RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To establish Wistar rat models of acute radiation esophagitis, and observe the histopathological changes at different time points after modeling.Methods:Wistar rats were locally irradiated with different doses of 6 MV X-rays, and the rats were sacrificed on the 3 rd, 5 th, 7 th, and 14 th days after irradiation. The full-length esophagus tissue was taken for paraffin embedding, sectioning, and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining for pathological assessment. The pathological changes of the esophagus of the rats were observed at the 3 rd, 5 th, 7 th, and 14 th days after 25 Gy and 30 Gy irradiation. The changes of daily dietary intake of rats in different irradiation groups within 1-2 weeks after radiation exposure were observed. Results:No rat died in two groups after being irradiated with 25 Gy and 30 Gy rays. All the rats in the 30 Gy group had esophagus injury. On the 7 th day, the degree of injury was the most serious, with a pathological score of 5.00±0.75 and a food intake of 0 g. On the 14 th day, the degree of injury was relieved, and the food intake was restored to the level before irradiation. Conclusions:The Wistar rat model of acute radiation esophagitis can be established by a single dose of 6 MV X-ray 30 Gy irradiation to the esophagus. The 7 th day after irradiation is an ideal observation time for the acute injury phase, which is gradually alleviated after the 7 th day. The time can be chosen from 7-14 days after irradiation as the observation point for the healing repair phase.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in the treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 170 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG who were admitted to Guangdong Provincial People′s Hospital from January 2010 to December 2018 were collected. There were 125 males and 45 females, aged from 30 to 85 years, with a median age of 64 years. Of the 170 patients, 82 cases undergoing proximal gastrectomy were allocated into the proximal gastrectomy group and 88 cases undergoing total gastrectomy were allocated into the total gastrectomy group. Observation indica-tors: (1) surgical and postoperative situations; (2) follow-up and survival; (3) analysis of prognostic factors. Follow-up was conducted using telephone interview and outpatient examination to detect survival of patients up to December 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measure-ment data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3) or M(range), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the rank sum test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves, and Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis. COX proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Variables with P<0.1 in univariate analysis were included for multivariate analysis. Results:(1) Surgical and postoperative situations. Cases with surgical approach as transthoracic or thoraco-abdominal approach, transabdominal approach, the operation time, cases with volume of intra-operative blood loss ≤100 mL or >100 mL, cases with length of proximal margin ≤1.5 cm or >1.5 cm, cases with radical surgery outcome as R 0, R 1, R 2, the number of lymph nodes harvest, cases with anastomotic leakage, cases with anastomotic stricture, cases with incision infection, cases with pleural infection or effusion, cases with abdominal infection or ascites were 61, 21, (211±18)minutes, 46, 36, 44, 38, 73, 6, 3, 15(9,22), 5, 2, 2, 4, 2 in the proximal gastrectomy group, respec-tively. The above indicators were 12, 76, (263±15)minutes, 27, 61, 45, 43, 82, 4, 2, 23(18,32), 4, 1, 3, 1, 4 in the total gastrectomy group, respectively. There were significant differences in the surgical approach, operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss and the number of lymph nodes harvest between the two groups ( χ2=63.94, t=-25.50, χ2=11.19, Z=-5.62, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of proximal margin or radical surgery outcome between the two groups ( χ2=0.11, Z=-0.95, P>0.05) and there was no significant difference in the anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, incision infection, pleural infection or effusion, abdominal infection or ascites between the two groups ( P>0.05). (2) Follow-up and survival. All the 170 patients were followed up for 89(64,106)months. Of the 170 patients, the 5-year overall survival rates were 43.8% and 35.5% of the Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG patients, respectively, showing no significant difference between them ( χ2=0.87, P>0.05). Of the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, the 5-year overall survival rates were 41.7% and 54.3% in the patients with proximal gastrectomy and the total gastrectomy, respectively, showing no significant difference between them ( χ2=1.05, P>0.05). Of the patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, the 5-year overall survival rates were 31.3% and 37.5% in the patients with proximal gastrectomy and the total gastrectomy, respectively, showing no significant difference between them ( χ2=0.33, P>0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates were 39.0% and 44.2% in the proximal gastrectomy group and the total gastrectomy