RÉSUMÉ
Background@#Although programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is effective for labor analgesia, an appropriate flow rate has not been established. Therefore, we investigated the analgesic effect based on different epidural injection flow rates. @*Methods@#Nulliparous women scheduled for spontaneous labor were enrolled in this randomized trial. After injection of intrathecal 0.2% ropivacaine 3 mg with fentanyl 20 μg, participants were randomized to three study groups. Epidural analgesics, 10 ml during one hour, were administered with patient controlled epidural analgesia as follows (0.2% ropivacaine 60 ml, fentanyl 180 μg, and 0.9% saline 40 ml): continuous (n = 28, 10 ml/h for continuous infusion), PIEB (n = 29, 240 ml/h for bolus infusion of 10 ml), or manual (n = 28, 1200 ml/h for bolus injection of 10 ml). The primary outcome was hourly consumption of the epidural solution. The time interval between labor analgesia and the first breakthrough pain was investigated. @*Results@#The median (Q1, Q3) hourly consumption of epidural anesthetics was significantly different among the groups (continuous: 14.3 [8.7, 16.9] ml, PIEB: 9.4 [6.2, 9.8] ml, manual: 8.6 [7.6, 9.9] ml; P < 0.001). The time to breakthrough pain for the PIEB group was longer than that for the other groups (continuous: 78.5 [35.8, 185.0] min, PIEB: 200.0 [88.5, 441.5] min, manual: 60.5 [37.3, 162.0] min, P = 0.027). @*Conclusions@#PIEB, with a low-flow rate, provided more adequate labor analgesia than a continuous epidural infusion or manual injection with a high-flow rate.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION@#Laryngeal mask airway (LMA), which is used in difficult airway maintenance conditions during emergencies, is rarely used in prolonged surgery despite its advantages over endotracheal tube (ETT). In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of intraoperative gas exchanges between second-generation LMA and ETT during prolonged laparoscopic abdominal surgery.@*METHODS@#Prolonged surgery was defined as a surgery lasting more than 2 h. In total, 394 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection via either second-generation LMA or ETT were retrospectively analysed. The following parameters were compared between the two groups of patients: end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide (ETCO2), tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), pH and ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen (PFR) during surgery. In addition, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including pulmonary aspiration, was compared.@*RESULTS@#The values of ETCO2, TV, RR and PIP during pneumoperitoneum were comparable between the two groups. Although PaCO2 at 2 h after induction was higher in patients in the LMA group (40.5 vs. 38.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), the pH and PFR values of the two groups were comparable. The incidence of PPC was similar.@*CONCLUSION@#During prolonged laparoscopic abdominal surgery, second-generation LMA facilitates adequate intraoperative gas exchange and may serve as an alternative to ETT.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Masques laryngés , Dioxyde de carbone , Études rétrospectives , Intubation trachéale , Laparoscopie/effets indésirables , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , OxygèneRÉSUMÉ
Only a few reports have been published on women with an infectious respiratory viral pathogen, such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) Coronavirus delivering a baby. A laboratory confirmed case of MERS was reported during a MERS outbreak in the Republic of Korea in a woman at gestational week 35 + 4. She recovered, and delivered a healthy baby by emergency cesarean section (C-sec). We present the clinical course and the emergency C-sec in a pregnant woman with MERS.
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Grossesse , Césarienne , Coronavirus , Infections à coronavirus , Urgences , Coronavirus du syndrome respiratoire du Moyen-Orient , Moyen Orient , Femmes enceintes , République de CoréeRÉSUMÉ
No abstract available.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Anesthésie , Syndrome des anticorps antiphospholipidesRÉSUMÉ
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a multifactorial disease with enlargement and systolic dysfunction of one or both ventricles. Most of parturients having DCM would be advised to avoid or terminate her pregnancy owing to the high risk of cardiac overload that is likely associated with pregnancy. When maternal cardiac disease is observed, effective neuraxial analgesia may play an important role because a pain induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system during labor is associated with cardiovascular adverse effects, which may endanger the maternal and/or fetal well-being. Herein we report a case of a parturient with known DCM who received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor and vaginal delivery. The maternal cardiac function and the effect of analgesia were evaluated by echocardiography during labor.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Grossesse , Analgésie , Anesthésie , Cardiomyopathie dilatée , Échocardiographie , Cardiopathies , Système nerveux sympathiqueRÉSUMÉ
Common peroneal neuropathy during normal delivery is associated with instrumentation and prolonged time spent in a certain position. We report a case of unilateral common peroneal neuropathy in a vaginal delivery patient under labor analgesia with the combined spinal-epidural technique. A 29-year-old woman complained of weakness and numbness of the left foot two days after vaginal delivery. Neurologic examination and electrodiagnostic testing confirmed left common peroneal neuropathy. The patient was referred for rehabilitation, which substantially improved her mobility and function, and prevented secondary damage. The patient had not fully recovered at three months after the delivery. The possible etiology of the postpartum common peroneal neuropathy was most likely prolonged and excessive pressure around the knee by assistants. Excessive compression during delivery should be minimized or avoided. Patient education and awareness among the labor and delivery team will prevent this complication. Neurologic complications related to epidural analgesia should also be ruled out in these patients.
