Associations between low back pain, urinary incontinence, and abdominal muscle recruitment as assessed via ultrasonography in the elderly

Background: Low back pain (LBP) and urinary incontinence (UI) are highly prevalent among elderly individuals. In young adults, changes in trunk muscle recruitment, as assessed via ultrasound imaging, may be associated with lumbar spine stability. Objective: To assess the associations between LBP, UI, and the pattern of transversus abdominis (TrA), internal (IO), and external oblique (EO) muscle recruitment in the elderly as evaluated by ultrasound imaging. Method: Fifty-four elderly individuals (mean age: 72±5.2 years) who complained of LBP and/or UI as assessed by the McGill Pain Questionnaire, Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and ultrasound imaging were included in the study. The statistical analysis comprised a multiple linear regression model, and a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The regression models for the TrA, IO, and EO muscle thickness levels explained 2.0% (R2=0.02; F=0.47; p=0.628), 10.6% (R2=0.106; F=3.03; p=0.057), and 10.1% (R2=0.101; F=2.70; p=0.077) of the variability, respectively. None of the regression models developed for the abdominal muscles exhibited statistical significance. A significant and negative association (p=0.018; β=-0.0343) was observed only between UI and IO recruitment. Conclusion: These results suggest that age-related factors may have interfered with the findings of the study, thus emphasizing the need to perform ultrasound imaging-based studies to measure abdominal muscle recruitment in the elderly. .

Patients in treatment for chronic low back pain have higher externalised beliefs: a cross-sectional study / Pacientes em tratamento da dor lombar crônica têm crenças mais externalizadas: um estudo transversal

BACKGROUND: People with low back pain (LBP) with higher levels of external locus of control have a poorer prognosis and require greater improvements from active interventions in order to consider these interventions worthwhile. Whether locus of control levels differ between participants with LBP in a patient-health provider relationship and those waiting for treatment is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate if differences in locus of control exist between participants with non-specific chronic LBP being treated (treatment group) and those waiting treatment (control group). METHODS: 100 participants (50 per group) with low back symptoms for at least three months for the current episode of LBP and aged between 18 and 60 years were recruited. Multidimensional health locus of control questionnaire (MHLC) was used to collect their beliefs. Multiple linear regression adjusted for disability was used to compare health locus of control between both groups. Differences were described as mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Treatment group scored higher for external locus of control and lower for internal locus of control than control group. Mean differences (95% confidence intervals) were 2.7 points on possible 30-points difference (0.5 to 4.8) for external locus of control and -2.8 points (-5.4 to -0.1) for internal subscale. CONCLUSION: Health locus of control was found to be different between treatment and control groups. Participants being treated had higher external locus of control and lower internal locus of control than control group.

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: Pessoas com dor lombar com altos níveis de lócus de controle externo têm piores prognósticos e necessitam de melhores intervenções ativas, uma vez que elas são consideradas mais valiosas. Se os níveis de lócus de controle diferem entre os participantes com dor lombar e aqueles que esperam o tratamento, a relação do atendimento-paciente não está clara. OBJETIVO: Investigar se existem diferenças no lócus de controle entre os indivíduos com dor lombar crônica em tratamento (grupo tratamento) e aqueles que esperam tratamento (grupo controle). MÉTODOS: Cem participantes (50 por grupo) com sintomas lombares por pelo menos três meses, com um episódio atual de dor lombar e com idades entre 18 e 60 anos foram recrutados. O Questionário Multidimensional de Lócus de Controle da Saúde (MHLC) foi usado para coleta das crenças dos participantes. Realizou-se uma regressão linear múltipla ajustada para incapacidade e para comparação do lócus de controle entre os grupos. As diferenças foram descritas com médias e intervalos de confiança de 95%. RESULTADOS: O grupo tratamento teve escore mais alto para o lócus de controle externo e mais baixo para o lócus de controle interno quando comparado com o grupo controle. As diferenças médias (intervalo de confiança de 95%) foram 2,7 pontos em possível diferença de até 30 pontos (0,5 a 4,8) para lócus de controle externo e -2,8 pontos (-5,4 a -0,1) para lócus de controle interno. CONCLUSÃO: O lócus de controle da saúde encontrado para o grupo tratamento e o controle foi diferente. Os participantes em tratamento tinham um alto lócus de controle externo e um baixo lócus de controle interno quando comparados com os do grupo controle.