The Usefulness of a Scoring System as a Predictor of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Chest Pain with an Unclear Diagnosis in the Emergency Department

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of several risk scoring systems, such as TIMI, GRACE, HEART, and PERSUIT as predictors for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in chest pain with an unclear diagnosis. METHODS: This study was conducted as a retrospective and observational study. Enrolled patients were classified into two groups depending on the cause of chest pain: ACS group (CG; N=80) and non-ACS group (NCG; N=42). Clinical variables, including age, gender, past history, characteristics of chest pain, final diagnosis, and risk score were analyzed according to each group. Risk scoring systems for prediction of acute coronary syndrome were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Significant differences in age (p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (p=0.049), prior ischemic heart disease (p<0.001), continuous chest pain (p=0.035), and severe chest pain (p=0.001) were observed between the two groups. Results of ROC analysis for each scoring system for prediction of ACS were as follows: HEART (AUC; 0.878, 95% Confidence Interval, CI; 0.806~0.930, cut-off value; 4 points, sensitivity; 90.48%, specificity; 71.25%), TIMI (AUC; 0.839, 95% CI; 0.762~0.899, cut-off value; 1 point, sensitivity 83.33%, specificity 77.50%), PERSUIT (AUC; 0.748, 95% CI; 0.661~0.822, cut-off value; 11 points, sensitivity 61.90%, specificity 77.50%), and GRACE (AUC; 0.698, 95% CI, 0.608~0.778, cut off value 102 points, sensitivity 83.33, specificity 53.75%). CONCLUSION: In comparative analysis of each scoring system, the HEART scoring system was found to be a strong predictor of ACS in chest pain with an unclear diagnosis, followed by the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE scoring systems.

Center of the Chest Versus Inter-nipple Line in the Selection of a Chest Compression Site by Novice Rescuers

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the distribution and risk from hand positions applied at the center of the chest (CoC) versus the inter-nipple line (INL) during external chest compression by novice rescuers. METHODS: This simulation study included 105 participants. The participants were given photographs of the unexposed male chest and asked to mark a cross at the center of the chest and at the midpoint of the inter-nipple line. The range of contact with the chest was estimated by measuring the participants' palm width. The median and distribution of the two points were then compared and analyzed to determine whether the range in contact with the chest involved the xiphoid process. RESULTS: The level of the INL was approximately 0.8 cm higher at the sternum than the CoC (p<0.001), while the standard deviation of the CoC [1.8(0.6-3.8)] was higher than that of the INL [1.2(0.4-2.4)] (p<0.001). There were more cases in which the palm range involved the xiphoid process in the CoC group [15(14.3%)] than the INL group [1(0.9%)] (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: For male adult patients, chest compression at the level of the INL by novice rescuers is safer and more intensive than compression at the level of the CoC.

The Usefulness of the Hot Pack as a Complementary Technique for the Treatment of Non-specific Abdominal Pain or Acute Gastroenteritis in an Emergency Department

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the hot pack as a complementary technique for the treatment of nonspecific abdominal pain or acute gastroenteritis in a hospital emergency department. METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective case-controlled trial of patients with nonspecific abdominal pain or acute gastroenteritis who visited an emergency department. A total of 166 participants, from 18 to 75 years old, were divided into two groups: patients treated with antispasmodics and hot pack (WH) group (n=83) and patients treated with antispasmodics without a hot pack (WOH) group (n=83). Patients rated their pain using the 10 cm numerical rating scale (NRS). Pain NRS was assessed four times: first on arrival and then at 1, 2, and 3 hours after treatment. The frequency of tramadol use and residence time was also assessed. RESULTS: The two groups did not significantly differ in age or gender distribution. The mean NRS score also did not significantly differ between the groups upon arrival (p=0.847). The NRS scores at 1 hour and 2 hours after treatment in the WH group were significantly lower than NRS scores in the WOH group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference, however in NRS scores after 3 hours for both groups (p=0.091). There was a significant difference in NRS scores between admission and after 1 hour (p=0.005) and a significant difference in NRS scores between 2 hours and 3 hours (p<0.001). The frequency of tramadol use significantly differed between groups (p<0.01) but there was no significant difference in residence time in each group. CONCLUSION: The hot pack is an effective complementary technique for reducing abdominal pain in the hospital emergency department.