group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=0.63, P>0.05). Of the patients in TNM stage Ⅰ, stage Ⅱ, stage Ⅲ, the 5-year overall survival rates were 65.3%, 36.3%, 27.1% in the proximal gastrectomy group, versus 83.3%, 48.0%, 39.7% in the total gastrectomy group, showing no signifi-cant difference between the two groups ( χ2=0.02, 1.50, 1.21, P>0.05). (3) Analysis of prognostic factors. Results of univariate analysis showed that pathological N staging, degree of tumor differen-tiation and radical surgery outcome were related factors influencing prognosis of AEG patients ( hazard ratio=1.71, 1.70, 2.85, 95% confidence interval as 1.16-2.60, 1.15-2.50, 1.58-5.14, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that pathological N staging and radical surgery outcome were independent factors influencing prognosis of AEG patients ( hazard ratio=1.55, 2.18, 95% confidence interval as 1.05-2.31, 1.18-4.02, P<0.05). Conclusions:There is no significant difference in the prognosis of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy. Proximal gastrectomy can be used for the treatment of advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective@#To investigate the feasibility and safety of the medial approach "four-step method" in the laparoscopic mobilization of splenic flexure.@*Methods@#A retrospective cohort study was performed. Clinical data of 157 colorectal cancer patients undergoing the medial approach "four-step method" in the laparoscopic mobilization of splenic flexure at Gastrointestinal Surgical Department of Guangdong Provincial People′s Hospital from July 2015 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Of 157 cases, 17 were transverse colon cancer, 94 were descending colon cancer, 25 were sigmoid cancer and 21 were rectal cancer; 89 were male and 68 were female; mean age was (61.8±10.3) years and mean body mass index was (23.2±3.7) kg/m2. The medial approach "four-step method" in the laparoscopic mobilization of splenic flexure was performed as follows: (1) The root vessels were treated with the "provocation" technique to expand the Toldt′s gap. This expansion was extended from the lateral side to the peritoneum reflex of left colonic sulcus, from the caudal side to the posterior rectal space, and from the cephalad side to the lower edge of pancreas. (2) The left colonic sulcus was mobilized, converging with the posterior Toldt′s gap. Mobilization was carried out from cephalad side to descending colon flexure, freeing and cutting phrenicocolic ligament and splenocolic ligament, and from caudal side to peritoneal reflex. (3) Gastrocolic ligament was moblized. Whether to enter the great curvature of stomach omentum arch when the gastrocolic ligament was cut, that was, whether to clean the fourth group of lymph nodes, should be according to the tumor site and whether serosal layer was invaded. (4) Transverse mesocolon was moblized and transected at the lower edge of the pancreatic surface, merging with the posterior Toldt′s gap, and from lateral side to lower edge of the pancreatic body, merging with the lateral left paracolonic sulcus. Safety and short-term clinical efficacy of this surgical procedure was summarized.@*Results@#All the patients completed this procedure. During operation, 3 cases were complicated with organ injury, including 1 case of colon injury, 1 case of spleen injury and 1 case of pancreas injury. No operative death and conversion to open surgery was found. The average operation time was (147.5±35.1) minutes, the average intra-operative blood loss was (40.8±32.7) ml and the average number of harvested lymph node was (16.1±5.8), including (4.0±2.3) of positive lymph nodes. The first exhaust time after surgery was (41.3±20.6) hours, the fluid intake time was (1.5±1.3) days, the postoperative hospital stay was (5.2±2.3) days. Eight (5.1%) cases developed postoperative complications, and all were improved and discharged after conservative treatments. According to the TNM classification system, postoperative pathology revealed that 31 patients were stage I, 51 were stage II, 53 were stage III, 22 were stage IV.@*Conclusion@#The medial approach "four-step method" is safe and feasible, which can effectively decrease the operation difficulty of the laparoscopic mobilization of the splenic flexure.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To compare the effect of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open D2 radical gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 117 patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy at the Guangdong General Hospital from January 2014 to December 2014 were collected.Of 117 patients,60 undergoing LAG and 57 undergoing OG were respectively allocated into the LAG group and OG group.Total gastrectomy,distal subtotal gastrectomy and proximal subtotal gastrectomy were performed according to the location of the tumor.The perigastric lymph nodes dissection was performed according to the Japanese " Gastric cancer treatment protocol" (the 14th edition).Eligible patients received the adjuvant chemotherapy of XELOX regimen according to the Guideline published by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).Observation indicators:(1) comparison of intra-and postoperative recovery between groups;(2) stratified analysis of number of lymph node dissected;(3) relationship among surgical method,number of lymph node dissected and postoperative complication;(4) follow-up and survival.