ABSTRACT
Objetivo: quantificar e investigar casos de microrganismos durante o primeiro ano da pandemia da COVID-19, em hospital da região sul do Brasil, referência para tratamento de sintomáticos da doença e, analisar os desfechos das infecções pelos microrganismos estudados. Métodos: estudo transversal realizado em unidade hospitalar de ensino da região dos Campos Gerais - Paraná. Analisouse os exames de cultura positivas coletadas após 48 horas de internação dos pacientes, juntamente com o perfil de sensibilidade destes microrganismos. Os dados correspondem ao período entre janeiro de 2020 a janeiro de 2021 e foram analisados descritivamente segundo microrganismo, sensibilidade e óbitos. Resultados: houve crescimento na detecção de microrganismos no intervalo de agosto/20 e janeiro/21, correspondente ao período pandêmico da COVID-19. Os microrganismos mais frequentes foram Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus e Escherichia coli. Também observou-se maior frequência de óbitos por infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde nas unidades de terapia intensiva no mesmo período. Conclusão: verificou-se aumento da incidência de microrganismos associados a infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde em paralelo ao crescimento da pandemia na região estudada e, uma maior frequência de óbitos por infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde na ala de atendimento exclusivo COVID-19. (AU)
Objective: to quantify and investigate microorganisms associated with hospital healthcare-associated infections during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and analyze their outcomes. Methods: cross-sectional study carried out in a teaching hospital in the Campos Gerais region Paraná. Positive culture tests collected after 48 hours of patient admission were analyzed, along with the sensitivity profile of these microorganisms. The data correspond to the period from January 2020 to January 2021 and were analyzed descriptively according to microorganism, sensitivity and deaths. Results: there was an increase in the detection of microorganisms in the interval from August 2020 and January 2021, corresponding to the COVID-19 pandemic period. The most frequent microorganisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. There was also a higher frequency of deaths due to healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units in the same period. Conclusion: there was an increase in the incidence of microorganisms associated with healthcare-associated infections in parallel with the growth of the pandemic in the studied region and a higher frequency of deaths from healthcare-associated infections in the exclusive care ward for COVID-19. (AU)
Objetivo: cuantificar e investigar microorganismos asociados a las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria durante el primer año de la pandemia de COVID-19 y analizar sus resultados. Métodos: estudio transversal realizado en un hospital universitario de la región de Campos Gerais Paraná. Se analizaron las pruebas de cultivo positivas recogidas 48 horas después del ingreso de los pacientes, junto con el perfil de sensibilidad de estos microorganismos. Los datos corresponden al período comprendido entre enero de 2020 y enero de 2021 y se analizaron descriptivamente según microorganismo, sensibilidad y muertes. Resultados: hubo un aumento en la detección de microorganismos en el intervalo entre agosto de 2020 y enero de 2021, correspondiente al período pandémico de COVID-19. Los microorganismos más frecuentes fueron Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus y Escherichia coli. También se notó una mayor frecuencia de muertes por infecciones asociadas a la asistencia sanitaria en unidades de cuidados intensivos en el mismo período. Conclusión: se observó un aumento en la incidencia de microorganismos asociados a las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria en paralelo con el crecimiento de la pandemia en la región estudiada y una mayor frecuencia de muertes por infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria en el sector de atención exclusiva de COVID-19. (AU)
Subject(s)
Coronavirus , Cross Infection , Critical Care NursingABSTRACT
Objetivo: Análise do uso de métodos contraceptivos no período da pandemia. Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, descritivo, exploratório, aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa envolvendo Seres Humanos (número 3.146.657). Foram entrevistadas via chamada telefônicas colaboradoras que retiraram contraceptivos em 01/01/2020 à 30/07/2020, excluídas os menores de 18 anos de idade; cadastro incompleto e residência fora da área de abrangência da Unidade Básica de Saúde Aquiles Stenghel (Londrina Paraná). Resultados: Elaboraram-se tabelas descritivas com as respostas obtidas. Notou-se que quatro colaboradoras não usavam nenhum contraceptivo no momento da entrevista, e oito haviam trocado de métodos contraceptivos. Todas referiram conhecer pelo menos um contraceptivo e tê-lo utilizado em algum momento. Conclusão: O anticoncepcional injetável, apesar dos efeitos indesejáveis mencionados, continuou sendo o mais usado por entre a maioria delas, e observou-se um desuso da camisinha. Ficou evidente a necessidade de ampliar o olhar para as especificidades das mulheres, em especial as que estão em contexto de vulnerabilidades.(AU)
Objective: Analyze the use of contraceptive methods during the pandemic. Method: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, exploratory study, approved by the Ethics Committee for Research involving Human Beings (number 3,146,657). Women, who collected contraceptives in the period between 01/01/2020 to 07/30/2020, over 18 years old, with complete registration and resident in the coverage area of the Basic Health Unit Aquiles Stenghel (Londrina Paraná) were interviewed by the researchers by telephone. Results: Descriptive tables were created with the interview responses obtained. It was noted that four collaborators were not using any contraceptive at the time of the interview, and eight had changed contraceptive methods. All participants reported being familiar with at least one contraceptive and having used it at some point. Conclusion: Injectable contraceptives, despite the aforementioned undesirable effects, continued to be the most widely used method among the participants, and there was a lack of use of condoms. It is evident that women especially those who are in a vulnerability context need a bit more of pharmacy assistance in order to guarantee correct contraceptives use and its efficiency.(AU)
Objetivo: Análisis del uso de métodos anticonceptivos durante la pandemia. Método: Estudio transversal, descriptivo y exploratorio, aprobado por el Comité de Ética para la Investigación con Seres Humanos (número 3.146.657). Se entrevistó por llamada telefónica a mujeres que tomaron anticonceptivos entre el 01/01/2020 y el 30/07/2020; no se incluyeron menores de 18 años; registro incompleto y residencia fuera de la zona de captación de la Unidad Básica de Salud Aquiles Stenghel (Londrina Paraná). Resultados: Con las respuestas obtenidas se elaboraron tablas descriptivas. Se observó que cuatro colaboradoras no utilizaban ningún anticonceptivo en el momento de la entrevista y ocho habían cambiado de método anticonceptivo. Todas declararon conocer al menos un anticonceptivo y haberlo utilizado en algún momento. Conclusión: El anticonceptivo inyectable, a pesar de los efectos indeseables mencionados, siguió siendo el más utilizado entre la mayoría de las colaboradoras, y se observó desuso del preservativo. Se puso de manifiesto la necesidad de profundizar en las particularidades de las mujeres, especialmente las que se encuentran en contextos vulnerables.(AU)
Subject(s)
Coronavirus , Contraceptive Agents , PandemicsABSTRACT
El estrés laboral significó un riesgo importante para la presencia de alteraciones de salud mental en trabajadores de salud, durante la pandemia de Coronavirus 2019. Objetivo. Determinar la relación del nivel de estrés laboral y salud mental en el personal asignado en primera línea de atención contra el COVID-19. Metodología. Se realizó un estudio transversal analítico en las áreas de emergencias y hospitalización del Hospital Nacional San Juan de Dios de San Miguel, de septiembre a diciembre de 2020. Participaron en total 121 trabajadores. Se utilizaron las escalas de estrés laboral de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo y la escala de Gilbert abreviada. El análisis de correlación de variables se realizó por el coeficiente de Spearman. Resultados. El 59,5 % de los estudiados son mujeres y el 44,6 % era personal de enfermería. El 89,3 % tenía bajo nivel de estrés y 79,3 % nivel intermedio de alteración en salud mental con predominio de ansiedad (51,2 %), sobre depresión (8,3 %) en enfermeras y personal de servicios generales entre 21 a 40 años. El análisis de la correlación Spearman determinó una correlación positiva entre el estrés laboral y la presencia de alteración de salud mental (R2 0,218; p = 0,016) en el personal de primera línea. Conclusión. El estudio demostró un nivel de estrés laboral bajo e intermedio en salud mental; con relación positiva, lo que significa que el aumento de estrés puede favorecer la presencia de alteraciones al estado de salud mental del trabajador