Changes in Preventable Death Rates and Traumatic Care Systems in Korea

PURPOSE: This study was performed in order to determine the changes over time in preventable and potentially preventable traumatic death rates, and to assess the factors that affected the deaths of trauma patients which occurred in Korean pre-hospital and hospital settings. METHODS: All trauma deaths occurring either in the emergency department (ED) or after admission at twenty Korean hospitals between August 2009 and July 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The deaths were initially reviewed by a team of multidisciplinary specialists and classified into non-preventable, potentially preventable, and preventable deaths. Only preventable and potentially preventable deaths were the subject of our analysis. Structured data extraction included patient demographics, vital signs, injury severity, probability of survival, preventability of mortality, reported errors in the evaluation and management of the patient, and classification of error types (system, judgment, knowledge). RESULTS: During the study period, 446 trauma victims died in the ED or within 7 days after admission. The mean age was 52 years, 74.1% were men and the mean time from injury to death was 35.6 hours. The most common cause of death was head injury (44.7%) followed by hemorrhage (30.8%) and multi-organ failure (8.0%). The rates of preventable/potentially preventable deaths were 35.2% overall and 29.8% when limited to patients surviving to admission. Of all death classifications, 31.2% were potentially preventable and 4.0% were preventable. Errors leading to preventable death occurred in the emergency department (51.2%), pre-hospital setting (30.3%) and during inter-hospital transfer (60.8%). Most errors were related to clinical management (48.4%) and structural problems in the emergency medical system (36.5%). CONCLUSION: The preventable death rates for Korean trauma victims were higher than those found in other developed countries, possibly due to poorly established emergency medical systems for trauma victims in pre-hospital and hospital settings. A system wide approach based on the emergency medical system and well-developed in-hospital trauma teams should be adopted in order to improve the quality of care of trauma victims in Korea.

Does Switching Rescuers Every 2 Minutes Improve the Quality of Chest Compression Provided in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

PURPOSE: Effective chest compressions may improve the return of spontaneous circulation and positive neurologic outcomes in cardiac arrest victims. Out of concern for rescuer fatigue, guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend that the individual applying chest compressions should be switched every 2 minutes, but there is little evidence to support this recommendation. In this study, we investigated whether or not changing the individual who is applying chest compressions every 2 minutes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is appropriate or not. METHODS: We recruited health personnel working at one university hospital on a volunteer basis. On a randomly assigned day, we compared the effectiveness of the use of multiple rescuers following the 2 minute guideline, versus single rescuer (rescuer-limited) in performance of CPR. The resulting data was collected by use of CPR recording technology, and chest compression quality variables including compression rate, compression depth, proportion of adequate compression depth, and proportion of incomplete recoil were recorded. RESULTS: There were statistically significant improvements in the rescuer-limited trial outcome including average compression depth (p=0.013), proportion of adequate compression depth (p=0.027), and difference in reported fatigue (0.007). CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that a rescuer-limited method is more effective than the multiple rescuer method in terms of subjective fatigue and chest compression quality metrics.

The Effect of Basic Life Support Education on Laypersons' Willingness and Self-confidence in Performing Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

PURPOSE: The purpose of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to laypersons is to give them the confidence and willingness to perform CPR in a real cardiac arrest, as well as the basic required knowledge and skills. However, no study has examined laypersons' confidence and willingness to act in a real, life-threatening situation. Therefore, we investigated the effects of CPR education on bystanders' confidence and attitude in performing bystander CPR. METHODS: From March to May 2008, 168 participants receiving 4 hours of CPR education were asked using a questionnaire about their confidence and willingness to perform bystander CPR before the education, after theoretical education, and after practical education. Those who answered that they wouldn't perform bystander CPR were asked for the reasons. RESULTS: Scores in confidence of bystander CPR were 50.4 +/-27.9 before the education, 64.9+/-22.5 after the theoretical education, and 79.5+/-16.1(p<0.001) after the practical education. The 'definitely yes' answer to 'willingness to perform CPR on a strange adult', increased from only 8.3% before the education to 18.5% after the theoretical education and 32.7% after the practical education (p<0.001). Among the reasons for not performing bystander CPR, 'fear of poor knowledge/performance' and 'fear of disease transmission' seemed to decrease as the education was carried on. However, the reasons 'fear of legal liability' and 'reluctance to perform mouth-to-mouth' showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Adequate education, including theoretical and practical CPR education, among laypersons significantly increased their confidence and willingness to perform bystander CPR.

The Effect of a Real Time Audiovisual Feedback System on the Quality of Chest Compressions by Trained Personnel during Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial using a Manikin Model

PURPOSE: The survival benefit to patients of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is well-documented. In the 2005 resuscitation guidelines, the quality of CPR was emphasized and the monitoring of CPR quality variables broadly recommended. However, little objective data exist regarding the effect of a monitoring and feedback system on CPR quality variables during resuscitation. METHODS: Forty-nine volunteers among hospital nurses and doctors were randomly assigned to two groups and asked to perform five minutes of continuous chest compression on a manikin either with or without a real time audiovisual feedback system. The quality variables of chest compression including compression rate, compression depth, the proportion of adequate compression depth, and the proportion of complete recoil were recorded. RESULTS: Data from 25 chest compression episodes in the control group were compared to 24 episodes in the feedback group. There was a improvement in the mean compression rate in the feedback group with a statistically significant narrowing of distribution (107.4+/-19.3 to 102.9+/-5.7 /min; test of means, p=0.071; test of variance, p<0.001). There were statistically significant improvements in the mean values of other quality variables in the feedback group including compression depth (from 39.7+/-5.9 to 42.3+/-2.8 mm; test of means, p=0.039; test of variance, p=0.026), the proportion of adequate compression depth (from 65.8+/-33.5% to 86.9+/-16.2%; test of means, p=0.011; test of variance, p<0.001), and the proportion of incomplete recoil (44.6+/-34.9% to 16.3+/-19.2%; test of means, p=0.014; test of variance, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: In this study, we confirmed that a real time audiovisual feedback system significantly improve the quality of chest compression during resuscitation.

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of 9.6% Lidocaine of Local Anesthesia for Pain Reduction of Venipuncture in the ED

PURPOSE: A eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA(R)) cream has been used as a topical anesthetic to reduce the pain of procedures penetrating the skin. It is generally applied for 40 to 60 minutes before the painful procedure. Because of the long application period, EMLA(R) is not useful in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a 20-minute application of 9.6% lidocaine would be useful in reducing the pain of routine peripheral intravenous cannulation in the ED. METHODS: We examined 27 male and 19 female patients ages over 18 years of age who required intravenous cannula insertion. Intravenous insertion was performed on 46 patients: 24 patients in the placebo group (mean age: 40.0 years) and 22 in the 9.6% lidocaine group (mean age: 37.6 years). The 9.6% lidocaine or placebo gel was applied and covered with an occlusive dressing for 20 minutes. Pain was scored by the patients using a 0- to 10-cm visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The patients in the 9.6% lidocaine group (mean pain score: 3.4) experienced less pain than those in the placebo group (mean: 5.3), and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: We concluded that a 20-minute application of 9.6% lidocaine is safe and effective for reducing pain associated with venipuncture.

