Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Rev. méd. Maule ; 36(2): 28-33, dic. 2020. tab
Article de Espagnol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1344611

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate initial results of a ambulatory major surgery program in Gynecology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study of the period March 2018 to June 2019. The interventions included were: surgical sterilizations via vaginal, minilap and laparoscopic, diagnostic laparoscopy, laparoscopic cyst or anexectomy, hysteroscopy, TOT, vaginal plasty, biopsy curettage, polypectomy, extraction of IUD under anesthesia, labiaplasty, and removal of transobsturatrix tape. Quality indicators such as suspension, readmissions and systemic and surgical complications have been analyzed. RESULTS: 136 patients were operated by CMA of which 43 were laparoscopic (31.6%), 55 patients vaginally (40.4%), 34 histeroscopy (25%) and 4 patients by minilap (3%)There were 4 minor and late complications (2.9%) that corresponded to operative wound infection in vaginal plasty and nymphoplasty, a dysfunctional TOT tape that had to be removed in a mediated manner and a PIP post surgical sterilization via vaginal route. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecological ambulatory major surgery is feasible to perform in a hospital of medium complexity with a low percentage of minor complications in this study.


Sujet(s)
Humains , Femelle , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Procédures de chirurgie ambulatoire/méthodes , Hystérectomie vaginale/méthodes , Patients en consultation externe , Réadmission du patient , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Dossier Clinique , Épidémiologie Descriptive , Résultat thérapeutique , Hystérectomie/méthodes
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE