ABSTRACT
Objective The social and health scenario of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 had an impact on the mental health of the population, characterized by strong health inequities. Faced with this problem, this study aimed to analyze the predictor variables of mental health in Brazilians during the pandemic, identifying the most vulnerable groups. Method An online survey was carried out, with a non-probabilistic sample of 1.397 Brazilians, who answered a biodemographic and general health questionnaire, analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results It was identified that being female, non-heterosexual, unemployed, with low income, and history of mental health comorbidities are predictors of mental health problems. In addition to these, the sample comparisons revealed other groups with greater susceptibility: single and divorced, without religion, with history of COVID-19, maintaining social distancing, and bereaved. Conclusion There are groups with greater vulnerability to mental health problems, requiring health policies for prevention and health promotion that are appropriate for different social groups.
Objetivo O cenário social e sanitário da pandemia de COVID-19 repercutiram na saúde mental da população, marcada por fortes iniquidades em saúde. Diante desse problema, o presente estudo objetivou analisar as variáveis preditoras da saúde mental de brasileiros durante a pandemia, identificando os grupos mais vulneráveis. Método Realizou-se um levantamento online, com amostra não probabilística de 1.397 brasileiros, que responderam a um questionário biodemográfico e ao Questionário de Saúde Geral, analisados por meio de estatística descritiva e analítica. Resultados Identificou-se que ser do sexo feminino, não heterossexual, desempregado, com baixa renda e comorbidade prévia em transtornos mentais são preditores de problemas em saúde mental. Além desses, as comparações amostrais revelaram outros grupos com maior susceptibilidade: solteiros e divorciados, sem religião, com histórico de COVID-19, em distanciamento social e enlutados. Conclusão Existem grupos com maior vulnerabilidade a problemas de saúde mental, sendo necessárias políticas de saúde de prevenção e promoção da saúde adequadas aos diferentes grupos sociais.
Subject(s)
Mental Health , Coronavirus Infections , Social Determination of HealthABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To analyze the death of Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women due to COVID-19 or unspecific cause. Methods This is retrospective, descriptive-exploratory, population-based study carried out with the Sistema de Informação de Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (SIVEP-Gripe) database, with pregnant and postpartum women of reproductive age who died from confirmed COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021. The chosen variables were: age, gestational period, type and number of comorbidities, skin color, using the statistical software R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform, version 4.0.3 and Statistical Package for Social Science, version 29.0 for analysis. Results A total of 19,333 cases of pregnant and postpartum women aged between 10 and 55 years diagnosed with SARS were identified, whether due to confirmed COVID-19 or unspecific causes. Of these, 1,279 died, these cases were classified into two groups according to the cause of death: deaths from COVID-19 (n= 1,026) and deaths from SARS of unspecific cause (n= 253). Conclusion The risk of death increased among black and brown women, in the postpartum period and with the presence of comorbidities, mainly diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and obesity. The data presented here draw attention to the number of deaths from SARS, especially among sociodemographic profiles, precarious access to health, such as the black population. In addition, limitations in adequate access to health care are reinforced by even lower rates of ICU admissions among women who died from SARS of an unspecified cause.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Maternal Death , Health Information Systems , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , COVID-19/mortalityABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: The aims of the study are to describe the association of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with the abnormal histopathological findings in human placenta and to highlight the potential predictors of these histopathological findings. Methods: A retrospective cohort study, held in two obstetric units from January 2021- 2022, 34 patients who were confirmed cases of COVID- 19 were followed up till the time of delivery as their placenta were sent for histopathology. Patients diagnosed with other viral infections, chorioamnionitis, or were known case of as pre-term or term pre labour rupture of membrans (PROM) were excluded as well as pre exisiting diabetes mellitus or pre-eclampsia. Data analysis were performed using STATA software version 16. Result: Specific histopatological findings (fetal vascular malperfusion, maternal vascular malperfusion, inflammatory pathology and thrombotic finding) were significantly high among 13 (38.2%) of the study group who got infected earlier in pregnancy (P<0.001). The period between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the delivery significantly increases the odds of the presence of pathological findings by 2.75 times for each week the patients getting infected earlier. Conclusion: Association of abnormal placental histopathological findings with COVID-19 infection in pregnancy and the potential predictor for the occurrence of placental findings is the longer duration between the diagnosis of the infection and the delivery.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Placenta , Coronavirus Infections , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analisar o impacto da cobertura da Atenção Primária à Saúde, Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano e Bolsa Família na ocorrência de casos, óbitos e letalidade por COVID-19 no Nordeste brasileiro. Método: Estudo descritivo, de caráter transversal, com dados extraídos das plataformas estaduais da COVID-19, Sistema de Informação em Saúde para Atenção Básica e Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Foram utilizados testes de correlação de Spearman e Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados:Verificou-se que foram notificados 483.793 casos confirmados de COVID-19 e 19.307 óbitos por esse agravo no Nordeste brasileiro. Com relação à ocorrência da COVID-19, o Estado do Ceará apresentou maior taxa de casos (1200,83/100.000 habitantes). Observou-se que quanto maior cobertura da ESF maior identificação da ocorrência de casos confirmados (r=0,855 e p-valor=0,002) e óbitos (r=0,818 e p-valor=0,004) por COVID-19. Conclusão: A Estratégia Saúde da Família é um modelo organizativo da Atenção Primária à Saúde potente para enfrentamento da pandemia, a partir da prevenção, rastreamento entre grupos mais vulneráveis, identificação e notificação dos casos e óbitos por COVID-19. Descritores: Atenção Primária à Saúde; Cobertura de Serviços de Saúde; Indicadores de Desenvolvimento; Infecções por Coronavírus; Programas Sociais.
Objective:To analyze the impact of the coverage of Primary Health Care, Human Development Index and Bolsa Família on the occurrence of cases, deaths and lethality due to COVID-19 in the Brazilian Northeast. Method:Descriptive, cross-sectional study, with data extracted from the state platforms for COVID-19, the Health Information System for Primary Care and the Institute for Applied Economic Research. Spearman and Kruskal-Wallis correlation tests were used. Results:It was found that 483,793 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 19,307 deaths from this condition were reported in the Brazilian Northeast. Regarding the occurrence of COVID-19, the State of Ceará had the highest rate of cases (1200.83/100,000 inhabitants). It was observed that the greater the coverage of FHS, the greater the number of confirmed cases (r=0.855 and p-value=0.002) and deaths (r=0.818 and p-value=0.004) due to COVID-19. Conclusion:The Family Health Strategy is an organizational model of Primary Health Care powerful to cope with the pandemic, based on prevention, tracking among the most vulnerable groups, identification and notification of cases and deaths due to COVID-19.Descriptors:Primary Health Care; Health Services Coverage; Development Indicators; Coronavirus Infections; Social Programs.
Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Health Services Coverage , Coronavirus Infections , Development Indicators , Social ProgramsABSTRACT
Introducción: La rápida propagación de la COVID-19 a escala mundial ocasionó el colapso de los sistemas sanitarios, lo cual contribuyó a que el personal sanitario incrementara el agotamiento sufrido, tanto físico como mental. Objetivo: Determinar el impacto psicológico de la pandemia de la COVID-19 en el personal sanitario. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico transversal, en 145 sujetos que se desempeñaron como personal sanitario en el periodo de enero a diciembre de 2021. La información se recopiló a través de un formulario online, precisando edad, sexo, antecedentes patológicos personales, institución, categoría laboral, acceso diario a información sobre la COVID-19, asistencia directa a pacientes infectados y muerte de personas cercanas. Se aplicó el Cuestionario de Salud General. Se utilizó la prueba de U de Mann-Whitney para buscar diferencias en la puntuación general reportada. Resultados: Presentaron un impacto psicológico alto el 62,1 por ciento de los encuestados; el 70,0 por ciento eran médicos y enfermeras; el 62,2 por ciento accedía más de 2 h al día a información sobre la COVID; el 64,4 por ciento participó directamente en la atención a pacientes infectados y el 35,6 por ciento había perdido a personas cercanas por la pandemia. Ser mujer (p= 0,008), acceder a información sobre la COVID-19 más de 2 h al día (p= 0,026), asistir directamente a pacientes infectados (p= 0,033) y la muerte de personas cercanas (p= 0,018) tuvo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el impacto psicológico. Conclusiones: La pandemia de la COVID-19 se asocia a un impacto psicológico alto en el personal sanitario(AU)
Introduction: The fast spread of COVID-19 around the world caused health systems collapse, which contributed to increase fatigue suffered by health workers, physical as well as mental. Objective: To determine psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health professionals. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study was carried out in 145 subjects who worked as health professionals from January to December 2021. This information was collected in an online form. Age, sex, medical record, institution, work category, daily access to COVID-19 information, direct assistance to infected patients and close people death was considered parameters in the applied form. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to find differences in the overall reported score. Results: 62.1 percent of health workers presented a High Psychological Impact, 70.0 percent were medical and nursing staff; 62.2 percent accessed to information about COVID-19 for more than 2 hours daily, 64.4 percent assisted infected patients directly, and 35.6 percent experienced close people death due to the pandemic. Being a woman (p= 0,008), accessing information about COVID-19 for more than 2 hours daily (p= 0,026), directly assisting infected patients (p= 0,033), and the death of close people (p= 0,018) had statistically significant differences in psychological impact. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a high psychological impact in health workers(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Physicians/psychology , Stress, Psychological/nursing , Burnout, Professional/psychology , COVID-19/etiology , Nurses/psychology , Coronavirus Infections/psychologyABSTRACT
Introducción: La enfermedad por coronavirus ha causado daño miocárdico, razón que ha impactado en las ciencias médicas por lo que ha sido motivo de investigación. Objetivo: Mostrar a través de resultados de recientes investigaciones, los mecanismos mediante los cuales el virus SARS-CoV-2 produce daño miocárdico en los pacientes afectados por la COVID-19, y su influencia en el pronóstico a corto y largo plazo. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de la literatura médica actualizada sobre el tema publicada en idioma inglés y español, indexado en varias bases de datos en el período comprendido de mayo de 2019 a mayo de 2022. De un total de 198 artículos en la revisión, cumplieron con los criterios de selección 78 artículos. Se excluyeron los que no contenían información precisa en cuanto al daño miocárdico provocado por el SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: Se han descrito varios mecanismos que pueden ser los desencadenantes entre los que se destacan: daño directo por angiotensina II, lesión inducida por hipoxia, daño microvascular miocárdico y síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica. Conclusiones: Los diferentes mecanismos por los cuales el virus SARS-CoV-2 produce daño miocárdico, hacen que los pacientes con la COVID-19 tengan más probabilidades de sufrir una lesión miocárdica. Las manifestaciones clínicas en pacientes con la COVID-19 como miocarditis, insuficiencia cardíaca, arritmias cardíacas, síndrome coronario agudo y derrame pericárdico, son más comunes en pacientes con antecedentes de enfermedad cardiovascular que desfavorecen su pronóstico(AU)
Introduction: Coronavirus disease has caused myocardial damage. This reality has impacted medical sciences and it has been the subject of research. Objective: To show, through the results of recent research, the mechanisms by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus produces myocardial damage in patients affected by COVID-19, and its influence on short- and long-term prognosis. Methods: A bibliographic search was carried out of the updated medical literature on the topic published in English and Spanish, indexed in several databases from May 2019 to May 2022. One hundred ninety-eight articles were included in the review, only 78 met the selection criteria. Those that did not contain precise information regarding myocardial damage caused by SARS-CoV-2 were excluded. Results: Several mechanisms have been described as probable triggers, standing out direct damage by angiotensin II, hypoxia-induced injury, myocardial microvascular damage and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Conclusions: The different mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 virus produces myocardial damage make COVID-19 patients more likely to suffer myocardial injury. Clinical manifestations in COVID-19 patients such as myocarditis, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, acute coronary syndrome and pericardial effusion are more common in patients with history of cardiovascular disease, which do not favors their prognosis(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analisar o impacto da cobertura da Atenção Primária à Saúde, Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano e Bolsa Família na ocorrência de casos, óbitos e letalidade por COVID-19 no Nordeste brasileiro. Método: Estudo descritivo, de caráter transversal, com dados extraídos das plataformas estaduais da COVID-19, Sistema de Informação em Saúde para Atenção Básica e Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Foram utilizados testes de correlação de Spearman e Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: Verificou-se que foram notificados 483.793 casos confirmados de COVID-19 e 19.307 óbitos por esse agravo no Nordeste brasileiro. Com relação à ocorrência da COVID-19, o Estado do Ceará apresentou maior taxa de casos (1200,83/100.000 habitantes). Observou-se que quanto maior cobertura da ESF maior identificação da ocorrência de casos confirmados (r=0,855 e p-valor=0,002) e óbitos (r=0,818 e p-valor=0,004) por COVID-19. Conclusão: A Estratégia Saúde da Família é um modelo organizativo da Atenção Primária à Saúde potente para enfrentamento da pandemia, a partir da prevenção, rastreamento entre grupos mais vulneráveis, identificação e notificação dos casos e óbitos por COVID-19. Descritores: Atenção Primária à Saúde; Cobertura de Serviços de Saúde; Indicadores de Desenvolvimento; Infecções por Coronavírus; Programas Sociais.
Objective:To analyze the impact of the coverage of Primary Health Care, Human Development Index and Bolsa Família on the occurrence of cases, deaths and lethality due to COVID-19 in the Brazilian Northeast. Method:Descriptive, cross-sectional study, with data extracted from the state platforms for COVID-19, the Health Information System for Primary Care and the Institute for Applied Economic Research. Spearman and Kruskal-Wallis correlation tests were used. Results:It was found that 483,793 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 19,307 deaths from this condition were reported in the Brazilian Northeast. Regarding the occurrence of COVID-19, the State of Ceará had the highest rate of cases (1200.83/100,000 inhabitants). It was observed that the greater the coverage of FHS, the greater the number of confirmed cases (r=0.855 and p-value=0.002) and deaths (r=0.818 and p-value=0.004) due to COVID-19. Conclusion:The Family Health Strategy is an organizational model of Primary Health Care powerful to cope with the pandemic, based on prevention, tracking among the most vulnerable groups, identification and notification of cases and deaths due to COVID-19. Descriptors: Primary Health Care; Health Services Coverage; Development Indicators; Coronavirus Infections; Social Programs
Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Health Services Coverage , Coronavirus Infections , Development Indicators , Social ProgramsABSTRACT
Objetivo: investigar los factores asociados a la infección por SARSCoV-2 en los profesionales de la salud de hospitales universitarios. Método: estudio multicéntrico, con abordaje mixto con estrategia incorporada concomitante, realizado con 559 profesionales en la etapa cuantitativa, y 599 en la etapa cualitativa. Fueron utilizados cuatro instrumentos de recolección de datos, aplicados a través un formulario electrónico. El análisis cuantitativo se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva e inferencial y los datos cualitativos mediante análisis de contenido Resultados: los factores asociados a la infección fueron: realización de la prueba "RT-PCR" (p<0,001) y unidades que atienden a pacientes con COVID-19 (p=0,028). Tener síntomas aumentó la prevalencia de infección 5,63 veces y cumplir la mayor parte del tiempo con el distanciamiento social en la vida privada la redujo un 53,9%. Los datos cualitativos mostraron las dificultades que enfrentaron los profesionales: escasez y baja calidad de equipos de protección personal, sobrecarga de trabajo, distanciamiento físico en el trabajo, procesos y rutinas inadecuados y la ausencia de una política de triage y testeo masivos. Conclusión: los factores asociados a la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en los profesionales de la salud se relacionaron mayormente con cuestiones laborales.
Objective: to investigate factors associated with the SARS-CoV-2 infection among health professionals from university hospitals. Method: a multicenter, mixed approach study with concomitant incorporated strategy, carried out with 559 professionals in the quantitative stage, and 599 in the qualitative stage. Four data collection instruments were used, applied by means of an electronic form. The quantitative analysis was performed with descriptive and inferential statistics and the qualitative data were processed by means of content analysis. Results: the factors associated with the infection were as follows: performance of the RT-PCR test (p<0.001) and units offering care to COVID-19 patients (p=0.028). Having symptoms increased 5.63 times the prevalence of infection and adhering to social distancing most of the time in private life reduced it by 53.9%. The qualitative data evidenced difficulties faced by the professionals: scarcity and low quality of Personal Protective Equipment, work overload, physical distancing at work, inadequate processes and routines and lack of a mass screening and testing policy. Conclusion: the factors associated with the SARS-CoV-2 infection among health professionals were mostly related to occupational issues.
Objetivo: investigar fatores associados à infecção por SARS-CoV-2 entre profissionais da saúde de hospitais universitários. Método: estudo multicêntrico, de abordagem mista com estratégia incorporada concomitante, realizado com 559 profissionais na etapa quantitativa, e 599 na etapa qualitativa. Foram utilizados quatro instrumentos de coleta de dados, aplicados via formulário eletrônico. A análise quantitativa foi realizada com estatística descritiva e inferencial e os dados qualitativos por meio de análise de conteúdo. Resultados: os fatores associados à infeção foram: realização de teste "RT-PCR" (p<0,001) e unidades com atendimento a pacientes com COVID-19 (p=0,028). Ter sintomas aumentou em 5,63 vezes a prevalência de infeção e aderir ao distanciamento social na maior parte do tempo na vida particular reduziu em 53,9%. Dados qualitativos evidenciaram dificuldades enfrentadas pelos profissionais: escassez e baixa qualidade de equipamentos de proteção individual, sobrecarga de trabalho, distanciamento físico no trabalho, processos e rotinas inadequadas e ausência de uma política de triagem e testagem em massa. Conclusão: os fatores associados à infecção por SARS-CoV-2 entre profissionais da saúde foram em sua maioria relacionados a questões ocupacionais.
Subject(s)
Humans , Infection Control , Health Personnel , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Hospitals, UniversityABSTRACT
RESUMEN Objetivos. Determinar la asociación entre el grado de severidad de la infección por COVID-19 durante el embarazo y la rotura prematura de membranas pretérmino (RPMP) en un hospital nivel III de Perú. Materiales y Métodos. Estudio transversal, analítico y observacional en mujeres mayores de 18 años con diagnóstico de infección por COVID-19 en el embarazo durante el 2020-2022. Se recogieron variables clínicas y obstétricas. Para el análisis descriptivo se realizaron las pruebas de Chi Cuadrado y exacta de Fisher, y para el análisis multivariado, se calculó la razón de prevalencia mediante regresión de Poisson en modelos crudos y ajustados. Todas las pruebas estadísticas se realizaron considerando un valor de p<0,05 como significativo y con un nivel de confianza de 95%. Resultados. Se analizaron los datos de 163 gestantes con COVID-19, de las cuales el 9,2% tuvieron RPMP, todas fueron casos sintomáticos. Los casos leves de COVID-19 tuvieron 1,10 veces la probabilidad de presentar RPMP (RPa=1,10; IC95%: 1,02−1,18) y los casos moderados/severos tuvieron 1,64 veces esta probabilidad (RPa=1,64; IC95%: 1,43−1,87), en comparación con los casos asintomáticos. Conclusiones. Se identificó que un mayor grado de severidad de la infección por COVID-19 durante el embarazo se asoció a una mayor probabilidad de tener RPMP.
ABSTRACT Objectives. To determine the association between the degree of severity of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in a level III hospital in Peru. Materials and Methods. Cross-sectional, analytical and observational study in women older than 18 years diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy, between the years 2020 and 2022. Clinical and obstetric variables were collected. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for the descriptive analysis. For the multivariate analysis, we calculated the prevalence ratio by using Poisson regression in crude and adjusted models. All statistical tests were performed considering a value of p<0.05 as significant and with a confidence level of 95%. Results. We analyzed data from 163 pregnant women with COVID-19, of which 9.2% had PPROM; all were symptomatic cases. Mild COVID-19 cases were 1.10 times more likely to have PPROM (RPa=1.10; 95%CI: 1.02-1.18) and moderate/severe cases were 1.64 times more likely (RPa=1.64; 95%CI: 1.43-1.87), compared to asymptomatic cases. Conclusions. We identified that a higher degree of severity of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was associated with a higher probability of having PPROM.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Severity of Illness Index , Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture , Coronavirus Infections , Pregnant WomenABSTRACT
La leucemia/linfoma T del adulto es una neoplasia maligna de mal pronóstico frecuente en población anciana. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 44 años de edad, de Ayacucho, diagnosticada con el subtipo linfomatoso de esta enfermedad e infección por virus linfotrópico T humano-I; mostró síndrome oclusivo de vena cava superior con tratamiento de quimioterapia sistémica bajo régimen de dosis ajustada con rituximab más etoposido, prednisona, vincristina, ciclofosfamida y doxorubicina. Posteriormente ingresó en emergencia por presentar dificultad respiratoria, tos seca, disminución de la conciencia, hipercalcemia, tomografía de tórax con patrón heterogéneo consolidativo en ambos pulmones y PCR en hisopado nasofaríngeo positivo a COVID-19. Recibió tratamiento de hidroxicloroquina, azitromicina, corticoides e ivermectina con pobre respuesta, rápido deterioro y fallece días después. La leucemia/linfoma T del adulto a edad temprana es rara y está relacionada con infecciones crónicas como strongyloides o tuberculosis, susceptible ante el padecimiento de COVID-19.
Adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma is a common malignancy with a poor prognosis in the elderly population. We present a 44-year-old woman from Ayacucho who was diagnosed with a lymphoma subtype of this disease and a human T-lymphotropic virus-I infection; she showed superior vena cava occlusive syndrome with systemic chemotherapy treatment under an adjusted-dose regimen with rituximab plus etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. Subsequently, she was admitted to the emergency service due to respiratory distress, dry cough, decreased consciousness, hipercalcemia, chest tomography with a heterogeneous consolidation pattern in both lungs and positive RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test for COVID-19. She received treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, corticosteroids and ivermectin with a poor response, rapid deterioration and died later. Adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma at an early age is rare and is related to chronic infections such as strongyloides or tuberculosis, susceptible to COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Lymphoma, T-Cell , Coronavirus Infections , Herpesvirus 6, Human , NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Introducción: La necesidad de información por desconocimiento del Sars-CoV-2 llevó a los investigadores a generar una gran cantidad de información. Colombia es el segundo país latinoamericano con mayor producción científica sobre el Sars- CoV-2. Objetivo: caracterizar la tendencia de colaboración científica de Colombia con países de Latinoamérica y el Caribe sobre la COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: estudio bibliométrico, los registros se obtuvieron de Scopus (2020 - 2021) con los términos COVID-19, 2019-nCoV, new coronavirus, coronavirus disease 2019 y Sars-CoV-2. Se analizaron indicadores de producción, colaboración y visibilidad. Resultados: se recuperaron 77 registros. La tasa de crecimiento de la producción fue del 65,51 %. El índice de transitoriedad alcanzó el 86,69 %. El autor más productivo fue A.J. Rodríguez Morales de la Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas y Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira de Colombia (14,28 %). El 96,10 % de las investigaciones procedieron de universidades. La tasa de colaboración inter-latinoamericana alcanzó el 11,66 % con un índice de colaboración de 3,71 ± 3,09. La densidad de la red fue de 0,51. La mayor colaboración se dio con autores de México (n= 27), Perú (n= 26), Chile (n= 25) y Argentina (n= 23). Argentina presentó un mayor outdegree (176) y número de citas (55,03) y Chile un eigenvector superior (0,35). La correlación entre el número de citas y el grado de centralidad fue de 0,9. Conclusión: Colombia tiende a participar en proyectos internacionales y con países de Latinoamérica y el Caribecon mayor capacidad para desarrollar investigaciones.
Introduction: The need for information due to ignorance of Sars-CoV-2 led researchers to write and publish a large amount of information. Colombia is the second within Latin American countries with the highest scientific production on Sars- CoV-2. Objective: to characterize the trend of scientific collaboration between Colombia and Latin American and Caribbean countries on COVID-19. Materials and methods: bibliometric study, the records were acquired from Scopus (2020 - 2021) with the terms COVID-19, 2019-nCoV, new coronavirus, coronavirus disease 2019 and Sars-CoV-2. Indicators of production, collaboration and visibility were analyzed. Results: 77 records were recovered. The production growth rate was 65.51%. The transience index reached 86.69%. The most productive author was A.J. Rodríguez Morales of the Autonomous University Foundation of the Americas and the Technological University of Pereira of Colombia (14.28%). 96.10% of the investigations came from universities. The inter-Latin American collaboration rate reached 11.66% with a collaboration index of 3.71 ± 3.09. The density of the network was 0.51. The greatest collaboration occurred with authors from Mexico (n= 27), Peru (n= 26), Chile (n= 25) and Argentina (n= 23). Argentina presented a higher degree of improvement (176) and number of citations (55.03) and Chile a higher eigenvector (0.35). The connection between the number of citations and the degree of centrality was 0.9. Conclusion: Colombia tends to participate in international projects and with Latin America and the Caribbeancountries with greater capacity to develop research.
Subject(s)
Humans , Colombia , COVID-19 , International Cooperation , Latin America , Bibliometrics , Coronavirus Infections , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Fundamento: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha incrementado los riesgos laborales en los profesionales de Enfermería, por ello es necesario conocer las percepciones del personal de salud como valor cualitativo a tener en cuenta en la gestión efectiva de su proceso laboral. Objetivo: Describir la percepción del profesional de Enfermería frente a los riesgos laborales durante la pandemia COVID-19, desde un enfoque fenomenológico. Metodología: Investigación cualitativa (descriptiva-explicativa) de tipo fenomenológico, estudiando las percepciones de 13 profesionales de Enfermería sobre los riesgos laborales de tipo físico, biológico, fisiológico y ergonómico, acontecidos en el Hospital del IESS "Dr. Efrén Jurado", en Guayaquil, Ecuador. Resultados: Se observó que los profesionales emplean estrategias de afrontamiento frente a los riesgos laborales, asimismo fomentan una conducta de autocuidado, siguen protocolos de bioseguridad, fortalecen la comunicación efectiva en el equipo de trabajo, brindan apoyo emocional al paciente, proyectan una actitud positiva y empática y mantienen su fortaleza en Dios; los profesionales constantemente experimentan miedo al contagio, tristeza, frustración e impotencia en su jornada laboral. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos se aproximan al modelo de creencias de salud, describiendo componentes que interactúan para originar una conducta o actitud de prevención de riesgo entre enfermeros, una percepción individual donde intervienen las creencias y los factores modificables como aspectos emocionales relacionados con los sentimientos.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased occupational hazards in nursing professionals, therefore, it is necessary to know the perceptions of health staff as a qualitative value to be taken into account in the effective management of their work process. Objective: To describe the perception of the Nursing professional in relation to occupational risks during the COVID-19 pandemic, from a phenomenological point of view. Methodology: Qualitative research (descriptive-explanatory) of the phenomenological type, studying the perceptions of 13 nursing professionals about physical occupational hazards, biological, physiological and ergonomic, occurred at the IESS Hospital "Dr. Efrén Jurado", in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Results: It was observed that the professionals use strategies for coping against occupational hazards, they also encourage self-care behaviors, follow biosafety protocols enhance effective communication in the work team, provide emotional support to the patient, project an attitude of positivity and compassion, and remain strong in God; professionals constantly experience fear of infection, sadness, frustration and powerlessness in their daily work. Conclusions: Findings approach the health belief model, describing components that interact to create a risk prevention behavior or attitude among nurses, an individual perception that involves beliefs and modifiable factors such as emotional aspects related to feelings.
Subject(s)
Occupational Risks , Coronavirus Infections , NursesABSTRACT
Introducción: El síndrome de May-Thurner es una enfermedad cuya prevalencia real es desconocida. Suele ser asintomática y las manifestaciones clínicas aparecen en el contexto de las complicaciones asociadas a la enfermedad. La aproximación diagnóstica se realiza por medio de imágenes, donde se identifican alteraciones patognomónicas que permiten descartar diagnósticos diferenciales. Se ha demostrado que la COVID-19 genera un estado protrombótico, que en contexto del síndrome de May-Thurner puede derivar en complicaciones tromboembólicas. Objetivo: Comparar la clínica y la posible relación de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en el curso de la COVID-19 en pacientes con SMT. Caso clínico: Mujer de 24 años, secretaria de profesión y residente en Bucaramanga. Presentó un cuadro clínico de 20 días de evolución que inició con rinorrea hialina, tos ocasional y mialgias; cinco días después manifestó fiebre no cuantificada y tos con expectoración hemoptoica. Conclusiones: Dentro de la fisiopatología de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 se desarrollan mecanismos procoagulantes, lo cual incrementa el riesgo de eventos trombóticos en pacientes con o sin factores de riesgo(AU)
Introduction: May-Thurner syndrome is a disease whose actual prevalence is unknown. It is usually asymptomatic and clinical manifestations appear in the context of complications associated with the disease. The diagnostic approach is performed by imaging, where pathognomonic alterations are identified to rule out differential diagnoses. It has been demonstrated that COVID-19 generates a prothrombotic state, which particularly in patients with May-Thurner syndrome would lead to thromboembolic complications. Objective: To compare the clinical and possible relationship of venous thromboembolic disease in the course of COVID-19 in patients with May-Thurner syndrome. Clinical case: 24-year-old woman, secretary by profession and resident in Bucaramanga, Colombia. She presented a clinical picture of 20 days of evolution that began with hyaline rhinorrhea, occasional cough and myalgias; five days later she manifested unquantified fever and cough with hemoptotic expectoration. Conclusions: Within the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection, procoagulant mechanisms develop, which increases the risk of thrombotic events in patients with or without risk factors(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Young Adult , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis , May-Thurner Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Iliac ArteryABSTRACT
Se presenta el caso clínico de una paciente de 30 años de edad, con antecedentes de asma bronquial, úlcera gastroduodenal y virus C de la hepatitis, quien fue ingresada en el Hospital Universitario Clínico-Quirúrgico Dr. Ambrosio Grillo Portuondo de la provincia de Santiago de Cuba en 2 ocasiones: primero por presentar infección del virus SARS-CoV-2 y luego, el virus del dengue, con formas graves de la enfermedad en ambos momentos, por lo que se deduce que el daño vascular producido por el SARS-CoV-2 puede ser un factor de riesgo para que se desarrolle un dengue con signos de alarma.
The case report of a 30 years patient with history of bronchial asthma, gastroduodenal ulcer and hepatitis C virus is presented. She was admitted to Dr. Ambrosio Grillo Portuondo Clinical-Surgical University Hospital in Santiago de Cuba in 2 occasions: first for presenting SARS-CoV-2 infection and then, dengue virus, with serious forms of the disease in both moments, reason why it is deduced that the vascular damage caused by SARS-CoV-2 can be a risk factor so that dengue with warning signs is developed.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Secondary Care , DengueABSTRACT
Introdução: Ao desempenhar e promover práticas que visam a melhoria da saúde, a equipe de enfermagem se assumiu como protagonista e linha de frente em tempos de pandemia de COVID-19. Logo, fica evidente a exposição pessoal-profissional-familiar; a carência de pessoal e a insegurança laboral-emocional, além das consequências que vão recair sobre os contextos de saúde e de trabalho destes profissionais. Objetivo: Analisar os contextos de saúde e trabalho de profissionais de enfermagem durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Metodologia: Estudo de método misto, combinando as abordagens por meio da estratégia de incorporação concomitante - QUAN(qual), realizado em Minas Gerais, Brasil, entre agosto e dezembro de 2020. Aplicou-se, via ligação telefônica, um roteiro de perguntas a 58 profissionais enfermeiros, técnicos e auxiliares de enfermagem. O roteiro continha perguntas abertas e fechadas ligadas a questões sociodemográficas e aos contextos e condições de saúde, trabalho e COVID-19. Realizou-se análise quantitativa descritiva e Análise de Conteúdo Temática. Resultados: A maioria mulheres (93,1%) técnicas de enfermagem (69%). 39,7% trabalhavam em plantão noturno; 58,6% relataram terem sofrido violências no trabalho e 48,3% relataram diagnósticos de transtorno mental. Os contextos de trabalho na pandemia evidenciaram necessidade de estímulos e valorização profissional e relações com fatores institucionais, a dinâmica e organização do trabalho, condições adequadas de trabalho e ao favorável relacionamento interpessoal, enquanto que contextos de saúde evidenciaram relação com interesses, oportunidades, rotina, normalidade, esperança e tenacidade que seriam trazidos pelo fim da COVID-19. Conclusão: A pandemia de COVID-19 fortaleceu um contexto de saúde e de trabalho crítico, amedrontado e inseguro da equipe de Enfermagem brasileira, exacerbando a necessidade de providências, ações e políticas que considerem a Saúde do Trabalhador como estruturantes para a organização dos serviços.
Introducción: Al realizar y promover prácticas que tienen como objetivo la mejora de la salud, el equipo de enfermería asumió el protagonismo en los tiempos de la pandemia por COVID-19. Por tanto, es evidente la exposición personal-profesional-familiar, la falta de personal y la inseguridad laboral-emocional, además de las consecuencias que recaerán sobre la salud y los contextos laborales de este grupo profesional. Objetivo: Analizar el contexto sanitario y laboral de profesionales de enfermería durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Metodología: Estudio de método mixto, combinando los abordajes a través de la estrategia de incorporación concomitante - QUAN(qual), realizado en Minas Gerais, Brasil, entre agosto y diciembre de 2020. Se aplicó un guion de preguntas, mediante llamada telefónica, a 58 profesionales, personal técnico y auxiliares de enfermería. El guion contenía preguntas abiertas y cerradas relacionadas con cuestiones sociodemográficas y los contextos y condiciones de salud, trabajo y COVID-19. Se realizó un análisis cuantitativo descriptivo y un análisis de contenido temático. Resultados: La mayor parte de la muestra estuvo compuesta por mujeres (93.1 %) y personal técnico de enfermería (69 %). El 39.7 % trabajaba en turno de noche, el 58.6 % declaró haber sufrido violencia en el trabajo y el 48.3 % informó de diagnósticos de trastorno mental. Los contextos de trabajo en la pandemia mostraron la necesidad de estímulo y valoración profesional y las relaciones con los factores institucionales, la dinámica y la organización del trabajo, las condiciones adecuadas de trabajo y la relación interpersonal favorable. Los contextos de salud, mientras tanto, mostraron una relación con los intereses, las oportunidades, la rutina, la normalidad, la esperanza y la tenacidad que se produciría al final de la COVID-19. Conclusión: La pandemia de la COVID-19 fortaleció un contexto de salud y trabajo crítico, atemorizado e inseguro del equipo de enfermería brasileño, exacerbando la necesidad de providencias, acciones y políticas que consideren la salud de la persona trabajadora como estructurante para la organización de los servicios.
Introduction: By performing and promoting practices that aim to improve health, the nursing team has assumed itself as a protagonist during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the personal, professional, and family exposure is evident; the lack of personnel and occupational security, in addition to the consequences on the health and work contexts of these professionals. Objective: To analyze the health and work contexts of nursing professionals during the pandemic of COVID-19. Methodology: This is a mixed-method study that combines approaches through the concurrent incorporation strategy - QUAN(qual), conducted in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between August and December 2020. A script of questions was applied over the phone to 58 professional nurses, nursing technicians, and nursing assistants. The script included open and closed questions related to sociodemographic issues and health, work, and COVID-19 contexts and conditions. A descriptive quantitative analysis and thematic content analysis were performed. Results: The majority were women (93.1%) nursing technicians (69%). The 39.7% of the participants worked the night shift; the 58.6% reported experiencing violence at work and the 48.3% was diagnosed with mental disorders. The work contexts during the pandemic showed that there was a need for encouragement and professional evaluation; they also portrayed the relationships with the institutional factors, the work dynamics and the organization, the appropriate working conditions and the favorable interpersonal relationships. On the other hand, health contexts showed the relationship between interests, opportunities, routine, normality, hope and tenacity that would occur at the end of COVID-19. Conclusion: The pandemic of COVID-19 strengthened a critical, fearful, and insecure health and work context of the Brazilian nursing team, exacerbating the need for provisions, actions and policies that consider worker's health crucial for the organization of services.
Subject(s)
Humans , Health Personnel/psychology , COVID-19/psychology , Brazil , Coronavirus Infections , Working Conditions , Job DescriptionABSTRACT
Objetivo:analisar o impacto dos desafios na condução da oxigenação por membrana extracorpórea realizada pelo enfermeiro em paciente com infecção por coronavírus. Método: trata-se de um relato de caso com coleta de dados documental num Centro Especializado no Rio de Janeiro. O participante da pesquisa, possuía 30 anos, com diagnóstico de infecção por coronavírus foi submetido a oxigenação extracorpórea veno-venosa por 18 dias. Análise descritiva pautada na identificação dos desafios ao protocolo institucional do suporte circulatório e nas estratégias de enfrentamento com apoio das recomendações científicas vigentes. Resultados: os principais desafios foram restrição de mobilização, insuficiência de drenagem, distúrbios de coagulação e broncoscopia seriada. Conclusões: os impactos identificados nacondução do suporte foram a alta demanda para a enfermagem elevando o tempo e o quantitativo de profissionais necessários para a assistência segura com melhoria dos cuidados de enfermagem relacionados a mobilização e arevisão do protocolo de anticoagulação.
Objective: to analyze the impact of challenges in conducting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation performed by nurses in patients with coronavirus infection. Method: this is a case report with documentary data collection in a Specialized Center in Rio de Janeiro. The research participant was 30 years old, with a diagnosis of coronavirus infection was underwent veno-venous extracorporeal oxygenation for 18 days. Descriptive analysis based on the identification of challenges to the institutional protocol of circulatorysupport and coping strategies supported by current scientific recommendations. Results: the main challenges were restriction of mobilization, insufficiency of drainage, coagulation disorders and serial bronchoscopy. Conclusions: the impacts identified in the conduct of support were the high demand for nursing, increasing the time and number of professionals needed for safe care with improvement of nursing care related to mobilization and review of the anticoagulation protocol.
Objetivo: analizar el impacto de los desafíos en la realización de la oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea realizada por enfermeras en pacientes con infección por coronavirus. Método: es un informe de caso con recolección de datos documentales en un Centro Especializado en Río de Janeiro. El participantede la investigación tenía 30 años,con infección por coronavirus,se le realizó oxigenación extracorpórea veno-venosa durante 18 días. Análisis descriptivo basado en la identificación de desafíos al protocolo institucional de apoyo circulatorio y estrategias de afrontamiento sustentadas en recomendaciones científicas actuales. Resultados:los principales desafíos fueron: restricción de la movilización, insuficiencia de drenaje, trastornos de la coagulación y broncoscopia seriada. Conclusiones: los impactos identificados en la conducta de apoyo fueron: alta demanda de enfermería, aumentando el tiempo y número de profesionales necesarios para un cuidado seguro con mejora de los cuidados de enfermería relacionados con la movilización y revisión del protocolo de anticoagulación.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Nursing , Coronavirus Infections , Critical Care , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health professionals were at an increased risk of developing psychological conditions, especially in Intensive Care Units. A gap is verified in the knowledge about ICU Nursing teams' mental health in the care provided to patients affected by COVID-19. Objective: To review the literature to identify the mental health conditions of ICU Nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and method: This is an integrative literature review with data collection from January to April 2022 in the Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus Content Overview and Web of Science databases. The following descriptors were listed: "Intensive Care Units," "COVID-19," "Mental Health," and "Nurse." The materials included were studies produced since 2020, available in full in the Spanish, English and Portuguese languages, and which answered the research question. Search and selection of the articles were the duty of two duly trained researchers, who worked independently through peer discussion. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations were followed. Results: From a sample of 16 articles, it was observed that the critical care of COVID-19 patients affected Nursing professionals' mental health with an emphasis on depression, anxiety, stress and fear. This was associated with a lack of evidence-based training, scarcity of human and physical resources, work overload and insufficient work experience. Conclusions: ICU Nursing professionals are mentally shaken; therefore, it is imperative to implement policies, strategies and methods to improve the psychological conditions of these professionals, to ensure the quality of services.
Introdução: durante a pandemia da covid-19, os profissionais de saúde apresentaram risco aumentado para o desenvolvimento de afecções psíquicas, especialmente na unidade de terapia intensiva. Verifica-se lacuna de conhecimento sobre a saúde mental da equipe de enfermagem intensivista no atendimento aos pacientes acometidos pela covid-19. Objetivo: identificar, na literatura científica, as condições da saúde mental do profissional de enfermagem intensivista durante a pandemia da covid-19. Materiais e método: esta é uma revisão integrativa da literatura; a coleta de dados ocorreu de janeiro a abril de 2022 nas fontes de dados Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus Content Overview e Web of Science. Elencaram-se os seguintes descritores: "Intensive Care Units", "Covid 19", "Mental Health", "Nurse". Incluíram-se estudos produzidos desde 2020, disponíveis na íntegra, em espanhol, inglês e português, e que respondessem à questão de pesquisa. A busca e seleção dos artigos foram executadas por dois pesquisadores treinados, de modo independente, mediante discussão por pares. As recomendações do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses foram seguidas. Resultados: a partir de uma amostra de 16 artigos, observou-se que o cuidado crítico de pacientes com covid-19 afetou a saúde mental dos profissionais de enfermagem com destaque para depressão, ansiedade, estresse e medo. Isso se associou à falta de tratamento baseado em evidências, à carência de recursos humanos e físicos, à sobrecarga de trabalho e às experiências de trabalho insuficientes. Conclusões: os profissionais de enfermagem intensivistas estão mentalmente abalados; portanto, é imperativa a implantação de políticas, estratégias e métodos para melhorar as condições psicológicas desses profissionais, para, assim, garantir a qualidade nos serviços.
Introducción: durante la pandemia de la covid-19, los profesionales de la salud han presentado riesgo aumentado para el desarrollo de afecciones psíquicas, especialmente en la unidad de terapia intensiva. Se encuentra vacío de conocimiento acerca de la salud mental de los profesionales de enfermería intensivistas en la atención a los pacientes acometidos por la covid-19. Objetivo: identificar, en la literatura científica, las condiciones de la salud mental del profesional de enfermería intensivista durante la pandemia de la covid-19. Materiales y método: se trata de una revisión integradora de la literatura; la recolección de datos ocurrió de enero a abril de 2022 en las fuentes de dados Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Scopus Content Overview y Web of Science. Se han relacionado los siguientes descriptores: "Intensive Care Units", "Covid 19", "Mental Health", "Nurse". Se han incluido estudios producidos desde el 2020, disponibles de forma integral, en español, inglés y portugués, y que atendieran a la pregunta de investigación. La búsqueda y selección de los artículos se ejecutaron por dos investigadores capacitados, de modo independiente, mediante discusión por pares. Se siguieron las recomendaciones del Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Resultados: desde una amuestra de 16 artículos, se ha observado que la atención crítica a pacientes con covid-19 ha afectado la salud mental de los profesionales de enfermería con énfasis para depresión, ansiedad, estrés y miedo. Lo anterior se asocia a la falta de tratamiento basado en evidencia, la carencia de recursos humanos y físico, la sobrecarga de trabajo y las experiencias de trabajo insuficientes. Conclusiones: los profesionales de enfermería intensivistas están mentalmente debilitados; por lo tanto, urge la implantación de políticas, estrategias y métodos para mejorar las condiciones psicológicas de estos profesionales para, así, asegurar la calidad en los servicios.
Subject(s)
Mental Health , Coronavirus Infections , Health Promotion , Intensive Care Units , NursingABSTRACT
SUMMARY The pandemic caused by the COVID-19 has influenced peoples' lifestyles. Home-confinement scenario might impair physical activity practice, resulting in new challenges for maintaining health during the pandemic of the COVID-19. The aim of this study was to present the current context of COVID-19 pandemic, its impact on the practice of physical activity, and the strategies available to remain active during home-confinement according to international recommendations. The narrative review was conducted based on studies that analyzed themes related to physical activity and COVID-19. Virtual Health Library (VHL), CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant papers. Although an increased number of experimental studies are still necessary, people should devote more time to physical activity during social isolation. Guidelines were adjusted by international entities in order to encourage people to remain active, through practice regular physical activity, using alternative strategies such as fitness program applications, exergames, online exercise classes, and even chores. Reduction of prolonged sedentary behavior could contribute to maintain health and improve quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.
La pandemia provocada por la Covid-19 ha influido en los estilos de vida de las personas. El escenario de confinamiento domiciliario podría perjudicar la práctica de actividad física, generando nuevos desafíos para el mantenimiento de la salud durante la pandemia de la Covid-19. El objetivo de este estudio fue presentar el contexto actual de la pandemia de Covid-19, su impacto en la práctica de actividad física y las estrategias disponibles para mantenerse activo durante el confinamiento domiciliario según las recomendaciones internacionales. La revisión narrativa se realizó con base en estudios que analizaron temas relacionados con la actividad física y la Covid-19. Se realizaron búsquedas de artículos relevantes en las bases de datos Virtual Health Library (BVS), CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Scopus, SPORTDiscus y Web of Science. Aunque todavía es necesario un mayor número de estudios experimentales, las personas deberían dedicar más tiempo a la actividad física durante el aislamiento social. Las pautas fueron ajustadas por entidades internacionales para alentar a las personas a mantenerse activas, mediante la práctica de actividad física regular, utilizando estrategias alternativas como aplicaciones de programas de acondicionamiento físico, exergames, clases de ejercicios en línea e incluso tareas domésticas. La reducción del sedentarismo prolongado podría contribuir a mantener la salud y mejorar la calidad de vida durante la pandemia de Covid-19.
Subject(s)
Humans , Social Isolation , Exercise , Health , Coronavirus Infections , ReviewABSTRACT
Introducción. Al declararse la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, se establecieron múltiples cambios en los sistemas de salud y en las instituciones hospitalarias, influyendo en la actividad quirúrgica global. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la pandemia en los niveles de autonomía y supervisión operatorias de los residentes de cirugía. Métodos. Estudio analítico cuasi-experimental, que incluyó los procedimientos quirúrgicos registrados por residentes de cirugía general de la Universidad de La Sabana, de febrero de 2019 a agosto de 2021. Se analizaron la autonomía y la supervisión mediante la escala Zwisch en los periodos prepandemia y pandemia. Resultados. Se recolectaron datos de 10.618 procedimientos en el periodo establecido, la mayoría realizados con abordaje abierto (57,4 %) y en rotaciones tronculares de cirugía general (65 %). Los procedimientos realizados más frecuentes fueron apendicectomía (18,6 %), colecistectomía (18,4 %) y herniorrafías (8,6 %). Se encontró una disminución estadísticamente significativa en los niveles globales de autonomía y supervisión entre los periodos analizados de 2, 4/4, 0 a 2, 2/4, 0 (p<0,001). Discusión. La disminución en la autonomía percibida por los residentes podría corresponder al impacto negativo en la motivación intrínseca de los individuos, en la disminución objetiva en el logro de las competencias esperadas en su proceso de formación quirúrgica y a la pérdida del relacionamiento colectivo propiciado por los aislamientos y limitaciones vividos. Conclusión. La pandemia por COVID-19 impactó negativamente en la autonomía y supervisión operatoria de los residentes de cirugía general de la Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Introduction. Changes in health systems and hospital institutions due to the coronavirus pandemic influenced global surgical activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the levels of autonomy and supervision in general surgery residents. Methods. Quasi-experimental analytical study. It included the surgical procedures recorded by general surgery residents of the University of La Sabana from February 2019 to August 2021. Autonomy and supervision were analyzed using the Zwisch scale in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Results. 10,618 procedures were collected in the established period. Most surgeries were performed with an open approach (57,4%), in rotations of general surgery (65%). The most frequent procedures performed were appendectomy (18,6%), and cholecystectomy (18,4%), and herniorrhaphy (8,6%). There was a decrease in levels of autonomy and supervision compared between the analyzed periods from 2, 4/4, 0 to 2, 2/4, 0 (p<0.001). Discussion. The decrease in the autonomy perceived by the residents could correspond to the negative impact on the intrinsic motivation of the individuals, a decrease in the achievement of the competencies expected in their surgical training process, and the loss of the collective relationship produced by the isolation and limitations experienced. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on autonomy and supervision in general surgery residents of the University of La Sabana, Chia, Colombia
Subject(s)
Humans , Professional Autonomy , Coronavirus Infections , General Surgery , Education, Medical , Health Postgraduate Programs , Pandemics , MotivationABSTRACT
Introducción. La condición de pandemia por COVID-19 impactó a la sociedad y los sistemas de salud a nivel mundial. Las adaptaciones institucionales procuraron mantener la calidad de la atención a pesar de un contexto organizacional desfavorable. La apendicitis aguda requirió ser manejada en un nuevo escenario institucional. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico de la apendicitis durante la pandemia. Métodos. Estudio observacional analítico, retrospectivo, en el que se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía, antes y durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Se evaluaron las complicaciones, infección del sitio operatorio, reingresos y estancia hospitalaria. Adicionalmente, se analizaron los desenlaces en los 3 picos epidemiológicos de la pandemia. Se efectuaron estadísticas descriptivas y analíticas entre los grupos a comparar. Resultados. Se incluyeron 1521 pacientes con apendicitis, 48,3 % operados antes y 51,7 % durante la pandemia. No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en complicaciones (p=0,352), infección del sitio operatorio (p=0,191), reingreso en los primeros 30 días (p=0,605) y estancia hospitalaria (p=0,514). El manejo de la apendicitis durante el tercer pico fue similar a las prácticas habituales. El tiempo de evolución fue mayor durante la pandemia (p=0,04) y los pacientes fueron llevados a cirugía más pronto que previo a la pandemia (p<0,001). Conclusiones. No se evidenció un incremento de complicaciones quirúrgicas, reingresos, estancia hospitalaria ni infección del sitio operatorio en los pacientes operados durante la pandemia. Hubo un efecto favorable para los pacientes como consecuencia de la adaptación institucional en la pandemia por COVID-19
Introduction. COVID-19 pandemic impacted society and health systems worldwide. The institutional adaptations sought to maintain the quality of care in an unfavorable organizational context. Acute appendicitis was required to be managed in a new institutional setting. The effectiveness of surgical treatment of appendicitis during the pandemic was evaluated. Methods. Retrospective analytical observational study, in patients with appendectomy, before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Complications, surgical site infections, readmissions, and hospital stay were evaluated. Additionally, the outcomes in the 3 epidemiological peaks of the pandemic were analyzed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed between the groups to be compared. Results. A total of 1521 patients with appendicitis were included, 48.3% before and 51.7% during the pandemic. There were no differences in complications (p=0.352), operative site infection (p=0.191), readmission at 30 days (p=0.605), and hospital stay (p=0.514) between the groups. Management of appendicitis during the 3rd peak was like usual practices. There was a long evolution time during the pandemic (p=0.04) and the patients were taken to surgery sooner than before the pandemic (p<0.001). Conclusions. There was no evidence of an increase in surgical complications, readmissions, hospital stay, and surgical site infections during patients who underwent surgery. There was a favorable effect for patients because of institutional adaptation in the COVID-19 pandemic