Résumé
Objective:To investigate the difference of dose distribution between intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 8 patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer who received radiotherapy in Ion Medical center of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from November 2020 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. IMRT and IMPT radiotherapy plans were created for each patient separately, the main evaluation indicators were targeted area dose distribution parameters [homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and the percent volume of volume wrapped by 95% and 100% of prescription dose profile in the targeted area (V 95% and V 100%)], and the average dose (D mean) to the organ at risk and the percent volume of a certain relative biological effect (RBE) dose exposure [D mean, V 5 Gy(RBE) and V 20 Gy(RBE) of ipsilateral lung, D mean, V 5 Gy(RBE) and V 20 Gy(RBE) of bilateral lung, D mean, V 30 Gy(RBE) and V 40 Gy(RBE) of heart, maximum dose (D max) of spinal cord, and D mean of esophageal]. Results:In comparison with IMRT, IMPT reduced the levels of dose parameters in bilateral lung, ipsilateral lung, spinal cord, esophagus, and heart with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05), especially in D mean of bilateral lung [(4.1±1.8) Gy (RBE) vs. (6.9±1.9) Gy (RBE)], V 5 Gy(RBE) [(15.9±7.1) % vs. (28.5±8.6)%], V 20 Gy(RBE) [(7.4±3.5)% vs. (10.1±3.5)%], and D mean of ipsilateral lung [(9.1±4.5) Gy (RBE) vs. (11.9±3.3) Gy (RBE)], all decreased significantly (all P < 0.001), but the differences in the levels of targeted area dose distribution parameters between them were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Conclusions:For patients with non-small cell lung cancer, IMPT is superior to IMRT in the protection of bilateral lung, ipsilateral lung, spinal cord, esophagus and heart.
Résumé
Objective:To investigate whether the real-world marital status is a factor affecting the survival of patients with early stage breast cancer.Methods:According to the data of 62 845 patients with early stage (T 1-2N 0M 0) breast cancer who received treatment from January 2012 to December 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, univariate survival analysis for 7 factors including age, race, surgery, T stage, tumor differentiation, molecular type and marital status was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. The 5-year cancer specific survival (5-CSS) rate was calculated. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the death risk of patients with different marital status (married, unmarried and bad marriage). Results:Univariate analysis showed that 7 factors were correlated with the survival of patients with early stage breast cancer (all P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that marital status was an independent factor affecting the survival of patients, and the death risk of unmarried patients and patients with bad marriage was 2.014 times (95% CI 1.714-2.367, P < 0.001) and 2.559 times (95% CI 2.254-2.905, P < 0.001) higher than that of married patients, respectively. In tumor differentiation, molecular type, T stage and race subgroups, univariate analysis showed that the rates of 5-CSS in married patients were higher than those in unmarried patients and patients with bad marriage (all P < 0.001); multivariate analysis showed that the risk of death in patients with bad marriage (except undifferentiated type) was higher than that in married patients (all P < 0.001), and the risk of death in unmarried patients (except undifferentiation, Luminal B type, black and other races) was also higher than that in married patients (all P < 0.01). Conclusions:Marital status is one of the factors influencing the survival of patients with early stage breast cancer.
Résumé
Objective:To compare the dosimetric difference between intensity-modulated photon radiaotherapy (IMRT) planning and intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) planning for glioma.Methods:The clinical data of 15 glioma patients who underwent IMRT in ion medical center of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from November 2020 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. IMRT planning and IMPT planning were designed for the image of each patient in the therapy planning system. Main dosimetric parameters were compared including plan target volume (PTV), coverage index (CI), dose homogeneity index (HI), and maximal dose (D max) and mean dose (D mean) of organs at risk between both plans. Results:There were no significant differences between IMRT planning and IMPT planning in terms of D max and D mean of PTV1 and PTV2, CI and HI (all P > 0.05). Compared with IMRT planning, brainstem D mean [6.92 GyE (0.09 GyE, 12.58 GyE) vs. 24.41 GyE (2.59 GyE, 34.18 GyE)], left optic nerve D max [0.78 GyE (0.04 GyE, 25.18 GyE) vs. 20.42 GyE (6.38 GyE, 37.17 GyE)], left optic nerve D mean [0.10 GyE (0.01 GyE, 11.63 GyE) vs. 9.74 GyE (2.99 GyE, 20.87 GyE)], right optic nerve D mean [1.57 GyE (0.13 GyE, 14.90 GyE) vs. 14.08 GyE (2.66 GyE, 23.67 GyE)], left len D max [0 GyE (0 GyE, 2.91 GyE) vs. 4.84 GyE (1.42 GyE, 5.48 GyE)], left len D mean [0 GyE (0 GyE, 1.73 GyE) vs. 3.84 GyE (1.25 GyE, 4.30 GyE)], right len D max [0.25 GyE (0.04 GyE, 4.55 GyE) vs. 4.28 GyE (1.58 GyE, 5.84 GyE)], right len D mean [0.16 GyE (0.01 GyE, 1.95 GyE) vs. 3.73 GyE (1.04 GyE, 4.86 GyE)], pituitary D max [6.97 GyE (0.18 GyE, 39.70 GyE) vs. 36.60 GyE (2.74 GyE, 45.19 GyE)], pituitary D mean [1.36 GyE (0.06 GyE, 13.85 GyE) vs. 24.74 GyE (2.42 GyE, 32.80 GyE)], hippocampus D max [5.10 GyE (0.24 GyE, 26.52 GyE) vs. 35.83 GyE (5.03 GyE, 46.11 GyE)], hippocampus D mean [0.36 GyE (0.04 GyE, 25.65 GyE) vs. 18.79 GyE (2.37 GyE, 28.10 GyE)] in IMPT planning were lower, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in brainstem D max [51.98 GyE (0.66 GyE, 53.43 GyE) vs. 53.29 GyE (3.87 GyE, 53.48 GyE)], right optic nerve D max [9.60 GyE (0.01 GyE, 43.32 GyE) vs. 25.37 GyE (3.45 GyE, 41.25 GyE)] of both plans (all P > 0.05). Conclusion:In the radiotherapy for glioma, IMRT and IMPT can meet the dose demand in clinic. Furthermore, IMPT planning can protect organs at risk and reduce radiation dose in hippocampus, brainstem, optic nerve, lens and pituitary.
Résumé
Objective To investigate the acute adverse reactions of craniospinal irradiation with helical tomotherapy in medulloblastoma patients and its risk factors. Methods A total of 20 patients with medulloblastoma who received craniospinal irradiation with helical tomotherapy between October 2012 and September 2016 in Air Force General Hospital were selected. The acute adverse events of 20 patients during the treatment were record. According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0, the adverse reactions were divided into the mild group (grade 0-Ⅱ) and severe group (grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ) adverse reactions. And the risk factors were also analyzed. Results The non-hematological adverse reactions included fatigue (55%), vomiting (45%) and headache (25%). The hematological adverse reactions included leukopenia (95%), thrombocytopenia (55%) and lower hemoglobin (45%), and the incidence of severe adverse reactions was 35% (7/20), 20% (4/20) and 0 ( 0/20 ) , respectively . Leukopenia occurred in 18 patients ( 90%) at the beginning of radiotherapy within 2 weeks, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 8 patients (40%) at the beginning of radiotherapy after 2 weeks. Single factor analysis showed that there were no statistical differences in hematological adverse events of gender, age and radiation dose of spinal cord (all P>0.05). The incidence of leukopenia for the patients who received the chemotherapy before the radiotherapy was higher than that for the patients without the chemotherapy before the radiotherapy (P< 0.05). Conclusions The hematological adverse reactions were the major acute adverse events during the craniospinal irradiation with helical tomotherapy in patients with medulloblastoma. Theincidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia is common, and the incidence of hematological adverse reactions is higher after the chemotherapy. Thus, the close monitoring of hemogram change and treatment of hematological adverse reactions in time during the radiotherapy should be taken into the consideration.
Résumé
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a minimally-invasive technique,which has been widely employed in the treatment of hemangiomas,vertebral compression fractures,spinal metastases,myeloma and other diseases.Clinically,it is generally believed that the curative effect of PVP is closely related to the injected amount of bone cement.However,there is still great controversy over the optimal injection volume of bone cement.Based on the current researches both at home and abroad,this article aims to make a brief introduction about the relevant vertebral biomechanical factors that might affect the injection volume of bone cement,the influence of the injected volume of bone cement on the vertebral strength,rigidity and adjacent vertebral bodies.The main current disputes are pointed out so as to lay the foundation for further study.
Résumé
Objective To explore the curative effect and adverse reaction of applying stereotactic radiotherapy to primary lesion inside chest cavity of patients with oligometastasis non-small cell lung cancer and rendering radical radiotherapy to all metastases. Methods 43 patients with≤5 metastases of non-small cell lung cancer received initial treatment during 2009-2015 in our department were analyzed;the stereotactic radiotherapy was adopted to implement radical radiotherapy on primary lesion and all metastases. The average and neutral position BED10 respectively were 101416 Gy and 102700 Gy,the number of neutral position chemotherapy period was 4. Kaplan-Meier method, survival analysis, Cox model, multi factor Prognosis analysis were used. Results By the end of January 10,2017 in 36 months' neutral position follow-up visit, the total effective rate of lesion treatment of 86%;the survival rates after 1,2 and 3 years respectively were 74%, 70% and 51%. Neutral survival time was 48 months, and the progression-free time of neutral position was 15 months. Multi-factor analysis indicated that,ECOG<2 and ECOG≥2(P=0000),BED10<100 Gy and BED10≥100 Gy ( P=0006) generated obvious influence on survival prognosis. About 90% of the patients only got 1-2 degree of adverse reaction without emerging treatment related death. Conclusions On the premise of systematic therapy of oligometastasis non-small cell lung cancer, combined with radical radiotherapy of primary lesion and metastasis can obviously improve patients ' overall survival and progression-free survival,the adverse reaction is durable.
Résumé
Objective To explore the curative effect and adverse reaction of applying stereotactic radiotherapy to primary lesion inside chest cavity of patients with oligometastasis non-small cell lung cancer and rendering radical radiotherapy to all metastases. Methods 43 patients with≤5 metastases of non-small cell lung cancer received initial treatment during 2009-2015 in our department were analyzed;the stereotactic radiotherapy was adopted to implement radical radiotherapy on primary lesion and all metastases. The average and neutral position BED10 respectively were 101416 Gy and 102700 Gy,the number of neutral position chemotherapy period was 4. Kaplan-Meier method, survival analysis, Cox model, multi factor Prognosis analysis were used. Results By the end of January 10,2017 in 36 months' neutral position follow-up visit, the total effective rate of lesion treatment of 86%;the survival rates after 1,2 and 3 years respectively were 74%, 70% and 51%. Neutral survival time was 48 months, and the progression-free time of neutral position was 15 months. Multi-factor analysis indicated that,ECOG<2 and ECOG≥2(P=0000),BED10<100 Gy and BED10≥100 Gy ( P=0006) generated obvious influence on survival prognosis. About 90% of the patients only got 1-2 degree of adverse reaction without emerging treatment related death. Conclusions On the premise of systematic therapy of oligometastasis non-small cell lung cancer, combined with radical radiotherapy of primary lesion and metastasis can obviously improve patients ' overall survival and progression-free survival,the adverse reaction is durable.
Résumé
Along with the aging of population in China,more and more people suffer from osteoporosis.As a consequence,osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture has become one of the major clinical issues.More and more patients like to take percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) as the preferred treatment,thus,the number of patients who develop recurrent vertebral fracture after PVP is also increased.In recent years,more and more attention has been paid to the recurrent fractures after PVP for vertebral compression fractures by clinicians.In order to reduce the incidence of recurrent vertebral fracture after PVP,it is necessary to make the further and deep studies on the risk factors that cause recurrent vertebral fractures.This paper aims to make a comprehensive review about the risk factors that may cause recurrent vertebral fractures after PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.