Robotic salvage partial nephrectomy following surgical and ablative therapies

ABSTRACT Purpose: Partial nephrectomies in the salvage setting after ablative or surgical therapy remain challenging cases that are underreported in the literature (1-5). The aim of this video is to demonstrate techniques for robotic salvage partial nephrectomy to manage recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after failed prior partial nephrectomy and primary cryotherapy. Materials and methods: A 55-year-old man after previous robotic-assisted right partial nephrectomy presented with a 2.5 cm locally recurrent renal mass abutting the collecting system. A 59-year-old man with right renal cell carcinoma initially treated with cryoablation presented local recurrence. CT imaging demonstrated 2.6 cm right renal mass consistent with tumor recurrence at previous treatment site. Results: Both procedures were completed in under 180 minutes. Clamp time was 22 minutes after the previous partial nephrectomy and 25 minutes after previous cryotherapy. There were no perioperative complications. Pathology in both cases demonstrated pT1a clear cell RCC with negative margins. Both patients have since no evidence of recurrent disease on follow-up imaging at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusions: Salvage robotic partial nephrectomy should be considered as a feasible treatment option after failure of initial therapy—surgical or ablative. A salvage procedure is often more challenging than its standard therapy-naïve counterpart due to development of dense inflammation after previous interventions. Despite this, robotic partial nephrectomies in the salvage setting can be safely carried out with good surgical outcomes, particularly when utilizing intraoperative ultrasound to identify tumor margins and key anatomy.

Long-term functional outcomes and surgical retreatment after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: A 10-year follow-up study

ABSTRACT Background: To evaluate the 10-year functional outcomes (primary) and frequency and predictors of BPH surgical retreatment (secondary) after ThuLEP. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing ThuLEP between 2010 and 2013 was performed. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 40 years, prostate volume (PV) ≥ 80 mL, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)-Total score ≥ 8 points. IPSS-Total score was the primary outcome, and BPH surgical retreatment rate was the secondary outcome. Paired t-test, McNemar test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of surgical retreatment. Results: A total of 410 patients with a mean ±SD age of 63.9 ± 9.7 years and a PV of 115.6 ± 28.6 mL were included. Mean ±SD follow-up was 108.2 ± 29.6 months. IPSS-Total score was significantly improved at 1 year compared to baseline (23.3 ± 4.7 vs. 10.3 ± 3.8; p<0.001). It was similar after 5 years (10.5 ± 3.6 vs. 10.7 ± 5.0; p=0.161), with a significant worsening at 10 years (10.3 ±4.8 vs. 13.8 ±4.5; p=0.042) but remaining statistically and clinically better than baseline (13.8 ±4.5 vs. 22.1 ±4.3; p<0.001). After 10 years, 21 (5.9%) patients had undergone BPH reoperation. Baseline PV (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.41; p<0.001) and time from BPH surgery (adjusted OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.43; p<0.001) were predictors of BPH surgical retreatment. Conclusions: ThuLEP is associated with optimal functional outcomes and a low frequency of BPH surgical retreatment in the long-term. Baseline PV and time from surgery were predictors of BPH reoperation.

Single Port Robotic Pyeloplasty: early single-center experience

ABSTRACT Purpose: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a prevalent cause of hydronephrosis, especially in young patients. The treatment paradigm for this condition has shifted from open to minimally invasive pyeloplasty. In the present study we describe our initial single centre experience with single port (SP) robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) via periumbilical incision. Material and methods: With the patient in a 60-degree left flank position, the SP system is docked with the Access port (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, US) placed in a periumbilical 3 cm incision. Robotic instruments are deployed as follows: camera at 12 o'clock, bipolar grasper at 9 o'clock, scissors at 3 o'clock and Cadiere at 6 o'clock. After isolation and identification of the ureter and the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), the ureter is transected at this level and then spatulated. Anastomosis is carried out by two hemicontinuous running sutures, over a JJ stent. Results: Between 2021 and 2023, a total of 8 SP RAP have been performed at our institution, with a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 23 years (20.5-36.5). Intraoperative outcomes showed a median (IQR) OT of 210.5 minutes (190-240.5) and a median (IQR) estimated blood loss (EBL) of 50 mL (22.5-50). No postoperative complications were encountered, with a median (IQR) length of stay (LOS) of 31 hours (28.5-34). Conclusion: In the present study we evaluated the feasibility and safety of SP RAP. The observed outcomes and potential benefits, combined with the adaptability of the SP platform, hold promising implications for the application of SP system in pyeloplasty treatment.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for large renal Leiomyoma: first case report

ABSTRACT Aim: Renal leiomyoma is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor arising from the smooth muscle cells of the kidney. Renal capsule is its most common location (1). Large tumor may require surgical excision which can be challenging in case of proximity to major vessels (2). Indications of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) have exponentially expanded over the past few years (3). We aim to report a case of large renal leiomyoma successfully managed with RPN. Methods: A 59-year-old female patient with BMI 51 presented with chief complaint of abdominal discomfort. The patient underwent a CT scan that revealed a massive circumscribed exophytic complex solid cystic mass of 4.5 × 7.7 × 6.2 cm, arising from the lower pole of right kidney and abutting the inferior vena cava. RENAL score was 11ah (high complexity). Past surgical history included mid-urethral sling, breast reduction, and hysterectomy with salpingectomy. Preoperative creatinine and eGFR were 0.9 (mg/dL) and 77 (mL/min), respectively. A robotic excision of this mass was successfully performed by using Da Vinci Xi platform. Main steps of the procedure are illustrated in the present video. Results: Dissection and isolation of the tumor were carefully performed after identifying key anatomical structures such as the ureter, the IVC and the renal hilum. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to confirm the margins of the mass. The renal artery was clamped and then the tumor was resected/enucleated. Renal parenchyma was re-approximated with a single layer of interrupted CT-1 Vicryl 0 with sliding clip technique. Warm ischemia time was 19 min. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 250 ml. Operative time was 165 min. No intraoperative complications occurred. No drain was placed. Patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. Post-operative hypotension was managed with fluid bolus. Postoperative creatinine and eGFR were 1,0 (mg/dL) and 69 (mL/min/1.72m2), respectively. Pathology revealed a leiomyoma of genital stromal origin with hyalinization and calcification. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of RPN for the management of a large (about 8 cm) renal leiomyoma. Robotic assisted surgery allows to expand the indications of minimally invasive conservative renal surgery whose feasibility becomes even more clinically significant in case of benign masses which can be managed without sacrificing healthy renal parenchyma.