estudiadas las variables grupos de edades, sexo, nivel de conocimiento sobre la epidemiología de las secuelas discapacitantes pos-COVID-19, clasificación por sistemas, identificación, seguimiento, tratamiento y nivel de conocimiento global acerca de estas. Resultados: Predominaron el grupo de 21-25 años (50 por ciento) y el sexo femenino (65 por ciento). En el tema sobre la epidemiología de las secuelas discapacitantes pos-COVID-19 el nivel de conocimiento aumentó entre 5-95 por ciento; mientras, en lo referente a la clasificación por sistemas alcanzó 20-90 por ciento. En cuanto a la identificación, el seguimiento y el tratamiento, el nivel de conocimiento suficiente fue de un 15-75 por ciento. La evaluación global suficiente transitó de un 5 por ciento a un 90 por ciento. Conclusiones: Se logró elevar el nivel de conocimiento sobre las secuelas discapacitantes pos-COVID-19 en estudiantes de medicina. Esto permitirá identificar, conducir y seguir los casos durante la educación en el trabajo(AU)


Introduction: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the disabling sequelae emerge, still to be measured, which will accompany the coming years. With respect to this issue, actions with a multidisciplinary approach should be targeted, in which public health and the educational system provide the knowledge and methodology for their confrontation. Objective: To raise the level of knowledge about post-COVID-19 disabling sequelae in medical students. Methods: A quasiexperimental study of educational intervention was carried out with fifth-year medical students from Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Camagüey, as part of the Public Health course, during the period April-May 2023. From the study universe of 23 students, a sample of 20 was selected. The following variables were studied: age groups, sex, level of knowledge about the epidemiology of post-COVID-19 disabling sequelae, classification by systems, identification, follow-up, treatment and overall level of knowledge about these. Results: The group aged 21-25 years (50 percent) and the female sex (65 percent) predominated. The level of knowledge about the epidemiology of post-COVID-19 disabling sequelae increased between 5 percent and 95 percent, while it reached 20 percent -90 percent regarding the classification by systems. With respect to identification, follow-up and treatment, the level of sufficient knowledge was 15 percent -75 percent. The overall sufficient assessment moved from 5 percent to 90 percent. Conclusions: The level of knowledge about post-COVID-19 disabling sequelae was managed to be raised in medical students. This will allow identifying, conducting and following up cases during education at work(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Knowledge , COVID-19/complications , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome/complications , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome/epidemiology , Students, Medical , Universities , Public Health/education
10.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1552136

ABSTRACT

A COVID-19 é uma doença respiratória aguda provocada pela infecção do vírus SARS-CoV-2, que pode causar uma grave insuficiência respiratória hipoxêmica, complicações e mortes, principalmente na população com condições crônicas de saúde. Os mecanismos pelos quais a obesidade pode aumentar a gravidade da COVID-19 incluem mecanismos físicos, inflamação crônica e uma função imunológica prejudicada. Além disso, o índice de massa corporal elevado é um fator de risco para várias condições médicas que têm sido sugeridas para aumentar o risco de gravidade da COVID-19. Objetivo: analisar a associação entre o índice de massa corporal e desfechos clínicos dos casos confirmados de COVID-19. Metodologia: Estudo transversal, com coleta de dados de prontuários, conduzido de março de 2020 a dezembro 2021. Foram analisados os registros de prontuários, exames bioquímicos e de imagem de pacientes internados com COVID-19 em três hospitais da cidade de Francisco Beltrão (PR). As variáveis analisadas foram o diagnóstico nutricional, idade, sexo, necessidade de internação em UTI, comorbidades, dias de hospitalização, complicações, exames laboratoriais e desfecho. Os critérios para inclusão no estudo foram, pacientes hospitalizados com diagnóstico para COVID-19, com presença de diagnóstico nutricional relatado. Resultados: No ano de 2020 foram analisados 292 prontuários e no ano de 2021 foram 860 prontuários. Destes, somente 413 possuíam diagnóstico nutricional, sendo assim incluídos no presente estudo. Foram classificados como peso normal 78 (18,9%), com sobrepeso 153 (37%)e como obeso 182 (44,1%) participantes. A maior prevalência de obesidade foi encontrada no sexo feminino (52,5%), portadores de diabetes (27,6%), pacientes com estado geral comprometido (67,9%), que apresentaram complicações pulmonares (54,5%) e arritmias (23%). A média de idade encontrada em pacientes com obesidade foi mais jovem (55,54) em comparação com os classificados com sobrepeso (59,08) e normal (62,51). Observou-se que quanto maior o IMC menor foram os valores encontrados para idade (rho = -0,190), leucócitos (rho = -0,109), ureia (rho = -0,145) e D-dímero (rho = -0,155). Conclusão: Este estudo fornece evidências de que o sobrepeso e/ou obesidade então associadas a um pior quadro clínico durante a internação dos pacientes com COVID-19. Em relação a frequência de óbito, não houve diferença estatística em relação ao diagnóstico nutricional.


COVID-19 is an acute respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, which can cause severe hypoxemic respiratory failure, complications, and deaths, especially in the population with chronic health conditions. The mechanisms by which obesity may increase the severity of COVID-19 include physical mechanisms, chronic inflammation, and impaired immune function. In addition, high body mass index is a risk factor for several medical conditions that have been suggested to increase the risk of COVID-19 severity. Objective: to analyze the association between body mass index and clinical outcomes of confirmed cases of COVID-19. Methodology: Cross-sectional study, with data collection from medical records, conducted from March 2020 to December 2021. The records of medical records, biochemical and imaging tests of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in three hospitals in the city of Francisco Beltrão (PR) were analyzed. The variables analyzed were nutritional diagnosis, age, gender, need for ICU admission, comorbidities, days of hospitalization, complications, laboratory tests and outcome. The inclusion criteria for the study were, hospitalized patients with diagnosis for COVID-19, with presence of nutritional diagnosis reported. Results: In the year 2020, 292 medical records were analyzed and in the year 2021 there were 860 medical records. Of these, only 413 had nutritional diagnosis, thus being included in this study. Were classified as normal weight 78 (18.9%), overweight 153 (37%), and obese 182 (44.1%) participants. The highest prevalence of obesity was found in females (52.5%), patients with diabetes (27.6%), patients with impaired general condition (67.9%), who presented pulmonary complications (54.5%) and arrhythmias (23%). The mean age found in obese patients was younger (55.54) compared to those classified as overweight (59.08) and normal (62.51). It was observed that the higher the BMI the lower were the values found for age (rho = -0.190), leukocytes (rho = -0.109), urea (rho = -0.145) and D-dimer (rho = -0.155). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that overweight and/or obesity then associated with a worse clinical picture during hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. Regarding the frequency of death, there was no statistical difference in relation to nutritional diagnosis.


COVID-19 es una enfermedad respiratoria aguda causada por la infección por el virus SARS-CoV-2, que puede provocar insuficiencia respiratoria hipoxémica grave, complicaciones y muertes, especialmente en poblaciones con enfermedades crónicas. Los mecanismos por los cuales la obesidad puede aumentar la gravedad de la COVID-19 incluyen mecanismos físicos, inflamación crónica y función inmune deteriorada. Además, un índice de masa corporal alto es un factor de riesgo para varias afecciones médicas que, según se ha sugerido, aumentan el riesgo de gravedad del COVID-19. Objetivo: analizar la asociación entre el índice de masa corporal y los resultados clínicos de casos confirmados de COVID-19. Metodología: Estudio transversal, con recolección de datos de historias clínicas, realizado de marzo de 2020 a diciembre de 2021. Se analizaron historias clínicas, exámenes bioquímicos y de imagen de pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 en tres hospitales de la ciudad de Francisco Beltrão (PR). Las variables analizadas fueron diagnóstico nutricional, edad, sexo, necesidad de ingreso a UCI, comorbilidades, días de internación, complicaciones, exámenes de laboratorio y evolución. Los criterios de inclusión en el estudio fueron pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de COVID-19, con presencia de diagnóstico nutricional informado. Resultados: En 2020 se analizaron 292 historias clínicas y en 2021 se analizaron 860 historias clínicas. De ellos, sólo 413 tenían diagnóstico nutricional, por lo que fueron incluidos en el presente estudio. 78 (18,9%) participantes fueron clasificados como normopeso, 153 (37%) como sobrepeso y 182 (44,1%) como obesidad. La mayor prevalencia de obesidad se encontró en el sexo femenino (52,5%), pacientes con diabetes (27,6%), pacientes con estado general comprometido (67,9%), quienes presentaron complicaciones pulmonares (54,5%) y arritmias (23%). La edad promedio encontrada en los pacientes con obesidad fue menor (55,54) en comparación con los clasificados como con sobrepeso (59,08) y normales (62,51). Se observó que a mayor IMC, menores son los valores encontrados para edad (rho = -0,190), leucocitos (rho = -0,109), urea (rho = -0,145) y dímero D (rho = -0,155). Conclusión: Este estudio proporciona evidencia de que el sobrepeso y/u obesidad se asocia con una peor condición clínica durante la hospitalización de pacientes con COVID-19. En cuanto a la frecuencia de muerte, no hubo diferencia estadística en relación al diagnóstico nutricional.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Body Mass Index , Retrospective Studies , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Nutrition Assessment , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Overweight , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization , Obesity
11.
Rev. Baiana Enferm. (Online) ; 38: e54897, 2024. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1559301

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: descrever a prevalência de casos graves pelo SARS-Cov-2 e fatores associados à ocorrência em crianças e adolescentes. Método: estudo transversal, num hospital pediátrico, com 236 crianças e adolescentes com COVID-19 entre março-2020 até fevereiro-2022. Resultados: a prevalência de casos graves da COVID-19 foi de 37%. A maior frequência foram do sexo masculino (41%), até 1 ano de idade (41,8%) e municípios circunvizinhos (46,5%). As manifestações clínicas em até 72 horas após hospitalização, associados aos casos graves foram: desconforto respiratório (RPb: 1,91; IC 95% 1,36 - 2,67), saturação de O2 < 92% (RPb: 9,27 IC 95% 5,99 - 14,35), necessidade de cuidados intensivos (RPb: 5,25; IC 95% 3,87 - 7,12) e comorbidades (RPb: 1,73 IC 95% 1,25 - 2,40). Os desfechos, óbito/transferência, associaram-se com maior proporção de casos graves. Conclusão: conhecer o perfil de casos de COVID-19 na população pediátrica e fatores associados pode contribuir para revisar processos a fim de manejo adequado dos casos.


Objetivo: describir la prevalencia de casos graves por el SARS-Cov-2 y factores asociados a la ocurrencia en niños y adolescentes. Método: estudio transversal, en un hospital pediátrico, con 236 niños y adolescentes con COVID-19 entre marzo-2020 hasta febrero-2022. Resultados: la prevalencia de casos graves de COVID-19 fue del 37%. La mayor frecuencia fueron del sexo masculino (41%), hasta 1 año de edad (41,8%) y municipios circundantes (46,5%). Las manifestaciones clínicas en hasta 72 horas después de la hospitalización, asociados a los casos graves fueron: malestar respiratorio (RPb: 1,91; IC 95% 1,36 - 2,67), saturación de O2 < 92% (RPb: 9,27 IC 95% 5,99 - 14,35), necesidad de cuidados intensivos (RPb: 5,25; IC 95% 3,87 - 7,12) y comorbilidades (RPb: 1,73 IC 95% 1,25 - 2,40). Los resultados, muerte/transferencia, se asociaron con mayor proporción de casos graves. Conclusión: conocer el perfil de casos de COVID-19 en la población pediátrica y factores asociados puede contribuir para revisar procesos a fin de manejo adecuado de los casos.


Objective: to describe the prevalence of severe cases by SARS-Cov-2 and factors associated with the occurrence in children and adolescents. Method: cross-sectional study, in a pediatric hospital, with 236 children and adolescents with COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2022. Results: the prevalence of severe cases of COVID-19 was 37%. The highest frequency was male (41%), up to 1 year of age (41.8%) and surrounding cities (46.5%). Clinical manifestations within 72 hours of hospitalization, associated with severe cases, were respiratory distress (PRc: 1.91; 95% CI 1.36 -2.67), O2saturation < 92% (PRc: 9.27 95% CI 5.99 - 14.35), need for intensive care (PRc: 5.25; 95% CI 3.7 - 87) and comorbidities (PRc: 1.73 95% CI 1.25 - 2.40). The outcomes death/transfer were associated with a higher proportion of severe cases. Conclusion: knowing the profile of COVID-19 cases in the pediatric population and associated factors can contribute to review processes for proper management of cases.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , COVID-19/complications , Hospitals, Pediatric , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies
12.
Arq. ciências saúde UNIPAR ; 27(2): 556-573, Maio-Ago. 2023.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1419200

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: avaliar a eficácia da Ivermectina e do Atazanavir em comparação com placebo no tempo de resolução dos sintomas e no tempo de duração da doença por COVID-19. Método: estudo observacional, de coorte prospectivo, longitudinal, descritivo e analítico com pacientes sintomáticos ambulatoriais, acompanhados por 06 meses em duas Unidades Básicas de Saúde para atendimento de COVID-19 em Teresina- Piauí, Brasil, no período de novembro a abril de 2021 identificados por amostragem aleatória 1:1:1. Foram realizados exames Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) para confirmação laboratorial da suspeita de infecção pelo novo coronavírus e avaliação sociodemográfica e clínica. Resultados: dos 87 pacientes randomizados, 62,1% (n=54) eram do sexo masculino, com média de idade de 35,1 anos, possuíam companheira (53,9%), baixa renda (50,6%), eutróficos (40,7%) e sem comorbidades de saúde (78,2%). Não houve diferença entre o tempo médio para resolução dos sintomas, que foi de 21 dias (IQR, 8-30) no grupo atazanavir, 30 dias (IQR, 5-90) no grupo ivermectina em comparação com 14 dias (IQR, 9-21) no grupo controle. No dia 180, houve resolução dos sintomas em 100% no grupo placebo, 93,9% no grupo atazanavir e 95% no grupo ivermectina. A duração mediana da doença foi de 08 dias em todos os braços do estudo. Conclusão: o tratamento com atazanavir (6 dias) e ivermectina (3 dias) não reduziu o tempo de resolução dos sintomas e nem o tempo de duração da doença entre os pacientes ambulatoriais com COVID-19 leve em comparação com o grupo placebo. Os resultados não suportam o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir para tratamento de COVID-19 leve a moderado.


Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of Ivermectin and Atazanavir compared to placebo in the time to resolution of symptoms and duration of illness due to COVID-19. Method: observational, prospective, longitudinal, descriptive and analytical cohort study with symptomatic outpatients, followed for 06 months in two Basic Health Units for COVID-19 care in Teresina-Piauí, Brazil, from November to April 2021 identified by 1:1:1 random sampling. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were performed for laboratory confirmation of suspected infection with the new coronavirus and sociodemographic and clinical evaluation. Results: of the 87 randomized patients, 62.1% (n=54) were male, with a mean age of 35.1 years, had a partner (53.9%), low income (50.6%), eutrophic (40.7%) and without health comorbidities (78.2%). There was no difference between the median time to resolution of symptoms, which was 21 days (IQR, 8-30) in the atazanavir group, 30 days (IQR, 5- 90) in the ivermectin group compared with 14 days (IQR, 9- 21) in the control group. At day 180, there was resolution of symptoms in 100% in the placebo group, 93.9% in the atazanavir group, and 95% in the ivermectin group. The median duration of illness was 8 days in all study arms. Conclusion: Treatment with atazanavir (6 days) and ivermectin (3 days) did not reduce the time to symptom resolution or the duration of illness among outpatients with mild COVID-19 compared to the placebo group. The results do not support the use of ivermectin and atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19.


Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad de Ivermectina y Atazanavir en comparación con placebo en el tiempo de resolución de los síntomas y duración de la enfermedad por COVID-19. Método: estudio de cohorte observacional, prospectivo, longitudinal, descriptivo y analítico con pacientes ambulatorios sintomáticos, seguidos durante 06 meses en dos Unidades Básicas de Salud para atención de COVID-19 en Teresina-Piauí, Brasil, de noviembre a abril de 2021 identificados por 1:1:1 muestreo aleatorio. Se realizaron pruebas de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcriptasa inversa (RT-PCR) para confirmación de laboratorio de sospecha de infección por el nuevo coronavirus y evaluación sociodemográfica y clínica. Resultados: de los 87 pacientes aleatorizados, 62,1% (n=54) eran del sexo masculino, con una edad media de 35,1 años, tenían pareja (53,9%), bajos ingresos (50,6%), eutróficos (40,7%) y sin comorbilidades de salud (78,2%). No hubo diferencia entre la mediana de tiempo hasta la resolución de los síntomas, que fue de 21 días (RIC, 8-30) en el grupo de atazanavir, 30 días (RIC, 5- 90) en el grupo de ivermectina en comparación con 14 días (RIC, 9 - 21) en el grupo control. En el día 180, hubo una resolución de los síntomas del 100 % en el grupo de placebo, del 93,9 % en el grupo de atazanavir y del 95 % en el grupo de ivermectina. La mediana de duración de la enfermedad fue de 8 días en todos los brazos del estudio. Conclusión: El tratamiento con atazanavir (6 días) e ivermectina (3 días) no redujo el tiempo de resolución de los síntomas ni la duración de la enfermedad entre los pacientes ambulatorios con COVID-19 leve en comparación con el grupo placebo. Los resultados no respaldan el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir para el tratamiento de la COVID-19 de leve a moderada.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Ivermectin/analysis , Efficacy , Atazanavir Sulfate/analysis , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/drug therapy , Outpatients , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Observational Studies as Topic/methods
13.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 40(6): 626-633, dic. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1529992

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: La mortalidad por pacientes por COVID-19 grave que desarrollaban neumonía grave y síndrome de dificultad respiratoria agudo (SDRA) grave ha sido significativa a pesar del tratamiento oportuno. Es importante determinar predictores tempranos de enfermedad que nos ayuden a estratificar aquellos pacientes con mayor riesgo de fallecer. Se pretende estudiar el comportamiento del puntaje APP (APPS) como predictor de ello, basados en algunos reportes de uso y utilidad en el SDRA. no COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Determinar si el APPS es útil como predictor de mortalidad en SDRA. por COVID-19 grave. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio tipo cohorte retrospectivo, incluyendo pacientes de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI), con SDRA. por COVID-19 grave, que ingresaron a la UCI del Hospital Regional Docente de Trujillo (HRDT) en el período abril 2020- abril 2021. Se evalúo la utilidad del APPS como predictor de mortalidad em dicha población. RESULTADOS: El APPS demostró ser un factor asociado a mortalidad en pacientes con SDRA. y COVID-19 grave (RPa 1,34; IC 95% 1,16 a 1,56; p < 0,001). Además, encontramos que, al realizar un modelo de predicción ajustado por edad, sexo, SOFA, APPS, shock, Indice de Charlson (ICh), se comportan como factores asociados a mortalidad el APPS, el sexo masculino (RPa: 1,48; IC 95% 1,09 a 2,049; p < 0,05) y el ICh (RPa: 1,11; IC 95% 1,02 a 1,21; p < 0,05). CONCLUSIÓN: El APPS, el sexo masculino y el ICh son predictores de mortalidad en SDRA. por COVID-19 grave.


BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 who developed severe pneumonia and severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) has been significant despite timely treatment. It is important to determine early predictors of disease that help us to stratify those patients with a higher risk of death. It is intended to study the behavior of the APPS score as a predictor of this, based on some reports of use and usefulness in non-COVID-19 ARDS. AIM: To determine if the APP score is useful as a predictor of mortality in ARDS due to severe COVID-19. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was carried out, including patients from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with ARDS due to severe COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU of the Trujillo Regional Teaching Hospital (HRDT) in the period March 2020 to March 2021. The usefulness of the APP score as a predictor of mortality in mentioned population was evaluated. RESULTS: The APP score proved to be a factor associated with mortality in patients with ARDS and severe COVID-19 (APR 1.34; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.56; p < 0.001). We also found that when performing a prediction model adjusted for age, sex, SOFA, APP score, shock and Charlson Index (ICh) we found that the APP score, male sex (APR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.049; p < 0.05) and the ICh behave as factors associated with mortality (RPa: 1.11; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.21; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The APP score, male sex, and ICh are predictors of mortality in ARDS due to severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/mortality , COVID-19/complications , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , ROC Curve , Hospital Mortality , COVID-19/mortality , Intensive Care Units
14.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 121(6): e202202893, dic. 2023. tab
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1518725

ABSTRACT

El síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico pediátrico (MIS-C, por su sigla en inglés) es una enfermedad rara. Se desconoce si los niños que se recuperaron del MIS-C tienen riesgo de recurrencia de MIS-C cuando presentan reinfección por SARS-CoV-2. El objetivo de este estudio es describir los casos de dos niñas que se recuperaron del MIS-C y presentaron reinfección por SARS-CoV-2 sin recurrencia de MIS-C.


Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare condition. It is still unknown if children who have recovered from MIS-C are at a risk of recurrence of MIS-C when they are reinfected with SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to report 2 children who recovered from MIS-C and reinfected with SARS-CoV-2 without recurrence of MIS-C.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complications , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/therapy
15.
Rev. enferm. UERJ ; 31: e76490, jan. -dez. 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1527027

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: descrever as características sociodemográficas e clínicas de pessoas idosas com sequelas da COVID-19. Método: estudo documental quantitativo, observacional, descritivo, compôs-se a amostra 204 prontuários de pessoas idosas com registros de sequelas da COVID-19. Realizados testes de Qui-quadrado de Pearson e Fisher. Resultados: prevaleceram mulheres, entre 60 a 69 anos (66,7%), casadas (50,5%), com filhos (92,9%), aposentadas (47,6%), com renda de dois a quatro salários-mínimos (50,7%). Verificou-se como comorbidades a hipertensão arterial (65,2%), obesidade (40%), diabetes mellitus (23,5%), doenças cardíacas (13,7%) e respiratórias (7,8%) e como comportamentos de risco o sedentarismo (59,4%) e sobrepeso (52,2%). A hospitalização foi mais prevalente entre portadores de diabetes mellitus (56,3%), obesidade (68,8%) e câncer (83,3%). Conclusão: o envelhecimento, a presença de comorbidades e hospitalização são condições associadas a mortalidade por COVID-19. Ressalta-se a importância de uma assistência individualizada e multidimensional(AU)


Objective: to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of elderly people with sequelae of COVID-19. Method: quantitative, observational, descriptive documentary study, the sample consisted of 204 medical records of elderly people with records of COVID-19 sequelae. Pearson and Fisher Chi-square tests were performed. Results: women prevailed, between 60 and 69 years old (66.7%), married (50.5%), with children (92.9%), retired (47.6%), with income of two to four salaries- minimum (50.7%). Comorbidities were arterial hypertension (65.2%), obesity (40%), diabetes mellitus (23.5%), heart disease (13.7%) and respiratory diseases (7.8%) and as health behaviors. risk of sedentary lifestyle (59.4%) and overweight (52.2%). Hospitalization was more prevalent among patients with diabetes mellitus (56.3%), obesity (68.8%) and cancer (83.3%). Conclusion: aging, the presence of comorbidities and hospitalization are conditions associated with mortality from COVID-19. The importance of individualized and multidimensional assistance is highlighted(AU)


Objetivo: describir las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de personas mayores con secuelas de COVID-19. Método: estudio documental cuantitativo, observacional, descriptivo, la muestra estuvo compuesta por 204 historias clínicas de personas mayores con antecedentes de secuelas de COVID-19. Se realizaron pruebas de Chi-cuadrado de Pearson y Fisher. Resultados: predominaron las mujeres, entre 60 y 69 años (66,7%), casadas (50,5%), con hijos (92,9%), jubiladas (47,6%), con ingresos de dos a cuatro salarios mínimos (50,7%). Las comorbilidades fueron hipertensión arterial (65,2%), obesidad (40%), diabetes mellitus (23,5%), enfermedades cardíacas (13,7%) y enfermedades respiratorias (7,8%) y, en cuanto a conductas de riesgo, el sedentarismo (59,4%) y el sobrepeso (52,2%). La hospitalización fue más prevalente entre los pacientes con diabetes mellitus (56,3%), obesos (68,8%) y con cáncer (83,3%). Conclusión: el envejecimiento, la presencia de comorbilidades y la hospitalización son condiciones asociadas a la mortalidad por COVID-19. Destacan la importancia de la asistencia individualizada y multidimensional(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Health Profile , COVID-19/complications , Sociodemographic Factors , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome/complications , Social Determinants of Health , Document Analysis
16.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1551254

ABSTRACT

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 has rapid dissemination and high infectivity and can evolve into Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome (SARS), which led to a high number of deaths and hospitalizations in the recent pandemic. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest has demonstrated an essential role in the initial evaluation and evolution of these patients. Methodology: This was a retrospective observational study at a single center, University Hospital in Northeastern Brazil, evaluating 97 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with laboratory confirmation to evaluate and quantify the chest CT findings, comparing the findings with the severity of the case and relating them to the morbidities presented. The CT scans were performed by radiologists from the hospital and the data were evaluated by the university's statistics laboratory. Results: Among the main alterations, ground-glass opacities were present in more than 90% of the patients. The study observed that the magnitude of the pulmonary involvement of this finding had a relationship with the outcome of higher hospitalization. Conclusion: In this sense, the relevance of chest CT to suggest the diagnosis of Covid-19 and establish the prognosis of the disease is observed. However, further studies are still needed to confirm these finding (AU).


Introdução: O SARS-CoV-2 possui rápida disseminação e alta infectividade, podendo evoluir com Síndrome da Angústia Respiratória Grave (SARS), o que levou a um número elevado de mortes e internações na recente pandemia. A Tomografia Computadorizada (TC) de tórax demonstrou um papel essencial na avaliação inicial e evolução desses pacientes. Metodologia: Este foi um estudo observacional retrospectivo em centro único - Hospital Universitário no Nordeste do Brasil - avaliando 97 pacientes internados por COVID-19 com confirmação laboratorial, a fim de avaliar e quantificar os achados de TC de tórax, comparando os achados com a gravidade do caso e relacionando-os com as morbidades apresentadas. As TCs foram laudadas por radiologistas do próprio hospital. Após isso, os dados foram avaliados pelo laboratório de estatística da universidade para serem analisados e discutidos. Resultados: Dentre as principais alterações, o vidro fosco estava presente em mais de 90% dos pacientes. Foi observado que a magnitude do comprometimento pulmonar deste achado apresentou relação desfavorável com o desfecho da internação. Conclusão: Neste sentido, observa-se a relevância da TC de tórax para sugerir o diagnóstico de Covid-19 e estabelecer o prognóstico da doença. No entanto, ainda são necessários mais estudos para destrinchar estes achado (AU).


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia , Tomography , COVID-19/complications
17.
Rev. enferm. Inst. Mex. Seguro Soc ; 31(4): 100-105, 09-oct-2023. tab
Article in Spanish | BDENF, LILACS | ID: biblio-1518861

ABSTRACT

Introduction: T he COVID-19 p andemic caused by t he SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus h as shaken the world since the beginning of 2020, causing a huge number of patient deaths. Objective: To evaluate the main symptoms of patients hospitalized for SARS CoV-2 in th e H.G.Z No.1 of the IMSS in Nayarit. Methodology: It is a retrospective, observational and cross-sectional study, with information collected from the clinical records of patients admitted through the respiratory triage area with a diagnosis of SARS Cov-2, confirmed with PCR. Results: 433 patients were included, of these 267 male patients (62%) and 166 female patients (38%), with an average age of 62 years. Within the main symptomatology is dyspnea (96%), fever (78%), attack to the general state (78%), cough (76%) and headache (67%). In addition, 102 (23.6%) patients required advanced airway management, of whom 89 died (87%). Of the total number of patients, 208 (48%) died and 225 (54%) showed improvement. Conclusions: The main symptoms of patients hospitalized for SARS CoV-2 are dyspnea, fever, general condition attack, cough and headache.


Introducción: la pandemia de COVID-19 provocada por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 ha sacudido al mundo desde el comienzo del año 2020, provocando un número ingente de fallecimientos de pacientes. Objetivo: evaluar la principal sintomatología de los pacientes hospitalizados por SARS-CoV-2 en el Hospital General de Zona No.1 del IMSS. Metodología: estudio retrospectivo, observacional y transversal, con información recabada de los expedientes clínicos de pacientes que ingresaron por área de triage respiratorio con diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2 confirmado mediante prueba PCR. Resultados: se incluyeron 433 pacientes, de estos 267 pacientes de sexo masculinos (62%) y 166 pacientes del femenino (38%), con una edad promedio de 62 años. Dentro de la principal sintomatología se encuentra la disnea (96%), fiebre (78%), ataque al estado general (78%), tos (76%) y cefalea (67%). Además, 102 (23.6%) pacientes necesitaron manejo avanzado de la vía aérea, de los cuales 89 fallecieron (87%). Del total de pacientes, 208 (48%) fallecieron y 225 (54%) mostraron mejoría. Conclusiones: los principales síntomas de pacientes hospitalizados por SARS CoV-2 son disnea, fiebre, ataque del estado general, tos y cefalea.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/pathology , Mexico
18.
Distúrb. comun ; 35(3): 63637, 25/10/2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1526043

ABSTRACT

Introdução: A COVID-19 pode afetar o sistema auditivo, justificando a avaliação da audição de indivíduos infectados. Objetivo: analisar a via auditiva até o tronco encefálico de indivíduos acometidos por COVID-19 comparados ao grupo controle. Método: Estudo observacional transversal analítico realizado em uma amostra não probabilística de adultos que tiveram COVID-19, que foram comparados com um grupo controle, sem queixa auditiva. A avaliação consistiu em: medidas de imitância acústica, audiometria tonal liminar (ATL), emissões otoacústicas evocadas por estímulo transiente (EOET) e potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico (PEATE). Resultados: Foram avaliados 77 indivíduos, sendo, 41 participantes do grupo COVID-19 (idade média de 26,3) e 36 do grupo controle (idade média de 25,8). Os limiares auditivos estavam dentro dos padrões da normalidade para todos os indivíduos do grupo COVID-19, sendo significativamente maiores para as frequências de 1000, 2000 e 3000 Hz à direita. A amplitude das EOET foi significativamente menor na banda de frequência de 1500 à direita. Houve correlação significativa e negativa para as frequências de 1000 Hz e 3000 Hz à direita e para as frequências de 1000, 2000 e 3000 Hz à esquerda, entre EOET e ATL. Foi verificado aumento da latência absoluta da onda I, do PEATE, na orelha esquerda. Conclusão: a COVID-19 afetou locais específicos do sistema auditivo. Houve diminuição da acuidade auditiva e do funcionamento das células ciliadas externas da cóclea, bem como aumento do tempo de condução neural do som na porção distal do VII par craniano à esquerda. (AU)


Introduction: COVID-19 can affect the auditory system, justifying the evaluation of the hearing of infected individuals. Objective: to analyze the auditory pathway to the brainstem of individuals affected by COVID-19 compared to the control group. Method: Analytical cross-sectional observational study carried out in a non-probabilistic sample of adults who had COVID-19, who were compared with a control group, without hearing complaints. The evaluation consisted of: acoustic immittance measurements, pure tone audiometry (PTA), transient stimulus-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP). Results: 77 individuals were evaluated, 41 participants in the COVID-19 group (average age of 26.3) and 36 in the control group (average age of 25.8). Hearing thresholds were within normal limits for all individuals in the COVID-19 group, being significantly higher for the frequencies of 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz on the right. TEOAE amplitude was significantly lower in the 1500 frequency band on the right. There was a significant and negative correlation for the frequencies of 1000 Hz and 3000 Hz on the right and for the frequencies of 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz on the left, between TEOAE and PTA. An increase in the absolute latency of wave I, of the BAEP, was observed in the left ear. Conclusion: COVID-19 affected specific locations in the auditory system. There was a decrease in auditory acuity and the functioning of the outer hair cells of the cochlea, as well as an increase in the neural conduction time of sound in the distal portion of the VII cranial nerve on the left. (AU)


Introducción: COVID-19 puede afectar el sistema auditivo, justificando la evaluación de la audición de individuos infectados. Objetivo: analizar la vía auditiva hacia el tronco encefálico de individuos afectados por COVID-19 en comparación con el grupo control. Método: Estudio observacional analítico transversal realizado en una muestra no probabilística de adultos que padecieron COVID-19, quienes fueron comparados con un grupo control, sin escuchar quejas. La evaluación consistió en: mediciones de inmitancia acústica, audiometría de tonos puros (ATP), otoemisiones acústicas provocadas por estímulos transitorios (OAET) y potenciales evocados auditivos del tronco encefálico (PEATE). Resultados: Se evaluaron 77 individuos, 41 participantes en el grupo COVID-19 (edad promedio de 26,3 años) y 36 en el grupo control (edad promedio de 25,8 años). Los umbrales de audición estaban dentro de los límites normales para todos los individuos del grupo de COVID-19, siendo significativamente más altos para las frecuencias de 1000, 2000 y 3000 Hz de la derecha. La amplitud de OAET fue significativamente menor en la banda de frecuencia de 1500 de la derecha. Hubo correlación significativa y negativa para las frecuencias de 1000 Hz y 3000 Hz a la derecha y para las frecuencias de 1000, 2000 y 3000 Hz a la izquierda, entre OAET y ATP. Se observó un aumento de la latencia absoluta de la onda I, del PEATE, en el oído izquierdo. Conclusión: COVID-19 afectó ubicaciones específicas del sistema auditivo. Hubo una disminución de la agudeza auditiva y del funcionamiento de las células ciliadas externas de la cóclea, así como un aumento del tiempo de conducción neural del sonido en la porción distal del VII par craneal izquierdo. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , COVID-19/complications , Hearing/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Tests
19.
Int. j. morphol ; 41(5): 1310-1316, oct. 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521015

