RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION@#Nail psoriasis treatment is challenging due to difficult drug delivery and systemic therapy toxicities. Self-dissolvable microneedle patches embedded with corticosteroids offers a potentially rapid, minimally invasive drug delivery platform with good efficacy and minimal adverse side effects.@*METHODS@#We conducted a 4-month prospective randomised controlled trial. Subjects with psoriatic nails were randomised to receive microneedle device delivered topical steroids on one hand and control treatment (topical Daivobet gel) on the other. Two independent dermatologists blinded to the treatment assignment scored their Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) during visits at baseline, 2 and 4 months. All treatment was discontinued after 2 months. Average NAPSI score on each hand was analysed.@*RESULTS@#A total of 25 participants were recruited, aged 22 to 73 years. Majority were Chinese (72%), followed by Indian and Malay. There was equal randomisation of treatment to the left and right nail. While there was a rapid significant improvement in average NAPSI score for the control arm at 2 months, the treatment arm had a greater, more sustained improvement of the NAPSI score at 4 months. The average NAPSI score improved for both treatment and control group at 4 months compared to baseline. However, only the NAPSI value improvement in the controls at 2 months compared to baseline was statistically significant (P=0.0039). No severe adverse effects were reported.@*CONCLUSION@#To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomised control trial comparing microneedle technology against conventional topical steroids in nail psoriasis treatment. Our findings demonstrate microneedle technology is as efficacious as topical therapy.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades de la Uña/tratamiento farmacológico , Uñas , Estudios Prospectivos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , TriamcinolonaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION@#Melanomas in Asians have different clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis from melanomas in Caucasians. This study reviewed the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of cutaneous melanoma diagnosed at a tertiary referral dermatology centre in Singapore, which has a multiracial population. The study also determined whether Asians had comparable relapse-free and overall survival periods to Caucasians in Singapore.@*METHOD@#This is a retrospective review of cutaneous melanoma cases in our centre between 1996 and 2015.@*RESULTS@#Sixty-two cases of melanoma were diagnosed in 61 patients: 72.6% occurred in Chinese, 19.4% in Caucasians and 3.2% in Indians, with an over-representation of Caucasians. Superficial spreading melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma and nodular melanoma comprised 37.1%, 35.5% and 22.6% of the cases, respectively. The median time interval to diagnosis was longer in Asians than Caucasians; median Breslow's thickness in Asians were significantly thicker than in Caucasians (2.6mm versus 0.9mm, @*CONCLUSION@#More physician and patient education on skin cancer awareness is needed in our Asian-predominant population for better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Melanoma/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Singapur/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION@#Pemphigus is a chronic, relapsing immunobullous disease. There is limited data on the clinical course and prognostic factors of pemphigus in Asian patients.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all newly diagnosed pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) patients seen at the National Skin Centre from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2009. Demographic and clinical data on comorbidities, treatment and remission were recorded. Mortality information was obtained from the National Registry of Diseases. Prognostic endpoint was overall remission at last visit.@*RESULTS@#Sixty- one patients (36 PV and 25 PF) were recruited. Among PV patients, higher initial prednisolone dose ( = 0.017) and the use of azathioprine ( = 0.028) were significantly associated with overall remission at last visit. However, higher desmoglein 1 antibody titres at diagnosis ( = 0.024) and the use of dapsone ( = 0.008) were negatively associated with overall remission at last visit. Among PF patients, only higher desmoglein 1 antibody titre at diagnosis ( = 0.041) was found to be associated with lower overall remission at last visit. There was no mortality during the 3-year follow-up period in both PV and PF.@*CONCLUSION@#Higher initial prednisolone dose and the use of azathioprine in PV desmoglein 1 antibody titre at diagnosis in PV and PF might be prognostic markers for achieving remission. Use of dapsone was associated with lower overall remission in PV, but this might be confounded because dapsone was used as an adjuvant therapy in recalcitrant cases. Owing to study methodology and limitations, further evaluation is needed for better prognostication of pemphigus.
RESUMEN
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>This study aimed to determine if disposable filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) that come with an exhalation valve (EV) and a novel active venting system (AVS) provided greater perceived comfort and exertion when compared to standard N95 FFRs without these features among male military personnel performing prolonged essential outdoor duties.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We used a randomised open-label controlled crossover study design to compare three FFR options: (a) standard FFR; (b) FFR with EV; and (c) FFR with EV+AVS. Male military personnel aged between 18 and 20 years completed a questionnaire at the start of outdoor duty (baseline), after two hours of standardised non-strenuous outdoor duty and after 12 hours of duty divided into two-hour work-rest cycles. Participants rated the degree of discomfort, exertion and symptoms using a five-point Likert scale. The association between outcomes and types of FFR was assessed using a multivariate ordered probit mixed-effects model.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>For a majority of the symptoms, study participants gave FFR with EV and FFR EV+AVS significantly better scores than standard FFR. Both FFR with EV and FFR with EV+AVS had significantly less discomfort (FFR with EV+AVS: 91.1%; FFR with EV: 57.6%) and exertion (FFR with EV+AVS: 83.5%; FFR with EV: 34.4%) than standard FFR. FFR with EV+AVS also had significantly better scores for exertion (53.4%) and comfort (39.4%) when compared to FFR with EV.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Usage of FFR with EV+AVS resulted in significantly reduced symptoms, discomfort and exertion when compared to FFR with EV and standard FFR.</p>