RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).Methods:The clinical data of 144 patients with NSTEMI from January 2017 to October 2020 in the 942 Hospital of Chinese PLA were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 36 cases were treated with Dex 0.05 to 0.15 μg/(kg·h) (Dex1 group), 36 cases with Dex 0.20 to 0.40 μg/(kg·h) (Dex2 group), 36 cases with Dex 0.50 to 0.70 μg/(kg·h) (Dex3 group), and 36 cases without Dex (control group). The changes of HRV time domain indexes, frequency domain indexes and prognosis index before and after treatment were compared among 4 groups, the time domain indexes include normal R-R interval standard deviation (SDNN), mean value of adjacent normal R-R interval standard deviation (SDANNindex), root mean square of adjacent normal R-R interval standard deviation (SDNNindex), square root of adjacent normal R-R interval difference (rMSSD) and percentage of adjacent normal R-R interval difference>50 ms to R-R interval number (PNN50); the frequency domain indexes include total power (TP), low frequency power (LF), high frequency power (HF), ultra-low frequency power (VLF) and LF/HF; the prognostic indexes include ICU stay time, vasoactive drug use time, 28-day mortality and incidence of complication.Results:There was no significant difference in HRV indexes among 4 groups before treatment ( P>0.05); after treatment, except for LF/HF in Dex2 group and Dex3 group was significantly lower than that in control group and Dex1 group, other HRV indexes were significantly higher than those in control group and Dex1 group, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality among 4 groups; the ICU stay time and vasoactive drug use time in Dex2 group were significantly shorter than those in control group, Dex1 group and Dex3 group: (7.14 ± 1.25) d vs. (9.08 ± 1.68), (9.53 ± 1.98) and (9.81 ± 1.95) d, (122.67 ± 29.5) h vs. (176.15 ± 23.26), (181.72 ± 23.40) and (180.42 ± 22.90) h, the incidence of complication was significantly lower than that in control group, Dex1 group and Dex3 group: 16.67% (6/36) vs. 72.22% (26/36), 47.22% (17/36) and 61.67% (22/36), and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05); there were no statistical difference in ICU stay time, vasoactive drug use time and incidence of complication among control group, Dex1 group and Dex3 group ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Dex 0.20 to 0.40 μg/(kg·h) is well tolerated, and has less adverse reactions. It can effectively increase HRV, regulate the balance of sympathetic-vagal nerve tension, stabilize cardiovascular response and improve prognosis in patients with NSTEMI.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To investigate the expression and significance of JWA in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Methods Bone marrow mononuclear cell specimens were taken from 22 AML patients in newly diagnosis stage and complete remission stage respectively , and the JWA expression were detected at RNA and protein level. Results (1) JWA was expressed in all the samples at RNA and protein level. (2) At protein level, JWA expression was higher in the cells from newly diagnosed AML patients than in those from patients in complete remission stage (P < 0.05). (3)The complete remission rate of patients with higher expression level of JWA (87.5%) was similar to those with lower expression (83.3%). The complete remission rate of patients with higher expression level of JWA after the first course (31.25%) was lower than those with lower expression (66.7%). The early recurrence rate of patients with higher expression level of JWA (42.86%) was higher than those with lower expression (20%). Conclusion JWA may play an important role in the development and progression of AML. Increased expression of JWA may be one of the causes of refractory and relapsed AML.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To explore an evaluation method of quality of care using the 2012 medical record front page.Methods The admission pathway and discharge method information of inpatients discharge recorded in the medical record front pages of the hospital were chosen and evaluated with contingency tables.Results The outcomes indicated that the differences between discharge methods of those admitted through different pathways are significant statistically (x2 =856.55,P ＜ 0.05).The correlation analysis showed that the coefficient of Spearman correlation between the inpatients admitted through different pathways and their discharge methods was -0.11 (P＜0.05).Calculated as such,the score of quality of care was 4.95 for the hospital as a whole.Conclusion The establishment of this evaluation system showed that the indicators set for quality of care using the 2012 medical record front page are scientific,and the results are more objective.