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy,tumor-free survival and tumor recurrence or metastasis up to December 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)± s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the independent-sample t test.Count data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.The relationship between number of lymph node dissected and postoperative complication was done using the Logistic regression model.Results (1) Comparison of intra-and post-operative recovery between groups:all the patients completed the operation successfully.Volume of intraoperative blood loss,time to postoperative anal exsufflation and duration of postoperative hospital stay were (113±36) mL,(4.3±2.1) days,(9.7±2.9) days in the LAG group and (209 ± 77) mL,(5.3 ± 2.2) days,(11.2 ± 3.9) days in the OG group,respectively,with statistically significant differences between groups (t =6.850,-2.604,-2.405,P＜0.05).Number of lymph node dissected,numbers of patients with overall complication,incisional infection,intestinal obstruction,digestive tract fistula,intra-abdominal bleeding,cardiovascular accident,pulmonary infection,urinary tract infection and death within postoperative 30 days were respectively 31±7,6,1,0,4,0,0,1,0,0 in the LAG group and 34±6,12,0,1,2,2,1,4,1,1 in the OG group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t=0.177,x2=2.743,0.126,0.563,0.837,P＞0.05).All the patients with complications received symptomatic treatment,1 patient with abdominal bleeding in the OG group died and other patients recovered smoothly.(2) Stratified analysis of number of lymph node dissected:number of lymph node dissected in patients with total gastrectomy,distal subtotal gastrectomy and proximal subtotal gastrectomy were 35±8,29±5,27±4 in the LAG group and 34± 5,34±6,29±6 in the OG group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =0.846,1.052,0.934,P＞0.05).Number of lymph node dissected in patients with stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ of TNM staging were respectively 31±5,32±9,31±6 in the LAG group and 34±7,32±4,35±6 in the OG group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =0.494,1.657,0.136,P＞0.05).(3) Relationship among surgical method,number of lymph node dissected and postoperative complication:surgical method (LAG and OG) and number of lymph node dissected were used as the independent variable and postoperative complication between groups was used as the dependent variable,the Logistic regression model showed that surgical method and number of lymph node dissected were not related factors affecting the postoperative complication (OR =1.062,2.049,95％ confidence interval:0.998-1.140,0.695-6.042,P＞0.05).(4) Follow-up and survival:108 of 117 patients (54 in each group) were followed up for 2-35 months,with a median time of 28 months.During the follow-up,numbers of patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy,with tumor-free survival and with tumor recurrence were 45,43,10 in the LAG group and 42,42,10 in the OG group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference in the tumor-free survival and tumor recurrence between groups (x2 =0.055,0.002,P＞0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy is safe and feasible,which equivalent to clinical effect of open radical gastrectomy,meanwhile,it also can reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss and duration of postoperative hospital stay,and accelerate recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function.
RÉSUMÉ
Gastric cancer is one of the most common digestive malignant tumors. More and more elderly gastric cancer patients are diagnosed and need to undergo surgical treatment as the population ages. Since the elderly patients decrease in organ function and increase in internal diseases, the tolerance to anesthesia and surgery is poor. As a result, the incidence of surgical and postoperative complications is obviously higher. Complications can be divided into surgical complications and non-surgical related complications. Surgical complications consist mainly of hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic dehiscence and intestinal obstruction, while non-surgical related complications include deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary infection, anesthesia-related complication, abdominal infection, urinary infection, incision infection, poor wound healing, gastroparesis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, dumping syndrome and so on. Hence, we should consider more about the elderly patients' physical condition instead of the extent of radical operation. To reduce complications, we should evaluate the organ function and take an active role in underlying diseases before operation. Meanwhile, high quality nursing, powerful analgesia, anti-inflammation, keeping water electrolyte balance and nutrition support are also required postoperatively. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can reduce the postoperative complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer as well. Further prospective randomized controlled trials about elderly gastric cancer should be carried out in the future, which can provide advanced evidences for treatment.