Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density around proximal femoral prosthesis after total hip replacement in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the effect of denosumab on bone mineral density around proximal femoral prosthesis after total hip arthroplasty(THA) in the postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.@*METHODS@#Fifty-four consecutive patients underwent unilateral primary THA were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-five patients received denosumab for osteoporosis as the treatment group, and the twenty-nine without denosumab were the control group. At 1 week, 3month, 6 months, and 12 months after THA, bone turnover markers and proximal femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) were measured.@*RESULTS@#At 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, the level of TRACP-5b in the control group was significantly higher than that in the treatment group (P<0.05);the level of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) between two groups showed significant difference in 12 months after operation (control group was higher than treatment group, P<0.05). The BMD of Gruen 1 and Gruen 7 decreased at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation compared with 1 week after operation. Comparing the treatment group and the control group, the differences of the the decrease of BMD in Gruen 1 and Gruen 7 were no significant at 3 months after surgery. In Gruen 1, Gruen 7 at 6 months after operation and Gruen 1, Gruen 7 at 12 months after operation, the decrease of BMD in the control group was significantly higher than that in the treatment group(P<0.05). It is suggested that desudumab could inhibit the loss of BMD after 6 months, and continuously show a protective effect on bone mass at 12 months after operation.@*CONCLUSION@#After THA in postmenopausal patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fracture, Desuzumab can reduce the loss of BMD around the proximal femoral prosthesis and effectively inhibit bone resorption.

MIPPO and ORIF for the treatment of elderly proximal humerus fractures of type Neer II:a case control study / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating senile NEER IIproximal humerus fractures.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From March 2014 to March 2016, 46 elderly patients with Neer II proximal humerus fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 20 patients in MIPPO group included 9 males and 11 females with an average age of (70.4±4.4) years old; while 26 patients in ORIF group included 11 males and 15 females with an average age of (70.9±4.0) years old. The length of hospital stay, times of fluoroscopy, beginning time of function rehabilitation, healing time of fracture, Constant Murley score of the shoulder joint at 3, 6, 12 months after operation and complications were observed and compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of 16.8±3.7. The healing time of fracture, beginning time of function rehabilitation in MIPPO group were(13.0±0.8) weeks, (3.0±0.9) days respectively and shorter than those in ORIF group which were (13.8±1.4) weeks and(6.8±1.3) days. The times of fluoroscopy in MIPPO group was 19.2±3.7 and more than that in ORIF group which was 12.1±3.4. At 3 and 6 months after operation, Constant Murley score in MIPPO group were 81.3±3.9, 86.6±5.4 and more than that in ORIF group which were 69.5±6.6, 80.5±6.7. There were no differences between two groups in the length of hospital stay, Constant Murley score at 12 months after operation and grading at the final follow-up. There was one fracture redisplacement in each group. And 1 case of axillary nerve injury in MIPPO group, 2 cases of delayed union in ORIF group. No incision infection, screw loosening or plate break was found.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>MIPPO and ORIF are both effective in treating Neer II proximal humeral fractures. MIPPO technique has the advantages of faster recovery, earlier rehabilitative exercise and better shoulder function. The disadvantages are more exposure to radiationd and the possibility of axillary nerve injure.</p>