Sujet(s)
Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Grossesse , Analgésie , Analgésie péridurale , Pied , Hypoesthésie , Genou , Travail obstétrical , Examen neurologique , Éducation du patient comme sujet , Neuropathies des nerfs péroniers , Période du postpartum , RéadaptationRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Intrathecal labor analgesia using new local anesthetics such as ropivacaine or levobupivacaine becomes more popular by virtues of their safety and decreased motor weakness. However, the analgesic efficacy of the clinically effective intrathecal doses of these new local anesthetics combined with fentanyl has yet to be determined. METHODS: Sixty parturients who requested neuraxial analgesia in early active labor were randomly assigned to either ropivacaine (group R, n = 30) or levobupivacaine (group L, n = 30) group. Group R received 3 mg of intrathecal ropivacaine and the group L received 3 mg of intrathecal levobupivacaine mixed with 20 microg of fentanyl as part of a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique. The associated block parameters, such as pain scores, duration of analgesia, the highest levels of the sensory block and motor block scores 30 mins after the injection were compared between two groups. RESULTS: Intrathecal ropivacaine offered shorter analgesia (87 +/- 41 min vs. 122 +/- 56 min, P < 0.05) with lower sensory height (T8.5 vs. T6, P < 0.05) and led to lower incidence of complete analgesia (73 vs. 97%, P < 0.05) compared with intrathecal levobupivacaine. Although motor weakness was comparable in both groups, significantly weak perineal squeezing was noticed in Group L (7 of 30 parturients vs. 16 of 30, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine in combination with fentanyl as part of a CSE technique provides more effective analgesia than equivalent doses of intrathecal ropivacaine in early labor, but is accompanied by slight motor weakness.
Sujet(s)
Analgésie , Anesthésiques locaux , Fentanyl , Incidence , Injections rachidiennes , VertusRÉSUMÉ
Pregnancy is considered a period of high risk for cardiovascular complications in patients with Marfan syndrome. Therefore the choice of anesthetic technique for delivery should be focused on minimizing hemodynamic fluctuations, and preferably provide adequate post-operative pain control. For this purpose, neuraxial blocks, such as spinal or epidural anesthesia, may be deemed a safe option. However, dural ectasia is present in 63-92% of patients with Marfan syndrome, and the increased amount of cerebrospinal fluid volume is thought to be one of main reasons for spinal anesthesia failure. We report herein the peri-operative management of a patient with Marfan syndrome and dural ectasia for cesarean section using epidural anesthesia.
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Grossesse , Anesthésie péridurale , Rachianesthésie , Césarienne , Dilatation pathologique , Hémodynamique , Syndrome de MarfanRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Total knee replacement is one of the most painful orthopedic procedures, and effective pain relief is essential for early mobility and discharge from hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether addition of single-injection femoral nerve block to epidural analgesia would provide better postoperative pain control, compared to epidural analgesia alone, after total knee replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients received a single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.25% levobupivacaine (30 mL) combined with epidural analgesia (femoral nerve block group) and 40 patients received epidural analgesia alone (control group). Pain intensity and volume of patient-controlled epidural analgesia medication and rescue analgesic requirements were measured in the first 48 hours after surgery at three time periods; 0-6 hours, 6-24 hours, and 24-48 hours. Also, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were evaluated. RESULTS: Median visual analog scale at rest and movement was significantly lower until 48 hours in the femoral nerve block group. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia volume was significantly lower throughout the study period, however, rescue analgesia requirements were significantly lower only up to 6 hours in the femoral nerve block group. The incidences of nausea and vomiting and rescue antiemetic requirement were significantly lower in the femoral nerve block group up to 6 hours. CONCLUSION: The combination of femoral nerve block with epidural analgesia is an effective pain management regimen in patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.
Sujet(s)
Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analgésie péridurale/méthodes , Analgésie autocontrôlée/méthodes , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Arthroplastie prothétique de genou/méthodes , Bupivacaïne/administration et posologie , Nerf fémoral/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Injections , Bloc nerveux/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
The use of neuroaxial blocks in patients with multiple sclerosis has been controversial, because the effect of local anesthetic drugs on the course of the disease is unclear. We report an obstetric patient with multiple sclerosis whose caesarian section was performed successfully under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and postoperative pain control was managed using patient-controlled epidural analgesia. There were no exacerbation of neurologic symptoms and no relapse of disease at two month follow-up. We suggest that the choice of anesthetic technique for patients with multiple sclerosis should be determined after evaluation of the course of the disease and informed consent. The obstetric patients with multiple sclerosis should not be denied the neuroaxial block for labor and caesarian section.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Analgésie péridurale , Anesthésie , Anesthésiques , Études de suivi , Consentement libre et éclairé , Sclérose en plaques , Manifestations neurologiques , Douleur postopératoire , RécidiveRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Ephedrine has been recommended as the best vasopressor in obstetrics. But, recent clinical evidences show the possibility that phenylephrine has become more pertinent as a primary vasopressor. We think a phenylephrine infusion with colloid co-hydration will be more useful in maintaining baseline blood pressure in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for cesarean section. METHODS: CSEA was performed using 6 mg bupivacaine and 20microgram fentanyl as a spinal and 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine as an epidural in randomized, colloid co-hydration (hydroxyethl starch, HES 500 ml) (group C, n = 34) or no colloid co-hydration (group N, n=34) parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery. After an infusion of 100microgram phenylephrine following the spinal injection, phenylephrine was intermittently infused using a PCA-pump to maintain the baseline blood pressure (BP). Systolic BP and heart rate (HR) were checked and total phenylephrine amount was measured. Nausea and vomiting and fetal umbilical pH/base excess (BE) were also investigated. RESULTS: There was a lower incidence of bradycardia in the C group compared with the N group (5.9% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.014), and total phenylephrine consumption was less in the C group (400microgram vs. 500microgram, p = 0.019). The incidence of reactive hypertension (11.8% vs. 55.9%, p < 0.001), and the hypotension (0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.114) were lower in the C group, too. The others were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Colloid co-hydration was effective in reducing the phenylephrine use and the incidences of abnormal hemodynamics such as hypotension, bradycardia and hypertension in low-dose CSEA for cesarean delivery.
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Grossesse , Anesthésie , Pression sanguine , Bradycardie , Bupivacaïne , Césarienne , Colloïdes , Éphédrine , Fentanyl , Rythme cardiaque , Hémodynamique , Hypertension artérielle , Hypotension artérielle , Incidence , Injections rachidiennes , Nausée , Obstétrique , Phényléphrine , Amidon , VomissementRÉSUMÉ
It was previously reported that the Korean predictive model could be used to identify patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study investigated whether PONV in the high-risk and very high-risk patients identified by the Korean predictive model could be prevented by multiple prophylactic antiemetics. A total of 2,456 patients were selected from our previous PONV study and assigned to the control group, and 374 new patients were recruited consecutively to the treatment group. Patients in each group were subdivided into two risk groups according to the Korean predictive model: high-risk group and very high-risk group. Patients in the treatment group received an antiemetic combination of dexamethasone 5 mg (minutes after induction) and ondansetron 4 mg (30 min before the end of surgery). The incidences of PONV were examined at two hours after the surgery in the postanesthetic care unit and, additionally, at 24 hr after the surgery in the ward, and were analyzed for any differences between the control and treatment groups. The overall incidence of PONV decreased significantly from 52.1% to 23.0% (p< or =0.001) after antiemetic prophylaxis. Specifically, the incidence decreased from 47.3% to 19.4% (p< or =0.001) in the high-risk group and from 61.3% to 28.3% (p< or =0.001) in the very high-risk group. Both groups showed a similar degree of relative risk reductions: 59.0% vs. 53.8% in the high-risk and very high-risk groups, respectively. The results of our study showed that the antiemetic prophylaxis with the combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron was effective in reducing the occurrence of PONV in both high-risk and very high-risk patients.
Sujet(s)
Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Anesthésiques/effets indésirables , Antiémétiques/pharmacologie , Dexaméthasone/administration et posologie , Incidence , Corée , Ondansétron/administration et posologie , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Période postopératoire , Risque , Facteurs de risque , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Opioid delivered by epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is effective in relieving pain after surgery, but it is associated with side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, and urinary retention. The purpose of this study was to compare hydromorphone related side effects and the quality of analgesia when naloxone was added to epidural PCA regimen. METHODS: Fifty-two thoracotomy patients with PCA were allocated blindly into two groups. Patients in group H (n = 26) received continuous epidural hydromorphone (16microgram/ml) in 0.1% bupivacaine; patients in group N (n = 26) received an epidural infusion containing naloxone (2 microgram/ml) and hydromorphone (16microgram/ml) in 0.1% bupivacaine. The basal rate of PCA was 4 ml/hr and the demand dose was 1.5 ml with a lockout time of 15 min. Pain intensity, sedation, pruritus, nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression were checked at 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in group H than in group N. There were no significant differences in the overall incidence of pruritus, nausea and sedation between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous epidural infusion of naloxone combined with hydromorpho-ne is not effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pruritus induced by epidural hydromorphone.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Analgésie , Analgésie autocontrôlée , Bupivacaïne , Hydromorphone , Incidence , Naloxone , Nausée , Anaphylaxie cutanée passive , Prurit , Insuffisance respiratoire , Thoracotomie , Rétention d'urine , Échelle visuelle analogique , VomissementRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using a local anesthetic-opioid mixture, has been effectively applied after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, which is associated with intense postoperative pain that requires postoperative analgesia for both rehabilitation and the pain itself. However, adverse opioid-related effects, such as nausea, vomiting and pruritus, are commonly encountered. It was our hypothesis that the adverse opioid-related effects could be reduced by the addition of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, to a mixture of fentanyl-ropivacaine PCEA. METHODS: In 120 patients undergoing elective TKR surgery, epidural or combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia was performed and PCEA applied. In the control group (n = 65), 0.16% ropivacaine and 3microgram/ml fentanyl (2.4microgram/ml for those older than 65 yrs) were administered. In the naloxone group (n = 55), naloxone (2microgram/ml) was coadministered with the above regimen. The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the frequency of pruritus, the visual analog score (VAS) and the PCEA volume used were assessed 6 and 24 hrs after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea and vomiting during the early postoperative period, and those of pruritus during the late postoperative period were significantly lower in the naloxone group. The VAS pain scores, the PCEA volume used and amount of rescue IV meperidine were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A small dose of naloxone mixed with an opioid significantly reduces the incidence and severity of adverse opioid-related effects in PCEA, without reducing the analgesic effect
Sujet(s)
Humains , Analgésie , Analgésie péridurale , Anesthésie , Arthroplastie prothétique de genou , Fentanyl , Incidence , Péthidine , Naloxone , Nausée , Douleur postopératoire , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires , Période postopératoire , Prurit , Réadaptation , VomissementRÉSUMÉ
We report a patient with a postpartum headache, who was later diagnosed with an intra cerebral hemorrhage. She underwent a cesarean section under the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and complained of a suspicious post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in the puerperium. The headache was partially improved with analgesics and she was discharged. The day after discharge, the headache became aggravated and she visited our labor floor for further treatment. An epidural blood patch (EBP) was performed because the headache regarded as aggravation of PDPH. However, hemiparesis and dysarthria developed 40 minutes after the EBP. Computed tomography was revealed an intracerebral hemorrhage in the right side basal ganglia. She was transferred to the neurosurgical intensive care unit. She was treated conservatively and has almost completely recovered. This case highlights the need to consider an intracranial hemorrhage, a cerebrovascular accident, nonspecific headache and PDPH when making a differential diagnosis of postpartum headache, particularly when an atypical postpartum headache is noted.
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Grossesse , Analgésiques , Anesthésie , Noyaux gris centraux , Colmatage sanguin épidural , Hémorragie cérébrale , Césarienne , Diagnostic différentiel , Dysarthrie , Céphalée , Unités de soins intensifs , Hémorragies intracrâniennes , Parésie , Céphalée post-ponction durale , Période du postpartum , Accident vasculaire cérébralRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) along with postoperative pain is one of the most frequently encountered complaints after the surgery. The goal of this study is to elucidate the probable high risks factors of PONV by making 24 hr-observations on 4008 patients undergone general anesthesia. METHODS: PONV scores (0: no PONV; 1, nausea; 2, retching; 3, vomiting) and characteristics of patient, surgery, anesthesia were recorded by patient interview and chart review at post anesthesia care unit and at ward 24 hours after operation. Risk factors of PONV were investigated by Odds ratio and P value. Multiple regression analysis was performed to produce the provability of PONV. RESULTS: Incidence of PONV was 26.1% at PACU and 22.9% at ward. Total incidence of PONV during 24 hrs was 39.3. High risk factors of PONV were as follows in decreasing order: 1) female, 2) history of PONV or motion sickness, 3) nonsmoker, 4) operative time of longer than 60 minutes and 5) patient controlled analgesia. P (probability of PONV) = 1/1 + e-Z Z = -1.928 + 0.899 (Gender) + 0.664 (Hx) + 0.558 (OP-duration) + 0.261 (Smoking Status) + 0.184 (Postop-opioid). CONCLUSIONS: We could identify 5 risk factors and developed a Korean PONV risk model enabling to predict the probability of PONV by this study of 4008 patients.
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Analgésie autocontrôlée , Anesthésie , Anesthésie générale , Incidence , Mal des transports , Nausée , Odds ratio , Durée opératoire , Douleur postopératoire , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires , Facteurs de risqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: In the previous study, patients at high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were identified by the Korean risk model. Consecutively, we investigated whether high-risk patients based on the Korean risk model could be managed with multiple prophylactic antiemetics. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were classified in two risk groups (first group: high risk group, second group: very high risk group) by using the Korean risk model. All patients received volatile general anesthesia and antiemetic combination of dexamethasone 5 mg (after induction) and ondansetron 4 mg (before end of surgery). We investigated the incidences of PONV in the postanesthetic care unit and at ward. RESULTS: Compared with the data from our previous study, the overall incidence of PONV decreased from 52.2% to 23.1% (P< or =0.001). The incidence decreased from 47.4% to 19.4% (P< or =0.001) in the high risk group and from 61.6% to 32.2% (P< or =0.001) in the very high risk group. The relative risk reduction did not differ between two groups (59.1%:47.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Antiemetic prophylactic with combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron was equally effective in reducing the occurrence of PONV in both group patients.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Anesthésie générale , Antiémétiques , Dexaméthasone , Incidence , Ondansétron , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires , Comportement de réduction des risquesRÉSUMÉ
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common and distressing complications after surgery. An identification of risk factors associated with PONV would make it easier to select specific patients for effective antiemetic therapy. We designed a case-controlled study to identify the risk factors for PONV in 5,272 surgical patients. At postoperative 2 and 24 hr, patients were visited and interviewed on the presence and severity of PONV. Thirty nine percent of patients experienced one or more episodes of nausea or vomiting. Five risk factors were highly predictive of PONV: 1) female, 2) history of previous PONV or motion sickness, 3) duration of anesthesia more than 1 hour, 4) non-smoking status, and 5) use of opioid in the form of patient controlled analgesia (PCA), in the order of relevance. The formula to calculate the probability of PONV using the multiple regression analysis was as follows: P (probability of PONV)=1/1+e(-Z), Z=-1.885+0.894 (gender)+0.661 (history)+0.584 (duration of anesthesia)+0.196 (smoking status) +0.186 (use of PCA-based opioid) where gender: female=1, male=0; history of previous PONV or motion sickness: yes=1, no=0; duration of anesthesia: more than 1 hr=1, less than or 1 hr=0; smoking status: no=1, yes=0; use of PCA-based opioid: yes=1, no=0.
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Anesthésie/statistiques et données numériques , Études cas-témoins , Corée/épidémiologie , 29918/méthodes , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires/épidémiologie , Prévalence , Pronostic , Modèles des risques proportionnels , Reproductibilité des résultats , Appréciation des risques/méthodes , Facteurs de risque , Sensibilité et spécificitéRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Paresthesia is unpleasant for patients and more importantly, is related to neurological injury in some cases. There have been few studies comparing combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) techniques such as needle-through-needle technique (NTN) and double segment technique (DST) regarding the incidence of paresthesia. METHODS: Eighty-four parturients undergoing CSE for an elective cesarean section were divided into NTN and DST groups. A CSE was performed using 27 G Sprotte needle, 18 G Tuohy needle and 20 G multiport catheter in both groups. In the NTN group, at L3-4 or L4-5, a spinal anesthesia was performed and then an epidural catheter was inserted through the same Tuohy needle. In the DST group, an epidural catheter was inserted at L1-2 or L2-3 and then a spinal anesthesia was done two interspaces caudally. Incidences of paresthesia with each procedure were recorded with block characteristics and adverse effects. RESULTS: Overall frequency of paresthesia was higher in the NTN group (54.8% vs. 29.3%, P = 0.033). Incidences of intrathecal paresthesia were three times higher (21.4% vs. 7.3%, not significant) and epidural paresthesia was significantly higher (45.2% vs. 22%, P = 0.044) in the NTN group. Sensory and motor block characteristics and side effects were mostly comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Double-segment technique shows less incidence of overall paresthesia compared to needle-through-needle.