Study of the Appropriateness of 11 9 Rescue Usage

PURPOSE: In order to elicit efficient and effective operation of the Korean Emergency Medical Service System, we observed patients brought in by way of the Emergency Center by 119 ambulances and analyzed the appropriateness of the transport and the level of emergency care provided. METHODS: For the month of August 2002, patients who visited a university hospital emergency unit in Seoul were separated and evaluated according to the study protocols. The appropriateness of the 119 transport was based on a patient questionnaire and an evaluation of medical records and was categorized as follows; 1) need for emergency care or urgency/emergency transport by 119 ambulance, 2) need for emergency care or urgency/emergency transport by non 119 ambulance, 3) no need for emergency care or subemergency/nonemergency transport by 119 ambulance, 4) no needs for emergency care or subemergency/ nonemergency transport by non 119 ambulance. Of these, category 1 is viewed as the appropriate level of transport to the hospital emergency unit by 119 rescuers whereas category 3 is considered inappropriate transportation by 119 rescuers. The analysis of the appropriateness of the level of emergency care was based on sorting patients into 5 service categories; 1) emergency care required - appropriate operation, 2) emergency care required - no operation, 3)emergency care required - inappropriate operation, 4) no emergency care required - operation, 5) no emergency care required - no operation. Within these, categories 1 and 5 are considered appropriate and categories 2, 3 and 4 as inappropriate. RESULTS: Over the course of the study, 1,376 out of 1,451 patients transported to the hospital emergency unit qualified to be included under study protocols. Among them, the proportion of patients who needed emergency care or urgency/emergency transport was 22.8% (314 patients), and the proportion of those who received appropriate transport by the 119 emergency team was 62.6% (196 patients). Among the 282 patients who were transported by 119 emergency teams, in 195 patients (69.1%), emergency care was indicated while only 81 of the 195 patients (41.5%) received operations with an emergency or critical level of care. Of these 81, 47 patients (58.0%) received the appropriate operation. Therefore, the overall appropriateness of emergency care was 45.0% (127 patients), including emergency care required - appropriate operation (47 patients) and no emergency care required - no operation (80 patients). CONCLUSION: From this study, the appropriateness of transport by 119 rescuers is 62.6% but if subemergency cases are included, the appropriateness of transport increases to 95.2%. However, the appropriateness of care is only 45.0%, implying a need for continuing training for 119 emergency medical technicians and further organization of the medical control system.

Emergency Ultrasonography in Unconscious Trauma Victims

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity of the ultrasound examination performed by emergency physicians in patients with altered mental state due to trauma. METHODS: From July 1998 until June 2000, a total number of 59 patients showing altered mental state were examined using emergency ultrasound at the time of primary survey. Their medical records were reviewed, and the interpretations of the emergency ultrasound were compared with the abdominal CT scan or clinical results. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients, 3 were excluded due to incomplete records. Among the 56 remaining patients, 9 patients had intra-abdominal problems. The sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 95.7%, respectively. Abdominal CT was not required in 41 (73.2%) patients. CONCLUSION: Emergency ultrasonography can serve as a useful screening tool in detecting free fluid in trauma victims who are not mentally alert.

Factors Associated with Delayed Arrival at the Hospital in Cases of Acute Stroke

BACKGROUND: Recent advances have been made in the treatment of acute stroke, but the effectiveness of the new therapies is highly time-dependent. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors that influence the time from symptom onset to hospital arrival and the total arrival delay time for patients with acute stroke. METHODS: A prospective registry of patients presenting to the ED with signs or symptoms of acute stroke was established at Ewha Womans University Mokdong and Dongdaeumn hospitals from March to December 1999. We analyzed the prehospital delay time(reaction interval and total arrival delay) and factors associated with delayed arrival at the hospital. RESULTS: The study included 256 patients(49% were women) with a mean age of 62+/-13 years. 50.9% of the patients arrived within 3 hours, and 94.9% patients arrived within 24 hours after onset of symptoms of acute stroke. The total arrival delay time was 180 minutes(median time), and the reaction interval was 60 minutes(median time). Transportation by 119 or 129 ambulances was linked to shorter delay(47 minutes). Age, mental status, and degree of disability were statistically significant factors associated with delayed arrival at the hospital. CONCLUSION: Age, mental status, and degree of disability were significant factors associated with delayed arrival at the hospital. For effective treatment of acute stroke patients, increased public awareness to use an ambulance with direct transport to the acute-care hospital required.