Occupational stress posed a relevant risk for mental health disturbances in healthcare workers during the 2019 Coronavirus pandemic. Objective. To determine the relationship between the level of occupational stress and mental health in front-line healthcare personnel against COVID-19. Methodology. An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out in the emergency and hospitalization areas of the San Juan de Dios National Hospital in San Miguel, from September to December 2020. A total of 121 workers participated. The occupational stress scales of the International Labor Organization and the abbreviated Goldberg scale were used. Variable correlation analysis was performed using Spearman's coefficient. Results. 59.5 % were female and 44.6 % were the nursing staff. 89.3 % had a low level of stress and 79.3 % had an intermediate level of alteration in mental health with a predominance of anxiety (51.2 %) over depression (8.3 %) in nurses and general services personnel between 21 and 40 years. The analysis of the Spearman correlation determined a positive correlation between occupational stress and mental health disorders (R2 0.218; p = 0.016) in workers. Conclusion. The study showed a low and intermediate level of occupational stress in mental health; with a positive correlation, which means that the increase in stress can favor the presence of alterations in the mental health status of the worker
Subject(s)
Mental Health , Occupational Stress , COVID-19 , Work , Coronavirus , Delivery of Health Care , PandemicsABSTRACT
Introduction: controlling the worldwide pandemic, coronavirus disease (COVID-19), could be impossible due to the hesitancy about the available vaccines and the difficulty to implement strict restrictions. Little information is available about herd immunity in the highly vulnerable region of North East Africa, Egypt. Objectives: to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic in one of the highly vulnerable populations in Egypt, Fayoum district of Fayoum Governorate. Additionally, to assess the predictive value of symptoms and other associated risk factors towards a positive COVID-19 test. Methods: in this cross-sectional community-based pilot study, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that are specific for the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1-RBD) protein were tested during the period from February 2021 to July 2021. Results: out of 155 participants, 60.6% were SARS-CoV-2 seropositive. Out of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, 76.5% and 56.2% were seropositive, respectively. Surprisingly, only one individual had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Previous history of COVID-19; such as symptoms and gender are statistically significant predictors of high seroconversion independent of age, comorbidities, and level of education. Conclusion: this study which disclosed unexpectedly high SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion among the Egyptians, might provide a clear insight into COVID-19 transmission patterns and state of immunity. Further study with a larger sample size on a large scale is required to represent the whole local population.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Coronavirus , Seroconversion , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Signs and Symptoms , Cross-Sectional Studies , AntibodiesABSTRACT
A novel coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in China in 2019 and later ignited a global pandemic. Contrary to expectations, the effect of the pandemic was not as devastating to Africa and its young population compared to the rest of the world. To provide insight into the possible reasons for the presumed immune sufficiency to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Africa, this review critically examines literature published from 2020 onwards on the dynamics of COVID-19 infection and immunity and how other prevalent infectious diseases in Africa might have influenced the outcome of COVID-19. Studies characterising the immune response in patients with COVID-19 show that the correlates of protection in infected individuals are T-cell responses against the SARSCoV-2 spike protein and neutralising titres of immunoglobin G and immunoglobin A antibodies. In some other studies, substantial pre-existing T-cell reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 was detected in many people from diverse geographical locations without a history of exposure. Certain studies also suggest that innate immune memory, which offers protection against reinfection with the same or another pathogen, might influence the severity of COVID-19. In addition, an initial analysis of epidemiological data showed that COVID-19 cases were not severe in some countries that implemented universal Bacillus CalmetteGuerin (BCG) vaccination policies, thus supporting the potential of BCG vaccination to boost innate immunity. The high burden of infectious diseases and the extensive vaccination campaigns previously conducted in Africa could have induced specific and non-specific protective immunity to infectious pathogens in Africans.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Vaccination , Coronavirus , Protective Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , T-Lymphocytes , Communicable Diseases , Pandemics , ImmunityABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus (COVID-19) which emerged from Wuhan, Hubei province, China has gained tremendous attention. It has caused huge morbidity and mortality as well as a visible psychological burden on communities across the globe. Knowledge, fear, and willingness to accept COVID-19 Vaccine are reported to be serious factors in the fight against the disease in many communities for which Jere LGA, Maiduguri, Borno State, may not be an exception. Objectives: To determine the Knowledge, fear, and willingness to accept the COVID-19 Vaccine among the residents of Jere LGA, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. Methodology:Adescriptive cross-sectional study design was adopted for this study. Atotal of 384 questionnaires were administered in this study. However, only 367 questionnaires were retrieved for analysis. The sampling technique adopted for this study was multistate sampling techniques. Results: The findings of the study revealed that the majority (67.8%) of the respondents had poor knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccine. On the question of COVID-19 fear, 50.1% had moderate fear. Regarding the vaccination status of the respondents, 93.5% did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine jab and 6.5% did receive the vaccine as of the time of this study. Of the 367 respondents, 78.2% were unwilling to accept the COVID-19 vaccine, if made available to them. Conclusions: The study concluded that there is poor knowledge, and moderate fear and the majority of respondents were unwilling to receive or accept the COVID-19 vaccine in the study area. Therefore, this study recommends a comprehensive awareness campaign on the importance of the COVID-19 vaccine at the community level.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fear , COVID-19 Vaccines , Coronavirus , KnowledgeABSTRACT
Aim: To verify changes in the frequency of oral hygiene among basic education teachers in Minas Gerais during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to gender. Methods: This is a web survey, epidemiological study. Data collection took place from August to September 2020 through digital form. The dependent variable was the frequency of oral hygiene during the pandemic, categorized as: remained the same, increased, and decreased. Multinomial Logistic Regression was performed. Results: In this study, 15,641 teachers participated, 81.9% of whom were women. Regarding the frequency of oral hygiene, 73.4% reported that it remained the same, 20.1% increased, and 6.5% decreased, with no significant difference between genders. The chances of a decrease in the frequency of oral hygiene were greater in women under 60 years of age, those without children, those who tested positive for COVID-19, those with a worsening health during the pandemic, those with an increased body weight during the pandemic, and those who were sad or depressed during the pandemic. Among men, the chances of reduction were greater among those who did not live with a spouse, those with a worsening health during the pandemic, those who were sad or depressed during the pandemic, and among smokers or ex-smokers. Conclusion: Although the prevalence of changes in the frequency of oral hygiene in the pandemic did not differ between men and women, the factors related to the increase and decrease in frequency were different for each sex.
Introdução: Cuidar da higiene bucal é fundamental para a manutenção da saúde. Objetivo: Verificar as mudanças na frequência de higienização bucal entre professores durante a pandemia da COVID-19, segundo sexo. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, do tipo websurvey, realizado com professores da educação básica pública de Minas Gerais. A coleta de dados ocorreu em 2020. A variável dependente foi a frequência de higiene bucal durante a pandemia. Foi realizada Regressão Logística Multinomial. Resultados: Participaram do estudo 15.641 professores, sendo 81,9% mulheres. Em relação à frequência de higiene bucal, 73,4% relataram que permaneceu a mesma, 20,1% aumentou e 6,5% diminuiu, sem diferença significativa entre os sexos. As chances de diminuição da frequência de higienização bucal foram maiores em mulheres com menos de 60 anos, sem filhos, que testaram positivo para a COVID-19, com piora da saúde durante a pandemia, com aumento de peso corporal durante a pandemia e aquelas que estavam tristes ou deprimidas durante a pandemia. Entre os homens, as chances de redução foram maiores entre aqueles que não moravam com cônjuge, com piora da saúde durante a pandemia, aqueles que estavam tristes ou deprimidos durante a pandemia e entre os fumantes ou ex-fumantes. Conclusão: A frequência de higienização bucal na pandemia não apresentou diferenças significativas entre os sexos, no entanto, observou-se, em ambos os sexos, que variáveis referentes às características sociodemográficas, hábitos de vida e condições de saúde, foram associados ao aumento e diminuição da frequência de higienização bucal na pandemia.
Subject(s)
Oral Hygiene , Oral Health , Health Surveys , Occupational Health , CoronavirusABSTRACT
Introducción: El SARS-CoV-2 es un Betacoronavirus, así como el SARS-CoV y el MERS-CoV, ambos asociados a abortos espontáneos, parto prematuro, morbi-mortalidad materna y alto número de ingresos a UCI en las gestantes. Además, al ser un virus nuevo, se conoce poco sobre los efectos en la gestación. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo analizar la evidencia disponible sobre el SARS-CoV-2 en la gestación. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura en PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, BVS y SciElo. Se realizó la crítica de la evidencia y la extracción de la información con dos instrumentos propuestos por el Instituto Joanna Briggs. Lo anterior bajo las directrices de PRISMA-ScR. Resultados: Se incluyeron 85 artículos que evidenciaron que la mayoría de gestantes con SARS-CoV-2 desarrollaron enfermedad leve a moderada, pero presentaron mayor riesgo de muerte y complicaciones comparado con las pacientes no embarazadas. Se documentó bajo riesgo de transmisión vertical y los resultados perinatales se asociaron a la severidad del cuadro clínico materno. La efectividad del tratamiento no fue concluyente.Discusión: Se discute la presentación clínica de la infección en las gestantes, la transmisión vertical, el tratamiento, la gravedad de la enfermedad y los desenlaces neonatales.Conclusiones: La COVID-19 en la gestación es una complicación que genera mayor morbimortalidad, por lo que es de vital importancia el desarrollo de más investigaciones que amplíen la comprensión de su comportamiento, las implicaciones fisiológicas, emocionales y el posible tratamiento. Esta revisión hace un análisis riguroso de la calidad de los estudios y aporta información valiosa de la evidencia.
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 is a betacoronavirus as well as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, both associated with spontaneous miscarriage, preterm birth, maternal morbidity and mortality and a higher number of ICU admissions for pregnant women. Being a new virus, its effects on pregnancy are little known. This review aims to analyze the available evidence on SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy. Materials and Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, BVS and SciElo. Evidence criticism and information extraction were conducted using two instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: 85 articles were included evidencing that most pregnant women with SARS-COV-2 suffered mild to moderate disease and were at a higher risk of death and complications compared to non-pregnant patients. Low risk of vertical transmission was documented and adverse perinatal outcomes were associated with severe maternal clinical manifestations. The effectiveness of treatment was inconclusive. Discussion: Clinical presentation of infection in pregnant women, vertical transmission, treatment, disease severity and neonatal outcomes were discussed. Conclusions: COVID-19 during pregnancy is a complication that generates greater morbidity and mortality, for which it is vital to develop further research on the understanding of the behavior, physiological and emotional implications and possible treatment. This review makes a rigorous analysis of the quality of studies and provides valuable information from evidence.
Introdução: O SARS-CoV-2 é um betacoronavírus, assim como o SARS-CoV e o MERS-CoV, ambos associados ao aborto espontâneo, parto prematuro, morbidade e mortalidade materna e alto número de internações na UTI em mulheres grávidas. Além disso, sendo um novo vírus, pouco se sabe sobre seus efeitos na gravidez. Esta revisão tem como objetivo analisar as evidências disponíveis sobre o SARS-CoV-2 na gravidez. Materiais e métodos: Foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica na PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, BVS e SciElo. A analise crítica das provas e a extração de dados foram realizadas utilizando dois instrumentos propostos pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs sob as diretrizes do PRISMA-ScR. Resultados: 85 artigos foram incluídos, mostrando que a maioria das mulheres grávidas com SRA-CoV-2 desenvolveu doença leve a moderada, mas tinha um risco maior de morte e complicações em comparação com pacientes não grávidas. Baixo risco de transmissão vertical foi documentado e os resultados perinatais foram associados à gravidade do quadro clínico materno. A eficácia do tratamento foi inconclusiva. Discussão: Apresentação clínica da infecção em mulheres grávidas, transmissão vertical, tratamento, gravidade da doença e resultados neonatais são discutidos. Conclusões: A COVID-19 na gravidez é uma complicação que gera maior morbidade e mortalidade, portanto, mais pesquisas para expandir a compreensão de seu comportamento, implicações fisiológicas e emocionais, e o tratamento potencial são de vital importância. Esta revisão fornece uma análise rigorosa da qualidade dos estudos e informações valiosas a partir das evidências.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Identificar os reflexos da utilização de tecnologias para o ensino remoto na pandemia por coronavírus na perspectiva de estudantes de enfermagem. Métodos: Pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, descritiva, com 14 estudantes de enfermagem de uma Universidade Pública do Sul do Brasil. Os dados foram produzidos mediante entrevistas semiestruturadas realizadas na Plataforma Google Meet no segundo semestre de 2020, e submetidos a análise temática de conteúdo. Resultados: Elaborou-se duas categorias temáticas: Impactos do distanciamento social na vida de estudantes de enfermagem; Uso de tecnologias digitais para o ensino remoto na perspectiva de estudantes de enfermagem. O uso de tecnologias digitais ampliam as possibilidades de manutenção das atividades de ensino no período pandêmico e auxiliam no desenvolvimento de estratégias para a continuidade do vínculo entre docentes e estudantes. Portanto, os estudantes ainda se encontram em um cenário de incertezas referente ao futuro de sua formação, que contribui para a manifestação de sentimentos de ansiedade, medo e preocupação. Conclusão: Diante do contexto da pandemia, as tecnologias digitais se constituíram em estratégias adotadas para a continuidade da prática pedagógica, contudo os efeitos do isolamento social e o contexto de incertezas geram preocupações nos estudantes, podendo produzir desgastes emocionais nestes. (AU)
Objective: To identify the reflexes of the use of technologies for remote education in the pandemic by coronavírus from the perspective of nursing students. Methods: Qualitative, descriptive research with 14 nursing students from a public university in southern Brazil. The data were produced through semi-structured interviews conducted on the Google Meet Platform in the second half of 2020, and subjected to thematic content analysis. Results: Two thematic categories were elaborated: Impacts of social distance in the life of nursing students; Use of digital technologies for remote teaching from the perspective of nursing students. The use of digital technologies expands the possibilities of maintaining teaching activities in the pandemic period and helps in the development of strategies for the continuity of the link between teachers and students. Therefore, students are still in a scenario of uncertainty regarding the future of their education, which contributes to the manifestation of feelings of anxiety, fear and concern. Conclusion: Given the context of the pandemic, digital technologies have become strategies adopted for the continuity of pedagogical practice, however, the effects of social isolation and the context of uncertainties generate concerns in students, which can produce emotional distress in them. (AU)
Objetivo: Identificar los reflejos del uso de tecnologías para la educación a distancia en la pandemia por coronavírus desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de enfermería. Métodos: Investigación descriptiva cualitativa con 14 estudiantes de enfermería de una universidad pública del sur de Brasil. Los datos fueron producidos a través de entrevistas semiestructuradas realizadas en la plataforma Google Meet en la segunda mitad de 2020, y sometidas a análisis de contenido temático. Resultados: Se elaboraron dos categorías temáticas: Impactos de la distancia social en la vida de los estudiantes de enfermería; Uso de tecnologías digitales para la enseñanza a distancia desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de enfermería. El uso de tecnologías digitales amplía las posibilidades de mantener las actividades docentes en el período pandémico y ayuda en el desarrollo de estrategias para la continuidad del vínculo entre docentes y estudiantes. Por lo tanto, los estudiantes aún se encuentran en un escenario de incertidumbre con respecto al futuro de su educación, lo que contribuye a la manifestación de sentimientos de ansiedad, miedo y preocupación. Conclusión: Ante el contexto de la pandemia, las tecnologías digitales se convirtieron en estrategias adoptadas para la continuidad de la práctica pedagógica, sin embargo los efectos del aislamiento social y el contexto de incertidumbres generan inquietudes en los estudiantes, que pueden producir estrés emocional en ellos. (AU)
Subject(s)
Nursing , Teaching , Technology , CoronavirusABSTRACT
Introduction: Social stigmas in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) have been part of their history and can still be identified in today's care environments. Objective: To analyze the social stigmas in relation to the care of people living with HIV by those who provide the anti Sars-CoV-2 vaccination service. Materials and methods: A descriptive quantitative research were developed that included a census sample of 126 people. The scale of social stigma in the care of people with HIV/AIDS (Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) was applied. The information was analyzed through SPSS version 25. Results: Most of the participants reported not knowing people with HIV, but they have been treated as users (54%) and considered that they are discriminated (88.1%). Although a low level of stigma was evidenced (71.4%), these are present in 85.7%. Having had contact as a user with people with HIV was associated with the level of stigma (p=0.008). Conclusions: It is necessary to promote training in which the complexity of the phenomenon is addressed and aspects such as social stigmas are identified, incorporating the biopsychosocial paradigm together with a gender perspective in favor of the comprehensive provision of care.
Introducción: Los estigmas sociales en personas que viven con VIH han sido parte de su historia y aún se puede identificar en los entornos actuales de atención. Objetivo: Analizar los estigmas sociales en relación con la atención de las personas que viven con VIH por parte de quienes otorgan el servicio de vacunación anti Sars-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos: Se desarrolló una investigación cuantitativa descriptiva que incluyó una muestra censal de 126 personas. Se aplicó la Escala de estigma social en la atención de personas con VIH/SIDA. La información fue analizada a través del SPSS versión 25. Resultados: La mayoría de participantes refirió no conocer a personas con VIH, pero sí les han atendido como usuarios (54%), y consideró que son discriminadas (88,1%). Pese a que se evidenció un nivel bajo de estimas (71,4%), éstos están presentes en el 85,7%. El haber tenido contacto como usuario con personas con VIH se asoció con el nivel de estigma (p=0.008). Conclusiones: Se requiere fomentar capacitaciones en las que se aborde la complejidad del fenómeno y se identifiquen aspectos como los estigmas sociales, incorporando el paradigma biopsicosocial y con perspectiva de género en pro de la prestación integral de los cuidados.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Social Behavior , Communicable Diseases , Coronavirus , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , HIV , Vaccination , Environment , Social Stigma , SARS-CoV-2 , PersonsABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19-related stigma towards healthcare professionals negatively influences their job performance and well-being, however, this issue has not been sufficiently investigated. Objective: To determine the frequency and variables associated with COVID-19-related stigma toward health care workers in a university population in Mexico. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study. An online questionnaire was sent to 1,054 students between 18 and 29 years of age. Demographic variables, religiosity, fear of COVID-19 and its association with COVID-19-related stigma-discrimination towards health workers (dependent variable) were analyzed. Bivariate analysis and a generalized linear model were performed to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios. Results: The proportion of high stigma-discrimination was 12.4% and was associated with high fear of COVID-19 RPa= 1.51 (95% CI 1.06 - 2.23). Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of establishing programs to reduce COVID-19-related stigmatization towards healthcare professionals.
Introducción: El estigma relacionado con la COVID-19 hacia los profesionales de la salud influye negativamente en su desempeño laboral y bienestar, sin embargo, este tema no ha sido suficientemente investigado. Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia y las variables asociadas al estigma relacionado con el COVID-19 hacia los trabajadores de la salud en una población universitaria de México. Materiales y métodos: Estudio transversal. Se envió un cuestionario en línea a 1.054 estudiantes de entre 18 y 29 años. Se analizaron variables demográficas, religión, miedo al COVID-19 y su asociación con el estigma-discriminación hacia el personal de salud relacionado con la COVID-19 (variable dependiente). Se realizó un análisis bivariado y un modelo lineal generalizado para calcular las razones de prevalencia ajustadas. Resultados: La proporción de estigma-discriminación alto fue de 12,4% y se asoció con miedo alto a la COVID-19 RPa=1,51 (IC=95% 1,06-2,23). Conclusión: Los hallazgos destacan la importancia de establecer programas para reducir la estigmatización relacionada con COVID-19 hacia los profesionales de la salud.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Social Behavior , Health , Coronavirus , Students , Health Personnel , Social Stigma , Social Discrimination , Work Performance , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: La hospitalización de pacientes durante la pandemia de COVID-19 se incrementó de manera importante, y evidenció las carencias de los sistemas de salud, que no respondieron de forma adecuada y eficiente. Objetivo: Determinar la evolución de pacientes hospitalizados durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en Perú. Métodos: Investigación descriptiva, transversal, retrospectiva. Efectuada con una data de 115 306 pacientes, a quienes se valoró su última evolución, el ingreso a Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, si recibieron oxígeno o ventilación, fallecidos por COVID-19 y vacunación contra esta enfermedad, según los datos de la plataforma nacional de datos abiertos del Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Para analizar los datos se usaron frecuencias absolutas y relativas y para la asociación comparativa de variables, el chi cuadrado de homogeneidad con una significancia estadística de p < 0,01. Resultados: De los pacientes que ingresaron a Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, que recibieron oxígeno y ventilación, el 51,1 %, 59,1 % y 44,9 %, respectivamente, fueron dados de alta. Del 28,3 % de pacientes que fallecieron, el 90,2 % fue por COVID-19. La mayor proporción fueron adultos (51,1 %) y adultos mayores (31,2 %), de los cuales el 36,3 % y 62,4 % fallecieron por COVID-19. De los fallecidos por COVID-19, el 96,9 % no tenía ninguna dosis de vacuna contra la enfermedad. Conclusión: Más de la mitad de los pacientes que ingresaron a Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y recibieron oxígeno fueron dados de alta, la mayoría de los fallecidos por COVID-19 fueron adultos, adultos mayores y no vacunados. Las diferencias entre todos los pares de variables comparadas fueron altamente significativas (p < 0,001).
Abstract Introduction: The hospitalization of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic increased significantly, and evidenced the shortcomings of the health systems, which did not respond adequately and efficiently. Objective: To determine the evolution of hospitalized patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru. Methods: Descriptive, cross sectional, retrospective research. Done with a data of 115,306 patients, who were assessed their latest evolution, admission to the Intensive Care Unit, if they received oxygen or ventilation, died from COVID-19 and vaccination against this disease, according to data from the national data platform open from the Ministry of Health of Peru. To analyze the data, absolute and relative frequencies were used and for the comparative association of variables, the chi-square of homogeneity with a statistical significance of p <0.01. Results: Of the patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, who received oxygen and ventilation, 51.1%, 59.1% and 44.9%, respectively, were discharged. Of the 28.3% of patients who died, 90.2% were from COVID-19. The largest proportion were adults (51.1%) and older adults (31.2%), of which 36.3% and 62.4% died from COVID-19. Of those who died from COVID-19, 96.9% did not have any dose of vaccine against the disease. Conclusion: More than half of the patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and received oxygen were discharged, the majority of deaths from COVID-19 were adults, older adults and not vaccinated. The differences between all pairs of compared variables were highly significant (p <0.001).
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Peru , Vaccination , Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus , Mortality, PrematureABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: A más de un año del inicio de la pandemia COVID-19, el número de contagiados y muertes aún presenta frecuencias que escapan al control de manejo hospitalario. Aunado al temor, se acrecentó la aparición de mitos, creencias, automedicación e inadecuada percepción de riesgo en la población. Objetivo: Identificar la percepción de riesgo, automedicación, mitos y creencias de prevención respecto al COVID-19 en adultos jefes de hogar del distrito Gregorio Albarracín de Tacna en el 2020. Material y métodos: Se aplicó una encuesta a una muestra representativa de 250 jefes de hogar, residentes en el distrito Gregorio Albarracín. Resultados: El promedio total del grupo en percepción del riesgo expresado en porcentaje fue de 60,96 % (59,81-62,11) de un total de probable esperado ideal de 100 %. La percepción de "estar en riesgo en la pandemia" es baja. Solo el 15,20 % acató el aislamiento domiciliario estricto cuando fue indicado. El 14,8 % se automedicaba y en este grupo, los productos usados fueron Ivermectina (48,6 %) y dióxido de cloro (45,9 %). Los mitos y creencias más frecuentes fueron "rociarse con alcohol o cloro mata el virus" y "los remedios caseros pueden curar o prevenir el coronavirus". Hubo diferencia según edad (p<0,05), nivel de instrucción (p<0,001). Conclusiones: La automedicación estuvo fuertemente asociada con elevada percepción de riesgo (p<0,001) y presencia de mitos y creencias (p<0,001). El nivel de instrucción estuvo altamente asociado con la presencia de mitos y creencias (p<0,001)
Abstract Introduction: More than a year after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of infections and deaths is still beyond the control of hospital management. In addition to fear, myths, beliefs, self-medication and inadequate risk perception in the population have increased. Objective: To identify the perception of risk, self-medication, myths and prevention beliefs regarding COVID-19 in adult heads of household in the Gregorio Albarracin district of Tacna in 2020. Method: A survey was administered to a representative sample of 250 heads of household residing in the Gregorio Albarracin district. Results: The total average of the group in risk perception expressed as a percentage was 60.96% (59.81-62.11) out of a total expected ideal of 100%. The perception of "being at risk in the pandemic" is low. Only 15.20% adhered to strict home isolation when instructed to do so. The 14.8% self-medicated and in this group, the products used were ivermectin (48.6%) and chlorine dioxide (45.9%). The most frequent myths and beliefs were "spraying with alcohol or chlorine kills the virus" "home remedies can cure or prevent coronavirus"; there were differences according to age (p<0.05) and educational level (p<0.001). Conclusions: self-medication was strongly associated with high-risk perception (p<0.001) and presence of myths and beliefs (p<0.001). Educational level was highly associated with the presence of myths and beliefs (p<0.001).
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Perception , Coronavirus , Culture , COVID-19 , Peru , Self MedicationABSTRACT
La neuroinmunología es una disciplina que cada vez amplía más sus horizontes en la comprensión de las enfermedades neurológicas. Contemporáneamente, y a la luz de los nexos fisiopatológicos de las enfermedades neurológicas y la inmunología, se han planteado enfoques diagnósticos y terapéuticos específicos. A pesar de los importantes avances de esta disciplina, existen múltiples dilemas que le conciernen y se filtran en la práctica clínica. En esta revisión, se presentan y discuten 15 controversias, las cuales se construyen con la información clínica disponible más actualizada. Los temas incluidos son: disminución de esteroides en recaídas de esclerosis múltiple; recomendaciones terapéuticas en esclerosis múltiple a la luz de la pandemia por el SARS-CoV-2; evidencia de vacunación en esclerosis múltiple y en otras enfermedades desmielinizantes; panorama actual del síndrome clínico y radiológico aislado; y fallas terapéuticas en esclerosis múltiple; además, criterios para suspender las terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad; evidencia del manejo en recaídas leves; recomendaciones para la profilaxis contra Strongyloides stercolaris; utilidad de un segundo ciclo de inmunoglobulina en el síndrome de Guillain-Barré; criterios para diferenciar una polineuropatía crónica desmielinizante inflamatoria de inicio agudo de un síndrome de Guillain-Barré y, utilidad de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina en neurosarcoidosis. En cada una de las controversias, se presenta la problemática general y se ofrecen recomendaciones específicas que pueden adoptarse en la práctica clínica diaria.
Neuroimmunology is a discipline that increasingly broadens its horizons in the understanding of neurological diseases. At the same time, and in front of the pathophysiological links of neurological diseases and immunology, specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been proposed. Despite the important advances in this discipline, there are multiple dilemmas that concern and filter into clinical practice. This article presents 15 controversies and a discussion about them, which are built with the most up-to-date evidence available. The topics included in this review are: steroid decline in relapses of multiple sclerosis; therapeutic recommendations in MS in light of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; evidence of vaccination in multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases; overview current situation of isolated clinical and radiological syndrome; therapeutic failure in multiple sclerosis, as well as criteria for suspension of disease-modifying therapies; evidence of the management of mild relapses in multiple sclerosis; recommendations for prophylaxis against Strongyloides stercolaris; usefulness of a second course of immunoglobulin in the Guillain-Barré syndrome; criteria to differentiate an acute-onset inflammatory demyelinating chronic polyneuropathy versus Guillain-Barré syndrome; and, the utility of angiotensin-converting enzyme in neurosarcoidosis. In each of the controversies, the general problem is presented, and specific recommendations are offered that can be adopted in daily clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Vaccines , Coronavirus , Multiple Sclerosis , Sarcoidosis , Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating , NatalizumabABSTRACT
Rationale: Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-Cov-2, also called COVID-19, has spread rapidly across countries, making it one of the biggest health challenges of this century. In Brazil, it was declared a public health emergency in March 2020. The aim of this study was to describe the profile of patients hospitalized by COVID-19 in an emergency hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, as well as the factors associated with in-hospital death. Methods: Retrospective observational study, which included patients hospitalized between March and December 2020 with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. The epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory aspects were extracted from the epidemiological investigation files and the hospital chart. Results: 582 suspected cases of COVID-19 were hospitalized and 317 were confirmed, of which 182 (57.5%) were male, and most were residents in the north of Rio de Janeiro (42.5%). Main tomographic or radiological findings: ground glass (34.7%) and pulmonary infiltrate (15.4%), and more than half of those hospitalized (64.0%) had at least one comorbidity. Among hospitalized patients, the overall lethality was 53.6%, and among those admitted to the ICU, this percentage was 84.5%. Age and use of ventilatory support and ICU were the variables that showed a statistically significant association with in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: This study reinforces the importance of epidemiological surveillance, in a hospital setting, especially for diseases in which the passive surveillance system may not be able to adequately report, as in the case of COVID-19.(AU)
Justificativa: Desde dezembro de 2019, o novo coronavírus SARS-Cov-2, também chamado COVID-19, tem se espalhado rapidamente pelos países, tornando-se um dos maiores desafios sanitários deste século. No Brasil, ele foi declarado como una emergência de saúde pública em março de 2020. O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever o perfil dos pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 em um hospital de emergência no município de Rio de Janeiro, bem como os fatores associados ao óbito hospitalar. Métodos: Estudo observacional retrospectivo, que incluiu pacientes internados entre março e dezembro de 2020 com um diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19. Os aspectos epidemiológicos, clínicos, e laboratoriais foram extraídos das fichas de investigação epidemiológica e do prontuário hospitalar. Resultados: Foram internados 582 casos suspeitos de COVID-19 e 317 foram confirmados, dos quais 182 (57,5%) eram do sexo masculino, e a maioria era residente na zona norte do Rio de Janeiro (42,5%). Principais achados 'tomográficos ou radiológicos': vidro fosco (34,7%) e infiltrado pulmonar (15,4%), e mais da metade dos hospitalizados (64,0%) apresentava pelo menos uma comorbidade. Entre os pacientes hospitalizados, a letalidade geral foi de 53,6% sendo que entre os internados na UTI esse percentual foi de 84,5%. Idade e uso de suporte ventilatório e UTI foram as variáveis que mostraram associação estatisticamente significante com mortalidade intra-hospitalar. Conclusão: Este estudo reforça a importância da vigilância epidemiológica, em âmbito hospitalar, principalmente para as doenças em que o sistema de vigilância passivo pode não ser capaz de reportar adequadamente, como no caso da COVID-19.(AU)
Justificación: Desde diciembre de 2019, el coronavirus SARS-Cov-2, también llamado COVID-19, se ha extendido rápidamente por los países, convirtiéndose en uno de los mayores retos sanitarios de este siglo. En Brasil, se declaró una emergencia de salud pública en febrero de 2020. El objetivo de este estudio es describir el perfil de los casos hospitalizados por COVID-19 en un hospital de urgencias de la ciudad de Río de Janeiro, así como los factores asociados a la muerte hospitalaria. Métodos: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, que incluyó pacientes hospitalizados entre marzo y diciembre de 2020 con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19. Los aspectos epidemiológicos, clínicos y de laboratorio fueron extraídos del formulario de investigación epidemiológica y de los registros hospitalarios. Resultados: Se hospitalizaron 582 casos sospechosos de COVID-19 y se confirmaron 317, de los cuales 203 (57,5%) eran hombres, la mayoría residentes en el norte de Río de Janeiro (42,5%). Los principales hallazgos tomográficos o radiológicos: vidrio deslustrado (34,7%) e infiltrado pulmonar (15,4%) y más de la mitad de los hospitalizados (64%) tenían al menos 1 comorbilidad. La letalidad global entre los hospitalizados fue del 53,6% y entre los ingresados en la UCI, este porcentaje fue del 84,5%. Las variables que mostraron una asociación estadísticamente significativa con la mortalidad intrahospitalaria fueron la edad, el uso de soporte ventilatorio y el uso de la UCI. Conclusiones: El estudio refuerza la importancia de la vigilancia epidemiológica en el ámbito hospitalario, especialmente para aquellas enfermedades en las que el sistema de vigilancia pasiva puede no informar adecuadamente, como es el caso de la COVID-19.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Coronavirus , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Profile , Public Health , Hospital Mortality , SARS-CoV-2 , Epidemiological InvestigationABSTRACT
Introducción: El constructo Sentido de Coherencia derivado del modelo salutogénico, permite afrontar factores estresantes a través de activos para mantener una buena salud. Objetivo: Describir el Sentido de Coherencia (SOC-29) en estudiantes universitarios de la ciudad de Manizales como recurso de cuidado en tiempos de pandemia. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo con una fase asociativa y comparativa, con 566 estudiantes matriculados en universidades públicas y privadas de la ciudad de Manizales, Caldas (Colombia), durante el primer período académico del 2021. La técnica de recolección fue la encuesta online. Para el análisis univariado se realizó distribución de frecuencias, medidas de tendencia central y dispersión, y para el bivariado U de Mann Whitney, H de Kruskal-Wallis y Chi-cuadrado. Resultados: El valor del Sentido de Coherencia osciló entre 58 y 185 puntos, promedio 133.6 ± 24,4 puntos, un 27% de los participantes informó la pandemia afectó negativamente su vida, se encontró asociación estadísticamente significativa p<0,05 entre el cambio en las condiciones de vida y todos los ítems de la escala. Conclusión: La consolidación del Sentido de Coherencia como parte integral de la salud mental de los universitarios los prepara para afrontar cambios en sus condiciones de vida y hace factible direccionar acciones de cuidado en el contexto social, familiar y académico.
Introduction:The construct of the sense of coherence, derived from the salutogenic model, allows people to cope with stressors through resources to maintain good health. Objective: To describe the sense of coherence (SOC-29) among university students in the city of Manizales as a care resource in times of pandemic. Materials and Methods: A quantitative and descriptive study with an associative-comparative phase was conducted with 566 students enrolled in public and private universities in Manizales, Caldas, (Colombia), during the first semester of 2021. The data collection technique was online surveys. For the univariate analysis, frequency distribution and central tendency and dispersion measures were determined. For bivariate analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Chi-square test were used. Results:The SOC-29 score ranged from 58 to 185 points (mean 133.6 ± 24.4 points), and 27% of the participants reported that the pandemic negatively affected their life, a statistically significant association (p<0.05) was found between the change in living conditions and all the items of the scale. Conclusions: Consolidating the sense of coherence as an integral part of university students' mental health prepares them to cope with changes in their living conditions and makes it feasible to direct care actions in social, family, and academic settings.
Introdução: A construção Sentido de Coerência derivada do modelo salutogênico, permite lidar com os estressores através de ativos para manter a boa saúde. Objetivo: Descrever o Sentido de Coerência (SOC-29) em estudantes universitários da cidade de Manizales, Caldas (Colômbia), como um recurso para o cuidado em tempos de pandemia. Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo quantitativo, descritivo com uma fase associativa e comparativa com 566 estudantes matriculados em universidades públicas e privadas na cidade de Manizales, Caldas (Colômbia), durante o primeiro período acadêmico de 2021. A técnica de coleta foi a pesquisa on-line. Para a análise univariada, foram utilizadas a distribuição de frequência, medidas de tendência central e dispersão, e para a análise bivariada foram utilizadas Mann Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H e Chi-quadrado. Resultados: O valor de senso de coerência variou de 58 a 185 pontos, média 133,6 ± 24,4 pontos, 27% dos participantes relataram que a pandemia afetou negativamente suas vidas, associação estatisticamente significativa p<0,05 foi encontrada entre mudança nas condições de vida e todos os itens da escala. Conclusões: A consolidação do Senso de Coerência como parte integrante da saúde mental dos estudantes universitários os prepara para enfrentar mudanças em suas condições de vida e torna viável a abordagem de ações de cuidado no contexto social, familiar e acadêmico.
Subject(s)
Students , Coronavirus , Psychosocial Impact , Empathy , EpidemicsABSTRACT
Este artigo analisa a percepção dos gestores e dos profissionais envolvidos no Projeto Mais Médicos sobre os desafios do provimento e da reorganização do processo de trabalho médico frente ao cenário de pandemia do coronavírus no município de Ilhéus (BA), em 2020. A produção de dados foi feita por meio de revisão documental e entrevistas aos gestores de saúde do município e a quatro profissionais médicos contratados pelo programa. A análise dos resultados contemplou a percepção dos gestores acerca do provimento médico no município bem como as ações de monitoramento, supervisão e avaliação do desempenho dos profissionais realizadas pela coordenação da Atenção Básica. A análise do processo de trabalho médico, por sua vez, tratou de identificar se houve mudanças nos objetos, meios de trabalho utilizados pelos profissionais e formas de organização do trabalho, antes e durante a eclosão da pandemia da covid-19. As conclusões apontam que, apesar de o número de vagas ser insuficiente para atender as necessidades do município em relação à cobertura da Atenção Básica, o provimento e fixação de médicos por meio do Projeto Mais Médicos para o Brasil ampliou o acesso da população aos serviços e, consequentemente, ao atendimento de necessidades decorrentes da alta prevalência de doenças crônicas, desnutrição, violência doméstica e, mais recentemente, da pandemia da covid-19.
This paper analyzes the challenges perceived by managers and professionals involved in the Mais Médicos Project regarding the provision and reorganization of the medical work process during the coronavirus pandemic in the municipality of Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil, in 2020. Data was collected by means of a document review and interviews with the municipality's health managers and four medical professionals hired by the project. Result analysis included the managers' perception regarding medical supply in the municipality, as well as the monitoring, supervision, and evaluation of professional performance carried out by the Primary Care coordination. Analysis of the medical work process, in turn, tried to identify whether the objects, means of work used by professionals, and ways of work organization changed before and during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings indicate that, despite the insufficient number of vacancies to meet the needs of the municipality in terms of Primary Care coverage, the provision and retention of physicians by the More Doctors for Brazil project expanded the population's access to services and, consequently, to meeting needs arising from the high prevalence of chronic diseases, malnutrition, domestic violence, and, more recently, the COVID-19 pandemic.
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la percepción de los gestores y profesionales involucrados en el Proyecto Más Médicos sobre los desafíos de la prestación y reorganización del proceso de trabajo médico frente al escenario de la pandemia del coronavirus en el municipio de Ilhéus, en Bahía (Brasil), en 2020. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante la revisión documental y entrevistas con los gestores de salud del municipio y cuatro profesionales médicos contratados por el programa. El análisis de los resultados incluyó la percepción de los gestores sobre la prestación médica en el municipio, así como las acciones de seguimiento, supervisión y evaluación del desempeño de los profesionales realizadas por la coordinación de atención primaria. El análisis del proceso de trabajo médico, a su vez, trató de identificar si hubo cambios en los objetos, medios de trabajo utilizados por los profesionales y formas de organización del trabajo antes y durante el estallido de la pandemia del Covid-19. Las conclusiones indican que, a pesar de que el número de plazas es insuficiente para satisfacer las necesidades del municipio en cuanto a la cobertura de la Atención Primaria, la provisión y fijación de médicos a través del Proyecto Más Médicos para Brasil amplió el acceso de la población a los servicios y, en consecuencia, la satisfacción de las necesidades derivadas de la alta prevalencia de enfermedades crónicas, la desnutrición, la violencia doméstica y, más recientemente, la pandemia del Covid-19.
Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Coronavirus , Health Consortia , Health Manager , Pandemics , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Este artigo analisa os saberes e práticas do cuidado em saúde relacionados à covid-19, a partir da observação participante de pessoas que trocam experiências e interagem sobre o tema no grupo da rede social Facebook, no Brasil, 'Eu já tive Covid-19'. A comunidade virtual, com 16,5 mil membros, gerou 397 postagens no período de 8 de março a 18 de abril de 2021. As postagens foram categorizadas e tiveram seus níveis de engajamento calculados com base no número de interações. Experiências em casos de covid-19, dúvidas e questionamentos dos usuários participantes representaram 74% das postagens. Os comentários com mensagens de acolhimento aproximaram as pessoas, fortalecendo seus laços sociais. Foram identificados discursos que contrariavam o saber científico, sendo uma a cada 25 postagens definida como fake news. Temas como automedicação, xarope caseiro, 'kit covid' e tratamento precoce foram destaque dentre os conteúdos e evidenciam o grau de desinformação dos participantes a respeito da covid-19.
This article analyzes the knowledge and practices of health care related to covid-19, based on the participant observation of people who exchange experiences and interact on the topic in the social network Facebook group, in Brazil, 'I already had Covid-19'. The virtual community, with 16,500 members, generated 397 posts, in the period from March 8 to April 18, 2021. They were categorized and had their engagement levels calculated based on the number of interactions. Experiences in cases of covid-19, doubts and questions from participating users represented 74% of posts. The comments with welcoming messages brought these people closer, strengthening their social ties. Speeches that contradicted scientific knowledge were identified, with one in 25 posts classified as fake news. Topics such as self-medication, homemade syrup, 'covid kit' and early treatment were highlighted among these contents and show the degree of disinformation of the participants about covid-19.
Este artículo analiza los conocimientos y prácticas de atención a la salud relacionados con el covid-19, a partir de la observación participante de personas que intercambian experiencias e interactúan sobre el tema en el grupo de la red social Facebook, en Brasil, 'Eu ya tuvo Covid-19'. La comunidad virtual, con 16.500 miembros, generó 397 publicaciones, en el período del 8 de marzo al 18 de abril de 2021. Se categorizaron y se calcularon los niveles de participación en función del número de interacciones. Experiencias en casos de covid-19, dudas y preguntas de los usuarios participantes representaron el 74% de las publicaciones. Los comentarios con mensajes de bienvenida acercaron a estas personas, fortaleciendo sus lazos sociales. Se identificaron discursos que contradecían el conocimiento científico, con una fake news cada 25 publicaciones. En estos contenidos se destacaron temas como la automedicación, el jarabe casero, el 'kit covid' y el tratamiento temprano, evidenciando el grado de desinformación de los participantes sobre el covid-19.