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Although COVID-19 is primarily considered a respiratory pathology, it has been observed to impact other bodily systems, including the nervous system. While several studies have investigated anatomical changes in brain structures, such as volume or thickness post-COVID-19, there are no comprehensive reviews of these changes using imaging techniques for a holistic understanding. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the literature on brain changes observed through neuroimaging after COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines using Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Pubmed, Sciencedirect, and LitCOVID. We selected studies that included adult patients during or after COVID-19 development, a control group or pre-infection images, and morphometric measurements using neuroimaging. We used the MSQ scale to extract information on sample characteristics, measured anatomical structures, imaging technique, main results, and methodological quality for each study. Out of 1126 identified articles, we included 19 in the review, encompassing 1155 cases and 1284 controls. The results of these studies indicated a lower volume of the olfactory bulb and variable increases or decreases in cortical and limbic structures' volumes and thicknesses. Studies suggest that brain changes occur post-COVID-19, primarily characterized by a smaller olfactory bulb. Additionally, there may be variations in cortical and limbic volumes and thicknesses due to inflammation or neuroplasticity, but these findings are not definitive. These differences may be attributed to methodological, geographical, and temporal variations between studies. Thus, additional studies are required to provide a more comprehensive and quantitative view of the evidence.


Aunque el COVID-19 se considera principalmente una patología respiratoria, se ha observado que afecta otros sistemas corporales, incluido el sistema nervioso. Si bien varios estudios han investigado los cambios anatómicos en las estructuras cerebrales, como el volumen o el grosor posteriores a la COVID-19, no hay revisiones exhaustivas de estos cambios que utilicen técnicas de imágenes para una comprensión holística. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar sistemáticamente la literature sobre los cambios cerebrales observados a través de neuroimagen después de COVID-19. Realizamos una revisión sistemática de acuerdo con las pautas PRISMA utilizando Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Pubmed, Sciencedirect y LitCOVID. Seleccionamos estudios que incluyeron pacientes adultos durante o después del desarrollo de COVID-19, un grupo de control o imágenes previas a la infección y mediciones morfométricas mediante neuroimagen. Utilizamos la escala MSQ para extraer información sobre las características de la muestra, las estructuras anatómicas medidas, la técnica de imagen, los principales resultados y la calidad metodológica de cada estudio. De 1126 artículos identificados, incluimos 19 en la revisión, que abarca 1155 casos y 1284 controles. Los resultados de estos estudios indicaron un menor volumen del bulbo olfatorio y aumentos o disminuciones variables en los volúmenes y espesores de las estructuras corticales y límbicas. Los estudios sugieren que los cambios cerebrales ocurren después del COVID-19, caracterizados principalmente por un bulbo olfatorio más pequeño. Además, pueden haber variaciones en los volúmenes y grosores corticales y límbicos debido a la inflamación o la neuroplasticidad, pero estos hallazgos no son definitivos. Estas diferencias pueden atribuirse a variaciones metodológicas, geográficas y temporales entre estudios. Por lo tanto, se requieren estudios adicionales para proporcionar una visión más completa y cuantitativa de la evidencia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Brain/pathology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/complications , Neuroimaging , Neurologic Manifestations
20.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 40(5): 555-558, oct. 2023. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521867

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 es una enfermedad viral principalmente respiratoria y/o gastrointestinal. Las manifestaciones neurológicas tienen una frecuencia variable en pediatría. Presentamos un varón de 10 años de edad, previamente sano, que presentó una ataxia cerebelosa durante un cuadro agudo de COVID-19. El SARS-CoV-2 fue detectado por hisopado nasofaríngeo por antígeno y RPC. El LCR fue normal y el cultivo bacteriológico y estudio viral fueron negativos. La TC y RM encefálica fueron normales. No requirió tratamiento específico y tuvo una evolución favorable, con resolución completa de los síntomas neurológicos al mes. Debe considerarse la infección por SARS-CoV-2 como un diagnóstico diferencial entre las causas de ataxia cerebelosa aguda, según la situación epidemiológica.


COVID-19 is a disease that mainly produces respiratory and/or gastrointestinal symptoms. Neurological manifestations occur with a variable frequency in children. We present a previously healthy 10-year-old boy who presented acute cerebellar ataxia during an acute COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in a nasopharyngeal sample by antigen and PCR. The CSF was normal, the bacteriological culture and the viral PCR were negative. CT of the brain and gadolinium MRI of the brain were normal. He did not require specific treatment and had a favorable evolution, with complete resolution of neurological symptoms at one month. SARS-CoV-2 infection should be considered as a differential diagnosis between the causes of acute cerebellar ataxia, according to the epidemiological situation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Cerebellar Ataxia/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Cerebellar Ataxia/diagnostic imaging , Acute Disease , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL