RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the biomechanical properties and clinical effects of the unilateral/bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly patients. Methods The finite element models of the unilateral/bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were established to evaluate changes in strain and stress of the fractured vertebra after surgery. Eighty patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures underwent unilateral or bilateral PVP were collected for retrospective analysis. The operation time,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,injected bone cement volume, bone cement leakage rate and visual analogue scales (VAS) score between the two groups were analyzed. Results The maximum strain and stress in unilateral PVP group were 1.18 times and 1.15 times of those in bilateral PVP group,respectively.The operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times in unilateral PVP group were obviously smaller than those in bilateral PVP group (P0.05).Conclusions The biomechanical effect of unilateral PVP was similar to that of bilateral PVP. The puncture needle localization of unilateral PVP for treating elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures had the advantage of less operation time and limited X-ray exposure.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND:Mason II type and III type radial head fractures with massive bone are mainly treated by open reduction and metal fixation, but metal implants have to be removed in the second operation, which increased patients’ travail and financial burden. Absorbable screw/rod also can be used to treat radial head fractures, and has its special advantages due to the low price and no second operation. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical therapeutic effects of absorbable rod and Herbert screw for the treatment of Mason II or III type radial head fractures. METHODS:A total of 80 patients with Mason II and III type radial head fractures were equal y assigned to experimental and control groups. They received open reduction and internal fixation. The experimental group was treated with absorbable rod and the control group received Herbert screw. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 79 patients were fol owed up for averagely 34 months. No significant difference in average operative time, fracture healing time, Broberg and Morrey elbow scores and incidence of complications was detected between the experimental and control groups (P>0.05). However, treatment costs were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). Results indicated that the therapeutic effects between absorbable rod and Herbert screw for Mason II or III type radial head fractures were similar. However, absorbable rod for radial head fractures can avoid the second operation for removal of the implant. Therefore, we recommend absorbable rod in the choice of internal fixation materials.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND:At present, the methods of treating unstable comminuted radial head fractures contain open reduction and internal fixation and metal prosthesis replacement. There were success cases treated by the two methods, but some shortcomings simultaneously existed. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical therapeutic effects of replacement of the radial head with metal prosthesis with open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of unstable comminuted radial head fractures. METHODS:A prospective randomized control ed analysis was performed in 45 cases of unstable comminuted radial head fractures. These cases received open reduction and internal fixation and metal prosthesis replacement. This study compared the Broberg and Morrey elbow joint function score and the incidence of complications after fixation, and performed statistical analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The subjects were fol owed up for 1-5 years, averagely 2.8 years. According to Broberg and Morrey scores, the average score was 90.1 and the incidence of complications was 13.6%in the prosthesis replacement group. The average score was 76.8 and the incidence of complications was 47.9%in the open reduction. Significant differences were visible between the two groups (P<0.01). Compared with the open reduction group, prosthesis replacement for unstable comminuted radial head fractures obtained better joint function and lower incidence of complications.