Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 3518-3523, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-663738

RESUMEN

Objective To detect the association between rs4646999 polymorphisms in the promoter region of the c-Jun and the prognosis of sporadic colorectal cancer. Methods rs4646999-673C>T genetypes were deter-mined by Taqman-MGB probes in 436 colorectal cancer cases. The survival curve was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.Western blot was used to analyze the expression levels of c-Jun protein in different gen-otypes. Results Univariate analysis showed that the cumulative survival rate of patients with rs4646999TT geno-type was significantly higher than that of patients with CT and CC genotype. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the differentiation,lymph node metastasis,distant metastasis,TNM stage and rs4646999 genetypes were prognostic factors.Compared with the carriers of TT genotype,CT/CC complex genotypes were associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer(P<0.05).Protein expression analysis showed that the expression of c-Jun pro-tein in CC genotype was increased.In contrast,the TT genotype was decreased.Conclusions This study provided the evidence that rs4646999-673C>T genetic variant in c-Jun promoter regions is associated with the poor survival prognosis of colorectal cancer,possibly by elevating the protein expression levels that appeared to up-regulate activ-ity of c-Jun thus tumorigenesis.

2.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 507-514, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-808980

RESUMEN

Objective@#To investigate the effect of irradiation to anastomosis from preoperative radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer by studying the pathological changes.@*Methods@#In this retrospective study, patients enrolled in the FOWARC study from January 2011 to July 2014 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University were included. In the FOWARC study, enrolled patients with local advanced rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Among these patients, 23 patients were selected as radiation proctitis (RP)group, who fulfilled these conditions: (1) received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving surgery; (2) developed radiation proctitis as confirmed by preoperative imaging diagnosis; (3) had intact clinical samples of surgical margins. Twenty-three patients who had received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy but without development of radiation proctitis were selected as non-radiation proctitis (nRP) group. Meanwhile, 23 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only were selected as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) group. Both nRP and CT cases were selected by ensuring the basic characteristics such as sex, age, tumor site, lengths of proximal margin and distal margin all maximally matched to the RP group. Both proximal and distal margins were collected for further analysis for all selected cases. Microscopy slices were prepared for hematoxylin & eosin staining and Masson staining to show general pathological changes, and also for immunohistochemistry with anti-CD-34 as primary antibody to reveal the microvessel. Microvessel counting in submucosal layer and proportion of macrovessel with stenosis were used to evaluate the blood supply of the proximal and distal end of anastomosis. A modified semi-quantitative grading approach was used to evaluate the severity of radiation-induced injury. Either ANOVA analysis, Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test or χ2 test was used for comparison among three groups, and Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between two groups.@*Results@#Compared to group of neoadjuvant chemotherapy only, patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy had lower microvessel count in both proximal and distal margins (M(QR): proximal, 25.5 (19.6) vs. 50.0 (25.0), Z=3.915, P=0.000; distal, 20.5 (17.5) vs. 49.0 (28.0), Z=3.558, P=0.000), higher proportions of macrovessel with stenosis (proximal, 9.5% (23.8%) vs. 0, Z=3.993, P=0.000; distal, 11.5%(37.3%) vs. 0 (2.0%), Z=2.893, P=0.004), higher histopathologic score (proximal, 4.0 (2.0) vs. 1.0 (2.0), Z=6.123, P=0.000; distal, 5.0 (3.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0), Z=4.849, P=0.000). In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, compared to nRP group, RP group had lower microvessel count in both proximal and distal margins (proximal, 19.0 (23.0) vs. 30.4 (38.0), Z=2.845, P=0.004; distal, 19.0 (13.0) vs. 30.0(29.1), Z=2.022, P=0.043), higher proportions of macrovessel with stenosis (proximal, 23.0% (40.0%) vs. 0(11.0%), Z=3.248, P=0.001; distal, 27.0% (45.0%) vs. 3.0% (19.0%), Z=2.164, P=0.030). Rate of anastomotic leakage for CT, nRP and RP group were 8.7% (2/23), 30.4% (7/23), and 52.2% (12/23), and the differences among three groups were statistically significant (χ2=10.268, P=0.007).@*Conclusion@#Radiation-induced injury existed on both margins of the resected rectal site after preoperative radiotherapy, and those diagnosed as radiation proctitis had more severe microvascular injury.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA