Résumé
Objective To explore the effect and influencing factors of prosthesis placement angle on hip replacement for bone fusion of hip joint.Methods A total of 100 patients with bone fusion of hip joint who were admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to January 2022 were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into the observation group(n=50)and the control group(n=50).The prosthesis placement angle was 30° to 40° in the observation group and 41° to 50° in the control group.The clinical data,VAS score and Harris score before and after operation,and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.The improvement of hip joint function of the two groups was compared by random walking model.According to the prognosis of patients,patients were divided into the poor prognosis group(n=32)and the good prognosis group(n=68).Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the independent influencing factors of the prognosis of hip replacement for bone fusion of hip joint,and a prediction model was constructed and verified.Results The Harris score 6 months after operation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in VAS score before and after operation and incidence of complications after operation between the two groups(P>0.05).The results of random walking model showed that the improvement of hip joint function in the observation group was better than that in the control group.There were significant differences in age,hyperlipidemia,osteoporosis,prosthesis placement angle,intraoperative blood loss,emotional disorder,postoperative complications,rehabilitation training and postoperative outdoor activity time of patients between the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that osteoporosis and prosthesis placement angle of 41° to 50° were the independent risk factors of the prognosis of hip replacement for bone fusion of hip joint(P<0.05),and rehabilitation training was the protective factor(P<0.05).A prediction model of the prognosis of hip replacement for bone fusion of hip joint was constructed.The calibration curve of the model fit well with the ideal curve,and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)was 0.854(95%CI:0.830 to 0.871),which indicates that the prediction model had good accuracy.The concordance index(C-index)of the model was 0.849(95%CI:0.817 to 0.868),which indicates that the model had high discrimination.Conclusion The prosthesis placement angle of 30° to 40° can significantly improve the postoperative hip joint function of patients,and the therapeutic effect is significant.Osteoporosis,prosthesis placement angle,and rehabilitation training are the independent influencing factors of the prognosis of hip replacement for bone fusion of hip joint.
Résumé
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the difference in the efficacy on thoracic facet joint disorder between the combined therapy of electroacupuncture and manual reduction and the simple manual reduction.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and sixty patients were randomized into an electroacupuncture and manual manipulation group (group A) and a simple manual manipulation group (group B), 80 cases in each one. In the group A, Ashi points and three pairs of Jiaji (EX-B 2) bilateral to the painful sites were selected. The perpendicular puncture was used at Ashi points, the oblique puncture was used at Jiaji (EX-B 2) and connected with electric stimulation for 20 min, additionally, the corresponding manual reduction was adopted at the sites of facet joint disorder. In the group B, the simple manual reduction was applied to the affected sites. Acupuncture was given once every day, the manual reduction was applied once every 10 days. The treatment of 10 days made one session. The efficacy was analyzed statistically at the end of two sessions of treatment. Before and after treatment, McGill pain scale was adopted for the value statistical analysis. PRI score, VAS score and PPI score of patients were calculated before and after treatment and compared in the two groups. The efficacy was compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The curative rate was 56.3% (45/80) in the group A, which was better than 18.8% (15/80) in the group B (P< 0.01). The total effective rate was 95.0% (76/80) in the group A, which was better than 76.3% (61/80) in the group B (P<0.01). The scores of PRI, VAS and PPI after treatment were all improved significantly in the two groups (all P<0.05), in which, the results in the group A were better than those in the group B (PRI: 4.00 +/- 0.97 vs 5.44 +/- 1.16, VAS: 3.29 +/- 0.72 vs 3.87 +/- 0.81, PPI: 1.07 +/- 0.74 vs 1.64 +/- 0.90, all P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The combined therapy of electroacupuncture and manual manipulation achieves the superior efficacy on thoracic facet joint disorder as compared with the simple manual manipulation. The combined therapy relieves the symptoms of thoracic facet joint disorder and reduces the severity of disorder.</p>